Tag: Tariffs

Posted on

Wall Street’s Fear Gauge Surges: What the Spike in Volatility Signals

VIX Fear gauge

Wall Street’s so-called ‘fear gauge’—officially known as the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX)—has surged to its highest level since April 2025, jolting investors out of a months-long lull and reigniting concerns about market stability.

On 14th October 2025, the VIX briefly spiked above 22.9 before settling near 19.70, a sharp rise from recent lows that had hovered below 14.

The VIX is a real-time market index that reflects investors’ expectations for volatility over the next 30 days. Often dubbed the ‘fear gauge’, it’s derived from S&P 500 options pricing and tends to rise when traders seek protection against sharp market declines.

CBOE (VIX Index) slowly creeping up again October 2025 – So called Fear Index

A reading above 20 typically signals heightened anxiety and increased demand for hedging strategies.

This latest spike was triggered by renewed tensions between the U.S. and China, including Beijing’s announcement of sanctions against American subsidiaries of South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean.

The move, widely seen as retaliation for Washington’s export controls, sent shockwaves through tech-heavy indices. The Dow dropped over 500 points, while the Nasdaq slid nearly 2%.

For months, markets had basked in a rare stretch of calm, buoyed by AI-driven optimism and resilient earnings. But the VIX’s resurgence suggests that investors are now recalibrating their risk assessments.

It’s not just about trade wars—concerns over interest rates, geopolitical instability, and tech sector overvaluation are converging.

While a rising VIX doesn’t guarantee a crash, it often precedes periods of turbulence. For editorial observers, it’s a symbolic pulse check on investor psychology—a reminder that beneath euphoric rallies, fear never fully disappears.

As Wall Street braces for further shocks, the fear gauge is once again flashing caution. Whether it’s a tremor or a tremor before the quake remains to be seen.

Posted on

Markets on a Hair Trigger: Trump’s Tariff Whiplash and the AI Bubble That Won’t Pop

Markets move as Trump tweets

U.S. stock markets are behaving like a mood ring in a thunderstorm—volatile, reactive, and oddly sentimental.

One moment, President Trump threatens a ‘massive increase’ in tariffs on Chinese imports, and nearly $2 trillion in market value evaporates.

The next, he posts that: ‘all will be fine‘, and futures rebound overnight. It’s not just policy—it’s theatre, and Wall Street is watching every act with bated breath.

This hypersensitivity isn’t new, but it’s been amplified by the precarious state of global trade and the towering expectations placed on artificial intelligence.

Trump’s recent comments about China’s rare earth export controls triggered a sell-off that saw the Nasdaq drop 3.6% and the S&P 500 fall 2.7%—the worst single-day performance since April.

Tech stocks, especially those reliant on semiconductors and AI infrastructure, were hit hardest. Nvidia alone lost nearly 5%.

Why so fickle? Because the market’s current rally is built on a foundation of hope and hype. AI has been the engine driving valuations to record highs, with companies like OpenAI and Anthropic reaching eye-watering valuations despite uncertain profitability.

The IMF and Bank of England have both warned that we may be in stage three of a classic bubble cycle6. Circular investment deals—where AI startups use funding to buy chips from their investors—have raised eyebrows and comparisons to the dot-com era.

Yet, the bubble hasn’t burst. Not yet. The ‘Buffett Indicator‘ sits at a historic 220%, and the S&P 500 trades at 188% of U.S. GDP. These are not numbers grounded in sober fundamentals—they’re fuelled by speculative fervour and a fear of missing out (FOMO).

But unlike the dot-com crash, today’s AI surge is backed by real infrastructure: data centres, chip fabrication, and enterprise adoption. Whether that’s enough to justify the valuations remains to be seen.

In the meantime, markets remain twitchy. Trump’s tariff threats are more than political posturing—they’re economic tremors that ripple through supply chains and investor sentiment.

And with AI valuations stretched to breaking point, even a modest correction could trigger a cascade.

So yes, the market is fickle. But it’s not irrational—it’s just balancing on a knife’s edge between technological optimism and geopolitical anxiety.

One tweet can tip the scales.

Fickle!

Posted on

Gold rockets through $4,000 for the first time ever amid global uncertainty

Gold at highest level ever!

Gold has surged to an unprecedented high, crossing the $4,000 per ounce mark for the first time on 7th October 2025.

The precious metal peaked at $4,014.60, driven by a potent mix of geopolitical instability, expectations of U.S. interest rate cuts, and sustained central bank buying. This marks a 52% rise since January 2025, making it the strongest annual rally since 1979.

It continued its ascent into the 8th October 2025 touching $4,045 in early trade, likely with more to come. That’s over £3,000 per troy ounce.

The rally reflects a flight to safety as investors seek refuge from volatile bond markets, a weakening dollar, and the ongoing U.S. government shutdown.

One-year gold price chart – looking at December 2025 futures

With key economic data delayed and the Federal Reserve expected to cut rates twice before year-end, gold’s appeal as a non-yielding asset has intensified.

Physical demand remains robust, particularly in India, where festive buying and a weaker Rupee have pushed domestic prices to ₹1,30,300 per 10 grams in Delhi.

Meanwhile, institutional investors and sovereign funds continue to accumulate gold, signalling long-term strategic shifts away from traditional reserve currencies.

While technical indicators suggest the market may be overbought in the short term, analysts expect any correction to be modest.

For now, gold’s glittering ascent underscores a broader loss of confidence in conventional assets—and a renewed faith in timeless value.

Posted on

Is the resilient stock market keeping the U.S. economy out of a recession and if so – is that a bad thing?

U.S. recession looming?

The Resilient Stock Market: A Double-Edged Shield Against Recession

In a year marked by political volatility, Trumps tariff war, soft labour data, and persistent inflation anxieties, one pillar of the economy has stood tall: the stock market.

Defying expectations, major indices like the Nasdaq, Dow Jones and S&P 500 have surged, buoyed by AI-driven optimism and industrial strength. This resilience has helped stave off a technical recession—but not without raising deeper concerns about economic fragility and inequality.

At the heart of this phenomenon lies the ‘wealth effect’. As equity portfolios swell, high-net-worth households feel richer and spend more freely.

This consumer activity props up GDP figures and masks underlying weaknesses in wage growth, job creation, and productivity.

August’s economic data showed surprising strength in consumer spending and housing, despite lacklustre employment figures and fading stimulus support.

But here’s the rub: this buoyancy is not broadly shared. According to the University of Michigan’s sentiment index, confidence has declined sharply since January, especially among those without significant stock holdings.

Balance

The U.S. economy, in effect, is being held aloft by a narrow slice of the population—those with the means to benefit from rising asset prices. For everyone else, the recovery feels distant, even illusory.

This divergence creates a dangerous illusion of stability. Policymakers may hesitate to intervene—whether through fiscal support or monetary easing—because headline indicators look healthy. Yet beneath the surface, vulnerabilities abound.

If the market were to correct sharply, the spending it fuels could evaporate overnight, exposing the economy’s dependence on asset inflation.

Moreover, the market’s resilience may be distorting capital allocation. Companies flush with investor cash are prioritising stock buybacks and speculative ventures over wage growth or long-term investment. This can exacerbate inequality and erode the foundations of sustainable growth.

In short, while the stock market’s strength has delayed a recession, it has also deepened the disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street.

The danger lies not in the market’s success, but in mistaking it for economic health. A resilient market may be a shield—but it’s not a cure. And if that shield cracks, the consequences could be swift and severe.

The challenge now is to look beyond the indices and ask harder questions: Who is benefitting? What are we neglecting?

And how do we build an economy that’s resilient not just in numbers, but in substance, regardless of nation.

Posted on

Trump’s Drug Tariffs: A protectionist prescription policy?

Trump's Pharma Tariffs

Trump’s latest tariff salvo is already rattling pharma stocks. Branded drugs now face a 100% levy unless firms build plants in the U.S.

Trump’s Drug Tariffs: A protectionist prescription policy?

In a move that’s rattled pharmaceutical markets across Asia and Europe, President Trump has announced a sweeping 100% tariff on branded, patented drugs imported into the United States—unless manufacturers relocate production to American soil.

The policy, unveiled via executive order, is part of a broader push to ‘restore pharmaceutical sovereignty’ and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.

The impact was immediate. Asian pharma stocks tumbled, with major exporters in India, South Korea, and Japan facing sharp declines. It is uncertain how this will affect the UK.

European firms, already grappling with regulatory headwinds, now face a stark choice: invest in U.S. manufacturing or risk losing access to one of the world’s most lucrative drug markets.

Critics argue the move is less about health security and more about economic nationalism. “This isn’t about safety—it’s about leverage,” said one analyst. “Trump’s team is using tariffs as a blunt instrument to force industrial relocation.”

Supporters, however, hail the policy as long overdue. With drug shortages and supply chain fragility exposed during the pandemic, the White House insists the tariffs will incentivise domestic resilience and job creation.

Yet the devil lies in the dosage. Smaller biotech firms may struggle to absorb the costs of relocation, potentially stifling innovation. And with branded drugs often tied to complex global patents and licensing agreements, the legal fallout could be significant.

The symbolism is potent: medicine, once a universal good, is now a battleground for economic identity. Trump’s tariff salvo reframes pharmaceuticals not as tools of healing, but as tokens of sovereignty. Whether this prescription cures or corrupts remains to be seen.

U.S. President Donald Trump has also stated that said plans to impose a 25% tariff on imported heavy trucks from 1st October 2025.

Posted on

Stock market pullback in 4th quarter… how likely is it?

Taking Stock

While many investors are hoping for a year-end rally, several analysts are warning that a fourth-quarter pullback remains a real possibility.

Valuation concerns: Large-cap stocks are trading at historically high valuations, reminiscent of the 2021 peak. That leaves little room for error if economic data disappoints.

Tariff aftershocks: April’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs triggered a sharp sell-off, and although markets rebounded, strategists at Stifel expect an ‘echo’ effect—potentially a 14% drop in the S&P 500 before year-end.

Economic slowdown: Consumer spending is showing signs of strain, and real wage growth may not keep pace with rising prices. That could dampen demand and corporate earnings.

Trade uncertainty: The 90-day tariff pause expired in July 2025 (with adjustments), leaving markets to navigate the fallout—valuation echoes, trade uncertainty, and investor psychology now collide in Q4’s shadow. This could lead to headline-driven volatility through Q4.

Mixed sentiment: Some strategists remain cautiously optimistic, citing resilient labour data and hopes for more Fed rate cuts. But others warn that investors may be wishful thinking!

A U.S. stock market pullback is likely due in Q4 2025

The fourth quarter (Q4) of the calendar year runs from 1st October to 31st December. In financial and editorial contexts, it often carries symbolic weight—year-end reckonings, holiday spending, and final earnings reports all converge here.

A pullback is due, but when?

Posted on

Fed cuts rates amid labour market strains and political Powell pressure

U.S. cuts rates

On 17th September 2025, the U.S. Federal Reserve announced its first interest rate cut of 2025, lowering the benchmark federal funds rate by 0.25% to a range of 4.00%–4.25%.

The decision follows nine months of monetary policy stagnation and comes amid mounting evidence of a weakening labour market and persistent inflationary pressures.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell described the move as a ‘risk management cut’, citing slower job growth and a rise in unemployment as key drivers.

While inflation remains elevated—partly due to tariffs introduced by the Trump administration—the Fed opted to prioritise employment support, signalling the possibility of two further cuts before year-end.

The decision was not without controversy. New Fed Governor Stephen Miran, recently appointed by President Trump, reportedly dissented, advocating for a more aggressive half-point reduction. Political tensions have escalated, with Trump publicly urging Powell to ‘cut bigger’.

Markets responded with mixed signals: the Dow rose modestly, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq slipped slightly. However, each improved in after-hours trading.

Analysts remain divided over the long-term impact, with some warning that easing too quickly could reignite inflation.

The Fed’s next move will be closely watched as it balances economic fragility with political crosswinds.

The next U.S. Federal Reserve meeting is scheduled for 29th–30th October 2025, with the interest rate decision expected on Wednesday, 30th October at 2:00 PM ET.

Posted on

China-U.S. trade slump deepens as exports plunge 33%

U.S. imports from China fall in August 2025

China’s exports to the United States fell sharply in August 2025, marking a six-month low and underscoring the growing strain in global trade dynamics.

According to recent data, shipments from China to the U.S. dropped by 33% year-on-year, reflecting both weakening demand and the ongoing effects of geopolitical tensions.

This decline is part of a broader slowdown in China’s export sector, which saw overall outbound shipments contract for the sixth consecutive month.

Analysts point to several contributing factors: tighter monetary policy in the U.S., shifting supply chains, and a cooling appetite for Chinese goods amid rising tariffs and trade barriers.

Down 33%

The 33% plunge is particularly striking given the scale of bilateral trade. The U.S. remains one of China’s largest export markets, and such a steep drop signals deeper economic recalibrations.

Sectors hit hardest include electronics, machinery, and consumer goods—industries that once formed the backbone of China’s export dominance.

Economists warn that this trend could have ripple effects across global markets. For China, it raises questions about domestic resilience and the need to pivot toward internal consumption.

For the U.S., it may accelerate efforts to diversify supply chains and invest in domestic manufacturing.

The timing is also politically charged. With President Trump’s tariff policies still in effect and China navigating its own economic headwinds, trade relations remain tense.

This downturn may prompt renewed negotiations—or further decoupling.

Despite the ongoing slump in trade, the U.S. continues to be China’s largest export destination among individual countries.

Posted on

India’s GDP: High growth amid global headwinds

GDP India

India’s economy continues to defy gravity, posting a robust 7.8% year-on-year GDP growth in the April–June quarter of 2025—the fastest pace in five quarters.

This surge, driven by strong domestic consumption, infrastructure investment, and a booming services sector, beat market expectations and reaffirmed India’s position as the world’s fastest-growing major economy.

Government-led infrastructure spending has catalysed private investment and job creation, while the digital economy—powered by fintech and e-commerce—continues to expand India’s economic footprint.

Manufacturing grew by 7.7%, and services soared by 9.3%, with government services hitting a 12-quarter high.

Yet, external pressures loom. The reintroduction of U.S. tariffs, particularly under a potential Trump administration, could dampen export momentum and strain trade relations.

Rising oil prices and geopolitical tensions in Asia further complicate India’s economic outlook. Despite these risks, the Reserve Bank of India has held steady, managing inflation and currency volatility with precision.

India’s GDP growth isn’t just a number—it’s a narrative of resilience and reinvention. From a service-dominated model to a more balanced mix of manufacturing, tech, and green energy, the country is repositioning itself as a global economic force.

The challenge now lies in sustaining this momentum while navigating fiscal constraints and global uncertainty.

📈 Chart Highlights

QuarterGDP GrowthAction
Q2 20246.5%U.S. signals tariff reintroduction
Q3 20246.9%India negotiates trade deals
Q4 20247.2%U.S. imposes limited tariffs
Q1 20257.8%India expands export incentives

Posted on

Japan faces steepest export decline in four years

Japan exports drop

Japan’s economy has hit a troubling patch, with July 2025 marking its sharpest export contraction in over four years.

The Ministry of Finance reported a 2.6% year-on-year drop, driven largely by tariff led trade tensions and weakening global demand.

The most dramatic impact came from the United States, where exports fell 10.1%, led by a 28.4% plunge in automobile shipments.

This follows the U.S. administration’s decision to impose 25% tariffs on Japanese vehicles and auto parts in April—a move that has rattled Japan’s automotive sector, long a pillar of its export economy.

Despite a partial tariff rollback to 15% in July, the damage was already done. Japanese carmakers absorbed much of the cost to maintain shipment volumes, which only fell 3.2%, but the value loss was substantial.

Japan – July export data infographic

Exports to China also declined by 3.5%, underscoring broader regional weakness. Meanwhile, imports dropped 7.5%, signalling sluggish domestic consumption and further strain on Japan’s trade balance, which recorded a 117.5 billion yen deficit.

Economists warn that if the export downturn continues, Japan could face a recession. Although Q2 GDP showed modest growth of 0.3%, the July figures suggest that momentum may be fading.

The Bank of Japan is now expected to hold off on interest rate hikes, with its next policy meeting scheduled for 19th September 2025.

As global markets digest the implications, Japan’s export slump serves as a stark reminder of how vulnerable even advanced economies can be to shifting trade policies and geopolitical headwinds.

Posted on

Is BIG tech being allowed to pay its way out of the tariff turmoil

BIG tech money aids tariff avoidance

Where is the standard for the tariff line? Is this fair on the smaller businesses and the consumer? Money buys a solution without fixing the problem!

  • Nvidia and AMD have struck a deal with the U.S. government: they’ll pay 15% of their China chip sales revenues directly to Washington. This arrangement allows them to continue selling advanced chips to China despite looming export restrictions.
  • Apple, meanwhile, is going all-in on domestic investment. Tim Cook announced a $600 billion U.S. investment plan over four years, widely seen as a strategic move to dodge Trump’s proposed 100% tariffs on imported chips.

🧩 Strategic Motives

  • These deals are seen as tariff relief mechanisms, allowing companies to maintain access to key markets while appeasing the administration.
  • Analysts suggest Apple’s move could trigger a ‘domino effect’ across the tech sector, with other firms following suit to avoid punitive tariffs.
Tariff avoidance examples

⚖️ Legal & Investor Concerns

  • Some critics call the Nvidia/AMD deal a “shakedown” or even unconstitutional, likening it to a tax on exports.
  • Investors are wary of the arbitrary nature of these deals—questioning whether future administrations might play kingmaker with similar tactics.

Big Tech firms are striking strategic deals to sidestep escalating tariffs, with Apple pledging $600 billion in U.S. investments to avoid import duties, while Nvidia and AMD agree to pay 15% of their China chip revenues directly to Washington.

These moves are seen as calculated trade-offs—offering financial concessions or domestic reinvestment in exchange for continued market access. Critics argue such arrangements resemble export taxes or political bargaining, raising concerns about legality and precedent.

As tensions mount, these deals reflect a broader shift in how tech giants navigate geopolitical risk and regulatory pressure.

They buy a solution…

Posted on

Global stocks indices flying high as new records broken – 12th August 2025

New records for global indices led by U.S. tech

In a sweeping rally that spanned continents and sectors, major global indices surged to fresh record highs yesterday, buoyed by cooling inflation data, renewed hopes of U.S. central bank rate cuts, and easing trade tensions.

U.S. inflation figures released 12th August 2025 for July came in at: 2.7% – helping to lift markets to new record highs!

U.S. Consumer Price Index — July 2025

MetricValue
Monthly CPI (seasonally adjusted)+0.2%
Annual CPI (headline)+2.7%
Core CPI (excl. food & energy)+0.3% monthly, +3.1% annual

Despite concerns over Trump’s sweeping tariffs, the U.S. July 2025 CPI came in slightly below expectations (forecast was 2.8% annual).

Economists noted that while tariffs are beginning to show up in certain categories, their broader inflationary impact remains modest — for now.

Global Indices Surged to Record Highs Amid Rate Cut Optimism and Tariff Relief

Tuesday, 12 August 2025 — Taking Stock

📈 S&P 500: Breaks Above 6,400 for First Time

  • Closing Level: 6,427.02
  • Gain: +1.1%
  • Catalyst: Softer-than-expected U.S. CPI data (+2.7% YoY) boosted bets on a September rate cut, with 94% of traders now expecting easing.
  • Sector Drivers: Large-cap tech stocks led the charge, with Microsoft, Meta, and Nvidia all contributing to the rally.

💻 Nasdaq Composite & Nasdaq 100: Tech Titans Lead the Way

  • Nasdaq Composite: Closed at a record 21,457.48 (+1.55%)
  • Nasdaq 100: Hit a new intraday high of 23,849.50, closing at 23,839.20 (+1.33%)
  • Highlights:
    • Apple surged 4.2% after announcing a $600 billion U.S. investment plan.
    • AI optimism continues to fuel gains across the Magnificent Seven stocks.

Nasdaq 100 chart 12th August 2025

Nasdaq 100 chart 12th August 2025

🧠 Tech 100 (US Tech Index): Momentum Builds

  • Latest High: 23,849.50
  • Weekly Gain: Nearly +3.7%
  • Outlook: Traders eye a breakout above 24,000, with institutional buying accelerating. Analysts note a 112% surge in net long positions since late June.

🇯🇵 Nikkei 225: Japan Joins the Record Club

  • Closing Level: 42,718.17 (+2.2%)
  • Intraday High: 43,309.62
  • Drivers:
    • Relief over U.S. tariff revisions and a 90-day pause on Chinese levies.
    • Strong earnings from chipmakers like Kioxia and Micron.
    • Speculation of expanded fiscal stimulus following Japan’s recent election results.

🧮 Market Sentiment Snapshot

IndexRecord Level Reached% Gain YesterdayKey Driver
S&P 5006,427.02+1.1%CPI data, rate cut bets
Nasdaq Comp.21,457.48+1.55%AI optimism, Apple surge
Nasdaq 10023,849.50+1.33%Tech earnings, institutional buying
Tech 10023,849.50+1.06%Momentum, bullish sentiment
Nikkei 22543,309.62+2.2%Tariff relief, chip rally

📊 Editorial Note: While the rally reflects strong investor confidence, analysts caution that several indices are approaching technical overbought levels.

The Nikkei’s RSI, for instance, has breached 75, often a precursor to short-term pullbacks.

Posted on

Trump – tactics and turmoil – tariff U-turn count

Trump U-turns

Trump’s latest flurry of tariff U-turns has left global markets whiplashed but oddly resilient.

From threatening Swiss gold bars with a 39% levy to abruptly tweeting ‘Gold will not be Tariffed!’ The former president’s reversals have become a hallmark of his political tactic.

Investors now brace for volatility not from policy itself, but from its rapid retraction. With China tariffs delayed, praise for previously criticised CEOs, and shifting stances on Ukraine and Russia, Trump’s tactics seem less about strategy and more about spectacle.

Yet despite the chaos, markets appear unfazed—suggesting that unpredictability may now be priced in

🧠 Why So Many U-Turns?

  • Market Sensitivity: Many reversals follow stock market dips or investor backlash.
  • Diplomatic Pressure: Allies like Switzerland, India, Ukraine, Canada and Australia have pushed back hard.
  • Narrative Control: Trump often uses Truth Social to pivot public messaging rapidly.
  • Strategic Ambiguity: Some analysts argue it’s part of a negotiation tactic—others call it chaos.

🔁 Latest Trump U-Turns

TopicInitial PositionReversalDate
Gold TariffsSwiss gold bars to face 39% tariffTrump tweets “Gold will not be Tariffed!”7 Aug 2025
China Tariffs145% reciprocal tariffs to beginDelayed for 90 days12 Aug 2025
Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan“Must resign, immediately”“His success and rise is an amazing story”11 Aug 2025
Russia-Ukraine ArmsPaused military aid to UkraineResumed shipments after backlash8 Jul 2025
India’s Role in Peace TalksCriticised India’s neutralityPraised India’s diplomatic efforts9 Aug 2025
Global TariffsImposed sweeping import taxesSuspended most tariffs within 13 hours9 Apr 2025
Epstein FilesPromised full declassificationNow downplaying and deflectingOngoing

TACO – Trump Always Chickens Out! Tactics or turmoil?

Posted on

Technical Signals: Cracks beneath the surface – are U.S. stocks beginning to stumble?

Stock correction?

There are increasingly credible signs that U.S. stocks may be heading into a deeper adjustment phase.

Here’s a breakdown of the key indicators and risks that suggest the current stumble could be more than a seasonal wobble. It’s just a hypothesis, but…

  • S&P 500 clinging to its 200-day moving average: While the long-term trend remains intact, short-term averages (5-day and 20-day) have turned negative.
  • Volatility Index (VIX) rising: A 7.61% surge in the 20-day average VIX suggests growing unease, even as prices remain elevated.
  • Diverging ADX readings: The S&P 500’s ADX (trend strength) is weak at 7.57, while the VIX’s ADX is strong at 45.37—classic signs of instability brewing.

🧠 Sentiment & Positioning: Optimism with Defensive Undercurrents

  • Investor sentiment is bullish (40.3%), but rising put/call ratios and a complacent Fear & Greed Index hint at hidden caution.
  • Historical parallels: Similar sentiment setups preceded corrections in 2021 and 2009. We’re not at extremes yet, but the complacency is notable.

🌍 Macroeconomic Risks: Tariffs, Fed Policy, and Structural Headwinds

  • Tariff escalation: Trump’s recent executive order raised effective tariffs to 15–20%, with new duties on rare earths and tech-critical imports.
  • Labour market weakening: July’s jobs report showed just 73,000 new jobs, with massive downward revisions to prior months. Unemployment ticked up to 4.2%.
  • Fed indecision: The central bank is split, with no clear path on rate cuts. This uncertainty is amplifying volatility.
  • Structural drag: Reduced immigration and R&D funding are eroding long-term growth potential.
  • 🛡️ Strategic Implications: How Investors Are Hedging
  • Defensive sectors like utilities, healthcare, and gold are gaining traction.
  • VIX futures and Treasury bonds are being used to hedge against volatility.
  • Emerging markets with trade deals (e.g., Vietnam, Japan) may outperform amid global realignment.
  • 🗓️ Seasonal Weakness: August and September Historically Slump
  • August is the worst month for the Dow since 1988, and the second worst for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq.
  • Wolfe Research reportedly notes average declines of 0.3% (August) and 0.7% (September) since 1990.
  • Sahm Rule: Recession indicator.

Now what?

While the broader market still shows resilience—especially in mega-cap tech—the underlying signals point to fragility.

Elevated valuations, weakening macro data, and geopolitical uncertainty are converging. A deeper correction isn’t guaranteed, but the setup is increasingly asymmetric: limited upside, growing downside risk.

Posted on

Trump’s 100% microchip tariff – A high-stakes gamble on U.S. manufacturing

U.S. 100% tariff threat on chips

President Donald Trump has announced a sweeping 100% tariff on imported semiconductors and microchips—unless companies are actively manufacturing in the United States.

The move, unveiled during an Oval Office event with Apple CEO Tim Cook, is aimed at turbocharging domestic production in a sector critical to everything from smartphones to defence systems.

Trump’s vow comes on the heels of Apple’s pledge to invest an additional $100 billion in U.S. operations over the next four years.

While the tariff exemption criteria remain vague, Trump emphasised that firms ‘committed to build in the United States’ would be spared the levy.

The announcement adds pressure to global chipmakers like Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC), Nvidia, and GlobalFoundries, many of which have already initiated U.S. manufacturing projects.

According to the Semiconductor Industry Association, over 130 U.S.-based initiatives totalling $600 billion have been announced since 2020.

Critics warn the tariffs could disrupt global supply chains and raise costs for consumers, while supporters argue it’s a bold step toward tech sovereignty.

With AI, automotive, and defence sectors increasingly reliant on chips, the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Whether this tariff threat becomes a turning point or a trade war flashpoint remains to be seen.

Trump has a habit of unravelling as much as he ‘ravels’ – time will tell with this tariff too.

Posted on

U.S. interest rates held steady at 4.25% to 4.50%

U.S. Federal Reserve

On 30th July 2025, the Federal Reserve opted to keep its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 4.25%–4.50%, defying mounting pressure from President Trump to initiate cuts.

The decision, reached by a 9–2 vote, marked the first time since 1993 that two governors—Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller—formally dissented, advocating for a quarter-point reduction.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell cited “moderated” economic growth and “somewhat elevated” inflation as reasons for maintaining the current stance.

Despite a robust Q2 GDP reading of 3%, Powell emphasised the need for caution, particularly amid uncertainty surrounding Trump’s tariff policies.

Markets reacted with disappointment, as hopes for a dovish pivot were dashed. Powell remained non-committal about September’s outlook, reportedly stating, ‘We have made no decisions about September’.

With inflation still above target and political tensions rising, the Fed’s wait-and-see approach underscores its commitment to data-driven policy.

Posted on

U.S. GDP surges 3.0% in Q2 — but what’s driving the rebound?

U.S. GDP

After a lacklustre start to 2025, the U.S. economy posted a surprising comeback in the second quarter, with GDP rising at an annualised rate of 3.0%, according to data released today.

The sharp upswing follows a 0.5% contraction in Q1, catching analysts off-guard and fuelling speculation about the durability of the recovery.

📈 A Rebound Built on Consumers and Imports

At the heart of the turnaround lies a 1.4% increase in consumer spending, led by strong demand in sectors like healthcare, finance, and automotive sales.

But what really moved the needle was a dramatic collapse in imports — down 30.3%, reversing the Q1 surge and effectively boosting the GDP calculation.

While exports and business investment both shrank modestly, the overall picture was buoyed by domestic strength and favourable trade math.

💰 Inflation Retreats — Temporarily?

The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, a key measure of inflation, ticked up just 2.1%, down from 3.7% in the previous quarter.

The Core PCE, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, landed at 2.5%, easing pressure on the Federal Reserve to act aggressively.

Yet policymakers are watching warily. A surge in tariffs—particularly those scheduled for August—could distort prices and consumer behaviour in the months ahead.

🧠 Fed and Market Implications

The GDP bounce gives the Federal Reserve some breathing room, but not total confidence. Investment weakness and subdued export activity could signal structural fragilities beneath the headline growth.

With tariff uncertainty, election-year dynamics, and a cautious jobs market all in play, rate policy may stay frozen until the economic picture becomes clearer.

Posted on

Are investors saying it’s time to move on from tariffs and if so to what effect on the markets?

Tariffs and the Markets

It looks like investor sentiment is shifting away from obsessing over tariffs—though not because they’ve disappeared.

Instead, there’s a growing sense that tariffs may be settling into a predictable range, especially in the U.S., where President Trump signalled a blanket rate of 15–20% for countries lacking specific trade agreements.

Here’s how that’s playing out

🌐 Why Investors Are Moving On

  • Predictability over Panic: With clearer expectations around tariff levels, markets may no longer treat them as wildcards.
  • Muted Market Reaction: The recent U.S.-EU trade deal barely nudged the S&P 500 or European indexes after moving the futures initially, signalling tariffs aren’t the hot trigger they once were.
  • Economists Cooling Expectations: Revisions to tariff impact estimates suggest future trade deals might not generate outsized optimism on Wall Street.

📈 Effects on the Markets

  • Focus Shift: Investors are turning to earnings—particularly from the ‘Magnificent Seven’ tech giants—and macroeconomic data for momentum.
  • Cautious Optimism: While stocks haven’t rallied hard, they’re not dropping either. Traders seem to be waiting for a new catalyst, like U.S. consumer strength or signs of a bull phase in certain indexes.
  • Geopolitical Undercurrents: A new deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal and threats of ‘secondary tariffs’ could still stir volatility, depending on how global partners react.

So, in short tariffs aren’t gone, but they’ve become background noise. Investors are tuning in to the next big signals.

If you’re keeping an eye on retail, tech earnings, or commodity flows, this shift could have ripple effects worth dissecting.

Market moving events, other than tariffs

DateEvent/CatalystMarket Impact Potential
July 30Meta earnings + possible stock split📈 High (tech sentiment)
July 31Fed meeting📈📉 High (rate guidance)
Aug 1U.S.–EU tariff milestone, not flashpoint📉 Moderate (sector recalibration)
July 22U.S. AI Action Plan (released)📈 Unclear (dependent on execution
Posted on

Markets rally as EU–U.S. trade deal eases some tariff tension

U.S. EU tariff trade deal

European and American financial markets rallied following the announcement of a new trade pact between the EU and the U.S on Sunday 27th July 2025., easing months of escalating tensions.

The deal introduces a 15% tariff on most EU exports to the United States—well below the previously threatened 30% rate—providing greater predictability across key sectors.

Global markets surged on Monday following the announcement of a landmark trade agreement between the European Union and the United States, announced by President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at Trump’s Turnberry golf resort in Scotland.

The deal imposes a 15% tariff on most EU exports to the U.S., significantly lower than the previously threatened 30% rate.

It would appear that Trump’s global tariff rate will end up between 15% – 20%

While still a sharp increase from pre-2025 levels—when many goods faced tariffs under 3%—the agreement has been hailed as a pragmatic compromise that averts a full-blown transatlantic trade war.

In exchange, the EU has reportedly committed to $750 billion in U.S. energy purchases and $600 billion in investment into the American economy, with further spending on military equipment also expected.

European negotiators secured zero tariffs on strategic goods such as aircraft components, select chemicals, and semiconductor equipment

Strategic exemptions for aircraft components, semiconductors and select chemicals help preserve supply chain efficiency, while agricultural and consumer goods will adapt to the new rate over time.

In return, the EU has reportedly committed to over $1.3 trillion in investments focused on U.S. infrastructure, renewable energy and defence technologies.

Investors responded positively to the agreement as futures surged

  • The FTSE 100 futures hit 9,172 overnight
  • Euro Stoxx 50 futures rose 1.3%.
  • DAX hit overnight futures high of: 24,550
  • S&P 500 and Nasdaq Tech 100 hit overnight futures highs of: 6,422 and 23,440
  • Wall Street’s major indices extended futures gains, boosted by trade optimism and tech strength.

However, European stocks trimmed back ‘futures’ gains after the opening bell.

While some concerns remain over unresolved steel and pharmaceutical tariffs, analysts view the pact as a turning point that restores confidence.

The deal sets the stage for further cooperation on digital standards, regulation and intellectual property later in 2025.

This step toward economic stability is expected to foster stronger ties and benefit export-driven industries across both regions.

Trump is getting his deals, but how good are they really?

Posted on

Trump’s self-imposed August tariff deadline looms

U.S. Tariffs

Since a little after Donald Trump’s declaration of ‘Liberation Day’ and renewed tariff threats, global markets have shown a remarkable degree of indifference.

While equities dipped briefly in April, investors appear increasingly unshaken by the looming 1st August deadline.

Several factors underpin this resilience. First, market participants have grown accustomed to political brinkmanship.

Traders now view tariff announcements as bargaining tools rather than certainties, adopting a wait-and-see approach before pricing in long-term consequences.

The episodic nature of past trade spats has dulled their impact, especially without immediate legislative backing and with Trump often pulling back last minute or extending deadlines.

The media have labelled this … TACO!

TACO – Trump Always Chickens Out: Definition – A satirical acronym coined by financial commentators to describe Donald Trump’s predictable pattern of announcing aggressive tariffs, then softening or delaying them under market pressure.

Second, economic fundamentals remain firm. Corporate earnings continue to surpass expectations, and key indicators—such as job growth and consumer spending—suggest sustained momentum in major economies.

As a result, the tariff narrative has taken a back seat to earnings reports and central bank manoeuvres.

Third, diversification strategies have matured since the 2018–2020 trade wars. Many multinationals have already restructured supply chains, buffered risk through regional trade agreements, and hedged exposure to volatile sectors.

This strategic evolution makes markets less sensitive to unilateral tariff threats, especially if they lack multilateral support.

Analysts note that Trump’s rhetoric still carries weight politically, but the financial world operates on evidence, not headlines. As one strategist quipped, ‘Markets don’t trade on bluster; they trade on impact’.

That’s all very well – but markets can be fickle and reflect sentiment too.

With investors focused on earnings and monetary policy, tariff drama may remain background noise—unless policy becomes policy.

Until then, the markets seem content to roll with it!

Posted on

Markets appear to dismiss Trump’s tariff threats – but will this prove to be unwise?

Super Chicken

Despite President Donald Trump’s renewed push for sweeping tariffs, global markets appear unfazed.

Trump issued letters to 14 countries – including Japan, South Korea, and Malaysia—outlining new import levies ranging from 25% to 40%, set to take effect on 1st August 2025. More letters then followed.

Yet, major indices like the FTSE 100 and Nikkei 225 barely flinched, with some even posting modest gains.

So, who’s right—the president or the markets?

Trump insists tariffs are essential to redress trade imbalances and bring manufacturing back to the U.S. The EU also faces higher tariffs.

He’s floated extreme measures, including a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals and a 50% levy on copper.

His administration argues these moves will strengthen domestic industry and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.

However, investors seem to be betting on a familiar pattern: Trump talks tough but ultimately softens under pressure. Analysts have dubbed this the ‘TACO’ trade—Trump Always Chickens Out.

His own comments have added to the ambiguity, calling the August deadline ‘firm, but not 100% firm’.

The economic logic behind the tariffs is being questioned. Tariffs are paid by importers—often U.S. businesses and consumers—not foreign governments.

This could lead to higher prices and inflation, especially in sectors like healthcare and electronics. Some economists warn of recessionary risks for countries like Japan and South Korea.

In short, markets may be right to remain calm—for now. But if Trump follows through, the impact could be far-reaching.

With trade negotiations still in flux and only two deals (UK and Vietnam) finalised, the next few weeks will be critical. Investors may be wise not to ignore the warning signs entirely.

Whether this is brinkmanship or a genuine shift in trade policy, the stakes are high—and the clock is ticking.

Posted on

Elon Musk launches ‘America Party’ amid ongoing feud with Trump

America Party

In a dramatic twist to the U.S. political landscape, Elon Musk has announced the formation of a new political party, the America Party, following a bitter fallout with President Donald Trump over his controversial tax and spending legislation – the ‘Big Beautiful Bill‘.

Musk, once a key ally of Trump and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), broke ranks after the passage of the so-called ‘Big Beautiful Bill‘, which Musk labelled a “disgusting abomination” that would balloon the national debt by trillions.

On U.S. Independence Day, Musk polled his followers on X, asking whether a new party should be formed. With a 2-to-1 majority voting ‘yes’, Musk declared, ‘Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom’.

The party aims to challenge the entrenched two-party system by targeting a handful of swing Senate and House seats, potentially becoming a decisive force in future legislation.

Musk has pledged to support primary challengers against Republicans who backed the bill, accusing them of betraying fiscal responsibility.

Trump, clearly irked, dismissed Musk’s move as ‘ridiculous’, reportedly stating, ‘It’s always been a two-party system… third parties have never worked’.

He added on Truth Social, ‘Elon Musk has gone completely off the rails… becoming a train wreck over the past five weeks’.

The feud has escalated rapidly, with Trump threatening to revoke federal subsidies for Musk’s companies and even suggesting deportation, despite Musk’s U.S. citizenship.

While Musk’s America Party faces steep legal and logistical hurdles, his immense wealth and online influence could make it a disruptive force.

Whether it gains traction or fizzles out remains to be seen but it’s clear the ‘love’ between Musk and Trump is officially over.

Posted on

U.S. debt surges close to $37 trillion after ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ -Elon Musk sounds alarm

High U.S. debt levels

Following the passage of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill, the U.S. national debt has officially soared to nearly $37 trillion, with projections suggesting it could hit $40 trillion by year’s end.

The bill, which extends 2017 tax cuts and introduces expansive spending on defence, border security, and domestic manufacturing, has sparked fierce debate across Washington and Wall Street.

Critics argue the legislation lacks meaningful offsets, with no new taxes or spending cuts to balance its provisions.

Interest payments alone reached $1.1 trillion in 2024, surpassing the defence budget. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill could add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.

Among the most vocal opponents is tech billionaire Elon Musk, who previously served as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Musk has labelled the bill a ‘disgusting abominatio’ and warned it undermines fiscal responsibility.

He has reportedly pledged to fund primary challengers against Republicans who supported the measure, accusing them of betraying their promises to reduce spending.

Musk’s concerns go beyond economics. He argues the bill reflects a broken political system dominated by self-interest, calling for the creation of a new political movement, the America Party, to restore accountability.

While the White House insists the bill will spur economic growth and eventually reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio, sceptics remain unconvinced.

With the debt ceiling raised by a record $5 trillion, the long-term implications for America’s financial stability are now front and centre.

As the dust settles, the clash between Trump’s fiscal vision and Musk’s warnings sets the stage for a turbulent political and economic period ahead.

Posted on

Trump shifts tariff ‘goal posts’ again and targets BRICS with extra 10% levy

Goal posts moved

In a fresh escalation of trade tensions, President Donald Trump has once again moved the goalposts on tariff policy, pushing the deadline for new trade deals to 1st August 2025.

This marks the second extension since the original April 2025 ‘Liberation Day’ announcement, which had already stirred global markets.

The latest twist includes a new 10% tariff targeting countries aligned with the BRICS bloc—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – along with newer members such as Iran and the UAE.

Trump declared on Truth Social that ‘any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% tariff. There will be no exceptions’.

The move has drawn sharp criticism from BRICS leaders, who condemned the tariffs as ‘indiscriminate’ and warned of rising protectionism. Industrial metals, including copper and aluminium, saw immediate price drops amid fears of disrupted supply chains.

While the White House insists the new deadline allows more time for negotiation, analysts warn the uncertainty could dampen global trade and investor confidence.

With letters outlining tariff terms expected to be sent this week, investors and market makers watch closely as Trump’s trade strategy continues to evolve or unravel.

Posted on

From Missiles to Tariffs: A desensitised stock market faces Trump’s new world

Markets desensitised to U.S. policy making

In years past, the mere hint of U.S. airstrikes or heightened geopolitical tension would send global stock markets into panic mode.

Yet, following President Trump’s re-election and his increasingly aggressive foreign policy stance, investor reactions have become notably muted.

From missile strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to an orchestrated ceasefire between Iran and Israel, markets have barely flinched. The question arises: are investors becoming desensitised to Trump’s geopolitical theatre?

Take the latest skirmish between Iran and Israel. After nearly two weeks of missile exchanges, Trump’s announcement of a ‘complete and total ceasefire’ barely nudged the S&P 500.

That calm came despite the U.S. launching pre-emptive strikes on Iranian facilities and absorbing retaliatory attacks on its military base in Qatar.

In another era, or under a different administration even, such developments might have triggered a broad risk-off sentiment. Instead, Wall Street just shrugged.

One reason may be fatigue. Trump’s approach – rife with tariffs, sanctions, and sudden reversals – has bred a kind of market immunity.

Investors, well-versed in the rhythm of Trump’s provocations, have begun treating them as background noise. His revived tariff agenda, particularly the threats aimed once again at China and EU auto imports, has likewise failed to prompt major selloffs.

Similarly, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, once a source of intense volatility, now registers as a strategic stalemate in the market’s eyes.

While Trump’s rhetoric surrounding Ukraine has shifted unpredictably, investors appear more focused on earnings, inflation data, and central bank signals than on diplomatic fallout and war!

This is not to suggest markets are indifferent to geopolitical risk, but rather that they’ve adapted. Algorithmic trading models may be increasingly geared to discount Trump’s headline-grabbing tactics, while institutional investors hedge through gold, volatility indices, or energy plays without dumping equities outright.

Critics argue this detachment is dangerous. Should a flashpoint spiral out of control, be it over Hormuz, Ukraine, or Taiwan, the slow-boiling complacency could leave portfolios badly exposed.

Still, for now, Trump’s policies are being priced in not with panic, but with complacency maybe.

The real story may not be what Trump does next, but how long the markets can continue to look away.

Trump announces he had brokered ceasefire between Israel and Iran?

Tensions between Israel and Iran reached a boiling point after 12 days of cross-border missile and drone strikes.

The situation escalated further when U.S. forces under President Trump launched targeted airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, prompting a direct Iranian missile response on a U.S. base in Qatar.

In a dramatic turn, President Trump announced what he called a ‘Complete and Total CEASEFIRE‘ – announced on Truth Social. According to Trump’s plan, Iran would begin the ceasefire immediately, with Israel to follow 12 hours later.

The truce would reportedly be considered complete after 24 hours if all attacks stopped.

While Trump touted the ceasefire as a triumph of ‘peace through strength’, analysts questioned the ceasefire’s enforceability – especially since missile exchanges reportedly continued despite the announcement.

Nonetheless, Trump claimed credit for halting the region’s slide into all-out war without committing to prolonged U.S. military involvement.

Critics argue Trump’s strategy relies more on military pressure and media theatrics than diplomatic engagement.

Supporters counter that his boldness forced both sides to the table. Either way, the world is watching to see whether this fragile peace endures – or erupts again in fire.

If this turns out to be a masterstroke in political brinkmanship – hats off to Trump, I guess. Whichever way you look at it, the precision U.S. strike on Iran was exactly that – precision. And, you have to take note.

Iran has been weakened, and this may even influence Russia’s war on Ukraine. Hopefully Israel with Palestine too – regardless of stock market reaction.

And that has to be a good thing!

But has Israel finished their war?

Despite all the noise regarding stock market reaction, one thing is for certain – the anxiety and worry for the people of the Middle East is unquestionable.

It’s not a happy time.

Posted on

UK economy shrank in April 2025

UK flag on a squeezed bottle

The UK economy contracted by 0.3% in April 2025, a sharper decline than the 0.1% forecast by economists, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

The unexpected downturn has raised fresh concerns about the country’s economic resilience amid rising costs and global trade tensions.

April’s contraction was driven by a combination of domestic and international pressures. A significant rise in employers’ National Insurance contributions, coupled with increases in water, energy, and council tax bills, placed added pressure on businesses and households.

Simultaneously, newly imposed U.S. tariffs, introduced by President Trump, led to the steepest monthly drop in UK exports to the United States on record.

Services and manufacturing, which together form the backbone of the UK economy, both saw declines.

Legal and real estate sectors were particularly affected, following a surge in house sales in March 2025 ahead of stamp duty changes. Car manufacturing also faltered after a strong first quarter.

Despite the monthly setback, UK GDP still grew by 0.7% over the three months to April 2025, suggesting some economic activity may have been pulled forward earlier in the year.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves reportedly acknowledged the figures were ‘clearly disappointing’ but reaffirmed her commitment to long-term growth through strategic investments in infrastructure, housing, and energy.

While April’s figures may not signal an immediate crisis, they underscore the fragility of the UK’s recovery.

With UK inflation still above target and interest rates elevated, the UK government faces a delicate balancing act to sustain momentum without stifling growth.