Tag: Tariffs

Posted on

Markets appear to dismiss Trump’s tariff threats – but will this prove to be unwise?

Super Chicken

Despite President Donald Trump’s renewed push for sweeping tariffs, global markets appear unfazed.

Trump issued letters to 14 countries – including Japan, South Korea, and Malaysia—outlining new import levies ranging from 25% to 40%, set to take effect on 1st August 2025. More letters then followed.

Yet, major indices like the FTSE 100 and Nikkei 225 barely flinched, with some even posting modest gains.

So, who’s right—the president or the markets?

Trump insists tariffs are essential to redress trade imbalances and bring manufacturing back to the U.S. The EU also faces higher tariffs.

He’s floated extreme measures, including a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals and a 50% levy on copper.

His administration argues these moves will strengthen domestic industry and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.

However, investors seem to be betting on a familiar pattern: Trump talks tough but ultimately softens under pressure. Analysts have dubbed this the ‘TACO’ trade—Trump Always Chickens Out.

His own comments have added to the ambiguity, calling the August deadline ‘firm, but not 100% firm’.

The economic logic behind the tariffs is being questioned. Tariffs are paid by importers—often U.S. businesses and consumers—not foreign governments.

This could lead to higher prices and inflation, especially in sectors like healthcare and electronics. Some economists warn of recessionary risks for countries like Japan and South Korea.

In short, markets may be right to remain calm—for now. But if Trump follows through, the impact could be far-reaching.

With trade negotiations still in flux and only two deals (UK and Vietnam) finalised, the next few weeks will be critical. Investors may be wise not to ignore the warning signs entirely.

Whether this is brinkmanship or a genuine shift in trade policy, the stakes are high—and the clock is ticking.

Posted on

Elon Musk launches ‘America Party’ amid ongoing feud with Trump

America Party

In a dramatic twist to the U.S. political landscape, Elon Musk has announced the formation of a new political party, the America Party, following a bitter fallout with President Donald Trump over his controversial tax and spending legislation – the ‘Big Beautiful Bill‘.

Musk, once a key ally of Trump and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), broke ranks after the passage of the so-called ‘Big Beautiful Bill‘, which Musk labelled a “disgusting abomination” that would balloon the national debt by trillions.

On U.S. Independence Day, Musk polled his followers on X, asking whether a new party should be formed. With a 2-to-1 majority voting ‘yes’, Musk declared, ‘Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom’.

The party aims to challenge the entrenched two-party system by targeting a handful of swing Senate and House seats, potentially becoming a decisive force in future legislation.

Musk has pledged to support primary challengers against Republicans who backed the bill, accusing them of betraying fiscal responsibility.

Trump, clearly irked, dismissed Musk’s move as ‘ridiculous’, reportedly stating, ‘It’s always been a two-party system… third parties have never worked’.

He added on Truth Social, ‘Elon Musk has gone completely off the rails… becoming a train wreck over the past five weeks’.

The feud has escalated rapidly, with Trump threatening to revoke federal subsidies for Musk’s companies and even suggesting deportation, despite Musk’s U.S. citizenship.

While Musk’s America Party faces steep legal and logistical hurdles, his immense wealth and online influence could make it a disruptive force.

Whether it gains traction or fizzles out remains to be seen but it’s clear the ‘love’ between Musk and Trump is officially over.

Posted on

U.S. debt surges close to $37 trillion after ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ -Elon Musk sounds alarm

High U.S. debt levels

Following the passage of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill, the U.S. national debt has officially soared to nearly $37 trillion, with projections suggesting it could hit $40 trillion by year’s end.

The bill, which extends 2017 tax cuts and introduces expansive spending on defence, border security, and domestic manufacturing, has sparked fierce debate across Washington and Wall Street.

Critics argue the legislation lacks meaningful offsets, with no new taxes or spending cuts to balance its provisions.

Interest payments alone reached $1.1 trillion in 2024, surpassing the defence budget. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill could add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.

Among the most vocal opponents is tech billionaire Elon Musk, who previously served as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Musk has labelled the bill a ‘disgusting abominatio’ and warned it undermines fiscal responsibility.

He has reportedly pledged to fund primary challengers against Republicans who supported the measure, accusing them of betraying their promises to reduce spending.

Musk’s concerns go beyond economics. He argues the bill reflects a broken political system dominated by self-interest, calling for the creation of a new political movement, the America Party, to restore accountability.

While the White House insists the bill will spur economic growth and eventually reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio, sceptics remain unconvinced.

With the debt ceiling raised by a record $5 trillion, the long-term implications for America’s financial stability are now front and centre.

As the dust settles, the clash between Trump’s fiscal vision and Musk’s warnings sets the stage for a turbulent political and economic period ahead.

Posted on

Trump shifts tariff ‘goal posts’ again and targets BRICS with extra 10% levy

Goal posts moved

In a fresh escalation of trade tensions, President Donald Trump has once again moved the goalposts on tariff policy, pushing the deadline for new trade deals to 1st August 2025.

This marks the second extension since the original April 2025 ‘Liberation Day’ announcement, which had already stirred global markets.

The latest twist includes a new 10% tariff targeting countries aligned with the BRICS bloc—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – along with newer members such as Iran and the UAE.

Trump declared on Truth Social that ‘any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% tariff. There will be no exceptions’.

The move has drawn sharp criticism from BRICS leaders, who condemned the tariffs as ‘indiscriminate’ and warned of rising protectionism. Industrial metals, including copper and aluminium, saw immediate price drops amid fears of disrupted supply chains.

While the White House insists the new deadline allows more time for negotiation, analysts warn the uncertainty could dampen global trade and investor confidence.

With letters outlining tariff terms expected to be sent this week, investors and market makers watch closely as Trump’s trade strategy continues to evolve or unravel.

Posted on

From Missiles to Tariffs: A desensitised stock market faces Trump’s new world

Markets desensitised to U.S. policy making

In years past, the mere hint of U.S. airstrikes or heightened geopolitical tension would send global stock markets into panic mode.

Yet, following President Trump’s re-election and his increasingly aggressive foreign policy stance, investor reactions have become notably muted.

From missile strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to an orchestrated ceasefire between Iran and Israel, markets have barely flinched. The question arises: are investors becoming desensitised to Trump’s geopolitical theatre?

Take the latest skirmish between Iran and Israel. After nearly two weeks of missile exchanges, Trump’s announcement of a ‘complete and total ceasefire’ barely nudged the S&P 500.

That calm came despite the U.S. launching pre-emptive strikes on Iranian facilities and absorbing retaliatory attacks on its military base in Qatar.

In another era, or under a different administration even, such developments might have triggered a broad risk-off sentiment. Instead, Wall Street just shrugged.

One reason may be fatigue. Trump’s approach – rife with tariffs, sanctions, and sudden reversals – has bred a kind of market immunity.

Investors, well-versed in the rhythm of Trump’s provocations, have begun treating them as background noise. His revived tariff agenda, particularly the threats aimed once again at China and EU auto imports, has likewise failed to prompt major selloffs.

Similarly, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, once a source of intense volatility, now registers as a strategic stalemate in the market’s eyes.

While Trump’s rhetoric surrounding Ukraine has shifted unpredictably, investors appear more focused on earnings, inflation data, and central bank signals than on diplomatic fallout and war!

This is not to suggest markets are indifferent to geopolitical risk, but rather that they’ve adapted. Algorithmic trading models may be increasingly geared to discount Trump’s headline-grabbing tactics, while institutional investors hedge through gold, volatility indices, or energy plays without dumping equities outright.

Critics argue this detachment is dangerous. Should a flashpoint spiral out of control, be it over Hormuz, Ukraine, or Taiwan, the slow-boiling complacency could leave portfolios badly exposed.

Still, for now, Trump’s policies are being priced in not with panic, but with complacency maybe.

The real story may not be what Trump does next, but how long the markets can continue to look away.

Trump announces he had brokered ceasefire between Israel and Iran?

Tensions between Israel and Iran reached a boiling point after 12 days of cross-border missile and drone strikes.

The situation escalated further when U.S. forces under President Trump launched targeted airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, prompting a direct Iranian missile response on a U.S. base in Qatar.

In a dramatic turn, President Trump announced what he called a ‘Complete and Total CEASEFIRE‘ – announced on Truth Social. According to Trump’s plan, Iran would begin the ceasefire immediately, with Israel to follow 12 hours later.

The truce would reportedly be considered complete after 24 hours if all attacks stopped.

While Trump touted the ceasefire as a triumph of ‘peace through strength’, analysts questioned the ceasefire’s enforceability – especially since missile exchanges reportedly continued despite the announcement.

Nonetheless, Trump claimed credit for halting the region’s slide into all-out war without committing to prolonged U.S. military involvement.

Critics argue Trump’s strategy relies more on military pressure and media theatrics than diplomatic engagement.

Supporters counter that his boldness forced both sides to the table. Either way, the world is watching to see whether this fragile peace endures – or erupts again in fire.

If this turns out to be a masterstroke in political brinkmanship – hats off to Trump, I guess. Whichever way you look at it, the precision U.S. strike on Iran was exactly that – precision. And, you have to take note.

Iran has been weakened, and this may even influence Russia’s war on Ukraine. Hopefully Israel with Palestine too – regardless of stock market reaction.

And that has to be a good thing!

But has Israel finished their war?

Despite all the noise regarding stock market reaction, one thing is for certain – the anxiety and worry for the people of the Middle East is unquestionable.

It’s not a happy time.

Posted on

UK economy shrank in April 2025

UK flag on a squeezed bottle

The UK economy contracted by 0.3% in April 2025, a sharper decline than the 0.1% forecast by economists, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

The unexpected downturn has raised fresh concerns about the country’s economic resilience amid rising costs and global trade tensions.

April’s contraction was driven by a combination of domestic and international pressures. A significant rise in employers’ National Insurance contributions, coupled with increases in water, energy, and council tax bills, placed added pressure on businesses and households.

Simultaneously, newly imposed U.S. tariffs, introduced by President Trump, led to the steepest monthly drop in UK exports to the United States on record.

Services and manufacturing, which together form the backbone of the UK economy, both saw declines.

Legal and real estate sectors were particularly affected, following a surge in house sales in March 2025 ahead of stamp duty changes. Car manufacturing also faltered after a strong first quarter.

Despite the monthly setback, UK GDP still grew by 0.7% over the three months to April 2025, suggesting some economic activity may have been pulled forward earlier in the year.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves reportedly acknowledged the figures were ‘clearly disappointing’ but reaffirmed her commitment to long-term growth through strategic investments in infrastructure, housing, and energy.

While April’s figures may not signal an immediate crisis, they underscore the fragility of the UK’s recovery.

With UK inflation still above target and interest rates elevated, the UK government faces a delicate balancing act to sustain momentum without stifling growth.

Posted on

U.S. inflation up 0.1% in May – but less than expected

U.S. inflation

In May 2025, U.S. inflation rose by 0.1% from the previous month, bringing the annual inflation rate to 2.4%, slightly below economists’ predictions of 2.5%.

Core U.S. inflation, which excludes food and energy, increased by 0.1% month-on-month, with a year-on-year rate of 2.8%.

The modest rise was largely offset by falling energy prices, particularly a 2.6% drop in petrol, which helped keep overall inflation in check.

Prices for new and used vehicles, as well as apparel, also declined. Meanwhile, food and housing (shelter) costs each rose by 0.3%, with housing (shelter) being the primary contributor to the monthly increase.

Despite President Trump’s sweeping tariffs introduced in April 2025, their inflationary impact has yet to fully materialise. Analysts suggest that many companies are still working through pre-tariff inventories, delaying price hikes for consumers.

However, economists caution that the effects may become more pronounced in the coming months.

The Federal Reserve is expected to hold interest rates steady for now, as U.S. policymakers monitor whether inflation remains contained or begins to accelerate due to trade-related pressures.

Markets responded positively to the data, with stock futures rising and Treasury yields falling.

So, while inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target, May’s figures suggest a temporary reprieve.

The summer could yet tell a different story.

Posted on

China suffers U.S. tariff driven falls in exports and increased deflation concerns

China exports to U.S. suffer due to tariffs

China’s economic landscape is facing mounting challenges as exports to the United States plummet and consumer prices decline, sparking fears of deflation.

The latest trade data reveals that Chinese exports to the U.S. fell by 34.5% in May 2025, marking the sharpest drop in over five years. This decline comes despite a temporary trade truce that paused most tariffs for 90 days.

China’s consumer prices have continued their downward trend, raising concerns about deflation and its long-term impact on the economy.

The sharp fall in exports is largely attributed to high U.S. tariffs and weakening demand. While China’s overall exports grew by 4.8%, shipments to the U.S. suffered significantly, reflecting the ongoing trade tensions between the two economic giants.

Imports from the U.S. also dropped by 18%, further shrinking China’s trade surplus with America. In response, Chinese exporters are shifting their focus to other markets, particularly Southeast Asia and Europe, where demand remains relatively strong.

China’s CPI reading

At the same time, China’s consumer price index (CPI) fell by 0.1% in May 2025, deepening concerns about deflation. Deflation, the opposite of inflation, can lead to lower corporate profits, wage cuts, and job losses, creating a vicious cycle of economic stagnation.

The decline in consumer prices is largely driven by weak domestic demand, exacerbated by the ongoing real estate crisis. Many Chinese consumers are hesitant to spend, fearing further declines in property values and economic uncertainty.

China’s rare earth materials olive branch

China appears to have offered U.S. and European auto manufacturers a reprieve after industry groups warned of increasing production threats over a rare earth shortage.

China’s Ministry of Commerce on Saturday 7th June 2025 reportedly said it was willing to establish a so-called ‘green channel’ for eligible export licence applications to expedite the approval process to European Union firms. 

Posted on

OECD cuts U.S. growth forecast amid Trump’s tariff chaos

OECD U.S. data

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has sharply downgraded its U.S. growth forecast, citing economic uncertainty and the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariff policies.

The OECD now expects the U.S. economy to expand by just 1.6% in 2025 and 1.5% in 2026, a significant cut from its previous estimate of 2.2% for 2025.

The report highlights several factors contributing to the slowdown, including elevated policy uncertainty, reduced net immigration, and a shrinking federal workforce.

The OECD also warns that higher trade barriers could further dampen business confidence and investment.

Global growth projections have also been revised downward, with the OECD stating that the slowdown is most pronounced in North America, particularly in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

The organisation reportedly notes that U.S. tariff-related disruptions are expected to push inflation higher, although weaker commodity prices may offset some of the impact.

The OECD’s latest outlook underscores the growing challenges facing the U.S. economy as trade tensions persist.

With tariffs fluctuating due to ongoing ‘stop start’ legal interventions, businesses and investors remain cautious about the future.

The coming months will be crucial in determining whether policymakers can stabilise growth and restore confidence in the market.

Stop the tariffs and all will be fine.

Posted on

China’s manufacturing sector experiences decline amid Tariff chaos

China factory data

China’s manufacturing activity took an unexpected hit in May 2025, marking its steepest decline since September 2022.

The Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI fell to 48.3, signalling contraction for the first time in eight months. This downturn comes as U.S. tariffs begin to weigh heavily on Chinese exports, dampening global demand and disrupting supply chains.

The latest data reveals that new export orders shrank for the second consecutive month, hitting their lowest level since July 2023.

Factory output also contracted for the first time since October 2023, reflecting the broader economic slowdown. Analysts attribute this slump to the reinstatement of sweeping U.S. tariffs, which were briefly halted before being reimposed by a federal appeals court.

Despite a temporary trade truce between the U.S. and China, tensions remain high, with both sides accusing each other of violating agreements.

The uncertainty surrounding trade policies has led Chinese manufacturers to cut jobs at the fastest pace since the start of the year, further exacerbating economic concerns.

China’s Premier Li Qiang has hinted at new policy tools, including unconventional measures to stabilise the economy. However, with tariffs set to remain high and structural challenges persisting, experts predict continued pressure on China’s industrial sector.

As the world’s second-largest economy grapples with these headwinds, the coming months will be crucial in determining whether Beijing can implement effective strategies to counteract the impact of tariffs and restore manufacturing momentum.

Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI survey

The report was based on the Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI survey, which is a private-sector survey that tracks China’s manufacturing activity.

This survey is conducted mid-month and covers over 500 mostly export-oriented businesses, making it distinct from China’s official PMI, which samples 3,000 companies and is compiled at month-end.

The Caixin PMI tends to focus more on small and medium-sized enterprises, whereas the official PMI aligns more closely with industrial output.

In May, the Caixin PMI fell to 48.3, marking its first contraction in eight months. The decline was largely driven by shrinking new export orders, which hit their lowest level since July 2023.

The survey also showed that employment in the manufacturing sector declined at the fastest pace since January, reflecting the broader economic slowdown.

One key difference between the Caixin PMI and the official PMI is their timing. The Caixin survey is conducted earlier in the month, meaning it may not fully capture policy changes or trade developments that occur later.

For example, economists noted that the effect of the tariff de-escalation in mid-May may not have been reflected in the Caixin PMI results

Posted on

Trump’s tariffs challenged in court and deemed to be illegal

U.S. tariff court ruling

A U.S. federal court has ruled that former President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs were imposed illegally, dealing a significant blow to his economic policies.

The Court of International Trade determined that Trump exceeded his authority by invoking emergency powers to justify tariffs on nearly every country.

The ruling states that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress exclusive power to regulate commerce, meaning the president cannot unilaterally impose such broad trade restrictions.

The decision immediately halted the 10% tariffs Trump had imposed on most U.S. trading partners, as well as additional levies on China, Mexico, and Canada.

The court found that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which Trump cited as justification, does not grant him the authority to implement such sweeping trade measures.

The White House swiftly filed an appeal, arguing that the tariffs were necessary to address trade imbalances and safeguard American industries.

However, businesses and state governments that challenged the tariffs welcomed the ruling, citing concerns over inflation and economic harm.

Dow Jones Industrial Average Futures 28th & 29th May 2025 after the court ruling

Dow Jones Industrial Average Futures 28th & 29th May 2025 after the court ruling

Markets responded positively to the decision, with stock futures rising and the U.S. dollar strengthening. If the ruling stands, businesses that paid the tariffs may be eligible for refunds, marking a potential shift in U.S. trade policy.

The U.S. President is expected to find a workaround after suffering a major blow to a core part of his economic agenda.

Posted on

What’s going on in the U.S. bond market?

Treasury yields

The U.S. bond market is experiencing some turbulence due to rising Treasury yields and concerns over government debt.

Investors are demanding higher yields because they’re worried about the GOP’s tax-cut plans, which could lead to increased borrowing and a larger deficit.

Additionally, the recent Trump tax bill has caused Treasury bond yields to surge, as investors anticipate more government debt issuance. Moody’s has also downgraded the U.S. credit rating, adding to market jitters.

The bond market’s reaction is significant because higher yields can lead to increased borrowing costs across the economy, affecting everything from mortgages to corporate financing.

Japan

Japan’s bond market is facing significant turbulence, with yields on 40-year government bonds hitting an all-time high. This surge in yields is causing concerns about capital repatriation, as Japanese investors may start pulling funds from the U.S. and other foreign markets.

The Bank of Japan’s reduced bond purchases have contributed to this trend, leading to weaker demand for long-term government debt. Analysts warn that if Japanese investors begin moving their capital back home, it could trigger a global financial market shake-up.

Additionally, Japan’s Finance Ministry is considering reducing the issuance of super-long bonds to stabilise the market. However, recent auctions have shown weak demand, raising concerns about the effectiveness of this strategy.

Europe

The European bond market is experiencing some shifts due to falling government bond yields and easing U.S. – EU trade tensions.

German 10-year bund yields dropped by 4 basis points, reflecting increased investor confidence.

UK and French 10-year bond yields also declined by 4 basis points, while Italian bonds saw a 2 basis point dip.

Long-term UK gilts experienced the biggest movement, with 20 and 30-year yields falling by 7 basis points.

This decline in yields suggests higher demand for European government debt, possibly due to investors shifting away from U.S. assets amid concerns over U.S. fiscal health.

UK

The UK bond market is facing some challenges, with the IMF warning that it is vulnerable to sudden shocks due to a growing reliance on hedge funds and foreign investors.

30-year gilt yields have hit 5.5%, the highest in over three decades.

The Bank of England’s quantitative tightening and increased bond issuance are putting pressure on the market.

The Debt Management Office (DMO) is shifting towards short-dated debt to reduce long-term interest costs.

Additionally, the UK government has launched a new 30-year gilt offering 5.375% interest, which is attracting investor attention.

Posted on

Tesla’s European market meltdown – sales plunge 49% amid brand damage and fierce competition

Tesla's European sales fall!

Tesla’s vehicle sales in Europe plummeted by 49% in April 2025, marking the fourth consecutive month of decline.

Despite an overall 27.8% rise in battery-electric vehicle sales, Tesla struggled to maintain its foothold in the region.

The drop in sales has been attributed to increasing competition from Chinese automakers, a shift in consumer preferences towards hybrid vehicles, and growing backlash against CEO Elon Musk’s political affiliations.

Tesla’s market share in Europe nearly halved, falling from 1.3% to 0.7%. The company’s aging lineup, particularly the Model Y, has failed to attract new buyers, while rivals such as BYD have overtaken Tesla in European EV sales for the first time.

Additionally, European carmakers are cutting costs and adapting to U.S. tariffs on auto imports, further intensifying competition. Chinese EV manufacturers are also cutting EV prices.

While Tesla faces challenges in Europe, the broader EV market continues to expand, driven by government incentives and stricter emission targets.

However, unless Tesla refreshes its lineup and rebuilds consumer trust, its dominance in the European market may continue to erode.

The company’s future remains uncertain as it navigates political controversies and shifting market dynamics

Posted on

China’s industrial profit accelerates in April 2025 – despite Trump’s tariffs

China factory output

Despite the heavy tariffs imposed by former U.S. President Donald Trump, China’s industrial sector has demonstrated remarkable resilience.

In April 2025, industrial profits rose by 3%, marking the second consecutive month of growth.

This increase was largely driven by Beijing’s strategic policy measures, which cushioned the impact of the tariffs and supported private enterprises.

In the first four months of 2025 China’s industrial profits rose 1.4%, according to data released on 27th May 2025.

Trump’s administration had levied tariffs as high as 145% on Chinese imports, prompting Beijing to retaliate with its own trade restrictions.

However, rather than crippling China’s manufacturing sector, these tariffs led to a shift in trade dynamics. Chinese exporters successfully found alternative markets, particularly in Southeast Asia and Europe, mitigating the losses from reduced U.S. trade.

It isn’t unusual for businesses to weather and absorb such tariffs but more usually, the consumer bears the brunt and pays some, if not all, of the increased costs.

High-tech manufacturing and equipment production saw notable gains, with profits in these sectors rising by 9% in the first four months of the year.

Additionally, government subsidies for consumer electronics and appliances helped boost domestic demand, further stabilising industrial growth.

While state-owned enterprises reportedly faced challenges, private firms and foreign-invested businesses saw profits improve.

Analysts suggest that China’s ability to adapt to external shocks underscores the resilience of its industrial economy, even in the face of aggressive trade policies

Posted on

Japan’s core inflation rises to 3.5% – higher than expected

Japan economic data

Japan’s inflation figures for April 2025 have revealed a continued rise in consumer prices, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) climbing 3.6% year-on-year.

This marks a sustained period of inflation above the Bank of Japan’s (BoJ) target of 2%, prompting speculation about potential interest rate hikes later in the year.

Core inflation, which excludes fresh food, rose 3.5% YoY, exceeding market expectations. A major driver of this surge has been food prices, particularly rice, which has soared by an astonishing 98% compared to last year.

The sharp increase has led the government to release emergency stockpiles to stabilise the market.

The BoJ faces a delicate balancing act. While inflation remains strong, economic uncertainty – partly fueled by U.S. tariffs, could complicate monetary policy decisions. The central bank has already raised rates in recent months but has paused further hikes to assess the broader economic impact.

With inflationary pressures persisting, analysts predict that the BoJ may tighten policy again by October 2025.

Concerns over global trade and domestic economic stability could influence the timing of any further rate adjustments.

The core inflation increase of 3.5% was far higher than expected.

Posted on

Are we underestimating the impact of tariffs on S&P 500 earnings growth?

Asleep

As global trade tensions escalate, many investors and analysts are questioning whether markets are too complacent about the long-term effects of tariffs on corporate earnings.

While some argue that businesses have adapted to protectionist policies, others warn that the S&P 500’s earnings growth could face significant headwinds.

Tariffs: A hidden threat to profit margins

Tariffs increase costs for companies reliant on imported goods and materials. Businesses must either absorb these costs, pass them on to consumers, or find alternative suppliers – each option presenting challenges.

According to Goldman Sachs, an additional 5% tariff could reduce S&P 500 earnings by 1-2%.

A 100% tariff would equate to around 10-20% reduction in the S&P 500 – and that’s correction territory.

Retailers and manufacturers are particularly vulnerable

Companies like Best Buy, Walmart, and Target rely on imports, and higher tariffs could suppress profit margins or lead to higher consumer prices, potentially dampening demand.

Market sentiment vs. economic reality

Despite concerns, Wall Street has remained relatively optimistic. A recent 90-day tariff pause between the U.S. and China has boosted investor confidence, leading firms like Goldman Sachs and Yardeni Research to raise their S&P 500 targets.

This optimism may be short-lived if tariffs resume or escalate

Sector-specific risks

Certain industries are more exposed than others

Technology: Supply chain disruptions and higher costs for components could reduce profit margins.

Consumer Discretionary: Higher prices on imported goods could weaken consumer spending.

Industrials: Increased costs for raw materials could slow growth and investment.

The bigger picture: long-term economic impact

Beyond immediate earnings concerns, tariffs could stifle innovation, reduce global competitiveness, and slow economic growth.

Citi analysts estimate that aggressive tariffs could cut S&P 500 earnings growth by 2-3%.

A false sense of security?

While markets have bounced back from initial tariff shocks, the long-term effects remain uncertain.

Investors should closely monitor trade policies, sector-specific risks, and corporate earnings reports to assess whether the S&P 500’s growth trajectory is truly secure – or dangerously fragile.

Time will tell – but the S&P 500 is vulnerable to pressure right now!

Posted on

UK first quarter GDP better than expected at 0.7%

UK GDP up!

The UK economy has defied expectations, recording a 0.7% increase in GDP in the first quarter of 2025 – better than the forecast of 0.6%.

This surge places Britain ahead of economic heavyweights, including the United States, Canada, France, Italy, and Germany.

A key driver of this growth has been the service sector, which demonstrated resilience amid global economic uncertainty. Production also experienced a boost, further solidifying the UK’s standing as an economic force.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves was quick to praise the achievement, citing the government’s commitment to fostering stability and investment.

However, economists are watching closely as Britain navigates potential challenges ahead, particularly in light of the latest global trade tariffs imposed by Donald Trump in April.

These new restrictions could slow growth in the coming months, but for now, the economy is holding firm. However, the UK – U.S. tariff deal is likely to lessen the overall impact and present a further improvement in the second quarter.

With businesses continuing to adapt to shifting market conditions, the UK’s better-than-expected performance is a welcome sign.

Data source: Home – Office for National Statistics

Posted on

U.S. inflation rate at 2.3% in April 2025 – less than expected

U.S. inflation

April 2025 saw the U.S. inflation rate ease to 2.3%, marking its lowest level since February 2021.

The consumer price index (CPI) rose 0.2% for the month, aligning with expectations but slightly below the forecasted 2.4% annual rate.

Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also increased 0.2%, maintaining a 2.8% year-on-year rate.

Shelter costs, which make up a significant portion of the index, rose 0.3%, contributing to more than half of the overall inflation movement.

U.S. egg prices dropped 12.7%, though they remained 49.3% higher than a year ago.

The impact of Trump’s tariffs remains uncertain, with negotiations potentially influencing inflation trends in the coming months.

Court to judge on legality of ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

U.S. Court of International Trade is set to hear arguments in a case challenging President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

The lawsuit filed by five domestic businesses argues that the law Trump invoked to impose his ‘reciprocal’ tariffs does not actually give him the power he claims.

The Department of Justice maintains that that law ‘clearly’ authorises the president to impose tariffs.

Posted on

Trump tariff roll-back – a win for China? U.S. markets rejoice the ‘deal’

U.S. markets gain on U.S China tariff roll-back announcement

The U.S. stock market surged as investors cheered a breakthrough in trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing.

The rollback of tariffs, announced as part of a new trade agreement, sent the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite soaring.

The deal, which slashes ‘reciprocal’ tariffs on both sides, is seen as a major de-escalation in the ongoing trade war that has rattled global markets for years.

Wall Street’s Reaction

Markets responded with enthusiasm as the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped over 1,000 points, while the S&P 500 climbed more than 2.5%, and the Nasdaq surged by nearly 3%.

Investors had been wary of prolonged trade tensions, which had weighed heavily on corporate earnings and economic growth.

The tariff rollback signals a potential thaw in relations, boosting confidence across sectors, particularly in technology, retail, and manufacturing.

Tariff rollback

Under the agreement, U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports will be reduced from 145% to 30%, while China’s tariffs on American goods will drop from 125% to 10%. The reductions will be in effect for 90 days, allowing both nations to continue negotiations on a broader trade framework.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasised that neither side wants a complete decoupling, and the rollback is intended to restore trade flows disrupted by years of economic brinkmanship.

China’s perspective: A strategic victory?

While the U.S. markets celebrated, China views the deal as a significant win. Beijing has sought relief from the steep tariffs imposed by Washington, which had strained its export-driven economy.

The agreement not only reduces financial pressure on Chinese manufacturers but also positions China as a key player in shaping future trade policies.

Some analysts argue that Beijing successfully leveraged its economic resilience to push Washington toward concessions, reinforcing its global influence.

Looking ahead

Despite the optimism, uncertainties remain. The 90-day window for negotiations suggests that further trade disputes could arise if talks stall. But will the U.S. allow that after the stock market turmoil Trump’s tariffs originally created?

Additionally, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cautioned that while sentiment has improved, the economic impact of previous tariffs has yet to fully materialise. Investors will be watching closely for signs of sustained progress, as any setbacks could trigger renewed volatility.

For now, Wall Street is basking in the relief of a tariff truce, with hopes that this momentum will lead to a more stable and predictable trade environment.

Whether this marks the beginning of a lasting resolution or just a temporary reprieve remains to be seen.

It is most likely now a platform for the U.S. to benefit from generally lower tariffs in the future.

There will again be cheap goods on U.S. shelves in time for Christmas.

Posted on

U.S. and China agree 90-day ‘reciprocal’ tariff pause and reduction deal

Tariff trade war 90-day pause

In a surprising breakthrough, the United States and China have agreed to suspend most tariffs on each other’s goods for 90 days, marking a significant step toward easing trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies.

Following high-stakes negotiations in Geneva, representatives from both nations announced that reciprocal tariffs would be slashed from 125% to 10%, significantly lowering trade barriers.

However, the U.S. will continue imposing 20% tariffs on Chinese imports related to fentanyl, meaning total tariffs on Chinese goods will settle at 30%.

The agreement signals a temporary thaw in what has been a long-standing economic standoff between Washington and Beijing. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who played a leading role in the discussions, described the talks as ‘very productive’, crediting the location for fostering an atmosphere of cooperation.

While this move could provide immediate relief for businesses and consumers impacted by trade restrictions, analysts caution that the 90-day suspension may not translate into a long-term solution.

Some experts speculate that ongoing trade negotiations could lead to further reductions, while others warn that unresolved tensions could lead to reinstated tariffs if agreements stall.

For now, the deal presents an opportunity for renewed dialogue, leaving global markets optimistic about future relations between the two economic powerhouses.

How the next three months unfold will determine whether this development is a stepping stone to broader reforms or simply a temporary reprieve in a complex trade dispute.

I expect Trump, having instigated the ‘tariff’ upheaval, will happily hang on to this ‘deal’ with China to avoid any further stock market turmoil.

What really just happened? The markets seem to be rewarding a situation that was artificially created and then ‘fixed’.

Aren’t we simply back where we were before the Trump tariff onslaught or is this really a ‘promise’ for better ‘deals’ to come?

Has it opened a door for better relations?

Create a problem… fix a problem!

It’s all about the U.S.

We’ll see…

Posted on

China’s Exports Defy Tariff Pressures, Surge 8.1% in April

China World Trade

Despite the weight of U.S. tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, China’s export sector has shown remarkable resilience, posting an 8.1% increase in April 2025 compared to the previous year.

This surge comes as a surprise, surpassing economists’ expectations of a modest 1.9% rise.

While China’s outbound shipments to the U.S. plunged by over 21%, exports to Southeast Asian nations soared by 20.8%, with Indonesia and Thailand seeing particularly strong growth.

This shift suggests that Chinese exporters are successfully redirecting their goods to alternative markets, mitigating the impact of U.S. trade restrictions.

The tariffs, which now stand at 145% on Chinese imports, were designed to pressure Beijing into trade concessions. In response, China retaliated with 125% duties on American goods, further escalating tensions.

However, analysts suggest that some of China’s export growth may be attributed to transshipment through third countries and contracts signed before the tariffs took effect.

Despite the export boom, China’s factory activity has taken a hit, falling to a 16-month low in April 2025, with new export orders dropping to their lowest level since December 2022.

Concerns are mounting that the tariffs could spill over into the job market, with estimates suggesting China could lose 16 million jobs tied to U.S. – bound production.

As both nations prepare for high-level trade talks in Switzerland, there is cautious optimism that a phased rollback of tariffs could be on the horizon.

While a comprehensive deal remains elusive, even minor tariff reductions could provide relief to businesses on both sides.

The coming months will be crucial in determining whether China can sustain its export momentum or if the tariff war will take a deeper toll on its economy.

Posted on

U.S. Federal Reserve holds interest rates at 4.25% – 4.50% and upsets Trump in the process

Tariffs and the U.S. economy?

The Federal Reserve held its key interest rate steady at 4.25% – 4.50% on 7th May 2025, citing economic uncertainty and the potential impact of tariffs.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell emphasised that the central bank is in wait-and-see mode, monitoring inflation and employment risks.

The decision follows concerns that Trump’s trade policies could lead to stagflation, with rising prices and slowing growth.

While markets reacted positively, analysts remain divided on whether the Fed will cut rates later this year.

Powell stated that future adjustments will depend on evolving economic conditions and the balance of risks.

Trump’s take on this decision was reportedly to call Powell… a fool.

What is stagflation?

Stagflation is an economic condition where high inflation, stagnant economic growth, and high unemployment occur simultaneously.

It presents a challenge for policymakers because measures to reduce inflation can worsen unemployment, while efforts to boost growth may fuel inflation further.

Posted on

Signs of weakness in the U.S. economy – is a recession coming and is the United States causing harm to global economies?

Cracking world economies

The U.S. economy is showing cracks as multiple indicators suggest that growth may be slowing.

With GDP shrinking by 0.3% in the first quarter of 2025, concerns about an impending recession have intensified among analysts and investors.

A key driver of this economic downturn is the ongoing trade uncertainty, which has prompted businesses to stock up on imports before new tariffs take effect.

While some experts argue this is a temporary setback, others caution that prolonged trade conflicts could stifle growth for months to come.

Resilient labour market

Despite these concerns, the labour market has remained resilient, with unemployment hovering at 4.2%. However, signs of strain are emerging – job openings have declined, and layoffs have picked up in certain industries.

If hiring slows further, consumer spending could weaken, adding pressure to the economy.

Inflation remains another point of concern. Rising costs of goods and services have strained household budgets, leading to reduced discretionary spending.

The Federal Reserve, which has maintained high interest rates, is carefully assessing whether policy adjustments are needed to prevent a sharper downturn.

On Wall Street, sentiment is divided. Goldman Sachs estimates a 45% probability of a recession, while J P Morgan suggests the likelihood could be as high as 60%.

Some economists believe strategic trade deals and government intervention could avert a full-blown recession, but the margin for error is slim.

Does it really matter if there is to be a recession – it will likely be short lived. It will not please the U.S. President Donald Trump.

While uncertainty clouds the future, one thing is clear – the U.S. economy is at a pivotal moment. Whether policymakers can stabilise growth or if the nation is headed towards a deeper slowdown will depend on the next few quarters and the outcome of Trump’s tariffs.

Tudor Investment Corporation

Paul Tudor Jones, the founder of Tudor Investment Corporation, recently shared his outlook on the U.S. economy, and his perspective isn’t exactly optimistic.

He believes that U.S. stocks are likely to hit new lows before the end of the year, even if President Trump dials back tariffs on Chinese imports.

Jones pointed out that the combination of high tariffs and the Federal Reserve’s reluctance to cut interest rates is putting significant pressure on the stock market.

He reportedly noted that even if Trump reduced tariffs to 50% or 40%, it would still amount to one of the largest tax increases since the 1960s, potentially slowing economic growth.

The billionaire investor also warned that unless the Fed adopts a more dovish stance and aggressively cuts rates, the market is likely to continue its downward trajectory.

He reportedly emphasised that the current economic conditions – marked by trade uncertainty and tight monetary policy – are not favourable for a stock market recovery.

Interestingly, Jones also expressed concerns about artificial intelligence, stating that AI poses an imminent threat to humanity within our lifetime.

Maybe AI will start running hedge funds too…?

Posted on

S&P 500 achieves longest winning streak in two decades – then slides

S&P 500 hits new record!

The S&P 500 has surged to a new record, marking nine consecutive days of gains – its longest winning streak since November 2004.

This run came after significant market falls after President Trump announced his tariffs on Liberation Day in April 2025.

The index closed 1.47% higher on the final day of the streak on Friday 2nd May 2025, reflecting investor optimism amid shifting global economic conditions.

This historic run comes as China and the U.S. signal the potential of renewed trade discussions, easing concerns over tariffs and supply chain disruptions.

Additionally, a strong U.S. jobs report has bolstered confidence, with employment figures exceeding expectations. The rally has been broad-based, with technology, financial, and industrial stocks leading the charge.

Despite the impressive streak, analysts warn of potential volatility ahead. While the S&P 500 has demonstrated resilience, market corrections often follow extended periods of gains.

S&P 500 all-time chart as of 5th May 2025 – 9-day consecutive run record

S&P 500 all-time chart as of 5th May 2025 – 9-day consecutive run record

Investors are now watching for signs of consolidation or further momentum and that is down to Trump’s tariffs and the Fed’s interest rate decision.

Posted on

U.S. Economy Contracts in Q1 2025 Amid Trade Policy Uncertainty

U.S. GDP

The U.S. economy shrank by 0.3% in the first quarter of 2025, marking the first contraction since early 2022.

The decline was largely driven by a surge in imports, which soared 41.3%, as businesses rushed to stockpile goods ahead of President Donald Trump’s newly imposed tariffs. Imports subtract from GDP calculations, contributing to the negative growth figure.

Despite the contraction, consumer spending remained positive, increasing 1.8%, though at a slower pace than previous quarters. Private domestic investment also saw a sharp rise of 21.9%, fueled by a 22.5% increase in equipment spending, likely influenced by tariff concerns.

The Federal Reserve faces a complex decision ahead of its upcoming policy meeting. While the negative GDP growth may push the central bank toward interest rate cuts, inflation remains a concern, with the U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index rising 3.6% for the quarter.

Markets reacted cautiously, with stock futures slipping and Treasury yields climbing. As the Trump administration navigates trade negotiations, economists warn that continued uncertainty could weigh on future growth prospects.

Next up, U.S. employment data.

Posted on

Shock but no ‘awe’ in Trump’s first 100 days in office

Sledgehammer policies

U.S. President Donald Trump has definitely brought a lot of shock in the first 100 days of his presidency, smashing trade links, alliances, and even his own government, but it can hardly be said to have left anybody truly in ‘awe’.

Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office during his second term have been a whirlwind of activity, marked by bold moves and significant controversy.

His poll rating is the lowest of any President of recent times for the first 100 days. It currently sits at around 41% (a CNN poll result suggests).

How does it compare?

Harry S. Truman, hit a rock-bottom approval rating of 22% in 1952. Other presidents like Richard Nixon and George W. Bush also dipped below 25%. But these were during their terms and not in the first 100 days.

His administration has focused heavily on reshaping trade policies, imposing tariffs that have disrupted global markets and strained relationships with long-standing allies.

Despite his claims of progress, no major trade deals have been finalised, leaving many questioning the effectiveness of his approach.

Legal challenges

Domestically, Trump’s policies have faced significant legal challenges, with numerous lawsuits filed against his administration. His stance on immigration and energy has sparked heated debates, reflecting the polarising nature of his decisions.

Trump’s ‘drill-baby-drill’ mantra has not had the desire reaction – oil prices has fallen with U.S. oil below $65 a barrel.

The automotive industry, for instance, has grappled with regulatory uncertainty and additional costs due to his tariffs, prompting him to soften some measures in response to industry concerns.

Internationally, Trump’s actions have raised concerns about U.S. credibility and stability. His hostile stance toward traditional allies, such as Canada, the EU and NATO, has left multi-decade relationships in tatters.

Meanwhile, his administration’s handling of the ongoing war in Ukraine and trade negotiations with China has drawn criticism for its lack of tangible results.

Despite these challenges, Trump remains confident in his vision for America. He has claimed progress in tariff negotiations with India, suggesting that a trade deal may be on the horizon.

No deals… yet

There has not been a single trade deal concluded with Trump’s administration – despite him reportedly claiming to have done ‘200 deals’ with only 195 countries in the world.

China is still striking a defiant tone on trade, and the war in Ukraine rages on. The president has also been forced to walk back on his “reciprocal tariffs.” 

However, his administration’s approach has left many wondering whether his first 100 days will be remembered for their impact or their controversy.

As the dust settles, the world watches closely to see how Trump’s policies will shape the future of the United States and its role on the global stage.

Trump may have wanted his first 100 days to be historic, and they were – but for all the wrong reasons.