Tag: U.S.

Posted on

U.S. holds interest rates steady – Trump isn’t happy!

U.S. Interest Rate

U.S. Federal Reserve has kept its benchmark interest rate steady at 4.25% to 4.50% for the fourth consecutive meeting.

This decision reflects a cautious stance amid ongoing uncertainty surrounding President Trump’s tariff policies and their potential impact on inflation and economic growth.

The Fed still anticipates two rate cuts later in 2025, but officials are split – some expect none or just one cut.

Inflation projections have been revised upward to 3.0% for 2025, while economic growth expectations have been trimmed to 1.4%.

U.S. President Donald Trump has been sharply critical of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, especially following the Fed’s decision on June 18, 2025, to keep interest rates steady.

He’s called Powell ‘a stupid person’, ‘destructive’, and ‘Too Late Powell’. accusing him of being politically motivated and slow to act on rate cuts.

And the Federal Reserve is supposed to act independently of political influence.

Posted on

India’s Rare Earths Future: A growing contender in a strategic market

Rare Earth Elements

As the world transitions toward cleaner technologies and digital connectivity, rare earth elements (REEs) have emerged as vital components in everything from electric vehicles and wind turbines to smartphones and defence systems and of course AI.

Currently, China dominates the global supply chain, accounting for over 60% of global rare earth production and an even greater share of refining capacity.

But India, rich in untapped reserves and increasingly assertive in its industrial strategy, is positioning itself to become a major player in this crucial sector.

India possesses the world’s fifth-largest reserves of rare earths, largely located in coastal monazite sands.

For decades, however, its output has remained modest, constrained by limited infrastructure, outdated regulations, and a lack of downstream processing capabilities. That is changing.

In recent years, the Indian government has taken clear steps to ramp up domestic production and attract investment.

One significant move was allowing private and foreign players into the exploration and processing of REEs -previously controlled by a single government-run firm.

Coupled with India’s broader push to diversify supply chains away from China, this signals a shift in ambition.

India is also pursuing strategic partnerships. Collaborations with countries such as Australia and Japan – both of which have rare earth expertise and a shared desire to counterbalance Chinese dominance – are paving the way for technology transfers and joint ventures.

Moreover, India’s participation in the Quad (with the U.S., Australia, and Japan) adds a geopolitical dimension to these efforts.

Challenges remain. India still lacks the sophisticated separation and refining technologies that make rare earths commercially viable. Environmental concerns around mining also demand a careful, sustainable approach.

Rare Earth Elements table – top 10 producers

Total global reserves are estimated at approximately 131 million metric tons. See worlpopulationreview.

Yet, with incentives under the Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, and growing demand for localised electronics and green tech manufacturing, momentum is building.

So, is India likely to become a major competitor? Not overnight. But ‘possible’ is rapidly morphing into ‘plausible.’ As the global rare earths map continues to shift—fueled by geopolitics, technological change, and strategic realignment – India is no longer on the sidelines.

Whether it becomes a global leader or a key alternative supplier, its role is poised to expand.

The world should watch closely—not just for the metals it may mine, but for the strategic leverage they may bring.

And we have Greenland and Ukraine reserves yet to be discovered?

Posted on

U.S. inflation up 0.1% in May – but less than expected

U.S. inflation

In May 2025, U.S. inflation rose by 0.1% from the previous month, bringing the annual inflation rate to 2.4%, slightly below economists’ predictions of 2.5%.

Core U.S. inflation, which excludes food and energy, increased by 0.1% month-on-month, with a year-on-year rate of 2.8%.

The modest rise was largely offset by falling energy prices, particularly a 2.6% drop in petrol, which helped keep overall inflation in check.

Prices for new and used vehicles, as well as apparel, also declined. Meanwhile, food and housing (shelter) costs each rose by 0.3%, with housing (shelter) being the primary contributor to the monthly increase.

Despite President Trump’s sweeping tariffs introduced in April 2025, their inflationary impact has yet to fully materialise. Analysts suggest that many companies are still working through pre-tariff inventories, delaying price hikes for consumers.

However, economists caution that the effects may become more pronounced in the coming months.

The Federal Reserve is expected to hold interest rates steady for now, as U.S. policymakers monitor whether inflation remains contained or begins to accelerate due to trade-related pressures.

Markets responded positively to the data, with stock futures rising and Treasury yields falling.

So, while inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target, May’s figures suggest a temporary reprieve.

The summer could yet tell a different story.

Posted on

China suffers U.S. tariff driven falls in exports and increased deflation concerns

China exports to U.S. suffer due to tariffs

China’s economic landscape is facing mounting challenges as exports to the United States plummet and consumer prices decline, sparking fears of deflation.

The latest trade data reveals that Chinese exports to the U.S. fell by 34.5% in May 2025, marking the sharpest drop in over five years. This decline comes despite a temporary trade truce that paused most tariffs for 90 days.

China’s consumer prices have continued their downward trend, raising concerns about deflation and its long-term impact on the economy.

The sharp fall in exports is largely attributed to high U.S. tariffs and weakening demand. While China’s overall exports grew by 4.8%, shipments to the U.S. suffered significantly, reflecting the ongoing trade tensions between the two economic giants.

Imports from the U.S. also dropped by 18%, further shrinking China’s trade surplus with America. In response, Chinese exporters are shifting their focus to other markets, particularly Southeast Asia and Europe, where demand remains relatively strong.

China’s CPI reading

At the same time, China’s consumer price index (CPI) fell by 0.1% in May 2025, deepening concerns about deflation. Deflation, the opposite of inflation, can lead to lower corporate profits, wage cuts, and job losses, creating a vicious cycle of economic stagnation.

The decline in consumer prices is largely driven by weak domestic demand, exacerbated by the ongoing real estate crisis. Many Chinese consumers are hesitant to spend, fearing further declines in property values and economic uncertainty.

China’s rare earth materials olive branch

China appears to have offered U.S. and European auto manufacturers a reprieve after industry groups warned of increasing production threats over a rare earth shortage.

China’s Ministry of Commerce on Saturday 7th June 2025 reportedly said it was willing to establish a so-called ‘green channel’ for eligible export licence applications to expedite the approval process to European Union firms. 

Posted on

OECD cuts U.S. growth forecast amid Trump’s tariff chaos

OECD U.S. data

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has sharply downgraded its U.S. growth forecast, citing economic uncertainty and the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariff policies.

The OECD now expects the U.S. economy to expand by just 1.6% in 2025 and 1.5% in 2026, a significant cut from its previous estimate of 2.2% for 2025.

The report highlights several factors contributing to the slowdown, including elevated policy uncertainty, reduced net immigration, and a shrinking federal workforce.

The OECD also warns that higher trade barriers could further dampen business confidence and investment.

Global growth projections have also been revised downward, with the OECD stating that the slowdown is most pronounced in North America, particularly in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

The organisation reportedly notes that U.S. tariff-related disruptions are expected to push inflation higher, although weaker commodity prices may offset some of the impact.

The OECD’s latest outlook underscores the growing challenges facing the U.S. economy as trade tensions persist.

With tariffs fluctuating due to ongoing ‘stop start’ legal interventions, businesses and investors remain cautious about the future.

The coming months will be crucial in determining whether policymakers can stabilise growth and restore confidence in the market.

Stop the tariffs and all will be fine.

Posted on

Why are investors taking up positions in short term treasury bets?

Short-term Treasury Yields

Investors are increasingly favouring short-term U.S. Treasury securities, with notable figures like Warren Buffett taking sizeable positions.

This shift is driven by concerns over economic instability, fluctuating bond yields, and government spending.

Short-term Treasuries, such as T-bills with maturities under a year, offer a safer haven compared to longer-term bonds, which are more vulnerable to interest rate changes.

As central banks navigate monetary policy adjustments, many investors prefer the flexibility of short-duration assets that minimise exposure to prolonged economic uncertainty.

One of the biggest influences in this trend is Berkshire Hathaway’s substantial stake in T-bills, which has reinforced confidence in these instruments.

Additionally, ultra-short bond ETFs like SGOV and BIL have seen significant inflows, highlighting the growing demand for liquid, low-risk investments.

Another key factor driving this strategy is concern over U.S. fiscal policy. Investors are wary of rising deficits and potential tax hikes, which could impact long-term bond stability.

By allocating funds to short-term Treasuries, they can mitigate risks while maintaining liquidity.

This surge in short-term Treasury investments reflects a broader shift in market sentiment-favouring stability and flexibility over long-term speculation.

As economic uncertainty persists, investors are likely to continue this defensive strategy.

SGOV & BIL ETFs explained

SGOV and BIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that invest in U.S. Treasury bills, offering a low-risk way to earn interest on short-term government debt.

SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) tracks the ICE 0-3 Month U.S. Treasury Securities Index, investing in Treasury bonds with maturities of three months or less. It launched in 2020 and is known for its low expense ratio.

BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) follows the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, focusing on Treasury bills with maturities between one and three months.

It has been around since 2007 and is one of the largest T-bill ETFs.

Both ETFs provide exposure to ultra-short-term government securities, making them attractive options for investors seeking stability and liquidity in uncertain markets.

Posted on

Trump’s tariffs challenged in court and deemed to be illegal

U.S. tariff court ruling

A U.S. federal court has ruled that former President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs were imposed illegally, dealing a significant blow to his economic policies.

The Court of International Trade determined that Trump exceeded his authority by invoking emergency powers to justify tariffs on nearly every country.

The ruling states that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress exclusive power to regulate commerce, meaning the president cannot unilaterally impose such broad trade restrictions.

The decision immediately halted the 10% tariffs Trump had imposed on most U.S. trading partners, as well as additional levies on China, Mexico, and Canada.

The court found that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which Trump cited as justification, does not grant him the authority to implement such sweeping trade measures.

The White House swiftly filed an appeal, arguing that the tariffs were necessary to address trade imbalances and safeguard American industries.

However, businesses and state governments that challenged the tariffs welcomed the ruling, citing concerns over inflation and economic harm.

Dow Jones Industrial Average Futures 28th & 29th May 2025 after the court ruling

Dow Jones Industrial Average Futures 28th & 29th May 2025 after the court ruling

Markets responded positively to the decision, with stock futures rising and the U.S. dollar strengthening. If the ruling stands, businesses that paid the tariffs may be eligible for refunds, marking a potential shift in U.S. trade policy.

The U.S. President is expected to find a workaround after suffering a major blow to a core part of his economic agenda.

Posted on

What’s going on in the U.S. bond market?

Treasury yields

The U.S. bond market is experiencing some turbulence due to rising Treasury yields and concerns over government debt.

Investors are demanding higher yields because they’re worried about the GOP’s tax-cut plans, which could lead to increased borrowing and a larger deficit.

Additionally, the recent Trump tax bill has caused Treasury bond yields to surge, as investors anticipate more government debt issuance. Moody’s has also downgraded the U.S. credit rating, adding to market jitters.

The bond market’s reaction is significant because higher yields can lead to increased borrowing costs across the economy, affecting everything from mortgages to corporate financing.

Japan

Japan’s bond market is facing significant turbulence, with yields on 40-year government bonds hitting an all-time high. This surge in yields is causing concerns about capital repatriation, as Japanese investors may start pulling funds from the U.S. and other foreign markets.

The Bank of Japan’s reduced bond purchases have contributed to this trend, leading to weaker demand for long-term government debt. Analysts warn that if Japanese investors begin moving their capital back home, it could trigger a global financial market shake-up.

Additionally, Japan’s Finance Ministry is considering reducing the issuance of super-long bonds to stabilise the market. However, recent auctions have shown weak demand, raising concerns about the effectiveness of this strategy.

Europe

The European bond market is experiencing some shifts due to falling government bond yields and easing U.S. – EU trade tensions.

German 10-year bund yields dropped by 4 basis points, reflecting increased investor confidence.

UK and French 10-year bond yields also declined by 4 basis points, while Italian bonds saw a 2 basis point dip.

Long-term UK gilts experienced the biggest movement, with 20 and 30-year yields falling by 7 basis points.

This decline in yields suggests higher demand for European government debt, possibly due to investors shifting away from U.S. assets amid concerns over U.S. fiscal health.

UK

The UK bond market is facing some challenges, with the IMF warning that it is vulnerable to sudden shocks due to a growing reliance on hedge funds and foreign investors.

30-year gilt yields have hit 5.5%, the highest in over three decades.

The Bank of England’s quantitative tightening and increased bond issuance are putting pressure on the market.

The Debt Management Office (DMO) is shifting towards short-dated debt to reduce long-term interest costs.

Additionally, the UK government has launched a new 30-year gilt offering 5.375% interest, which is attracting investor attention.

Posted on

Tesla’s European market meltdown – sales plunge 49% amid brand damage and fierce competition

Tesla's European sales fall!

Tesla’s vehicle sales in Europe plummeted by 49% in April 2025, marking the fourth consecutive month of decline.

Despite an overall 27.8% rise in battery-electric vehicle sales, Tesla struggled to maintain its foothold in the region.

The drop in sales has been attributed to increasing competition from Chinese automakers, a shift in consumer preferences towards hybrid vehicles, and growing backlash against CEO Elon Musk’s political affiliations.

Tesla’s market share in Europe nearly halved, falling from 1.3% to 0.7%. The company’s aging lineup, particularly the Model Y, has failed to attract new buyers, while rivals such as BYD have overtaken Tesla in European EV sales for the first time.

Additionally, European carmakers are cutting costs and adapting to U.S. tariffs on auto imports, further intensifying competition. Chinese EV manufacturers are also cutting EV prices.

While Tesla faces challenges in Europe, the broader EV market continues to expand, driven by government incentives and stricter emission targets.

However, unless Tesla refreshes its lineup and rebuilds consumer trust, its dominance in the European market may continue to erode.

The company’s future remains uncertain as it navigates political controversies and shifting market dynamics

Posted on

Palantir now among 10 most valuable U.S. tech companies

Palantir stock up!

Palantir Technologies has officially joined the ranks of the top 10 most valuable U.S. tech companies, marking a significant milestone in its growth trajectory.

The data analytics and artificial intelligence firm saw its stock surge 8%, pushing its market valuation to $281 billion, surpassing Salesforce.

Founded in 2003 by Peter Thiel and CEO Alex Karp, Palantir has long been known for its government contracts and defense-related software solutions.

Its recent success is largely attributed to a booming government business, which grew 45% last quarter, including a $178 million contract with the U.S. Army.

Despite its impressive market cap, Palantir remains a relatively small player in terms of revenue compared to its peers. Investors are paying a premium for its stock, which currently trades at 520 times trailing earnings, far exceeding industry averages.

Analysts have raised concerns about its valuation, questioning whether its rapid rise is sustainable in the long term.

Palantir’s ascent reflects the growing influence of AI-driven data analytics in both commercial and governmental sectors.

As it continues to expand, the company faces the challenge of proving its financial fundamentals can support its lofty valuation.

Posted on

Are we underestimating the impact of tariffs on S&P 500 earnings growth?

Asleep

As global trade tensions escalate, many investors and analysts are questioning whether markets are too complacent about the long-term effects of tariffs on corporate earnings.

While some argue that businesses have adapted to protectionist policies, others warn that the S&P 500’s earnings growth could face significant headwinds.

Tariffs: A hidden threat to profit margins

Tariffs increase costs for companies reliant on imported goods and materials. Businesses must either absorb these costs, pass them on to consumers, or find alternative suppliers – each option presenting challenges.

According to Goldman Sachs, an additional 5% tariff could reduce S&P 500 earnings by 1-2%.

A 100% tariff would equate to around 10-20% reduction in the S&P 500 – and that’s correction territory.

Retailers and manufacturers are particularly vulnerable

Companies like Best Buy, Walmart, and Target rely on imports, and higher tariffs could suppress profit margins or lead to higher consumer prices, potentially dampening demand.

Market sentiment vs. economic reality

Despite concerns, Wall Street has remained relatively optimistic. A recent 90-day tariff pause between the U.S. and China has boosted investor confidence, leading firms like Goldman Sachs and Yardeni Research to raise their S&P 500 targets.

This optimism may be short-lived if tariffs resume or escalate

Sector-specific risks

Certain industries are more exposed than others

Technology: Supply chain disruptions and higher costs for components could reduce profit margins.

Consumer Discretionary: Higher prices on imported goods could weaken consumer spending.

Industrials: Increased costs for raw materials could slow growth and investment.

The bigger picture: long-term economic impact

Beyond immediate earnings concerns, tariffs could stifle innovation, reduce global competitiveness, and slow economic growth.

Citi analysts estimate that aggressive tariffs could cut S&P 500 earnings growth by 2-3%.

A false sense of security?

While markets have bounced back from initial tariff shocks, the long-term effects remain uncertain.

Investors should closely monitor trade policies, sector-specific risks, and corporate earnings reports to assess whether the S&P 500’s growth trajectory is truly secure – or dangerously fragile.

Time will tell – but the S&P 500 is vulnerable to pressure right now!

Posted on

Moody’s Downgrades U.S. Credit Rating Amid Rising Debt Concerns

U.S. credit rating downgrade

Moody’s Investors Service has downgraded the United States’ sovereign credit rating from Aaa to Aa1, citing concerns over the country’s growing debt burden and rising interest costs.

This marks the first time Moody’s has lowered the U.S. rating, aligning it with previous downgrades by Standard & Poor’s (2011) and Fitch Ratings (2023).

The downgrade reflects the increasing difficulty the U.S. government faces in managing its fiscal deficit, which has ballooned to $1.05 trillion – a 13% increase from the previous year.

Moody’s analysts noted that successive administrations have failed to implement effective measures to curb spending, leading to a projected U.S. debt burden of 134% of GDP by 2035.

Market reactions were swift, with U.S. Treasury yields rising and stock futures sliding as investors reassessed the risk associated with U.S. assets. The downgrade could lead to higher borrowing costs for the government and businesses, potentially slowing economic growth.

Despite the downgrade, Moody’s emphasised that the U.S. retains exceptional credit strengths, including its large, resilient economy and the continued dominance of the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency.

However, without significant fiscal reforms, further credit rating adjustments may be inevitable.

Time to print some more money…

Posted on

Trump does deals!

U.S. does deals!

Trump Secures Over $1.4 Trillion in Landmark Middle East Trade Agreements

President Donald Trump’s recent visit to the Middle East has resulted in a wave of economic agreements totaling over $1.4 trillion, marking one of the largest trade expansions between the region and the United States.

With a focus on investment, defence, and technology, Trump’s approach has emphasised strengthening economic ties rather than engaging in broader geopolitical discussions.

Qatar: aviation and defence take centre stage

One of the most eye-catching deals came from Qatar, where Qatar Airways finalised a $96 billion agreement to purchase 210 Boeing jets – the largest Boeing order in history.

This commitment not only bolsters Qatar’s aviation industry but also solidifies Boeing’s future as a leader in global aerospace manufacturing.

Additionally, Qatar has pledged $243.5 billion toward investments in quantum technology and defence systems, reinforcing the country’s push toward technological advancement.

Defence agreements also played a role, with Qatar signing a $1 billion deal for cutting-edge drone defence technology and a $2 billion contract for advanced remotely piloted aircraft.

These acquisitions align with the country’s long-term strategic vision of modernising its military capabilities.

Saudi Arabia: the biggest beneficiary

Saudi Arabia emerged as the biggest beneficiary of Trump’s visit, securing $600 billion in investment commitments across multiple sectors.

The kingdom allocated $142 billion toward military equipment and services, ensuring continued collaboration between U.S. defence contractors and Saudi leadership.

This agreement spans air defence systems, next-generation fighter jets, and cybersecurity infrastructure, strengthening Saudi Arabia’s military.

Beyond defence, Saudi Arabia also inked deals in AI infrastructure, energy projects, and technology investments, positioning itself as a hub for digital transformation.

By incorporating AI-driven solutions into its economy, the kingdom aims to enhance productivity and accelerate its shift toward a diversified financial landscape.

United Arab Emirates: AI

United Arab Emirates secured $200 billion in deals, featuring a 10-square-mile AI campus in Abu Dhabi and a $14.5 billion aircraft investment by Etihad Airways

Strategic impact

Trump’s visit signifies a shift in U.S. foreign policy, focusing heavily on economic partnerships rather than traditional diplomatic negotiations.

By securing these agreements, the administration aims to strengthen American industries, bolster employment, and ensure a steady flow of investment into the U.S. economy.

While critics may argue that the deals lack a geopolitical dimension, the sheer scale of $1.4 trillion in transactions underscores Trump’s intent to foster long-term financial alliances.

The coming months will determine whether these agreements yield sustainable benefits or spark concerns over economic dependencies.

Donald Trump’s Middle East tour has reportedly resulted in over $1.4 trillion in investment pledges. His deals span multiple sectors, including defence, aviation, artificial intelligence, and energy.

Deal summary

Saudi Arabia committed $600 billion in investments, including a $142 billion defence partnership and AI infrastructure deals.

Qatar signed $243 billion in agreements, including a $96 billion Boeing aircraft purchase.

United Arab Emirates secured $200 billion in deals, featuring a 10-square-mile AI campus in Abu Dhabi and a $14.5 billion aircraft investment by Etihad Airways.

Trump’s tour has been framed as a push for foreign investment to boost U.S. manufacturing while Gulf states aim to accelerate AI development and diversify their economies

Posted on

Saudi Arabia to acquire 18000 Nvidia AI chips with more to follow

Nvidia AI

Saudi Arabia is making bold moves in artificial intelligence with a major acquisition from Nvidia.

The tech giant will be sending more than 18,000 of its latest GB300 Blackwell AI chips to Saudi-based company Humain, in a deal that marks a significant step toward the nation’s ambitions to become a global AI powerhouse.

The announcement was made by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang during the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in Riyadh, as part of a White House-led trip that included President Donald Trump and other top CEOs.

Humain, backed by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, aims to develop AI models and build data center infrastructure, with plans to eventually deploy several hundred thousand Nvidia GPUs

Humain, backed by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, plans to use the chips to develop large-scale AI models and establish cutting-edge data centers.

The chips will be deployed in a 500-megawatt facility, making it one of the largest AI computing projects in the region. Nvidia’s Blackwell AI chips are among the most advanced in the industry, used in training sophisticated AI models and powering data-intensive applications.

Saudi Arabia’s investment in AI technology aligns with its long-term vision of transforming its economy beyond traditional industries. With plans to expand its data infrastructure and deploy several hundred thousand Nvidia GPUs in the future, the country is positioning itself as a major AI hub in the Middle East.

As AI continues to shape global industries, Saudi Arabia’s investment signals a broader shift in how nations are competing for dominance in the AI revolution.

Nvidia’s involvement underscores the strategic importance of AI chips, not just in business, but in international relations as well.

Posted on

U.S. inflation rate at 2.3% in April 2025 – less than expected

U.S. inflation

April 2025 saw the U.S. inflation rate ease to 2.3%, marking its lowest level since February 2021.

The consumer price index (CPI) rose 0.2% for the month, aligning with expectations but slightly below the forecasted 2.4% annual rate.

Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also increased 0.2%, maintaining a 2.8% year-on-year rate.

Shelter costs, which make up a significant portion of the index, rose 0.3%, contributing to more than half of the overall inflation movement.

U.S. egg prices dropped 12.7%, though they remained 49.3% higher than a year ago.

The impact of Trump’s tariffs remains uncertain, with negotiations potentially influencing inflation trends in the coming months.

Court to judge on legality of ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

U.S. Court of International Trade is set to hear arguments in a case challenging President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

The lawsuit filed by five domestic businesses argues that the law Trump invoked to impose his ‘reciprocal’ tariffs does not actually give him the power he claims.

The Department of Justice maintains that that law ‘clearly’ authorises the president to impose tariffs.

Posted on

Trump’s Boeing 747 Gift from Qatar – a diplomatic gesture or controversial play?

It's just a gift!

It’s just a gift?

Former U.S. President Donald Trump is set to receive a luxury Boeing 747-8 from the Qatari royal family, a move that has sparked debate over its implications.

The aircraft, valued at $400 million, is expected to serve as a temporary Air Force One until the U.S. government receives its long-delayed replacements.

Trump has been vocal about his frustration with Boeing’s delays in delivering the new presidential aircraft, originally scheduled for 2022 but now pushed to 2027.

The Qatari government’s offer provides an interim solution, allowing Trump to use the jet for official travel.

However, critics argue that accepting such a gift raises ethical and legal concerns, particularly regarding the U.S. Constitution’s emoluments clause, which restricts officials from receiving gifts from foreign states without congressional approval3.

The White House insists the arrangement is legal, stating that the aircraft will be transferred to the U.S. Air Force rather than Trump personally.

Upon completion of his term, the plane will reportedly be donated to his presidential library.

As Trump prepares for a Middle East visit, the controversy surrounding the aircraft continues to unfold.

Will this be seen as a practical solution or a diplomatic misstep?

And anyway, why can’t the U.S. provide its own presidential plane?

Posted on

Trump tariff roll-back – a win for China? U.S. markets rejoice the ‘deal’

U.S. markets gain on U.S China tariff roll-back announcement

The U.S. stock market surged as investors cheered a breakthrough in trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing.

The rollback of tariffs, announced as part of a new trade agreement, sent the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite soaring.

The deal, which slashes ‘reciprocal’ tariffs on both sides, is seen as a major de-escalation in the ongoing trade war that has rattled global markets for years.

Wall Street’s Reaction

Markets responded with enthusiasm as the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped over 1,000 points, while the S&P 500 climbed more than 2.5%, and the Nasdaq surged by nearly 3%.

Investors had been wary of prolonged trade tensions, which had weighed heavily on corporate earnings and economic growth.

The tariff rollback signals a potential thaw in relations, boosting confidence across sectors, particularly in technology, retail, and manufacturing.

Tariff rollback

Under the agreement, U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports will be reduced from 145% to 30%, while China’s tariffs on American goods will drop from 125% to 10%. The reductions will be in effect for 90 days, allowing both nations to continue negotiations on a broader trade framework.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasised that neither side wants a complete decoupling, and the rollback is intended to restore trade flows disrupted by years of economic brinkmanship.

China’s perspective: A strategic victory?

While the U.S. markets celebrated, China views the deal as a significant win. Beijing has sought relief from the steep tariffs imposed by Washington, which had strained its export-driven economy.

The agreement not only reduces financial pressure on Chinese manufacturers but also positions China as a key player in shaping future trade policies.

Some analysts argue that Beijing successfully leveraged its economic resilience to push Washington toward concessions, reinforcing its global influence.

Looking ahead

Despite the optimism, uncertainties remain. The 90-day window for negotiations suggests that further trade disputes could arise if talks stall. But will the U.S. allow that after the stock market turmoil Trump’s tariffs originally created?

Additionally, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cautioned that while sentiment has improved, the economic impact of previous tariffs has yet to fully materialise. Investors will be watching closely for signs of sustained progress, as any setbacks could trigger renewed volatility.

For now, Wall Street is basking in the relief of a tariff truce, with hopes that this momentum will lead to a more stable and predictable trade environment.

Whether this marks the beginning of a lasting resolution or just a temporary reprieve remains to be seen.

It is most likely now a platform for the U.S. to benefit from generally lower tariffs in the future.

There will again be cheap goods on U.S. shelves in time for Christmas.

Posted on

U.S. and China agree 90-day ‘reciprocal’ tariff pause and reduction deal

Tariff trade war 90-day pause

In a surprising breakthrough, the United States and China have agreed to suspend most tariffs on each other’s goods for 90 days, marking a significant step toward easing trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies.

Following high-stakes negotiations in Geneva, representatives from both nations announced that reciprocal tariffs would be slashed from 125% to 10%, significantly lowering trade barriers.

However, the U.S. will continue imposing 20% tariffs on Chinese imports related to fentanyl, meaning total tariffs on Chinese goods will settle at 30%.

The agreement signals a temporary thaw in what has been a long-standing economic standoff between Washington and Beijing. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who played a leading role in the discussions, described the talks as ‘very productive’, crediting the location for fostering an atmosphere of cooperation.

While this move could provide immediate relief for businesses and consumers impacted by trade restrictions, analysts caution that the 90-day suspension may not translate into a long-term solution.

Some experts speculate that ongoing trade negotiations could lead to further reductions, while others warn that unresolved tensions could lead to reinstated tariffs if agreements stall.

For now, the deal presents an opportunity for renewed dialogue, leaving global markets optimistic about future relations between the two economic powerhouses.

How the next three months unfold will determine whether this development is a stepping stone to broader reforms or simply a temporary reprieve in a complex trade dispute.

I expect Trump, having instigated the ‘tariff’ upheaval, will happily hang on to this ‘deal’ with China to avoid any further stock market turmoil.

What really just happened? The markets seem to be rewarding a situation that was artificially created and then ‘fixed’.

Aren’t we simply back where we were before the Trump tariff onslaught or is this really a ‘promise’ for better ‘deals’ to come?

Has it opened a door for better relations?

Create a problem… fix a problem!

It’s all about the U.S.

We’ll see…

Posted on

China’s Exports Defy Tariff Pressures, Surge 8.1% in April

China World Trade

Despite the weight of U.S. tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, China’s export sector has shown remarkable resilience, posting an 8.1% increase in April 2025 compared to the previous year.

This surge comes as a surprise, surpassing economists’ expectations of a modest 1.9% rise.

While China’s outbound shipments to the U.S. plunged by over 21%, exports to Southeast Asian nations soared by 20.8%, with Indonesia and Thailand seeing particularly strong growth.

This shift suggests that Chinese exporters are successfully redirecting their goods to alternative markets, mitigating the impact of U.S. trade restrictions.

The tariffs, which now stand at 145% on Chinese imports, were designed to pressure Beijing into trade concessions. In response, China retaliated with 125% duties on American goods, further escalating tensions.

However, analysts suggest that some of China’s export growth may be attributed to transshipment through third countries and contracts signed before the tariffs took effect.

Despite the export boom, China’s factory activity has taken a hit, falling to a 16-month low in April 2025, with new export orders dropping to their lowest level since December 2022.

Concerns are mounting that the tariffs could spill over into the job market, with estimates suggesting China could lose 16 million jobs tied to U.S. – bound production.

As both nations prepare for high-level trade talks in Switzerland, there is cautious optimism that a phased rollback of tariffs could be on the horizon.

While a comprehensive deal remains elusive, even minor tariff reductions could provide relief to businesses on both sides.

The coming months will be crucial in determining whether China can sustain its export momentum or if the tariff war will take a deeper toll on its economy.

Posted on

Signs of weakness in the U.S. economy – is a recession coming and is the United States causing harm to global economies?

Cracking world economies

The U.S. economy is showing cracks as multiple indicators suggest that growth may be slowing.

With GDP shrinking by 0.3% in the first quarter of 2025, concerns about an impending recession have intensified among analysts and investors.

A key driver of this economic downturn is the ongoing trade uncertainty, which has prompted businesses to stock up on imports before new tariffs take effect.

While some experts argue this is a temporary setback, others caution that prolonged trade conflicts could stifle growth for months to come.

Resilient labour market

Despite these concerns, the labour market has remained resilient, with unemployment hovering at 4.2%. However, signs of strain are emerging – job openings have declined, and layoffs have picked up in certain industries.

If hiring slows further, consumer spending could weaken, adding pressure to the economy.

Inflation remains another point of concern. Rising costs of goods and services have strained household budgets, leading to reduced discretionary spending.

The Federal Reserve, which has maintained high interest rates, is carefully assessing whether policy adjustments are needed to prevent a sharper downturn.

On Wall Street, sentiment is divided. Goldman Sachs estimates a 45% probability of a recession, while J P Morgan suggests the likelihood could be as high as 60%.

Some economists believe strategic trade deals and government intervention could avert a full-blown recession, but the margin for error is slim.

Does it really matter if there is to be a recession – it will likely be short lived. It will not please the U.S. President Donald Trump.

While uncertainty clouds the future, one thing is clear – the U.S. economy is at a pivotal moment. Whether policymakers can stabilise growth or if the nation is headed towards a deeper slowdown will depend on the next few quarters and the outcome of Trump’s tariffs.

Tudor Investment Corporation

Paul Tudor Jones, the founder of Tudor Investment Corporation, recently shared his outlook on the U.S. economy, and his perspective isn’t exactly optimistic.

He believes that U.S. stocks are likely to hit new lows before the end of the year, even if President Trump dials back tariffs on Chinese imports.

Jones pointed out that the combination of high tariffs and the Federal Reserve’s reluctance to cut interest rates is putting significant pressure on the stock market.

He reportedly noted that even if Trump reduced tariffs to 50% or 40%, it would still amount to one of the largest tax increases since the 1960s, potentially slowing economic growth.

The billionaire investor also warned that unless the Fed adopts a more dovish stance and aggressively cuts rates, the market is likely to continue its downward trajectory.

He reportedly emphasised that the current economic conditions – marked by trade uncertainty and tight monetary policy – are not favourable for a stock market recovery.

Interestingly, Jones also expressed concerns about artificial intelligence, stating that AI poses an imminent threat to humanity within our lifetime.

Maybe AI will start running hedge funds too…?

Posted on

S&P 500 achieves longest winning streak in two decades – then slides

S&P 500 hits new record!

The S&P 500 has surged to a new record, marking nine consecutive days of gains – its longest winning streak since November 2004.

This run came after significant market falls after President Trump announced his tariffs on Liberation Day in April 2025.

The index closed 1.47% higher on the final day of the streak on Friday 2nd May 2025, reflecting investor optimism amid shifting global economic conditions.

This historic run comes as China and the U.S. signal the potential of renewed trade discussions, easing concerns over tariffs and supply chain disruptions.

Additionally, a strong U.S. jobs report has bolstered confidence, with employment figures exceeding expectations. The rally has been broad-based, with technology, financial, and industrial stocks leading the charge.

Despite the impressive streak, analysts warn of potential volatility ahead. While the S&P 500 has demonstrated resilience, market corrections often follow extended periods of gains.

S&P 500 all-time chart as of 5th May 2025 – 9-day consecutive run record

S&P 500 all-time chart as of 5th May 2025 – 9-day consecutive run record

Investors are now watching for signs of consolidation or further momentum and that is down to Trump’s tariffs and the Fed’s interest rate decision.

Posted on

U.S. Economy Contracts in Q1 2025 Amid Trade Policy Uncertainty

U.S. GDP

The U.S. economy shrank by 0.3% in the first quarter of 2025, marking the first contraction since early 2022.

The decline was largely driven by a surge in imports, which soared 41.3%, as businesses rushed to stockpile goods ahead of President Donald Trump’s newly imposed tariffs. Imports subtract from GDP calculations, contributing to the negative growth figure.

Despite the contraction, consumer spending remained positive, increasing 1.8%, though at a slower pace than previous quarters. Private domestic investment also saw a sharp rise of 21.9%, fueled by a 22.5% increase in equipment spending, likely influenced by tariff concerns.

The Federal Reserve faces a complex decision ahead of its upcoming policy meeting. While the negative GDP growth may push the central bank toward interest rate cuts, inflation remains a concern, with the U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index rising 3.6% for the quarter.

Markets reacted cautiously, with stock futures slipping and Treasury yields climbing. As the Trump administration navigates trade negotiations, economists warn that continued uncertainty could weigh on future growth prospects.

Next up, U.S. employment data.

Posted on

Shock but no ‘awe’ in Trump’s first 100 days in office

Sledgehammer policies

U.S. President Donald Trump has definitely brought a lot of shock in the first 100 days of his presidency, smashing trade links, alliances, and even his own government, but it can hardly be said to have left anybody truly in ‘awe’.

Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office during his second term have been a whirlwind of activity, marked by bold moves and significant controversy.

His poll rating is the lowest of any President of recent times for the first 100 days. It currently sits at around 41% (a CNN poll result suggests).

How does it compare?

Harry S. Truman, hit a rock-bottom approval rating of 22% in 1952. Other presidents like Richard Nixon and George W. Bush also dipped below 25%. But these were during their terms and not in the first 100 days.

His administration has focused heavily on reshaping trade policies, imposing tariffs that have disrupted global markets and strained relationships with long-standing allies.

Despite his claims of progress, no major trade deals have been finalised, leaving many questioning the effectiveness of his approach.

Legal challenges

Domestically, Trump’s policies have faced significant legal challenges, with numerous lawsuits filed against his administration. His stance on immigration and energy has sparked heated debates, reflecting the polarising nature of his decisions.

Trump’s ‘drill-baby-drill’ mantra has not had the desire reaction – oil prices has fallen with U.S. oil below $65 a barrel.

The automotive industry, for instance, has grappled with regulatory uncertainty and additional costs due to his tariffs, prompting him to soften some measures in response to industry concerns.

Internationally, Trump’s actions have raised concerns about U.S. credibility and stability. His hostile stance toward traditional allies, such as Canada, the EU and NATO, has left multi-decade relationships in tatters.

Meanwhile, his administration’s handling of the ongoing war in Ukraine and trade negotiations with China has drawn criticism for its lack of tangible results.

Despite these challenges, Trump remains confident in his vision for America. He has claimed progress in tariff negotiations with India, suggesting that a trade deal may be on the horizon.

No deals… yet

There has not been a single trade deal concluded with Trump’s administration – despite him reportedly claiming to have done ‘200 deals’ with only 195 countries in the world.

China is still striking a defiant tone on trade, and the war in Ukraine rages on. The president has also been forced to walk back on his “reciprocal tariffs.” 

However, his administration’s approach has left many wondering whether his first 100 days will be remembered for their impact or their controversy.

As the dust settles, the world watches closely to see how Trump’s policies will shape the future of the United States and its role on the global stage.

Trump may have wanted his first 100 days to be historic, and they were – but for all the wrong reasons.  

Posted on

Countries begin to turn away from the U.S. because of Trump’s tariff policies

U.S. tariffs crate uncertainty

Countries are increasingly pivoting away from the United States due to the ripple effects of former President Donald Trump’s tariff policies.

His ‘America First’ ideology, which prioritised domestic interests over international collaboration, assumed that the world needed America more than America needed the world. While this may have held true in certain aspects, the global response suggests otherwise.

Southeast Asian nations, heavily impacted by Trump’s tariffs, have begun strengthening intra-regional trade and diversifying their export destinations.

This shift reflects a growing desire to reduce reliance on the U.S. economy and mitigate the risks associated with its unpredictable trade policies.

Similarly, China, facing significant challenges from the U.S.-China trade war, has ramped up fiscal stimulus and expanded its markets beyond American borders. These moves highlight a strategic effort to counteract the economic pressures imposed by U.S. tariffs.

China has also introduced employment support and hinted at more stimulus as U.S. created trade war tension escalates.

The U.S. has increasingly found itself playing catch-up in critical areas like rare earth elements and minerals. The original U.S. tariff scope has already been adjusted and rolled back.

The 90-day tariff pause being one of them and the reduction of tech related tariffs another.

Trump’s recent executive order to jump-start deep-sea mining underscores America’s attempt to secure access to these strategically important resources, which China currently dominates.

However, this reactive approach may not be enough to recover from the damage already done and to regain lost ground may prove even harder still.

The unintended consequence of Trump’s policies is a more fragmented global trade landscape. Countries are taking measures to strengthen their own economies and reduce dependence on the U.S., potentially leaving America isolated in certain aspects of international affairs.

While the U.S. remains a major player in global trade, its unilateral actions have prompted other nations to explore alternative paths, reshaping the dynamics of global commerce.

This shift serves as a reminder that in an interconnected world, cooperation often yields better outcomes than isolationist policies.

The long-term implications of these changes are yet to fully unfold, but they signal a significant transformation in the global economic order.

Will the U.S. be the loser – or will it become even stronger in the world order?

It was already the world’s number one economy!

It’s not easy to unravel 100’s of years of interconnected world trade.

Why?

Posted on

Stock markets see three-day recovery as U.S. tech boost offsets trade worries – but for how long?

Tech gains

Global markets have shown resilience in the past three days, rebounding from recent downturns as technology stocks rally amid cautious optimism.

The boost in investor confidence follows strong earnings reports from major tech firms, highlighting their ability to weather economic uncertainty.

However, lingering concerns about international trade tensions raise questions about how sustainable this recovery truly is.

Technology stocks have led the charge, with companies in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductor production posting better-than-expected growth figures.

Investors have flocked to these sectors, hoping that innovation will drive forward profitability even amid broader market volatility.

This renewed enthusiasm has helped offset concerns over ongoing global trade disputes, which have led to tariffs and economic slowdowns in key sectors such as manufacturing and consumer goods.

Yet, beneath this recovery, risks persist. Geopolitical uncertainties, including unresolved trade negotiations between major economies, continue to cast a shadow over financial markets.

Inflationary pressures, alongside tightening monetary policies by central banks, also threaten to cool investor enthusiasm. Analysts warn that without concrete progress on trade agreements; the rebound may be short-lived.

As investors weigh the competing forces of technological optimism and trade anxieties, the market remains in a delicate balance.

The question remains: Is this recovery a sign of renewed growth, or merely a temporary respite before further economic turbulence?

With the next wave of financial reports and policy decisions on the horizon, market makers will be closely monitoring whether the tech sector’s momentum can sustain broader economic confidence – or whether trade headwinds will ultimately pull markets back into uncertainty again.

Tech gains ground again


Stocks jumped Thursday 24th April 2024 thanks to strong gains in Mega Cap tech names.

The S&P 500 ended up 2.03%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite added 2.74%.

The S&P 500 index was able to exit correction territory, ending at least 10% above its recent low set in the wake of President Donald Trump’s 2nd April 2025 ‘liberation day’ tariffs.

For the S&P 500 to maintain its rapid exit from correction territory – it now has to witness Trump’s tariff walk-back and the ‘cooling’ of a potential Fed fight.

Trump seems to be the first to have ‘blinked’ on his self-imposed tariffs suggesting the tariffs are too high and will not go any higher – thy are high enough!

China has reportedly said there are no ‘ongoing’ trade talks?

The Dow Jones Industrial Average lagged the other two indexes but still added 1.23% and retook the 40,000 for the first time since 15th April 2025.

 Japan’s Nikkei 225 up almost 2% and leading gains.

Alphabet shares climb after better than expected results


Alphabet reported stronger-than-expected first-quarter growth on Thursday 24th April 2025.

Alphabet’s search and advertising units are still showing strong growth despite AI competition heating up, according to its first-quarter earnings report.

The company’s overall revenue grew 12% year-on-year, higher than the 10% Wall Street expected.

Shares rose more than 5% in after-hours trading. 

However, Alphabet reportedly indicated to expect ‘slight headwind’ to ads business this year.

Intel also posts results beat, but warns of tariff impact


Intel reported first-quarter results on 24th April 2025 that beat analysts’ estimates but also reportedly issued disappointing guidance. 

Second-quarter revenue will come in below estimates due to elevated uncertainty driven by the macro environment, the company warned.

Intel was reported saying that President Donald Trump’s tariffs and retaliation from other countries had increased the likelihood of a U.S. recession.

Big tech gains drive markets but the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s tariffs remain.

Posted on

U.S. stocks slide again as Trump publicly criticises Fed Chair Powell

Jerome Powell criticised

President Donald Trump’s recent criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has sent shockwaves through the financial markets, reigniting concerns about the central bank’s independence.

On Monday 21st April 2025, Trump took to social media to publicly call Powell a ‘major loser’ and demanded immediate interest rate cuts, warning of an economic slowdown if his demands were not met.

This public rebuke, coupled with Trump’s earlier threats to terminate Powell, has unsettled investors and triggered another sharp sell-off in U.S. stocks.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged nearly 1,000 points, or 2.48%, closing at 38170. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite also suffered significant losses, falling 2.36% and 2.55%.

Dow Jones one-year chart

Dow Jones one-year chart

Trump continues to create uncertainty

Analysts attribute this market turmoil to fears that Trump’s rhetoric could undermine the Federal Reserve’s ability to operate independently, a cornerstone of its credibility.

‘Magnificent Seven’ tech companies dragged the major indexes lower, with Tesla and Nvidia respectively losing 5.8% and more than 4%. Amazon shed 3%, and Meta Platforms suffered losses too.

Tesla one-year chart

Tesla one-year chart

Adding to the uncertainty, Trump’s tariff policies have already strained investor confidence. The combination of trade tensions and doubts about the Fed’s autonomy has led to a flight from U.S. assets.

The dollar hit a three-year low, while gold prices soared to record highs above $3,400 per ounce as investors sought safe-haven assets.

Market experts warn that prolonged uncertainty could have far-reaching implications. ‘The market is okay with rates coming down,’ reportedly said Thierry Wizman, a global currency strategist. ‘What the market is not okay with is having the president or politicians tell the Fed that the rates need to come down’.

As Trump’s public rebuttal of Powell continues, investors observe the potential implications. The stakes are high, not just for the U.S. economy but for global markets that rely on the stability of American financial institutions.

Investors are left grappling with a volatile landscape, where political pressures and economic policies collide.

The Trump ‘turmoil’ continues.