Magnificent 7 Archives - Taking Stock

June 5, 2026June 5, 2026

AI Rout Hits Seoul: Kospi Sinks Over 5% as Chip Giants Slide

South Korea’s markets were hit hard on Friday 5th June 2026, with AI‑linked stocks leading a sharp regional sell‑off after Wall Street’s tech slump rippled across Asia.

The Kospi tumbled 5.54%, closing at 8,160.59, its steepest one‑day fall in months, as investors rapidly unwound positions in semiconductor and AI beneficiaries.

Heavyweights Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were at the centre of the decline, sliding 6.40% and 9.92% respectively. This demonstrates how tightly exposed Seoul’s market has become to the global AI cycle.

The pullback followed a sharp rotation out of chipmakers in the United States, triggered by disappointing revenue data from Broadcom. This shook confidence in the sector’s near‑term momentum.

With A I names having powered much of 2026’s rally, even a modest earnings wobble proved enough to spark a broader de‑risking.

Domestic strain

Domestic pressures added to the strain. South Korea’s labour minister urged major tech firms to share more of their AI‑driven semiconductor profits with workers and suppliers. This is a signal that political scrutiny of the sector is rising just as global sentiment cools.

For now, the sell‑off looks like a reminder of how tightly South Korea’s market is tethered to global AI expectations.

If Wall Street’s AI led enthusiasm falters, Seoul’s tech giants may face a more prolonged test.

June 4, 2026June 3, 2026

The Coming Shockwave: How Three Mega‑IPOs Could Reshape the S&P 500 and Nasdaq – Opinion

The expected public listings of SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic represent the most consequential cluster of IPOs in two decades.

Each company sits at the centre of a structural shift—space infrastructure, frontier AI models and safety‑driven AI systems—and each is likely to command a valuation in the high hundreds of billions, if not beyond.

Their arrival on public markets will not be a routine liquidity event. It will be a reordering of index composition, capital flows and investor psychology.

At the mechanical level, the impact on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq will be immediate. Index providers now operate fast‑entry rules that allow very large IPOs to join major benchmarks within days rather than months.

This compresses the adjustment period and forces passive funds to sell existing constituents to make room for the newcomers.

The selling pressure will fall disproportionately on the current megacap cohort—Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Nvidia and Tesla—because these names dominate index weightings and therefore become the primary source of liquidity for rebalancing.

The indices themselves may not fall sharply, but the internal rotation will be violent.

The Nasdaq will feel the shock most acutely. Its concentration in technology means the inclusion of three new giants will trigger a scramble for weight, with ETFs forced to buy limited‑float shares at whatever price the market sets.

The S&P 500, broader and more liquid, will absorb the change more smoothly, but even there the effect will be visible: a temporary dip in existing leaders, a spike in volatility and a rapid reshaping of the top‑ten constituents.

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq will almost certainly experience a temporary liquidity shock, a forced rotation out of existing megacaps, and then—once the dust settles—a re‑concentration around the new AI/space giants.

The scale of SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic means the indices will not be able to absorb them quietly.

What will likely happen when SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic list their IPOs?

1. A mechanical sell‑off in today’s biggest tech names

Index funds must sell existing holdings to make room for the new entrants.

Goldman Sachs notes passive funds will need to rebalance as soon as these mega‑caps are added.
JPMorgan estimates that at a $2T valuation, up to $95bn of the eight largest tech stocks may need to be sold to rebalance portfolios.

This means pressure on Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Tesla, Broadcom—the very names currently carrying the indices.

2. Fast‑entry rules accelerate the shock

Nasdaq’s new “fast entry” rules allow these companies to join the Nasdaq 100 within 15 days of listing. S&P Dow Jones is considering similar fast‑track inclusion for mega‑caps. The Motley Fool

This compresses what used to be a 12‑month absorption period into weeks.

3. Liquidity drain is real—but limited in absolute terms

Deutsche Bank estimates that even the largest IPOs would still represent just over 0.1% of S&P 500 market cap. So the market‑wide liquidity drain is modest, but the rotation effect is violent because it concentrates selling in a handful of megacaps.

4. ETF flows will be chaotic

Strategas warns that ETFs tracking trillions will compete for a tiny float, making inclusion “frantic.” SpaceX is reportedly floating only ~5% of shares initially. That means forced buying at any price, followed by forced selling elsewhere.

5. After lockups expire (180 days), the second wave hits

SpaceX’s prospectus notes that selling pressure increases as lockups roll off in phases over 180 days. Expect a two‑stage impact:

Stage 1: violent index rebalancing
Stage 2: insider‑driven supply shock

So what happens to the S&P 500?

Short-term (0–3 months after IPOs):

Mild index-level dip as megacaps are sold to fund inclusion.
Volatility spike around rebalance windows.
Narrow leadership becomes even narrower temporarily.

This is consistent with historical mega‑IPO patterns (e.g., Tesla’s inclusion forced tens of billions in one-day flows).

Medium-term (3–12 months):

The S&P 500 becomes more top‑heavy, not less.
SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic quickly become meaningful index weights due to their trillion‑dollar valuations.
If AI earnings continue to dominate, the index likely recovers and re‑concentrates around the new entrants.

HSBC reportedly notes that stronger tech valuations—especially from high‑valuation IPOs—could push the S&P 500 above 8,000 if earnings broaden.

What about the Nasdaq?

The Nasdaq 100 is hit harder because:

It is more tech‑concentrated.
Fast‑entry rules force inclusion within 15 days.

Expect:

Sharper rotation, especially out of semiconductor and hyperscaler names.
Higher volatility as QQQ must buy the new entrants aggressively.
A structural reshaping: SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic could become low‑ to mid‑single‑digit weights almost immediately.

The contrarian view (Michael Burry)

Burry argues the IPOs won’t break the bull market, because IPOs float only a “small little bit” of shares, limiting true supply impact. He believes narrative > mechanics.

There’s truth in that: the story of AI and space‑compute may ultimately lift the indices after the initial turbulence.

My Opinion

Short-term: Expect a sell‑off in existing megacaps, a volatility spike, and mechanical downward pressure on both S&P 500 and Nasdaq.

Medium-term: Once the forced rotation is complete, the indices likely resume their upward trend, now with three new trillion‑dollar engines powering them.

Long-term: This is the biggest index‑composition shock since the dot‑com era. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq will become even more dominated by AI‑infrastructure and space‑compute giants.

In other words: the indices wobble, then re‑concentrate, then march higher—unless AI demand itself cracks.

If that happens then we’ll most likely witness a crash!

May 26, 2026May 26, 2026

What would happen to the S&P 500 should one or some or all of the Magnificent Seven companies fail to deliver their AI promise – even just a little?

If the Magnificent Seven were to fall short of the AI and tech transformation investors have priced in, the S&P 500 would face one of the most severe valuation resets in its modern history.

With the group now representing roughly one‑third of the entire index, any collective disappointment would ripple far beyond technology and into every sector tied to index‑tracking capital.

The concentration problem

The S&P 500 has never been this top‑heavy. Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Tesla have become the gravitational centre of global equity markets.

Their valuations are not merely high; they are explicitly built on the assumption of future dominance in AI infrastructure, cloud, automation, consumer platforms and next‑generation hardware.

If that future fails to materialise — or even arrives more slowly than expected — the index’s structure becomes a liability. A small number of companies would be responsible for a large portion of the downside.

Scenario 1: One or two companies stumble

If a single member — say Apple or Tesla — fails to deliver, the impact is sharp but contained. The S&P 500 would likely see a 3–5% drawdown, driven by index‑weight mechanics rather than systemic panic.

Investors have already priced in uneven performance within the group, and the remaining leaders would absorb some of the shock.

The more dangerous case is if one of the AI‑infrastructure engines — Microsoft, Nvidia or Alphabet — disappoints. These companies sit at the centre of the capex cycle.

A miss on AI demand, margins or utilisation would trigger a broader reassessment of the entire AI investment thesis.

Scenario 2: Several of the Seven disappoint simultaneously

A coordinated earnings miss or guidance reset across multiple names would force a valuation compression across the entire index. Because passive flows mechanically overweight the winners, a reversal would unwind years of momentum.

A realistic outcome:

S&P 500 correction of 10–15%
Volatility spike as systematic strategies de‑risk
Rotation into defensives and energy, sectors less dependent on AI narratives
Credit spreads widen, reflecting lower confidence in tech‑driven earnings growth

This is the point where the market stops treating AI as inevitability and starts treating it as a risk.

Scenario 3: The AI thesis breaks entirely

If all seven fail to deliver the productivity, revenue and margin expansion implied by their valuations, the S&P 500 would undergo a structural reset.

The index could fall 20% or more, not because of recessionary conditions but because the market would need to rebuild a new leadership structure from scratch.

The last time leadership collapsed this dramatically was the dot‑com unwind — but today’s concentration is far higher, and passive ownership is far larger. but AI has far more upfront utility, doesn’t it?

The core truth

The S&P 500’s fate is now inseparable from the Magnificent Seven. If they deliver, the index continues to levitate. If they falter, the entire market must reprice what growth, innovation and leadership look like in the post‑AI era.

When the Magnificent Seven Slip: Who Rises Next?

If the AI tide recedes, the market’s leadership will not vanish — it will rotate. The beneficiaries will be the sectors that have quietly compounded earnings while the spotlight stayed fixed on Silicon Valley.

1. Energy and Utilities With AI‑driven data centres consuming vast power, any slowdown in tech expansion would ease pressure on grids and shift investor focus back to traditional producers. Dividend yields and defensive cash flow would regain appeal as growth multiples compress.

2. Industrials and Infrastructure A retreat from speculative tech would redirect capital toward physical productivity — logistics, construction, and manufacturing modernisation. Firms tied to electrification, rail, and defence could see valuation upgrades as investors seek real‑world output rather than digital promise.

3. Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals The sector’s secular growth and pricing power make it a natural refuge when tech falters. Biotech innovation continues independently of AI cycles, and ageing demographics ensure steady demand.

4. Financials Banks and insurers benefit from higher rates and wider spreads when tech valuations deflate. A correction in mega‑caps could even restore balance to passive indices, giving financials a larger share of inflows.

5. Consumer Staples In a post‑AI correction, investors rediscover the comfort of predictable earnings. Food, beverages, and household goods regain their defensive premium as volatility rises.

The narrative shift: The market would move from promise to proof — from speculative AI multiples to tangible earnings. The S&P 500 would not collapse; it would evolve. Leadership would pass from code to concrete, from algorithms to assets.

Key Points — S&P 500 Risk if the Magnificent Seven Falter

1. The S&P 500 is structurally dependent on seven companies

The Magnificent Seven now make up ~35% of the entire index’s market cap.
This is the highest concentration in modern history, making the S&P 500 behave more like a mega‑cap tech fund than a diversified benchmark.

2. Their valuations are priced for an AI‑driven future

Current multiples assume sustained exponential AI demand, cloud capex growth, and productivity gains.
Any slowdown in AI adoption, monetisation, or enterprise rollout would force a valuation reset across the leaders.

3. A single-company stumble is absorbable — but still painful

If one member (e.g., Apple or Tesla) disappoints, the index likely sees a 3–5% pullback.
The remaining leaders can offset the drag, but the psychological impact is non‑trivial.

4. A slowdown in the AI infrastructure core is the real risk

Microsoft, Nvidia and Alphabet sit at the centre of the global AI capex cycle.
If cloud AI demand proves slower or less profitable than expected, the S&P 500 could face a 10–15% correction as earnings expectations compress.

5. A broad failure of the AI thesis triggers a structural reset

If AI productivity gains don’t materialise, or margins erode under cost/regulatory pressure, the index could fall 20%+.
This would resemble a leadership collapse, not a normal recession — similar to the dot‑com unwind but with far more concentration and passive capital tied to the winners.

6. Passive flows amplify both upside and downside

With so much capital in index funds, any derating of the top names mechanically drags the entire index lower.
The S&P 500’s fate is now mathematically tethered to the Magnificent Seven.

7. The uncomfortable conclusion

The S&P 500’s trajectory is inseparable from the success or failure of the AI narrative.
If the Magnificent Seven deliver, the index continues to defy gravity.
If they falter, the market must rebuild a new leadership structure from scratch.

The S&P 500 is fundamentally in the danger zone – be careful!

April 29, 2026April 29, 2026

What Happens to the S&P 500 if the Magnificent Seven Fail to Deliver on AI?

Mag 7 holding up the S&P 500 to the tune of almost 35% value of the entire S&P 500

The S&P 500 has never been so dependent on so few companies. The Magnificent Seven — Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Tesla — now account for roughly one‑third of the entire index’s value – that’s 33% of the whole S&P 500 vlauation.

Their dominance is not simply a reflection of current earnings power; it is a collective bet on an AI‑centred future that investors assume will transform productivity, reshape industries and justify valuations that stretch far beyond historical norms.

If one, several, or all of these companies fail to deliver the AI revolution that markets have priced in, the consequences for the S&P 500 would be immediate, structural and potentially severe.

Mild

The mildest scenario is a stumble by one or two members. If Apple’s device strategy falters, or Tesla’s autonomy narrative weakens further for instance, the index absorbs the shock.

A 3–5% pullback is plausible, driven by mechanical index weighting rather than systemic fear. Investors already expect uneven performance within the group, and the remaining leaders could offset the disappointment.

Major

The more destabilising scenario is a collective slowdown among the AI infrastructure leaders – Microsoft, Nvidia and Alphabet. These firms sit at the centre of the global capex cycle.

If cloud AI demand proves slower, less profitable or more niche than expected, the market would be forced to reassess the entire economic promise of generative AI.

In this case, the S&P 500 could see a 10–15% correction as valuations compress, volatility spikes and passive flows unwind years of momentum.

Dramatic

The most dramatic outcome is a broad failure of the AI ‘sector’ itself. If the promised productivity gains do not materialise, if enterprise adoption stalls, or if regulatory and cost pressures erode margins, the S&P 500 would face a structural reset.

With a third of the index priced for exponential growth, a collective disappointment could trigger a decline of 20% or more.

This would not resemble a cyclical recession; it would be a leadership collapse similar to the dot‑com unwind, but with far greater concentration and far more passive capital tied to the winners.

The uncomfortable truth is that the S&P 500’s trajectory is now inseparable from the Magnificent Seven. If they deliver, the index continues to defy gravity. If they falter, the market must rebuild a new narrative — and a new set of leaders — from the ground up.

If the Magnificent Seven Lose Their Grip, Who Rises Next?

For years, the S&P 500 has been defined by the gravitational pull of the Magnificent Seven. Their dominance has shaped index performance, investor psychology and the entire narrative arc of global markets.

If these companies lose momentum — whether through slower AI adoption, regulatory pressure, margin compression or simple over‑expectation — leadership will not disappear.

It will rotate. And the beneficiaries are already hiding in plain sight.

Alternative investment to AI

The first and most obvious winners would be Energy and Utilities. As AI enthusiasm cools, investors tend to rediscover the appeal of tangible cash flow. Energy companies, with their dividends and pricing power, become natural refuges.

Utilities, often dismissed as dull, regain relevance as defensive anchors in a more volatile market. If AI‑driven data‑centre demand slows, the sector’s cost pressures ease, improving margins.

Next in line are Industrials and Infrastructure. A retreat from speculative tech would likely redirect capital towards physical productivity — logistics, construction, defence, electrification and manufacturing modernisation.

These sectors have been quietly compounding earnings while Silicon Valley has monopolised attention. If the market shifts from promise to proof, industrials become the new growth story.

Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals would also rise. Their earnings cycles are largely independent of AI hype, driven instead by demographics, innovation and regulatory frameworks. When tech stumbles, healthcare’s stability becomes a premium rather than an afterthought.

Biotech, in particular, benefits from capital rotation when investors seek uncorrelated growth.

Financials stand to gain as well. A correction in mega‑cap tech would rebalance passive flows, giving banks and insurers a larger share of index‑tracking capital. Higher rates and wider spreads already support the sector; a shift away from tech simply amplifies the effect.

Finally, Consumer Staples would reassert themselves. In a market recalibrating after an AI disappointment, investors gravitate towards predictable earnings. Food, beverages and household goods regain their defensive premium as volatility rises.

The broader truth is simple: if the Magnificent Seven falter, the S&P 500 does not collapse — it redistributes. Leadership moves from code to concrete, from speculative multiples to operational reality. The market has always found new champions. It will again.

February 24, 2026February 24, 2026

Is the Magnificent Seven Trade a little less Magnificent now?

For much of the past three years, the so‑called Magnificent Seven – Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Tesla and Nvidia – have powered US equities to repeated record highs.

Their sheer scale, earnings strength and centrality to the AI boom turned them into a market narrative as much as an investment theme.

But as 2026 unfolds, the question is no longer whether they can keep leading the market higher, but whether the idea of treating them as a single trade still makes sense.

The short answer is closer to: the trade isn’t dead, but the era of effortless, broad‑based mega‑cap dominance is fading.

Mag 7 fatigue

The first sign of fatigue is the breakdown in cohesion. Last year, only a minority of the seven outperformed the wider S&P 500, a sharp contrast to the near‑uniform surges of 2023 and early 2024.

Nvidia and Alphabet continue to benefit from the structural demand for AI infrastructure and cloud‑driven productivity gains. Others, however, appear to be wrestling with slower growth, regulatory pressure or strategic resets.

Apple faces a maturing hardware cycle, Tesla is contending with intensifying global competition, and Meta’s spending plans continue to divide investors.

Divergence

This divergence matters. For years, investors could simply buy the group and let the rising tide of AI enthusiasm and index concentration do the work.

That simplicity has evaporated. Stock‑picking is back, and the market is finally distinguishing between companies with accelerating earnings power and those relying on past momentum.

At the same time, market breadth is improving. Capital is rotating into industrials and defensive sectors as investors seek exposure to areas that have lagged the mega‑cap rally. However, AI is affecting software stocks, law and financial sectors.

Healthy future

This broadening is healthy: it reduces concentration risk and signals that the U.S. economy is no longer dependent on a handful of tech giants to sustain equity performance.

Yet it would be premature to declare the Magnificent Seven irrelevant. Their combined earnings growth is still expected to outpace the rest of the index, and their role in AI, cloud computing and digital infrastructure remains foundational.

Change

What has changed is the nature of the trade. These are no longer seven interchangeable vehicles for tech exposure; they are seven distinct stories with diverging trajectories.

The Magnificent Seven haven’t left the stage. They have likely stopped performing in unison – and for investors, that marks the beginning of a more nuanced, more selective chapter.

November 26, 2025November 26, 2025

When Markets Lean Too Heavily on High Flyers

The recent rebound in technology shares, led by Google’s surge in artificial intelligence optimism, offered a welcome lift to investors weary of recent market sluggishness.

Yet beneath the headlines lies a more troubling dynamic: the increasing reliance on a handful of mega‑capitalisation firms to sustain broader equity gains.

Breadth

Markets thrive on breadth. A healthy rally is one in which gains are distributed across sectors, signalling confidence in the wider economy. When only one or two companies shoulder the weight of investor sentiment, the picture becomes distorted.

Google’s AI announcements may well justify enthusiasm, but the fact that its performance alone can swing indices highlights a fragility in the current market structure.

This concentration risk is not new. In recent years, the so‑called ‘Magnificent Seven‘ technology giants have dominated returns, masking weakness in smaller firms and traditional industries.

While investors cheer the headline numbers, the underlying reality is that many sectors remain subdued. Manufacturing, retail, and even parts of the financial industry are not sharing equally in the rally.

Over Dependence

Over‑dependence on highflyers creates two problems. First, it exposes markets to sudden shocks: if sentiment turns against one of these giants, indices can tumble disproportionately.

Second, it discourages capital from flowing into diverse opportunities, stifling innovation outside the tech elite.

For long‑term stability, investors and policymakers alike should be wary of celebrating narrow gains. A resilient market requires participation from a broad base of companies, not just the fortunes of a few.

Google’s success in AI is impressive, but true economic strength will only be evident when growth spreads beyond the marquee names.

Until then, the market remains vulnerable, propped up by giants whose shoulders, however broad, cannot carry the entire economy indefinitely.

July 29, 2025September 12, 2025

Are investors saying it’s time to move on from tariffs and if so to what effect on the markets?

It looks like investor sentiment is shifting away from obsessing over tariffs—though not because they’ve disappeared.

Instead, there’s a growing sense that tariffs may be settling into a predictable range, especially in the U.S., where President Trump signalled a blanket rate of 15–20% for countries lacking specific trade agreements.

Here’s how that’s playing out

🌐 Why Investors Are Moving On

Predictability over Panic: With clearer expectations around tariff levels, markets may no longer treat them as wildcards.
Muted Market Reaction: The recent U.S.-EU trade deal barely nudged the S&P 500 or European indexes after moving the futures initially, signalling tariffs aren’t the hot trigger they once were.
Economists Cooling Expectations: Revisions to tariff impact estimates suggest future trade deals might not generate outsized optimism on Wall Street.

📈 Effects on the Markets

Focus Shift: Investors are turning to earnings—particularly from the ‘Magnificent Seven’ tech giants—and macroeconomic data for momentum.
Cautious Optimism: While stocks haven’t rallied hard, they’re not dropping either. Traders seem to be waiting for a new catalyst, like U.S. consumer strength or signs of a bull phase in certain indexes.
Geopolitical Undercurrents: A new deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal and threats of ‘secondary tariffs’ could still stir volatility, depending on how global partners react.

So, in short tariffs aren’t gone, but they’ve become background noise. Investors are tuning in to the next big signals.

If you’re keeping an eye on retail, tech earnings, or commodity flows, this shift could have ripple effects worth dissecting.

Market moving events, other than tariffs

Date	Event/Catalyst	Market Impact Potential
July 30	Meta earnings + possible stock split	📈 High (tech sentiment)
July 31	Fed meeting	📈📉 High (rate guidance)
Aug 1	U.S.–EU tariff milestone, not flashpoint	📉 Moderate (sector recalibration)
July 22	U.S. AI Action Plan (released)	📈 Unclear (dependent on execution

January 2, 2025September 12, 2025

S&P 500 enjoyed a 23% gain in 2024 but 2025 may not be so good

The S&P 500 index witnessed big gains right from the start of 2024. In the first quarter of the year, it jumped up 10.20%. That’s around more than 10 times its average gain since 2000.

However, the momentum couldn’t be sustained as the S&P added 3.9% and 5.5% in the second and third quarter of 2024. In any other year, investors might not have been disappointed with those figures. But the index’s first-quarter performance set expectations so high that subsequent quarters seemed to pale in comparison.

In the final quarter of 2024, the S&P limped to a gain of just 1.9%. Making things worse, we did not get a 2024 Santa rally.

Of course, a gain is a good. But it’s hard not to e just a little disappointed when looking back at the highs we enjoyed in early 2024.

That said, a relatively weak end to the year wasn’t enough to dent the gains of the S&P 500 in the early part of 2024, where the index surged 23.30%. The index recorded no fewer than 57 record closes and this on the back of a 24.2% rise in 2023.

Big tech and Artificial intelligenc e stocks (the Magnificent Seven in particular) were behind much of 2024′s gains. Shares of Nvidia were up by around 171%, while Broadcom jumped 108%. To place this in context – the Magnificent 7’ stocks were responsible for more than half the S&P 500′s 2024 gain. It does beg the question – is the initial AI hype over for now or is there more to come? Has AI settled for the moment?

Uncertainties await the markets in 2025. Investors will have to contend with the incoming Trump administration’s policies, possibly higher-than-expected interest rates for the year, which in turn are keeping Treasury yields elevated, among other headwinds.

Trumps tariffs are on the way.

February 2, 2024September 12, 2025

Happy days on Wall Street for BIG tech companies

It was a good day of earnings for Big Tech companies.

Three of the Magnificent 7 results dominated the headlines: Meta, Amazon and Apple. Nasdaq and S&P 500 gained in ‘after the bell’ trading. This after a punishing day for Alphabet and Microsoft, despite good results.

Nasdaq 100 closed at: 17344 but climbed above 17500 in after-hours trading.

Wall Street seemed impressed with Meta’s results.

Meta platforms Inc. One year chart

The results show Meta’s online ad business continues to recover well from a terrible 2022.
Sales in the Q4 jumped 25% year on year.
Expenses decreased 8% year over year to $23.73 billion.

Amazon

Investors also enjoyed Amazon’s earnings, which easily topped Wall Street’s predictions. The ecommerce giant also provided a strong positive outlook. The stock jumped 7% in extended trading.

Amazon.com Inc. One year chart

Q4 was a record-breaking Holiday shopping season in the U.S. and closed out a robust 2023 for Amazon. Amazon has much planned for 2024.

Apple

But Apple didn’t benefit from the same treatment despite posting strong results.

Apple Inc. One year chart

Apple also exceeded estimates, reporting revenue growth for the first time in a year. But shares slid more than 2% in extending trading after it posted a 13% decline in sales in China.

Apple’s outlook suggesting weak iPhones sales may have also disappointed investors.

January 11, 2024September 12, 2025

The Magnificent Seven

The Magnificent Seven is a term coined to describe the seven most valuable and popularly owned tech companies in the U.S. stock market.

It was also a 1960’s movie…

The Seven

Apple (AAPL)

The world’s largest software company, known for its iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, AirPods, and other devices, as well as its services such as iCloud, Apple Music, Apple TV+, and App Store.

Microsoft (MSFT)

The world’s largest software company, known for its Windows operating system, Azure cloud services, LinkedIn social media platform, Office professional software suite, and Xbox gaming brand.

Alphabet (GOOGL)

The parent company of Google, the world’s leading search engine, as well as other businesses such as YouTube, Google Cloud, Google Maps, Google Ads, and Waymo.

Amazon (AMZN)

The world’s largest online retailer, as well as a leading provider of cloud computing services through Amazon Web Services (AWS), and a major player in digital entertainment through Amazon Prime Video, Amazon Music, and Kindle.

Meta Platforms (META)

The former Facebook, the world’s largest social media network, as well as the owner of other popular platforms such as Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, and Oculus.

Nvidia (NVDA)

The world’s leading manufacturer of graphics processing units (GPUs), which are used for gaming, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and cryptocurrency mining, as well as other products such as Nvidia Shield, GeForce Now, and Omniverse.

Tesla (TSLA)

The world’s most valuable automaker, known for its electric vehicles, battery products, solar panels, and self-driving technology, as well as its visionary founder and CEO, Elon Musk.

Market dominance

These seven companies are not only dominant in their respective fields, but also at the forefront of innovation and growth in the tech sector. They collectively make up some 30% of the S&P 500 index and more than half of the Nasdaq 100 index.

They have also delivered impressive returns for investors over the past five years, with Nvidia and Tesla leading the pack with more than 800% gains. The Magnificent Seven are often compared to the FAANG stocks, which include four of the seven companies, but exclude Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla, and include Netflix instead.

Some analysts suggest that the Magnificent Seven capture the current state and future potential of the tech industry. But is it now time to rotate out of tech into other areas that have been neglected. I wouldn’t be surprised to see the bull market charge on but with other ‘less’ loved companies leading the way.

It has been calculated that the combined market cap value of these seven companies is some $9 trillion.

October 2, 2023September 12, 2025

Magnificent 7 tech’ stocks haven’t been this cheap since 2017

The Magnificent Seven tech stocks

These are the seven largest U.S. listed companies in the technology sector.

Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia, Tesla and Meta Platforms.

According to a report released Monday 2nd October 2023, these tech’ stocks have seen their valuation drop relative to the median stock in the S&P 500, making them more attractive for investors. The report says that the Magnificent 7 trade at 1.3 times their PEG ratio (price-to-earnings-to-long-term growth), versus 1.9 for the median S&P 500 stock.

This is the cheapest valuation in over six years – time to buy yet?

The report also highlights some positive drivers for these stocks, such as their strong sales growth, their ability to beat expectations, and their resilience to rising interest rates.

However, some analysts also warn that the dominance of these stocks could pose a risk for the broader market if something bad happens to tech’.