Category: Chaos

Posted on

Trump’s self-imposed August tariff deadline looms

U.S. Tariffs

Since a little after Donald Trump’s declaration of ‘Liberation Day’ and renewed tariff threats, global markets have shown a remarkable degree of indifference.

While equities dipped briefly in April, investors appear increasingly unshaken by the looming 1st August deadline.

Several factors underpin this resilience. First, market participants have grown accustomed to political brinkmanship.

Traders now view tariff announcements as bargaining tools rather than certainties, adopting a wait-and-see approach before pricing in long-term consequences.

The episodic nature of past trade spats has dulled their impact, especially without immediate legislative backing and with Trump often pulling back last minute or extending deadlines.

The media have labelled this … TACO!

TACO – Trump Always Chickens Out: Definition – A satirical acronym coined by financial commentators to describe Donald Trump’s predictable pattern of announcing aggressive tariffs, then softening or delaying them under market pressure.

Second, economic fundamentals remain firm. Corporate earnings continue to surpass expectations, and key indicators—such as job growth and consumer spending—suggest sustained momentum in major economies.

As a result, the tariff narrative has taken a back seat to earnings reports and central bank manoeuvres.

Third, diversification strategies have matured since the 2018–2020 trade wars. Many multinationals have already restructured supply chains, buffered risk through regional trade agreements, and hedged exposure to volatile sectors.

This strategic evolution makes markets less sensitive to unilateral tariff threats, especially if they lack multilateral support.

Analysts note that Trump’s rhetoric still carries weight politically, but the financial world operates on evidence, not headlines. As one strategist quipped, ‘Markets don’t trade on bluster; they trade on impact’.

That’s all very well – but markets can be fickle and reflect sentiment too.

With investors focused on earnings and monetary policy, tariff drama may remain background noise—unless policy becomes policy.

Until then, the markets seem content to roll with it!

Posted on

Markets appear to dismiss Trump’s tariff threats – but will this prove to be unwise?

Super Chicken

Despite President Donald Trump’s renewed push for sweeping tariffs, global markets appear unfazed.

Trump issued letters to 14 countries – including Japan, South Korea, and Malaysia—outlining new import levies ranging from 25% to 40%, set to take effect on 1st August 2025. More letters then followed.

Yet, major indices like the FTSE 100 and Nikkei 225 barely flinched, with some even posting modest gains.

So, who’s right—the president or the markets?

Trump insists tariffs are essential to redress trade imbalances and bring manufacturing back to the U.S. The EU also faces higher tariffs.

He’s floated extreme measures, including a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals and a 50% levy on copper.

His administration argues these moves will strengthen domestic industry and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.

However, investors seem to be betting on a familiar pattern: Trump talks tough but ultimately softens under pressure. Analysts have dubbed this the ‘TACO’ trade—Trump Always Chickens Out.

His own comments have added to the ambiguity, calling the August deadline ‘firm, but not 100% firm’.

The economic logic behind the tariffs is being questioned. Tariffs are paid by importers—often U.S. businesses and consumers—not foreign governments.

This could lead to higher prices and inflation, especially in sectors like healthcare and electronics. Some economists warn of recessionary risks for countries like Japan and South Korea.

In short, markets may be right to remain calm—for now. But if Trump follows through, the impact could be far-reaching.

With trade negotiations still in flux and only two deals (UK and Vietnam) finalised, the next few weeks will be critical. Investors may be wise not to ignore the warning signs entirely.

Whether this is brinkmanship or a genuine shift in trade policy, the stakes are high—and the clock is ticking.

Posted on

Elon Musk launches ‘America Party’ amid ongoing feud with Trump

America Party

In a dramatic twist to the U.S. political landscape, Elon Musk has announced the formation of a new political party, the America Party, following a bitter fallout with President Donald Trump over his controversial tax and spending legislation – the ‘Big Beautiful Bill‘.

Musk, once a key ally of Trump and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), broke ranks after the passage of the so-called ‘Big Beautiful Bill‘, which Musk labelled a “disgusting abomination” that would balloon the national debt by trillions.

On U.S. Independence Day, Musk polled his followers on X, asking whether a new party should be formed. With a 2-to-1 majority voting ‘yes’, Musk declared, ‘Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom’.

The party aims to challenge the entrenched two-party system by targeting a handful of swing Senate and House seats, potentially becoming a decisive force in future legislation.

Musk has pledged to support primary challengers against Republicans who backed the bill, accusing them of betraying fiscal responsibility.

Trump, clearly irked, dismissed Musk’s move as ‘ridiculous’, reportedly stating, ‘It’s always been a two-party system… third parties have never worked’.

He added on Truth Social, ‘Elon Musk has gone completely off the rails… becoming a train wreck over the past five weeks’.

The feud has escalated rapidly, with Trump threatening to revoke federal subsidies for Musk’s companies and even suggesting deportation, despite Musk’s U.S. citizenship.

While Musk’s America Party faces steep legal and logistical hurdles, his immense wealth and online influence could make it a disruptive force.

Whether it gains traction or fizzles out remains to be seen but it’s clear the ‘love’ between Musk and Trump is officially over.

Posted on

U.S. debt surges close to $37 trillion after ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ -Elon Musk sounds alarm

High U.S. debt levels

Following the passage of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill, the U.S. national debt has officially soared to nearly $37 trillion, with projections suggesting it could hit $40 trillion by year’s end.

The bill, which extends 2017 tax cuts and introduces expansive spending on defence, border security, and domestic manufacturing, has sparked fierce debate across Washington and Wall Street.

Critics argue the legislation lacks meaningful offsets, with no new taxes or spending cuts to balance its provisions.

Interest payments alone reached $1.1 trillion in 2024, surpassing the defence budget. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill could add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.

Among the most vocal opponents is tech billionaire Elon Musk, who previously served as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Musk has labelled the bill a ‘disgusting abominatio’ and warned it undermines fiscal responsibility.

He has reportedly pledged to fund primary challengers against Republicans who supported the measure, accusing them of betraying their promises to reduce spending.

Musk’s concerns go beyond economics. He argues the bill reflects a broken political system dominated by self-interest, calling for the creation of a new political movement, the America Party, to restore accountability.

While the White House insists the bill will spur economic growth and eventually reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio, sceptics remain unconvinced.

With the debt ceiling raised by a record $5 trillion, the long-term implications for America’s financial stability are now front and centre.

As the dust settles, the clash between Trump’s fiscal vision and Musk’s warnings sets the stage for a turbulent political and economic period ahead.

Posted on

Trump shifts tariff ‘goal posts’ again and targets BRICS with extra 10% levy

Goal posts moved

In a fresh escalation of trade tensions, President Donald Trump has once again moved the goalposts on tariff policy, pushing the deadline for new trade deals to 1st August 2025.

This marks the second extension since the original April 2025 ‘Liberation Day’ announcement, which had already stirred global markets.

The latest twist includes a new 10% tariff targeting countries aligned with the BRICS bloc—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – along with newer members such as Iran and the UAE.

Trump declared on Truth Social that ‘any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% tariff. There will be no exceptions’.

The move has drawn sharp criticism from BRICS leaders, who condemned the tariffs as ‘indiscriminate’ and warned of rising protectionism. Industrial metals, including copper and aluminium, saw immediate price drops amid fears of disrupted supply chains.

While the White House insists the new deadline allows more time for negotiation, analysts warn the uncertainty could dampen global trade and investor confidence.

With letters outlining tariff terms expected to be sent this week, investors and market makers watch closely as Trump’s trade strategy continues to evolve or unravel.

Posted on

From Missiles to Tariffs: A desensitised stock market faces Trump’s new world

Markets desensitised to U.S. policy making

In years past, the mere hint of U.S. airstrikes or heightened geopolitical tension would send global stock markets into panic mode.

Yet, following President Trump’s re-election and his increasingly aggressive foreign policy stance, investor reactions have become notably muted.

From missile strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to an orchestrated ceasefire between Iran and Israel, markets have barely flinched. The question arises: are investors becoming desensitised to Trump’s geopolitical theatre?

Take the latest skirmish between Iran and Israel. After nearly two weeks of missile exchanges, Trump’s announcement of a ‘complete and total ceasefire’ barely nudged the S&P 500.

That calm came despite the U.S. launching pre-emptive strikes on Iranian facilities and absorbing retaliatory attacks on its military base in Qatar.

In another era, or under a different administration even, such developments might have triggered a broad risk-off sentiment. Instead, Wall Street just shrugged.

One reason may be fatigue. Trump’s approach – rife with tariffs, sanctions, and sudden reversals – has bred a kind of market immunity.

Investors, well-versed in the rhythm of Trump’s provocations, have begun treating them as background noise. His revived tariff agenda, particularly the threats aimed once again at China and EU auto imports, has likewise failed to prompt major selloffs.

Similarly, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, once a source of intense volatility, now registers as a strategic stalemate in the market’s eyes.

While Trump’s rhetoric surrounding Ukraine has shifted unpredictably, investors appear more focused on earnings, inflation data, and central bank signals than on diplomatic fallout and war!

This is not to suggest markets are indifferent to geopolitical risk, but rather that they’ve adapted. Algorithmic trading models may be increasingly geared to discount Trump’s headline-grabbing tactics, while institutional investors hedge through gold, volatility indices, or energy plays without dumping equities outright.

Critics argue this detachment is dangerous. Should a flashpoint spiral out of control, be it over Hormuz, Ukraine, or Taiwan, the slow-boiling complacency could leave portfolios badly exposed.

Still, for now, Trump’s policies are being priced in not with panic, but with complacency maybe.

The real story may not be what Trump does next, but how long the markets can continue to look away.

Trump announces he had brokered ceasefire between Israel and Iran?

Tensions between Israel and Iran reached a boiling point after 12 days of cross-border missile and drone strikes.

The situation escalated further when U.S. forces under President Trump launched targeted airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, prompting a direct Iranian missile response on a U.S. base in Qatar.

In a dramatic turn, President Trump announced what he called a ‘Complete and Total CEASEFIRE‘ – announced on Truth Social. According to Trump’s plan, Iran would begin the ceasefire immediately, with Israel to follow 12 hours later.

The truce would reportedly be considered complete after 24 hours if all attacks stopped.

While Trump touted the ceasefire as a triumph of ‘peace through strength’, analysts questioned the ceasefire’s enforceability – especially since missile exchanges reportedly continued despite the announcement.

Nonetheless, Trump claimed credit for halting the region’s slide into all-out war without committing to prolonged U.S. military involvement.

Critics argue Trump’s strategy relies more on military pressure and media theatrics than diplomatic engagement.

Supporters counter that his boldness forced both sides to the table. Either way, the world is watching to see whether this fragile peace endures – or erupts again in fire.

If this turns out to be a masterstroke in political brinkmanship – hats off to Trump, I guess. Whichever way you look at it, the precision U.S. strike on Iran was exactly that – precision. And, you have to take note.

Iran has been weakened, and this may even influence Russia’s war on Ukraine. Hopefully Israel with Palestine too – regardless of stock market reaction.

And that has to be a good thing!

But has Israel finished their war?

Despite all the noise regarding stock market reaction, one thing is for certain – the anxiety and worry for the people of the Middle East is unquestionable.

It’s not a happy time.

Posted on

China suffers U.S. tariff driven falls in exports and increased deflation concerns

China exports to U.S. suffer due to tariffs

China’s economic landscape is facing mounting challenges as exports to the United States plummet and consumer prices decline, sparking fears of deflation.

The latest trade data reveals that Chinese exports to the U.S. fell by 34.5% in May 2025, marking the sharpest drop in over five years. This decline comes despite a temporary trade truce that paused most tariffs for 90 days.

China’s consumer prices have continued their downward trend, raising concerns about deflation and its long-term impact on the economy.

The sharp fall in exports is largely attributed to high U.S. tariffs and weakening demand. While China’s overall exports grew by 4.8%, shipments to the U.S. suffered significantly, reflecting the ongoing trade tensions between the two economic giants.

Imports from the U.S. also dropped by 18%, further shrinking China’s trade surplus with America. In response, Chinese exporters are shifting their focus to other markets, particularly Southeast Asia and Europe, where demand remains relatively strong.

China’s CPI reading

At the same time, China’s consumer price index (CPI) fell by 0.1% in May 2025, deepening concerns about deflation. Deflation, the opposite of inflation, can lead to lower corporate profits, wage cuts, and job losses, creating a vicious cycle of economic stagnation.

The decline in consumer prices is largely driven by weak domestic demand, exacerbated by the ongoing real estate crisis. Many Chinese consumers are hesitant to spend, fearing further declines in property values and economic uncertainty.

China’s rare earth materials olive branch

China appears to have offered U.S. and European auto manufacturers a reprieve after industry groups warned of increasing production threats over a rare earth shortage.

China’s Ministry of Commerce on Saturday 7th June 2025 reportedly said it was willing to establish a so-called ‘green channel’ for eligible export licence applications to expedite the approval process to European Union firms. 

Posted on

What exactly is Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ that Musk hates so much?

Big Beautiful Bill

Trump calls it his ‘Big Beautiful Bill’, but Musk calls it a ‘Disgusting Abomination’ – who’s right?

Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill is a sweeping tax and spending package aimed at making his 2017 tax cuts permanent while introducing new tax breaks and budget reforms.

It eliminates taxes on tips and overtime, raises the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap, and creates government-funded savings accounts for newborns.

The bill also imposes stricter Medicaid work requirements, cuts funding for green energy incentives, and repeals taxes on gun silencers and indoor tanning.

Critics, including Elon Musk, argue it will increase the budget deficit by $2.5 trillion, burdening future generations with unsustainable U.S. debt.

Musk’s opposition to the Bill

Elon Musk has fiercely opposed Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill, calling it a “disgusting abomination”.

His main concerns include:

Massive Spending & Deficit Growth: Musk argues the bill adds $2.5 trillion to the federal deficit, saddling future generations with unsustainable debt.

Pork-Filled Legislation: He claims the bill is packed with wasteful spending that benefits political allies rather than the American people.

Cuts to EV & Solar Incentives: The bill removes tax credits for electric vehicles and solar energy, which directly impacts Tesla and Musk’s clean energy initiatives.

Unfair Favouritism: Musk believes the bill protects oil & gas subsidies while cutting incentives for renewable energy.

Lack of Transparency: He insists the bill was rushed through Congress without proper review, saying even lawmakers barely had time to read it.

Trump, on the other hand, has dismissed Musk’s criticism, saying he’s “very disappointed” and believes Musk is upset mainly because of the EV tax credit removal.

The feud continues to escalate, with Musk urging lawmakers to “kill the bill.”

Who does the Bill really benefit?

Posted on

Trump and Musk feud – love to hate in 137 days – a billionaire brawl

Trump Musk Argue

It’s a worry – arguably the most powerful man in the world and the richest man in the world in a highly visible fallout.

Unrest and distrust at the top of U.S. government and the and in the corporate world – so what’s new?

Donald Trump and Elon Musk, once allies, have engaged in a heated public feud over a tax and spending bill. The conflict began when Musk criticised Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” calling it a “disgusting abomination” and warning it would increase the budget deficit. Trump retaliated on Truth Social, calling Musk “CRAZY” and threatening to terminate billions of dollars in government contracts for his companies.

Musk fired back on X, claiming Trump would have lost the election without his support and accusing him of being named in the unreleased Epstein files.

The spat has had financial repercussions, with Tesla’s stock plummeting over 14%, wiping out $152 billion in market value. Investors fear the fallout could impact Tesla’s regulatory environment under Trump’s administration.

Tesla 5-day chart

Tesla 5-day chart – 14% fall

Political figures have weighed in, with billionaire Bill Ackman urging the two to reconcile, while Steve Bannon suggested Trump should seize SpaceX under the Defence Production Act. Musk also polled followers on whether to create a new political party, gaining support from Mark Cuban and Andrew Yang.

It got worse

Elon Musk escalated his feud with Donald Trump by making explosive claims that Trump appears in the Epstein files, suggesting that this is why they have not been made public. Musk posted on X, “Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.

“Have a nice day, DJT!”. He later doubled down, telling followers to “mark this post for the future” and insisting that “the truth will come out”.

Trump has denied any wrongdoing and dismissed Musk’s claims as retaliation for his tax bill. The White House press secretary called Musk’s comments “an unfortunate episode” and insisted that Trump is focused on passing his legislation.

Musk also endorsed a call for Trump’s impeachment, agreeing with a post that suggested Vice President JD Vance should replace Trump. This marks a dramatic shift, as Musk was previously a close ally of Trump and even held a government advisory role.

The feud continues to escalate, with Musk calling for the bill’s rejection and Trump defending it as a historic tax cut.

The position and authority of U.S. President Trump have been challenged. How will tariff trade negotiations and his standing with other world leaders progress from here?

I do have a couple of questions: why did Musk back Trump in the first place and, at what point in the 137 ‘love in’ days did he know about the Epstein link (if indeed there is one)?

Or did he know before?

Who to trust?

Posted on

Well – that didn’t last long – is the ‘love in’ over already?

Elon Musk and Trump

Elon Musk has dramatically distanced himself from Donald Trump’s latest tax-and-spending bill, branding it a ‘disgusting abomination’ in a fiery post on X.

The Tesla and SpaceX CEO, once a key financial backer of Trump’s 2024 campaign, has now turned against the administration’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’, warning that it will explode the federal deficit and burden American taxpayers with unsustainable U.S. debt.

Musk’s frustration boiled over as he accused lawmakers of reckless spending, calling out those who voted for the bill: ‘Shame on you. You know you did wrong’.

His criticism comes just days after leaving his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he had pushed for aggressive cost-cutting measures.

The White House, however, remains unmoved. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Musk’s remarks, insisting that Trump is ‘sticking to it’ and that the bill will drive economic growth.

With Republican deficit hawks rallying behind Musk’s concerns, the billionaire’s influence in Washington is far from over.

His next move? Firing back at politicians who, in his words, ‘betrayed the American people.’

Elon Musk’s fiery critique of Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ has raised concerns for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an initiative he once led.

His departure from DOGE signals instability (much of which he created) within the agency, which had been pushing for aggressive cost-cutting measures and anti-waste policies.

Without Musk’s influence, DOGE could lose traction, allowing excessive spending to go unchecked. Additionally, Musk’s fallout with Trump might weaken DOGE’s ability to implement reforms, as its credibility is tied to his vision.

The question now is whether DOGE can remain a force for fiscal responsibility, or whether it will become just another bureaucratic arm.

Mid-terms are coming!

Posted on

OECD cuts U.S. growth forecast amid Trump’s tariff chaos

OECD U.S. data

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has sharply downgraded its U.S. growth forecast, citing economic uncertainty and the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariff policies.

The OECD now expects the U.S. economy to expand by just 1.6% in 2025 and 1.5% in 2026, a significant cut from its previous estimate of 2.2% for 2025.

The report highlights several factors contributing to the slowdown, including elevated policy uncertainty, reduced net immigration, and a shrinking federal workforce.

The OECD also warns that higher trade barriers could further dampen business confidence and investment.

Global growth projections have also been revised downward, with the OECD stating that the slowdown is most pronounced in North America, particularly in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

The organisation reportedly notes that U.S. tariff-related disruptions are expected to push inflation higher, although weaker commodity prices may offset some of the impact.

The OECD’s latest outlook underscores the growing challenges facing the U.S. economy as trade tensions persist.

With tariffs fluctuating due to ongoing ‘stop start’ legal interventions, businesses and investors remain cautious about the future.

The coming months will be crucial in determining whether policymakers can stabilise growth and restore confidence in the market.

Stop the tariffs and all will be fine.

Posted on

China’s manufacturing sector experiences decline amid Tariff chaos

China factory data

China’s manufacturing activity took an unexpected hit in May 2025, marking its steepest decline since September 2022.

The Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI fell to 48.3, signalling contraction for the first time in eight months. This downturn comes as U.S. tariffs begin to weigh heavily on Chinese exports, dampening global demand and disrupting supply chains.

The latest data reveals that new export orders shrank for the second consecutive month, hitting their lowest level since July 2023.

Factory output also contracted for the first time since October 2023, reflecting the broader economic slowdown. Analysts attribute this slump to the reinstatement of sweeping U.S. tariffs, which were briefly halted before being reimposed by a federal appeals court.

Despite a temporary trade truce between the U.S. and China, tensions remain high, with both sides accusing each other of violating agreements.

The uncertainty surrounding trade policies has led Chinese manufacturers to cut jobs at the fastest pace since the start of the year, further exacerbating economic concerns.

China’s Premier Li Qiang has hinted at new policy tools, including unconventional measures to stabilise the economy. However, with tariffs set to remain high and structural challenges persisting, experts predict continued pressure on China’s industrial sector.

As the world’s second-largest economy grapples with these headwinds, the coming months will be crucial in determining whether Beijing can implement effective strategies to counteract the impact of tariffs and restore manufacturing momentum.

Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI survey

The report was based on the Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI survey, which is a private-sector survey that tracks China’s manufacturing activity.

This survey is conducted mid-month and covers over 500 mostly export-oriented businesses, making it distinct from China’s official PMI, which samples 3,000 companies and is compiled at month-end.

The Caixin PMI tends to focus more on small and medium-sized enterprises, whereas the official PMI aligns more closely with industrial output.

In May, the Caixin PMI fell to 48.3, marking its first contraction in eight months. The decline was largely driven by shrinking new export orders, which hit their lowest level since July 2023.

The survey also showed that employment in the manufacturing sector declined at the fastest pace since January, reflecting the broader economic slowdown.

One key difference between the Caixin PMI and the official PMI is their timing. The Caixin survey is conducted earlier in the month, meaning it may not fully capture policy changes or trade developments that occur later.

For example, economists noted that the effect of the tariff de-escalation in mid-May may not have been reflected in the Caixin PMI results

Posted on

What’s going on in the U.S. bond market?

Treasury yields

The U.S. bond market is experiencing some turbulence due to rising Treasury yields and concerns over government debt.

Investors are demanding higher yields because they’re worried about the GOP’s tax-cut plans, which could lead to increased borrowing and a larger deficit.

Additionally, the recent Trump tax bill has caused Treasury bond yields to surge, as investors anticipate more government debt issuance. Moody’s has also downgraded the U.S. credit rating, adding to market jitters.

The bond market’s reaction is significant because higher yields can lead to increased borrowing costs across the economy, affecting everything from mortgages to corporate financing.

Japan

Japan’s bond market is facing significant turbulence, with yields on 40-year government bonds hitting an all-time high. This surge in yields is causing concerns about capital repatriation, as Japanese investors may start pulling funds from the U.S. and other foreign markets.

The Bank of Japan’s reduced bond purchases have contributed to this trend, leading to weaker demand for long-term government debt. Analysts warn that if Japanese investors begin moving their capital back home, it could trigger a global financial market shake-up.

Additionally, Japan’s Finance Ministry is considering reducing the issuance of super-long bonds to stabilise the market. However, recent auctions have shown weak demand, raising concerns about the effectiveness of this strategy.

Europe

The European bond market is experiencing some shifts due to falling government bond yields and easing U.S. – EU trade tensions.

German 10-year bund yields dropped by 4 basis points, reflecting increased investor confidence.

UK and French 10-year bond yields also declined by 4 basis points, while Italian bonds saw a 2 basis point dip.

Long-term UK gilts experienced the biggest movement, with 20 and 30-year yields falling by 7 basis points.

This decline in yields suggests higher demand for European government debt, possibly due to investors shifting away from U.S. assets amid concerns over U.S. fiscal health.

UK

The UK bond market is facing some challenges, with the IMF warning that it is vulnerable to sudden shocks due to a growing reliance on hedge funds and foreign investors.

30-year gilt yields have hit 5.5%, the highest in over three decades.

The Bank of England’s quantitative tightening and increased bond issuance are putting pressure on the market.

The Debt Management Office (DMO) is shifting towards short-dated debt to reduce long-term interest costs.

Additionally, the UK government has launched a new 30-year gilt offering 5.375% interest, which is attracting investor attention.

Posted on

Are we underestimating the impact of tariffs on S&P 500 earnings growth?

Asleep

As global trade tensions escalate, many investors and analysts are questioning whether markets are too complacent about the long-term effects of tariffs on corporate earnings.

While some argue that businesses have adapted to protectionist policies, others warn that the S&P 500’s earnings growth could face significant headwinds.

Tariffs: A hidden threat to profit margins

Tariffs increase costs for companies reliant on imported goods and materials. Businesses must either absorb these costs, pass them on to consumers, or find alternative suppliers – each option presenting challenges.

According to Goldman Sachs, an additional 5% tariff could reduce S&P 500 earnings by 1-2%.

A 100% tariff would equate to around 10-20% reduction in the S&P 500 – and that’s correction territory.

Retailers and manufacturers are particularly vulnerable

Companies like Best Buy, Walmart, and Target rely on imports, and higher tariffs could suppress profit margins or lead to higher consumer prices, potentially dampening demand.

Market sentiment vs. economic reality

Despite concerns, Wall Street has remained relatively optimistic. A recent 90-day tariff pause between the U.S. and China has boosted investor confidence, leading firms like Goldman Sachs and Yardeni Research to raise their S&P 500 targets.

This optimism may be short-lived if tariffs resume or escalate

Sector-specific risks

Certain industries are more exposed than others

Technology: Supply chain disruptions and higher costs for components could reduce profit margins.

Consumer Discretionary: Higher prices on imported goods could weaken consumer spending.

Industrials: Increased costs for raw materials could slow growth and investment.

The bigger picture: long-term economic impact

Beyond immediate earnings concerns, tariffs could stifle innovation, reduce global competitiveness, and slow economic growth.

Citi analysts estimate that aggressive tariffs could cut S&P 500 earnings growth by 2-3%.

A false sense of security?

While markets have bounced back from initial tariff shocks, the long-term effects remain uncertain.

Investors should closely monitor trade policies, sector-specific risks, and corporate earnings reports to assess whether the S&P 500’s growth trajectory is truly secure – or dangerously fragile.

Time will tell – but the S&P 500 is vulnerable to pressure right now!

Posted on

U.S. and China agree 90-day ‘reciprocal’ tariff pause and reduction deal

Tariff trade war 90-day pause

In a surprising breakthrough, the United States and China have agreed to suspend most tariffs on each other’s goods for 90 days, marking a significant step toward easing trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies.

Following high-stakes negotiations in Geneva, representatives from both nations announced that reciprocal tariffs would be slashed from 125% to 10%, significantly lowering trade barriers.

However, the U.S. will continue imposing 20% tariffs on Chinese imports related to fentanyl, meaning total tariffs on Chinese goods will settle at 30%.

The agreement signals a temporary thaw in what has been a long-standing economic standoff between Washington and Beijing. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who played a leading role in the discussions, described the talks as ‘very productive’, crediting the location for fostering an atmosphere of cooperation.

While this move could provide immediate relief for businesses and consumers impacted by trade restrictions, analysts caution that the 90-day suspension may not translate into a long-term solution.

Some experts speculate that ongoing trade negotiations could lead to further reductions, while others warn that unresolved tensions could lead to reinstated tariffs if agreements stall.

For now, the deal presents an opportunity for renewed dialogue, leaving global markets optimistic about future relations between the two economic powerhouses.

How the next three months unfold will determine whether this development is a stepping stone to broader reforms or simply a temporary reprieve in a complex trade dispute.

I expect Trump, having instigated the ‘tariff’ upheaval, will happily hang on to this ‘deal’ with China to avoid any further stock market turmoil.

What really just happened? The markets seem to be rewarding a situation that was artificially created and then ‘fixed’.

Aren’t we simply back where we were before the Trump tariff onslaught or is this really a ‘promise’ for better ‘deals’ to come?

Has it opened a door for better relations?

Create a problem… fix a problem!

It’s all about the U.S.

We’ll see…

Posted on

Signs of weakness in the U.S. economy – is a recession coming and is the United States causing harm to global economies?

Cracking world economies

The U.S. economy is showing cracks as multiple indicators suggest that growth may be slowing.

With GDP shrinking by 0.3% in the first quarter of 2025, concerns about an impending recession have intensified among analysts and investors.

A key driver of this economic downturn is the ongoing trade uncertainty, which has prompted businesses to stock up on imports before new tariffs take effect.

While some experts argue this is a temporary setback, others caution that prolonged trade conflicts could stifle growth for months to come.

Resilient labour market

Despite these concerns, the labour market has remained resilient, with unemployment hovering at 4.2%. However, signs of strain are emerging – job openings have declined, and layoffs have picked up in certain industries.

If hiring slows further, consumer spending could weaken, adding pressure to the economy.

Inflation remains another point of concern. Rising costs of goods and services have strained household budgets, leading to reduced discretionary spending.

The Federal Reserve, which has maintained high interest rates, is carefully assessing whether policy adjustments are needed to prevent a sharper downturn.

On Wall Street, sentiment is divided. Goldman Sachs estimates a 45% probability of a recession, while J P Morgan suggests the likelihood could be as high as 60%.

Some economists believe strategic trade deals and government intervention could avert a full-blown recession, but the margin for error is slim.

Does it really matter if there is to be a recession – it will likely be short lived. It will not please the U.S. President Donald Trump.

While uncertainty clouds the future, one thing is clear – the U.S. economy is at a pivotal moment. Whether policymakers can stabilise growth or if the nation is headed towards a deeper slowdown will depend on the next few quarters and the outcome of Trump’s tariffs.

Tudor Investment Corporation

Paul Tudor Jones, the founder of Tudor Investment Corporation, recently shared his outlook on the U.S. economy, and his perspective isn’t exactly optimistic.

He believes that U.S. stocks are likely to hit new lows before the end of the year, even if President Trump dials back tariffs on Chinese imports.

Jones pointed out that the combination of high tariffs and the Federal Reserve’s reluctance to cut interest rates is putting significant pressure on the stock market.

He reportedly noted that even if Trump reduced tariffs to 50% or 40%, it would still amount to one of the largest tax increases since the 1960s, potentially slowing economic growth.

The billionaire investor also warned that unless the Fed adopts a more dovish stance and aggressively cuts rates, the market is likely to continue its downward trajectory.

He reportedly emphasised that the current economic conditions – marked by trade uncertainty and tight monetary policy – are not favourable for a stock market recovery.

Interestingly, Jones also expressed concerns about artificial intelligence, stating that AI poses an imminent threat to humanity within our lifetime.

Maybe AI will start running hedge funds too…?

Posted on

Shock but no ‘awe’ in Trump’s first 100 days in office

Sledgehammer policies

U.S. President Donald Trump has definitely brought a lot of shock in the first 100 days of his presidency, smashing trade links, alliances, and even his own government, but it can hardly be said to have left anybody truly in ‘awe’.

Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office during his second term have been a whirlwind of activity, marked by bold moves and significant controversy.

His poll rating is the lowest of any President of recent times for the first 100 days. It currently sits at around 41% (a CNN poll result suggests).

How does it compare?

Harry S. Truman, hit a rock-bottom approval rating of 22% in 1952. Other presidents like Richard Nixon and George W. Bush also dipped below 25%. But these were during their terms and not in the first 100 days.

His administration has focused heavily on reshaping trade policies, imposing tariffs that have disrupted global markets and strained relationships with long-standing allies.

Despite his claims of progress, no major trade deals have been finalised, leaving many questioning the effectiveness of his approach.

Legal challenges

Domestically, Trump’s policies have faced significant legal challenges, with numerous lawsuits filed against his administration. His stance on immigration and energy has sparked heated debates, reflecting the polarising nature of his decisions.

Trump’s ‘drill-baby-drill’ mantra has not had the desire reaction – oil prices has fallen with U.S. oil below $65 a barrel.

The automotive industry, for instance, has grappled with regulatory uncertainty and additional costs due to his tariffs, prompting him to soften some measures in response to industry concerns.

Internationally, Trump’s actions have raised concerns about U.S. credibility and stability. His hostile stance toward traditional allies, such as Canada, the EU and NATO, has left multi-decade relationships in tatters.

Meanwhile, his administration’s handling of the ongoing war in Ukraine and trade negotiations with China has drawn criticism for its lack of tangible results.

Despite these challenges, Trump remains confident in his vision for America. He has claimed progress in tariff negotiations with India, suggesting that a trade deal may be on the horizon.

No deals… yet

There has not been a single trade deal concluded with Trump’s administration – despite him reportedly claiming to have done ‘200 deals’ with only 195 countries in the world.

China is still striking a defiant tone on trade, and the war in Ukraine rages on. The president has also been forced to walk back on his “reciprocal tariffs.” 

However, his administration’s approach has left many wondering whether his first 100 days will be remembered for their impact or their controversy.

As the dust settles, the world watches closely to see how Trump’s policies will shape the future of the United States and its role on the global stage.

Trump may have wanted his first 100 days to be historic, and they were – but for all the wrong reasons.  

Posted on

Massive Power Outage Plunges Spain and Portugal into Darkness – this is an extremely serious event

Lights out!

A sudden and unprecedented power outage swept across Spain and Portugal, leaving millions without electricity and causing widespread disruption.

The blackout, which began on 28th April 2025, affected major cities including Madrid, Barcelona, and Lisbon, halting transportation, shutting down businesses, and sparking concerns about the stability of the Iberian power grid and beyond.

The Scale of the Blackout

The outage impacted nearly 60 million people across the Iberian Peninsula, disrupting daily life in ways not seen in recent history.

Metro systems ground to a halt, traffic lights went dark, airports were forced to delay flights, shops stopped trading, banks closed, and mobile phones and computers just stopped as internet access failed.

Hospitals relied on backup generators, while businesses scrambled to maintain operations amid the chaos.

The Spanish power operator, Red Eléctrica (REE), reported that by early Tuesday morning, roughly 90% of mainland Spain had regained electricity, though the cause of the blackout remained unclear.

Investigating the Cause

Authorities in both Spain and Portugal launched urgent investigations into the outage, with early reports suggesting a possible connection issue between Spain and France.

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez assured the public that all potential causes were being examined, urging patience amid swirling rumors of cyber sabotage.

Portuguese Prime Minister Luís Montenegro echoed these sentiments, stating that while the root of the problem likely originated in Spain, there was no firm evidence of an attack.

One theory gaining traction is that a rare atmospheric phenomenon caused extreme temperature variations, leading to instability in the electrical grid.

An Explanation?

In this case, the “rare atmospheric phenomenon” refers to extreme temperature variations in Spain that caused instability in the electrical grid.

According to Portugal’s grid operator, REN, these temperature fluctuations led to anomalous oscillations in high-voltage power lines, disrupting synchronization between electrical systems.

This resulted in cascading failures across the interconnected European network, ultimately triggering the massive blackout.

Essentially, the rapid shifts in temperature created disturbances in the power infrastructure, affecting the way electricity was transmitted and distributed. While the exact mechanics are still being investigated, experts suggest that such oscillations can interfere with grid stability, leading to widespread outages

The Portuguese grid operator, REN, warned that fully restoring power could take up to a week, highlighting the complexity of the situation.

Impact on Daily Life

The blackout triggered widespread panic, with long queues forming outside banks as people rushed to withdraw cash. Supermarkets saw shelves emptied as residents stocked up on essentials, fearing prolonged outages.

Transportation networks were severely affected, with trains halted and passengers stranded. Emergency services worked tirelessly to rescue individuals trapped in elevators and metro stations.

What’s Next?

As power gradually returns, European officials and energy experts are assessing the vulnerability of the Iberian grid.

The European Commission has pledged support, emphasising the need for stronger infrastructure to prevent future disruptions. While the immediate crisis is being managed, the incident raises critical questions about energy security and the resilience of interconnected power networks.

Spain and Portugal now face the challenge of restoring full stability while ensuring that such a massive outage does not happen again.

Posted on

Countries begin to turn away from the U.S. because of Trump’s tariff policies

U.S. tariffs crate uncertainty

Countries are increasingly pivoting away from the United States due to the ripple effects of former President Donald Trump’s tariff policies.

His ‘America First’ ideology, which prioritised domestic interests over international collaboration, assumed that the world needed America more than America needed the world. While this may have held true in certain aspects, the global response suggests otherwise.

Southeast Asian nations, heavily impacted by Trump’s tariffs, have begun strengthening intra-regional trade and diversifying their export destinations.

This shift reflects a growing desire to reduce reliance on the U.S. economy and mitigate the risks associated with its unpredictable trade policies.

Similarly, China, facing significant challenges from the U.S.-China trade war, has ramped up fiscal stimulus and expanded its markets beyond American borders. These moves highlight a strategic effort to counteract the economic pressures imposed by U.S. tariffs.

China has also introduced employment support and hinted at more stimulus as U.S. created trade war tension escalates.

The U.S. has increasingly found itself playing catch-up in critical areas like rare earth elements and minerals. The original U.S. tariff scope has already been adjusted and rolled back.

The 90-day tariff pause being one of them and the reduction of tech related tariffs another.

Trump’s recent executive order to jump-start deep-sea mining underscores America’s attempt to secure access to these strategically important resources, which China currently dominates.

However, this reactive approach may not be enough to recover from the damage already done and to regain lost ground may prove even harder still.

The unintended consequence of Trump’s policies is a more fragmented global trade landscape. Countries are taking measures to strengthen their own economies and reduce dependence on the U.S., potentially leaving America isolated in certain aspects of international affairs.

While the U.S. remains a major player in global trade, its unilateral actions have prompted other nations to explore alternative paths, reshaping the dynamics of global commerce.

This shift serves as a reminder that in an interconnected world, cooperation often yields better outcomes than isolationist policies.

The long-term implications of these changes are yet to fully unfold, but they signal a significant transformation in the global economic order.

Will the U.S. be the loser – or will it become even stronger in the world order?

It was already the world’s number one economy!

It’s not easy to unravel 100’s of years of interconnected world trade.

Why?

Posted on

U.S. stocks slide again as Trump publicly criticises Fed Chair Powell

Jerome Powell criticised

President Donald Trump’s recent criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has sent shockwaves through the financial markets, reigniting concerns about the central bank’s independence.

On Monday 21st April 2025, Trump took to social media to publicly call Powell a ‘major loser’ and demanded immediate interest rate cuts, warning of an economic slowdown if his demands were not met.

This public rebuke, coupled with Trump’s earlier threats to terminate Powell, has unsettled investors and triggered another sharp sell-off in U.S. stocks.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged nearly 1,000 points, or 2.48%, closing at 38170. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite also suffered significant losses, falling 2.36% and 2.55%.

Dow Jones one-year chart

Dow Jones one-year chart

Trump continues to create uncertainty

Analysts attribute this market turmoil to fears that Trump’s rhetoric could undermine the Federal Reserve’s ability to operate independently, a cornerstone of its credibility.

‘Magnificent Seven’ tech companies dragged the major indexes lower, with Tesla and Nvidia respectively losing 5.8% and more than 4%. Amazon shed 3%, and Meta Platforms suffered losses too.

Tesla one-year chart

Tesla one-year chart

Adding to the uncertainty, Trump’s tariff policies have already strained investor confidence. The combination of trade tensions and doubts about the Fed’s autonomy has led to a flight from U.S. assets.

The dollar hit a three-year low, while gold prices soared to record highs above $3,400 per ounce as investors sought safe-haven assets.

Market experts warn that prolonged uncertainty could have far-reaching implications. ‘The market is okay with rates coming down,’ reportedly said Thierry Wizman, a global currency strategist. ‘What the market is not okay with is having the president or politicians tell the Fed that the rates need to come down’.

As Trump’s public rebuttal of Powell continues, investors observe the potential implications. The stakes are high, not just for the U.S. economy but for global markets that rely on the stability of American financial institutions.

Investors are left grappling with a volatile landscape, where political pressures and economic policies collide.

The Trump ‘turmoil’ continues.

Posted on

No tariffs for Russia?

Russia escapes Trumps tariffs

Russia’s exemption from recent U.S. tariffs has sparked curiosity and debate. While many nations face new trade duties, Russia remains notably absent from the list

This decision stems from a combination of geopolitical, economic, and strategic factors.

One key reason is the existing sanctions imposed on Russia by several countries, including the United States, following its invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

These sanctions have already significantly curtailed trade between Russia and its global partners, rendering additional tariffs less impactful.

For instance, U.S.-Russia trade has dwindled to a fraction of its pre-war levels, focusing primarily on strategic goods like fertilisers and chemicals.

Another factor is the ongoing diplomatic efforts to address the conflict in Ukraine. Some analysts suggest that exempting Russia from tariffs could be a strategic move to maintain a channel for negotiation and potential cooperation.

This approach might aim to encourage Russia’s participation in peace talks or other diplomatic initiatives.

Additionally, the structure of Russia’s exports plays a role. Certain goods, such as fertilisers, are critical to global supply chains, and imposing tariffs could disrupt markets and harm economies reliant on these imports.

While the decision has drawn criticism, it underscores the complexities of balancing economic policies with geopolitical realities.

The debate continues as the global community navigates these challenging dynamics caused through the imposition of U.S. tariffs.

Posted on

Tech stocks propel market rally amid Trump’s tariff pause

Stocks move back up

On Monday 14th April 2025, the stock market experienced a notable mini rally, driven by the tech sector’s resurgence following a weekend announcement of a temporary tariff pause.

President Trump’s decision to exempt smartphones, computers, and other electronics from steep tariffs provided a much-needed reprieve for the industry, sparking optimism among investors.

Major tech companies like Apple, Nvidia, and Amazon saw significant gains, with Apple shares surging by 7.5%. The Nasdaq Composite, heavily weighted with tech stocks, climbed 1.9%, while the S&P 500 rose 1.5%.

This rally marked a stark contrast to the volatility of the previous week, where tariff uncertainties had sent shockwaves through the market.

The tariff pause, although temporary and restricted to 20%, helped to alleviate immediate concerns about rising costs for consumers and businesses.

Importers were spared from choosing between absorbing higher expenses or passing them on to customers. This relief was particularly impactful for companies reliant on Chinese manufacturing, as the exemptions covered a wide range of tech products.

Market analysts noted that the rally was not just a reaction to the tariff news but also a reflection of the tech sector’s resilience.

Despite facing challenges earlier in the year, tech companies have continued to innovate and adapt, maintaining their position as a driving force in the U.S. and world economies.

However, the rally’s sustainability remains uncertain. The administration’s mixed messages about future tariffs have left investors cautious.

While Monday’s gains were encouraging, the broader market continues to grapple with the unpredictability of trade policies.

Posted on

Trump takes wrecking ball to global trade – sets stock markets on fire and plays golf – all in one week

Reckless tariffs

Is this a fair ‘take’ on the last weeks tariff turmoil?

President Trump’s tariffs have left a significant mark on global trade and financial markets, creating waves that continue to shape global economic dynamics.

The tariffs, initially aimed at reducing the U.S. trade deficit and protecting domestic industries, triggered a rollercoaster ride for stock markets and strained international relations.

Highs to lows

The Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq Composite, and S&P 500 experienced sharp declines following the announcement of sweeping tariffs. At their lowest points, the Dow fell to 37226, the Nasdaq dropped to 15266, and the S&P 500 sank to 4956.

These figures marked significant losses, with trillions of dollars wiped off the market in just a few days.

The volatility was exacerbated by fears of a global trade war and the uncertainty surrounding the tariffs’ implementation.

Tariff turmoil and 90 day pause

In response to the market turmoil, President Trump announced a 90-day pause on most tariffs, providing temporary relief to investors and businesses. This decision led to a rebound in stock markets, with indices recovering some of their losses.

However, the relief was short-lived, as tensions with China escalated. While tariffs on many trading partners were paused, China’s tariff rate was increased to a staggering 125%.

This move further strained U.S.-China relations and added pressure on industries reliant on Chinese imports.

Tech garners favour

The tech sector, heavily dependent on global supply chains, was among the hardest hit. Tariffs on components like microchips and finished products such as smartphones and computers disrupted production and increased costs.

Companies faced challenges in maintaining profitability and passing on the increased costs to consumers. The eventual reduction and cancellation of some tariffs provided a lifeline to the tech industry, allowing businesses to stabilize operations and reduce prices.

However, the uncertainty surrounding trade policies continued to pose challenges for the sector.

Market turmoil?

Was this the ultimate in market ‘management’ as President Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, that it was a ‘great time to buy’ just hours before announcing the 90-day tariff pause.?

This statement, made at 9:37 am., came shortly before the announcement, which caused stock markets to surge significantly. The timing of his post raised eyebrows and sparked discussions about potential insider trading concerns

China retaliates

China’s response to the tariffs was swift and retaliatory. Beijing imposed its own tariffs on U.S. imports, raising rates to 125%. This retaliation targeted key U.S. industries, including agriculture and technology, further escalating the trade conflict.

The Chinese yuan also hit its lowest level against the dollar since the global financial crisis. These measures highlighted the deepening economic rift between the world’s two largest economies.

The effects of President Trump’s tariffs underscore the complexities of modern trade policies. While intended to protect domestic industries, the tariffs created significant economic disruptions, both domestically and globally.

The stock market volatility, strained international relations, and challenges faced by industries like technology illustrate the far-reaching consequences of such policies.

As the world continues to navigate the aftermath of these tariffs, the importance of balanced and strategic trade policies becomes increasingly evident.

Markets moved up, unsurprisingly, after Trump announced the tech tariff adjustment

Over the weekend, President Trump reportedly made several statements about tariffs on tech products, creating some confusion.

Initially, it was announced that smartphones, computers, and other electronics would be temporarily excluded from the steep tariffs.

However, Trump later clarified that these products were not entirely exempt but had been moved to a different ‘tariff bucket.’ He reportedly stated that they would still face a 20% tariff as part of broader measures targeting Chinese goods.

Trump also hinted at upcoming tariffs on semiconductors and the entire electronics supply chain, emphasising the need for the U.S. to produce more of these components domestically.

President Trump reportedly described this as part of a ‘National Security Tariff Investigation’. These announcements have left tech companies and investors uncertain about the long-term implications for the industry.

Tariffs are like a spider’s web cast over the world with the spider, crawling around collecting from its prey.

Trump’s tariffs continue to ‘infect’ world trade, and they will be here for a while yet.

Posted on

Just a thought…

Fickleness of the stock market

Do you believe in the ‘collective unconscious’, a universal mind to which all humanity is connected?

In the context of the financial world, the stock market is based on unwavering fundamental mathematics… numbers. However, is often driven by sentiment, instinct, hopes and fears.

They both function in a similar manner.

In other words, it is essentially a sentiment tracker.

This was very evident in the stock market movement during ‘normal’ trading hours immediately preceding U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff plan unveiling, contrasted with extended trading.

Investors had time to digest the sheer weight of the heavy tariffs on countries across the globe – we then witnessed an instant stock reversal after almost ‘normal’ trading before.

The point

Trump hinted at leniency on tariffs days before revealing his true intentions. However, that sense of mercy was absent, as the tariffs were sweeping and severe.

To describe Trump’s plan as a seismic shift in the economic and financial order might be understatement.

It will take time for tariff price changes to filter into the economy, but the stock market, reflecting the collective unconscious of investors, registered this shock instantly – just minutes after a stock climb.

That’s the markets for you.

Posted on

What’s a tariff?

Trump's tariffs

Some of the strangest locations affected by Trump’s tariffs include an uninhabited island near Antarctica?

U.S. President Donald Trump’s ‘reciprocal tariffs‘ hit major trading partners around the world, but some tiny islands and remote locations were also unlikely targets.

These ‘odd’ choices have cast doubt on the validity of the calculation used to fire off these tariff salvos.

President Donald Trump set a baseline tariff rate of 10% across the board, with a raft of levies affecting over 180 countries.

Meanwhile global markets, but especially U.S. stocks continue to tumble in a freefall rout!

Posted on

Russell 2000 goes into bear territory as Dow Jones – S&P 500 and Nasdaq hit correction!

Stocks fall

The Russell 2000, a key benchmark for small-cap U.S. stocks, has officially entered bear market territory.

This means the index has fallen more than 20% from its all-time high in late November 2024. The decline was accelerated by the recent rollout of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, which have raised concerns about rising costs, economic softening, and global supply chain disruptions3.

Small-cap stocks, which were initially seen as beneficiaries of Trump’s policies due to their domestic focus, are now facing significant challenges. Many of these companies are particularly vulnerable to input cost shocks and lack the financial flexibility of larger firms.

Analysts warn that the combination of higher costs and a slowing economy is squeezing profits, leaving small caps in a precarious position.

The Russell 2000’s downturn highlights the broader market volatility triggered by the tariff measures. While other major indices like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are in correction territory, the Russell 2000 was the first to enter a bear market.

Russell 2000 index

Russell 2000 index

This development underscores the heightened risks for small-cap stocks in the current economic climate.

Despite the challenges, some strategists believe there could be opportunities for recovery, particularly if the Federal Reserve takes steps to cut interest rates.

However, Trump’s tariffs have introduced uncertainty into this policy, as inflation is likely to increase, casting doubt on the possibility of further interest rate cuts.

For now, the Russell 2000’s performance serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between protectionist policies and market stability.

The Russell 2000, a key benchmark for small-cap U.S. stocks, has officially entered bear market territory.

Dow Jones decline – the ripple effects of tariff policies

The Dow Jones Industrial Average has seen a sharp decline, falling from its all-time high of 45,073.63 points in December 2024 to its current level of 38,314.86 points—a drop of approximately 15%.

Dow Jones one-year chart

Dow Jones one-year chart

This downturn reflects a mix of economic challenges, including the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariff policies.

Trump’s sweeping tariffs, introduced as part of his ‘Liberation Day‘ initiative, aimed to bolster American manufacturing by imposing taxes on imported goods. While the policy sought to ‘level the playing field’, it triggered significant disruptions in global trade.

Retaliatory tariffs from key trading partners, including China and the European Union, compounded the issue, ultimately leading to higher costs for U.S. businesses and consumers.

The tariffs have also strained supply chains, particularly in industries reliant on international components. This has contributed to inflationary pressures, further dampening investor sentiment.

The tech sector, already grappling with regulatory scrutiny, has been hit hard, with companies facing increased production costs.

Nasdaq tech 100 one-year chart

Nasdaq tech 100 one-year chart

While some view the market’s decline as a natural correction, others warn of prolonged economic challenges, especially with the uncertainty surround Trump’s tariff agenda.

For investors, the key lies in navigating these turbulent times with caution and a focus on long-term fundamentals.

As the Dow adjusts to these pressures, its performance underscores the far-reaching consequences of trade policies on global markets.

S&P 500 one-year chart

S&P 500 one-year chart