Category: Politica

Posted on

The UK is planning to build a homegrown artificial intelligence rival to OpenAI

UK AI

In a bold move to establish as a global leader in artificial intelligence, the United Kingdom is undertaking an ambitious initiative to develop a homegrown competitor to OpenAI.

This initiative is part of a broader strategy to enhance the nation’s computing infrastructure and foster innovation in AI technology.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s administration has committed to increasing the UK’s ‘sovereign’ computing capacity by twentyfold by 2030. This significant investment aims to support the development of powerful AI models that rely on high-performance computing equipment.

The government plans to expand data centre capacity across the country, providing the necessary infrastructure for AI developers to train and run their systems effectively.

AI Opportunities Action Plan

Central to this initiative is the AI Opportunities Action Plan, spearheaded by tech investor Matt Clifford. The plan outlines a comprehensive approach to harnessing the potential of AI, including the establishment of AI growth zones where planning permission rules will be relaxed to facilitate the creation of new data centers.

These zones are expected to become hubs of innovation, attracting both domestic and international talent to the UK.

The government is also set to launch the AI Research Resource, an initiative aimed at bolstering the UK’s computing infrastructure. This resource will provide access to high-performance computing facilities, enabling researchers and developers to work on cutting-edge AI projects.

Additionally, the establishment of a National Data Library will connect public institutions, such as universities, to enhance the country’s ability to create sovereign AI models.

Funding challenge

One of the key challenges facing the UK in its bid to rival OpenAI is funding. While the government has pledged substantial investments, many entrepreneurs and venture capitalists in the country have highlighted the difficulties in raising the kind of capital available to AI startups in the U.S. To address this, the government has secured commitments from leading tech firms, which have pledged £14 billion towards various AI projects.

This includes significant investments in data centers and the creation of thousands of AI-related jobs across the country.

UK AI sovereignty

The UK’s focus on AI sovereignty is driven by the belief that technologies critical to economic growth and national security should be developed within the country. This approach aims to reduce reliance on foreign tech giants and ensure that AI advancements align with national interests and ethical standards.

The government is also exploring the role of renewable and low-carbon energy sources, such as nuclear, to power the data centers that will support AI development.

Despite the ambitious plans, the UK faces several hurdles in its quest to become a global AI leader. The country’s risk-averse investment culture and the competitive landscape of AI development pose significant challenges.

However, the government’s proactive approach and the support of industry leaders provide a strong foundation for success.

Initiative and challenge

The UK’s initiative to build a homegrown rival to OpenAI represents a significant step towards establishing itself as a global leader in artificial intelligence.

By investing in computing infrastructure, fostering innovation, and securing industry support, the UK aims to create a thriving AI ecosystem that can compete on the world stage. While challenges remain, the commitment to AI sovereignty and the strategic vision outlined in the AI Opportunities Action Plan offer a promising path forward for the nation’s AI ambitions.

Sold – the UK needs to protect its future and not sell the silver… again

Over the years, the UK has seen several of its tech companies sold off to foreign investors.

  1. ARM Holdings: Perhaps the most famous example, ARM Holdings, a leading semiconductor and software design company, was acquired by Japan’s SoftBank Group in 2016 for £24.3 billion. ARM’s technology is used in the majority of smartphones worldwide.
  2. DeepMind: In 2014, Google acquired DeepMind, a UK-based AI company known for its advancements in machine learning and neural networks, for around £400 million. DeepMind has since become a key part of Google’s AI research efforts.
  3. Imagination Technologies: This British GPU and AI processing company was sold to Canyon Bridge Capital Partners, a private equity fund backed by Chinese state-owned China Reform Fund Management, in 2017 for £550 million. Recently, Imagination Technologies has been put up for sale again.
  4. Autonomy Corporation: Acquired by Hewlett-Packard (HP) in 2011 for $11.7 billion. The deal later became controversial due to allegations of financial mismanagement
  5. Powa Technologies: This mobile payments company faced financial difficulties and was sold off in parts after going into administration in 2016. PowaTag was sold to a consortium led by businessman Ben White, while Powa Web was sold in a management buyout backed by Greenlight Digital.

One to keep

Raspberry Pi Holdings plc, the parent company behind the iconic Raspberry Pi computer series, is a British technology business focused on designing and manufacturing single-board computers and modules. The company was founded by Eben Upton and is headquartered in Cambridge, England1.

As of the latest information, the largest shareholder of Raspberry Pi Holdings is the Raspberry Pi Foundation, which holds around 49% of the company. Other notable shareholders include Arm Holdings plc, Lansdowne Partners (UK) LLP, and the Raspberry Pi Employee Benefit Trust. The company went public on the London Stock Exchange in June 2024.

Raspberry Pi Holdings continues to innovate and expand its product offerings, maintaining its mission to make computing accessible and affordable for everyone.

These sales reflect the global interest in UK tech companies and the challenges they face in securing domestic investment to remain independent. The UK’s tech sector continues to be a hotbed of innovation, attracting significant attention from international investors.

The UK needs to nurture and keep its upcoming new tech discoveries, AI or otherwise – to protect the future of Britain.

We have the knowhow – we just need to keep it!

Posted on

U.S. introduces more restrictions on AI chip sales across the world

U.S. AI tech

In a significant move to maintain its technological edge and ‘national security’, the United States has announced new restrictions on the sale of advanced AI chips to most countries around the world

This decision, unveiled in the final days of President Joe Biden’s administration, aims to limit the global distribution of AI technology while ensuring that America’s closest allies continue to have access to these critical resources.

Regulation

The new regulations will cap the number of AI chips that can be exported to most countries, while allowing unlimited access to U.S. AI technology for America’s closest allies, including Japan, UK, South Korea, and the Netherlands.

This approach is designed to prevent adversaries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea from acquiring advanced computing power that could enhance their military capabilities.

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo emphasised the importance of maintaining U.S. leadership in AI development and chip design. ‘The U.S. leads AI now – both AI development and AI chip design, and it’s critical that we keep it that way,’ she reportedly said.

The regulations are part of a broader effort to close loopholes and add new guardrails to control the flow of AI chips and the global development of AI.

AI rules

The new rules will place limits on the export of advanced graphics processing units (GPUs), which are essential for powering data centers needed to train AI models. Companies like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, which produce these chips, will be significantly impacted by the new regulations.

Major cloud service providers, such as Microsoft, Google, and Amazon, will be able to seek global authorisations to build data centres, exempting their projects from the country quotas on AI chips.

The Biden administration’s decision has faced criticism from industry leaders. Nvidia, a leading producer of AI chips, called the new rules “sweeping overreach” and argued that the restrictions would clamp down on technology already available in mainstream gaming PCs and consumer hardware.

Oracle, a major data center provider, expressed concerns that the rules would hand over a significant portion of the global AI and GPU market to Chinese competitors.

Despite the opposition, the U.S. government remains steadfast in its commitment to protecting national security and maintaining its technological dominance. The new regulations are set to take effect in 120 days, giving the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump time to weigh in on the implementation and enforcement of the rules.

Restrictions

The U.S. restrictions on AI chip sales represent a strategic effort to safeguard ‘national security’ and maintain leadership in AI technology.

While the new regulations have sparked controversy and criticism from industry leaders, the government’s focus on controlling the global distribution of AI chips underscores the importance of technological sovereignty in an increasingly competitive world

Posted on

UK wants to control its own AI direction – suggesting a divergence from the EU and U.S.

UK tech

The UK is charting its own course when it comes to regulating artificial intelligence, signaling a potential divergence from the approaches taken by the United States and the European Union. This move is part of a broader strategy to establish the UK as a global leader in AI technology.

UK AI framework

Britain’s minister for AI and digital government, Feryal Clark, emphasised the importance of the UK developing its own regulatory framework for AI.

She highlighted the government’s strong relationships with AI companies like OpenAI and Google DeepMind, which have voluntarily opened their models for safety testing. Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed these sentiments, stating that the UK now has the freedom to regulate AI in a way that best suits its national interests following Brexit.

Unlike the EU, which has introduced comprehensive, pan-European legislation aimed at harmonising

AI rules across the bloc, the UK has so far refrained from enacting formal laws to regulate AI.

Instead, it has deferred to individual regulatory bodies to enforce existing rules on businesses developing and using AI. This approach contrasts with the EU’s risk-based regulation and the U.S.’s patchwork of state and local frameworks.

Labour Party Plan

During the Labour Party’s election campaign, there was a commitment to introducing regulations focusing on ‘frontier’ AI models, such as large language models like OpenAI’s GPT. However, the UK government has yet to confirm the details of proposed AI safety legislation, opting instead to consult with the industry before formalising any rules.

The UK’s AI Opportunities Action Plan, endorsed by tech entrepreneur Matt Clifford, outlines a comprehensive strategy to harness AI for economic growth.

The plan includes recommendations for scaling up AI capabilities, establishing AI growth zones, and creating a National Data Library to support AI research and innovation. The government has committed to implementing these recommendations, aiming to build a robust AI infrastructure and foster a pro-innovation regulatory environment.

Despite the ambitious plans, some industry leaders have expressed concerns about the lack of clear rules. Sachin Dev Duggal, CEO of AI startup Builder.ai, reportedly warned that proceeding without clear regulations could be ‘borderline reckless’.

He reportedly highlighted the need for the UK to leverage its data to build sovereign AI capabilities and create British success stories.

The UK’s decision to ‘do its own thing’ on AI regulation reflects its desire to tailor its approach to national interests and foster innovation.

While this strategy offers flexibility, it also presents challenges in terms of providing clear guidance and ensuring regulatory certainty for businesses. As the UK continues to develop its AI regulatory framework, it will be crucial to balance innovation with safety and public trust

Posted on

Has ‘Rachel from accounts’ messed up the UK economy?

UK budget

The pound has continued to fall after UK government borrowing costs rose and concerns grew about public finances

Sterling dropped as UK 10-year borrowing costs surged to their highest level since the 2008 financial crisis when bank borrowing virtually ground to a halt.

Economists have warned the rising costs could lead to further tax rises or cuts to spending plans as the government tries to meet its self-imposed borrowing target.

The UK government creates its own financial crisis as it messes up its ‘go for growth’ policy

The UK economy is currently grappling with a series of financial challenges that have led to a significant fall in the value of the pound, soaring treasury yields, and high borrowing costs.

These developments have been largely influenced by the recent budget announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, which has sparked concerns among investors and economists alike.

Downward trajectory

The pound has been on a downward trajectory, recently hitting its lowest level since November 2023. Traders are betting on further declines, with some predicting the pound could fall as low as $1.12

This decline is partly due to the rising cost of government borrowing, which has surged to levels not seen since the 2008 financial crisis. The yield on 10-year gilts has climbed to 4.8%, while the yield on 30-year gilts has reached 5.34%, the highest in 27 years.

Recent UK budget

The recent budget has played a crucial role in these developments. Announced in October 2024, the budget included significant tax hikes and increased spending, leading to a substantial rise in government borrowing.

The budget deficit is expected to reach 4.5% of GDP this fiscal year, pushing the overall government debt close to 100% of GDP. This increase in borrowing has led to a higher supply of government debt, which in turn has driven down the price of bonds and pushed up yields.

Higher yields

Higher yields mean that the government has to pay more to borrow money, which has significant implications for its fiscal policy. The rising cost of servicing government debt could force the government to either raise taxes further or cut spending to meet its fiscal rules.

This situation is reminiscent of the market turmoil following Liz Truss’s mini budget in 2022, which also led to a sharp rise in borrowing costs and a fall in the value of the pound.

The impact of these developments extends beyond the government. Higher borrowing costs are likely to affect households and businesses as well.

Economic growth at risk

Mortgage rates, which are influenced by government bond yields, are expected to remain high, putting additional pressure on homeowners. Businesses, on the other hand, may face higher costs of borrowing, which could lead to reduced investment and slower economic growth.

The UK is facing a challenging economic environment characterized by a falling pound, high treasury yields, and rising borrowing costs.

The recent budget has exacerbated these issues, leading to increased government borrowing and higher debt levels. As the government navigates these challenges, it will need to carefully balance its fiscal policies to avoid further economic instability and ensure sustainable growth and not more ‘unfunded’ debt.

Posted on

Meta boss bows to Trump re-aligning with their ‘free speech’ mandate

AI

Mark Zuckerberg’s recent actions seem to be driven by a mix of strategic business decisions and political pragmatism.

As Trump prepares to retake the White House, Zuckerberg has made several changes at Meta, including scaling back content moderation and fact-checking, and moving safety teams to Texas. These moves appear to align with Trump’s stance on free expression and reducing censorship.

Additionally, Zuckerberg and other tech leaders are likely seeking to build a favorable relationship with the incoming administration to navigate potential regulatory challenges and maintain their business interests. It’s a complex dance of power and influence, with both sides looking to benefit from the alliance.

Recalibrating for Trump

Zuckerberg, who has been summoned to Washington eight times to testify before congressional committees during the last two administrations, wants to be perceived as someone who can work with Trump and the Republican Party, it would appear.

Though Meta’s content-policy updates caught many of its employees and fact-checking partners off-guard, a small group of executives were formulating the plans in the aftermath of the U.S. election results. By the New Year – managers had reportedly begun planning the public announcements of its policy change.

It has been noted that Meta typically undergoes major ‘recalibrations’ after power changes hand. Meta adjusts its policies to best suit its business model and reputational needs based on the political landscape.

Does the company remain true to its original founding principles, whatever they are – or does it ‘cozy up’ with power to re-position itself to benefit politically? Let’s put some more money in the Trump inauguration pot.

Nothing new here then – but go watch the video of Zuckerberg’s announcement.

Does it may you cringe – or is it just me?

Posted on

How is AI regulation likely to affect stock markets in 2025?

AI regulation

As we head into 2025, the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation is poised to undergo significant changes, and these shifts are likely to have a profound impact on the stock markets.

The introduction of new regulations, particularly in regions like the European Union and the United States, will create both challenges and opportunities for investors.

One of the most anticipated regulatory developments is the European Union’s AI Act, which aims to set a global standard for AI regulation. This act is expected to impose stringent requirements on AI systems, particularly those used in high-risk sectors such as healthcare, finance, and law enforcement.

Companies operating in these sectors will need to invest heavily in compliance, which could lead to increased operational costs and potentially affect their profitability. As a result, stocks of companies heavily reliant on AI technologies may experience volatility as investors react to these new regulations.

In the United States, the political landscape is also shifting, with the incoming administration expected to take a more hands-on approach to AI regulation. President-elect Donald Trump has appointed Elon Musk to co-lead a new ‘Department of Government Efficiency – DOGE‘, which will focus on nascent technologies like AI. Musk’s influence and experience in the AI field could lead to more favourable policies for AI development, but it could also result in increased scrutiny and regulation of AI applications. Musk’s AI vision differs to that of Mark Zuckerberg’s for instance.

This dual approach of promoting innovation while ensuring safety and ethical use of AI could create a dynamic and unpredictable market environment.

The impact of AI regulation on the stock markets will not be uniform across all sectors. While companies in high-risk sectors may face challenges, those in industries like healthcare and finance could benefit from AI’s transformative potential.

For example, AI-driven innovations in healthcare, such as predictive diagnostics and personalised treatment plans, have the potential to revolutionize patient care and reduce costs. Companies that successfully integrate AI into their operations and comply with regulatory requirements could see their stock prices rise as investors recognize the long-term value of these advancements.

However, the regulatory landscape is not without its risks. Companies that fail to adapt to new regulations or face compliance issues may see their stock prices suffer. Additionally, the rapid pace of technological change means that regulations may struggle to keep up, leading to potential legal and financial uncertainties for companies operating in the AI arena.

AI regulation in 2025 is likely to create a complex and dynamic environment for the stock markets. While new regulations will pose challenges for some companies, they will also open up opportunities for those that can navigate the regulatory landscape successfully.

Investors will need to stay informed and agile, as the impact of AI regulation on the stock markets will be both significant and multifaceted.

Posted on

China initiates investigation into Nvidia as the microchip battle rumbles on

Tech tug 'o' war

China has reportedly initiated a probe into Nvidia, the US computer chip manufacturer, over purported breaches of anti-monopoly regulations.

The company’s shares fell by over 3% following the announcement, signalling the latest development in the ongoing tech conflict between the U.S. and China over the profitable semiconductor market.

Over recent weeks, the U.S. imposed stricter restrictions on the sale of certain exports to Chinese firms, and the dispute over the industry is anticipated to persist as Donald Trump returns to the White House.

Established in 1993, the company initially gained recognition for producing computer chips designed to process graphics, especially for video games.

Today, the tech giant leads in developing chips that drive artificial intelligence (AI), boasting a market value exceeding $3 trillion.

Its increasing control over the market has drawn scrutiny from competition regulators in the U.S. and internationally. Recently, the firm confirmed that it had been approached by regulatory bodies globally, including those in the U.S., UK, European Union, South Korea, and China.

The business finds itself at the centre of escalating geopolitical and economic tensions between the U.S. and China, with both nations vying for supremacy in advanced chip technology.

Nvidia disclosed last month that sales to China, including Hong Kong, represented approximately 13% of this year’s revenue to date.

However, this figure has declined following Americas enhancement of restrictions on sophisticated technology exports to Chinese companies, citing national security concerns. Chinese state media reported that Beijing had initiated an investigation.

The inquiry alleges that Nvidia breached commitments established during its 2020 acquisition of Mellanox Technologies, a smaller entity.

This development follows the U.S.’s recent intensification of restrictions, affecting sales to 140 entities, including Chinese chip companies such as Piotech and SiCarrier, barring special authorisation.

In retaliation, China reportedly imposed stringent new regulations on the export of crucial minerals to the U.S., such as antimony, gallium, and germanium. Observers have highlighted the significance of these measures, noting they specifically target the U.S rather than imposing general restrictions.

Posted on

UK business confidence falls to lowest level in almost two years after Labour budget

In November 2024, business confidence in the U.K. dropped to its lowest point since January 2023, as reported by BDO, a business advisory and accountancy firm.

Concurrently, KPMG noted that UK job vacancies decreased at the quickest pace since the pandemic began. This downturn coincides with warnings from businesses that the Labour Party’s ‘pro-growth’ budget could exacerbate inflation and decelerate hiring.

Tax increases do not fit well with a ‘pro-growth’ agenda. Also, GDP predictions made by the UK chancellor for 2025 through 2027 are lame.

The Labour budget has notably affected U.K. business confidence for a variety of critical reasons:

  • Tax Increases: The budget introduced a substantial hike in National Insurance contributions for employers, raising the rate to 15% on salaries above £5,000. This increase has led to concerns about higher operational costs, which many businesses fear will result in job cuts and reduced investment.
  • Minimum Wage Hike: The budget also included an inflation-busting increase in the minimum wage. While this aims to improve living standards, it has added financial pressure on businesses, particularly those in sectors with tight margins like retail and hospitality.
  • Economic Uncertainty: The combination of these measures has created a sense of economic uncertainty. Businesses are worried about their ability to absorb these additional costs, leading to a decline in overall optimism.
  • Investment Concerns: The increased costs have forced many businesses to reconsider their investment plans. Some have already announced cuts to expansion projects and other growth initiatives.
  • Next Increase: in public workers pay looms nigh.

These factors have collectively contributed to a significant drop in business confidence, with many firms bracing for a challenging economic environment ahead

Posted on

Has BIG tech just bought the most pro-crypto U.S. Congress ever?

DOGE

In a significant turn of events, the 2024 U.S. elections have ushered in what many are calling the most pro-crypto Congress in history.

The significant shift in political dynamics is largely due to the substantial financial support from the cryptocurrency industry, which has strategically funded political campaigns to foster a legislative environment favourable to digital assets.

Political Action Committees

Recognising the existential threat of strict regulations, the cryptocurrency industry has deployed unprecedented resources to sway election outcomes. Data from the Federal Election Commission reveals that crypto-related Political Action Committees (PACs) and other industry groups have raised over $245 million. These funds were channeled to endorse candidates favourable to the industry’s interests and to challenge those critical of it.

Money talked

A prominent example is Bernie Moreno’s election to the U.S. Senate. Moreno, a former car salesman with minimal political experience, succeeded in defeating Democratic incumbent Senator Sherrod Brown, a known critic of the cryptocurrency industry. Moreno’s campaign was bolstered by an impressive $40 million from the cryptocurrency sector, underscoring the industry’s commitment to influencing legislative representation.

Powerful crypto lobby

The crypto lobby’s success is credited to its tactical approach, which extends beyond post-election lobbying to active involvement in the electoral process. This strategy included targeting pivotal states and backing candidates supportive or neutral toward the industry. Consequently, Congress now includes nearly 300 pro-crypto legislators, granting the sector substantial sway over legislative priorities.

The ramifications of this development are significant. With a Congress inclined toward cryptocurrency, the industry anticipates more accommodating regulations and clearer guidelines on matters like digital asset classification and the creation of regulatory sandboxes. This shift could be a catalyst for innovation and expansion within the cryptocurrency domain.

Concerns

This development has also sparked concerns regarding the impact of money on politics. Critics contend that the cryptocurrency industry’s electoral success highlights the urgency for campaign finance reform to curb the potential of industries to purchase political sway. They caution that such tendencies could compromise the democratic process and result in policies that prioritise special interests above the common welfare.

As the newly elected Congress assumes power, attention is focused on its approach to the intricate domain of cryptocurrency regulation. The ensuing months are pivotal in deciding if the industry’s political contributions will yield substantial advantages for the cryptocurrency sector and its participants.

Whichever way you package this, for or against – money buys political influence. The bias is obvious. It likely will be a bad thing in the long-term. Let’s hope it helps the people and not just the profits of big business.

We’ll see.

And don’t forget, the biggest tech and business influence in the new U.S. government (to be) just happens to be the richest person in the world, Elon Musk. He’s in charge of the newly announced Department of Government Efficiency – DOGE.

Business and not just money is in charge of the U.S. government with very few obstacles in its way!

This ‘influential’ purchase is big!

Posted on

Trump U.S. election win drives gold price down and Crypto up!

Gold prices have fallen to near a two-month low as the dollar strengthens in the wake of Donald Trump’s election victory last week.

This downturn has halted the bullion’s rally, which had achieved a series of record highs over the past year. Gold has seen a decline in six of the seven most recent trading sessions following Trump’s win, interrupting its streak of record-breaking milestones over the last twelve months.

On the other hand, Crypto has relished the Trump pump with Bitcoin and many altcoins setting new all-time highs!

Gold price charts – 3 month and one-year snapshot as of: 15th November 2024 (08:10 GMT)

Posted on

Trump announces the new ‘Department of Government Efficiency’- DOGE – Dogecoin climbs over 150% on the news

DOGE

The purchase of Meme coins is often viewed as indicators of retail interest and the willingness to take risks in the cryptocurrency market. Increased activity in meme coins typically signals that retail investors are engaging and are inclined to speculate more aggressively on the risk spectrum.

Trump initially proposed the concept of an efficiency commission in September 2024. Since that time, Musk -who has previously referred to himself as the ‘Dogefather’ – is known for making public statements about the meme coin that affect its value, has posted on his social media platform X, referring to the commission as the ‘Department of Government Efficiency’ or ‘D.O.G.E.‘

Dogecoin’s relevance surged in 2021 due to Elon Musk’s endorsement and the continuous hype on social media, which became a significant catalyst for the cryptocurrency. In May of that year, Musk’s tweets propelled Dogecoin to its peak value around 67 cents, according to market analysis. However, his reference to Dogecoin as ‘a hustle’, caused its value to plummet.

Recently, Dogecoin’s value increased following the post-election announcement by President-elect Donald Trump about the establishment of the ‘Department of Government Efficiency‘, which he acronymized as ‘DOGE’ in his statement.

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, and Vivek Ramaswamy, the former Republican presidential candidate and co-founder of Strive Asset Management, have been appointed to lead this department.

According to Trump’s statement, their role will be instrumental in his administration’s efforts to dismantle government bureaucracy, reduce unnecessary regulations, eliminate wasteful spending, and reorganise federal agencies.

It’s time for D.O.G.E.

Posted on

Dow hits new all-time high as Trump wins 2024 U.S. election

U.S. stocks at all time high

The Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq all hit new highs!

Stocks rallied sharply on Wednesday 6th November 2024, with major indices hitting record highs, as Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election.

It looks like the Trump rally has already begun.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average surged 1,508.05 points to a record close of 43,729.93. The last time the Dow jumped more than 1,000 points in a single day was in November 2022.

The S&P 500 also hit an all-time high, soaring to 5,929.04. The Nasdaq Composite climbed to a record of its own too of 18,983.47.

Dow Jones one-year chart as of 6th November 2024

Dow Jones one-year chart as of 6th November 2024

S&P 500 one-year chart as of 6th November 2024

S&P 500 one-year chart as of 6th November 2024

Nasdaq Composite one-year chart as of 6th November 2024

Nasdaq Composite one-year chart as of 6th November 2024
Posted on

Oops I did it again! Trump wins 2024 U.S. presidential election – emphatically defeating Harris

Trump wins 2024 U.S. election

After losing the re-election to President Joe Biden in 2020, Donald Trump, the 45th president, has now been elected as the 47th.

Trump’s victory sets several historic records. At the age of 78, he becomes the oldest individual to win a U.S. presidential election. He is the first president to serve two nonconsecutive terms since Grover Cleveland 132 years ago, and his win comes from what is likely the costliest presidential race in history.

Also, he is reportedly the first president, whether in office or former, to have been convicted of crimes. He is also the first president to be impeached twice and then reclaim the presidency. Additionally, he is the first to assume office while actively facing criminal charges in both federal and state courts.

This victory for Trump prevents Vice President Harris from achieving what would have been a historic feat: becoming the first female president of the United States.

As Trump secures win stock markets react positively as Dow and S&P 500 futures rise to touch new all-time highs!

Posted on

Elon Musk predicts ‘hardship,’ economic turmoil and a stock market crash if Trump wins

U.S. presidential election

Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur and CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has recently made headlines in the U.S. with his stark predictions about the potential economic fallout if Donald Trump wins the upcoming presidential election.

This is unusual, as you are more likely to hear these proposals in a crisis, when desperate times demand desperate measures, but not leading up to a presential election and especially not from an opposition vying to take control of the U.S. presidency.

Musk’s comments have sparked widespread debate and concern, as he foresees significant economic turmoil and a stock market crash in the event of a Trump victory.

Musk’s predictions are deep-rooted in his belief that Trump’s proposed economic policies, including drastic cuts to federal spending and mass deportations, will lead to severe short-term economic disruptions.

Musk emphasised the need to reduce government spending to live within the country’s means, even if it involves temporary hardship.

He reportedly argued that such measures are necessary for long-term prosperity but acknowledged that they would likely cause an initial severe overreaction in the economy

Comments Elon Musk made

Billionaire Musk, Trump’s would-be government budget-cutting and ‘efficiency’ adviser, also says there will be “no special cases” and “no exceptions” when he starts slashing federal spending after Trump takes office.

With just a week until the presidential election, Donald Trump’s ally and influential economic adviser Elon Musk is warning people to expect economic chaos, a crashing stock market and financial “hardship” – albeit only “temporary” – if Trump wins.

“We have to reduce spending to live within our means,” Musk said. “That necessarily involves some temporary hardship, but it will ensure long-term prosperity.” 

Describing government spending as “a room full of targets,” Musk said: “Like, you can’t miss. Fire in any direction and you’re going to hit a target.”

He reportedly said, “I think once the election takes place we’ll immediately begin looking at where to take the most immediate action.”

And he reportedly added, “obviously a lot of people who are taking advantage of the government are going to be upset about that. I’ll probably need a lot of security.” 

“Everyone,” he reportedly said, will be taking a “haircut.”

The Tesla CEO went further and agreed with a supporter who predicted “an initial severe overreaction in the economy” and that “Markets will tumble.” 

“Sounds about right,” Musk replied.

Trump has already reportedly said he wants Musk to head up a commission of government efficiency. Trump says the billionaire tech entrepreneur would be his “Secretary of Budget-Cutting,” implying a possible Cabinet position.

Musk himself has described his new role as running a “Department of Government Efficiency,” though he admits the title is an inside joke – the acronym spells DOGE, the name of a cryptocurrency.

Musk speech highlights

One of the key points Musk highlighted is the potential impact of Trump’s policies on the stock market. He agreed with a social media post suggesting that the combination of mass deportations and significant government spending cuts would lead to a sharp decline in market values.

Musk’s agreement with this assessment has raised alarms among investors and economists, who fear that such a scenario could trigger a financial crisis.

Musk’s concerns are not without precedent. The stock market is highly sensitive to political and economic uncertainties, and drastic policy changes can lead to volatility and investor panic.

The prospect of mass deportations, in particular, could disrupt labour markets and consumer spending, further exacerbating economic instability. Additionally, significant cuts to federal spending could lead to job losses and reduced public services, compounding the economic challenges.

Unusual comments leading up to an election

Musk reportedly told supporters that the measures were needed because of the crisis of the skyrocketing federal debt.

This is not the usual picture when a politician and his campaign promise austerity, hardship, deep budget cuts, a likely economic “overreaction” and a slump in the stock market.

You usually hear these things proposed in a crisis, when desperate times supposedly demand desperate measures.

Are desperate times coming, maybe they are already here?

Optimism

Despite the grim outlook, Musk remains optimistic about the long-term benefits of these policies. He believes that once the initial shock subsides, the economy will recover and emerge stronger and more sustainable.

However, this perspective is not universally shared. Many economists argue that the risks associated with such drastic measures outweigh the potential benefits, and that a more balanced approach is needed to address the country’s economic challenges.

Musk’s predictions have also drawn criticism from those who view them as politically motivated. As a prominent supporter of Trump, Musk’s comments have been interpreted by some as an attempt to rally support for the former president’s economic agenda. Critics argue that Musk’s focus on austerity measures and government efficiency overlooks the broader social and economic implications of such policies.

Conclusion

Elon Musk’s predictions of economic hardship and a stock market crash if Trump wins the election have sparked significant debate and concern.

While Musk believes that these measures are necessary for long-term prosperity, the potential short-term disruptions and risks cannot be ignored. As the election approaches, investors and policymakers will be closely watching the developments and preparing for the potential economic fallout.

Whether Musk’s predictions come to pass remains to be seen, but his comments have undoubtedly added to the uncertainty and complexity of the current economic landscape and the never-ending ‘commentary surrounding the U.S. election.

Posted on

Russia’s central bank raises key rate to 21% to tackle high inflation

Russia bank rate

On Friday 25th October 2024, Russia’s central bank increased its key interest rate by 2% (200 basis points) to 21%, attributing the decision to consumer price increases significantly exceeding its projections and cautioning about persistent high inflation risks in the medium term

This rate hike surpasses the 1% (100 basis-point) rise anticipated by analysts and sets the bank’s benchmark rate at its highest level since February 2003, as reported by analysts.

Previously, the key rate had been raised by 1% (100 basis points) to 19% in September 2024.

It was reported that the annual seasonally adjusted inflation hit an average of 9.8% in September 2024, up from 7.5% in August 2024.

It is now anticipated the rate will stick at around the 8.0% – 8.5% range for the remainder of 2024. This is running above a July 2024 forecast of around 6.5% – 7.0%.

See more central bank interest rate moves here

Posted on

IMF head warns of worrying high debt and low growth combination

World debt

The International Monetary Fund’s leader warned on Thursday 17th October 2024 that the global economy continues to be hindered by high government debt and sluggish growth.

MD Kristalina Georgieva praised the efforts of major central banks in controlling inflation but pointed out that such successes were not widespread.

Additionally, Georgieva cautioned that international trade is no longer the growth catalyst it used to be, emphasizing the increase in restrictive policies across numerous economies.

“It is successful major economies that have done really well … and there are pockets in the world where inflation is still a problem,” she reportedly said.

“The impact of higher prices remains, and it is making many people in many countries feel worse off and angry.”

See articles here on the problems of world debt.

Posted on

European Union vote to slap tariff charge on Chinese EV imports

EU EV Charge

On Friday 4th October 2024, the European Union voted to implement definitive tariffs on battery electric vehicles (BEVs) made in China

‘The European Commission’s proposal to levy definitive countervailing duties on imports of Chinese battery electric vehicles has garnered the requisite support from EU Member States to proceed with the imposition of tariffs,‘ stated the EU.

Initially, the EU announced in June its intention to impose higher tariffs on imports of Chinese electric vehicles, citing substantial unfair subsidies that threaten economic harm to European electric vehicle manufacturers.

The EU disclosed specific duties for companies based on their level of cooperation and the information provided during the bloc’s investigation into China’s EV production, which commenced last year. Provisional duties have been in effect since early July.

Following the receipt of ‘substantiated comments on the provisional measures‘ from stakeholders, the European Commission updated its tariff strategy in September 2024.

A spokesperson from China’s Ministry of Commerce indicated that Beijing maintains its stance that the EU’s investigation into China’s electric vehicle industry subsidies has led to predetermined outcomes – suggesting that the EU is fostering unfair competition.

China responded by vowing a suitable response.

Posted on

There is a UK budget coming and the new chancellor reportedly needs to raise £20 billion – to fill a ‘black hole’ – how can this be done without upsetting the electorate?

Tax black hole

Tax Reforms

Increase in VAT: Adjusting the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate could generate substantial revenue.

Pension Tax Relief: Limiting pension tax relief to the basic rate of income tax could raise around £15 billion per year. Pension tax relief raid.

Windfall Tax: Increasing the windfall tax on the profits of oil and gas companies could also contribute significantly.

General Tax Increases: N.I., Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Inheritance Tax,

Public Sector Efficiency

Improving Productivity: Enhancing public sector productivity by just 5% could deliver up to £20 billion in benefits annually.

New Taxes or Levies

Green Taxes: Introducing or increasing taxes on carbon emissions and other environmental levies could help raise funds while promoting sustainability.

Digital Services Tax: Expanding the scope of the digital services tax to cover more online businesses could also be a potential revenue source.

Electric vehicle tax: new tax bands for electric cars

Spending Cuts

Reducing Public Expenditure: Identifying and cutting down on non-essential public spending could help balance the budget.

Economic Growth

Stimulating Growth: Policies aimed at boosting economic growth, such as investing in infrastructure and innovation, could increase tax revenues indirectly by expanding the tax base. But this will take time to fully materialise.

Each of these measures comes with its own set of challenges and implications, so the government would need to carefully consider the economic and social impacts before implementation.

Black hole?

The Chancellor has recently pointed to a ‘black hole’ in the public finances, referencing the recent uncovering of an ‘unbudgeted’ £22bn overspend in the current tax year following her tenure commencement at No. 11 Downing Street in July.

The reality of this newfound deficit is subject to debate. However, given that the Chancellor has ruled out the possibility of borrowing for day-to-day expenses, it seems she very likely she might be compelled to raise taxes to offset these expenditures.

N.I. and Pension raid?

In its last year, the Conservative government cut taxes by £20 billion by reducing the National Insurance rate. Reversing this cut would be a direct way to increase revenue, taking us back to the financial situation before last November.

Currently, many people receive a 40% tax relief on pension contributions but are taxed at 20% when they withdraw. This ‘inconsistency’ could easily become a target for the Chancellor.

Additionally, employers’ National Insurance contributions are not applied to pension contributions or withdrawals, and individuals can even take a tax-free lump sum from their pension after having received tax relief on their contributions.

Understanding the complexities is not necessary to see that a chancellor in search of extra tax revenue may consider pension contributions as a significant source of additional income.

The UK budget is due on: 30th October 2024 – let’s see just by how much UK taxes are increased – because they will be.

Posted on

Ireland’s 13-billion-euro Apple windfall

Apple

Ireland stands to gain a substantial financial boost following a pivotal ruling by the European Union’s highest court, which requires Apple to pay €13 billion (around $14 billion) in back taxes. Initially resisted by Dublin, this windfall is now seen as a transformative chance for the nation.

The settlement’s roots trace back to 2016 when the European Commission deemed that Apple had received illegal state aid via favorable tax deals with Ireland. After prolonged legal disputes, the EU court’s verdict has concluded the issue, mandating Apple to settle the substantial amount.

The Irish government has devised a strategic plan to capitalise on this unforeseen fiscal advantage. The funds are designated for various key sectors to promote sustained economic growth and societal welfare. A considerable portion is allocated for infrastructure enhancements, including transport network upgrades and sustainable energy initiatives, in line with Ireland’s green economy transition goals.

The windfall will also bolster progress in healthcare and education. Plans are in place to improve healthcare facilities and services, enhancing access and care quality for residents. In education, investments will focus on updating educational institutions, fostering research and innovation, and preparing the workforce with future-oriented skills.

The financial influx also presents a chance to tackle housing deficits, with investments directed towards boosting affordable housing availability and ameliorating living standards nationwide. This comprehensive strategy aims to forge a more equitable and thriving society.

In essence, Ireland’s $14 billion windfall from Apple offers an exceptional opportunity to effectuate considerable improvements across diverse sectors, potentially reshaping the country’s economic and social fabric for generations.

It’s quite remarkable how a fortune from just ONE company can be utterly transformational for an entire country.

As of September 2024, Apple’s market cap sat at around $3.4 trillion. This makes Apple the most valuable company in the world by market cap.

As of September 2024, Apple’s market cap sat at around $3.4 trillion. This makes Apple the most valuable company in the world by market cap.

Just so you know, 14 billion of 3.4 trillion equals about 0.41%. A small drop in a massive financial ocean.

Posted on

Chinese stocks up sharply after Beijing confirms stimulus measures

China stocks up

Chinese stocks continued to rise following state media reports that China’s top leaders have endorsed the government’s recent measures to bolster their economy.

The CSI 300 index in Mainland China continued its rally for a seventh consecutive day, reaching its highest point in about four months, subsequent to a meeting of China’s highest officials confirming the government’s latest economic stimulus actions.

South Korea’s Kospi index surged by 1.9%, driven by advances in semiconductor company SK Hynix, which declared the commencement of mass production of the world’s inaugural 12-layer HBM3E chip, utilised in AI applications.

See SK Hynix Newsroom report here

Posted on

UK says data centres are critical infrastructure and are designated as important as the power grid and the NHS

Critical data centres UK

UK data centres are set to be classified as critical national infrastructure (CNI), aligning them with sectors such as emergency services, finance, healthcare, and utilities

This classification will ensure they receive additional government support during major incidents like cyber-attacks, IT outages, or severe weather, to reduce disruption.

Data centres, large warehouses filled with extensive computer banks, are the backbone of services like AI applications, data processing, and streaming. Despite facing criticism for their energy and water usage, the new Labour government supports the industry, with Technology Secretary Peter Kyle referring to data centres as ‘the engines of modern life.’

Currently, the UK recognises 13 sectors as critical national infrastructure, a list last revised nine years ago with the addition of space and defence.

The 13 Critical National Infrastructure Sectors

  1. Chemicals
  2. Civil Nuclear
  3. Communications
  4. Defence
  5. Emergency Services
  6. Energy
  7. Finance
  8. Food
  9. Government
  10. Health
  11. Space
  12. Transport
  13. Water

British Technology Minister Peter Kyle announced on Thursday 12th September 2024 that UK data centres will be designated as ‘Critical National Infrastructure’ (CNI). This status, typically reserved for essential national sectors like nuclear power, provides data centre operators with a direct communication channel to the government for threat preparation and response.

Furthermore, the government has expressed support for a proposed £3.75 billion data centre by UK company DC01UK in Hertfordshire, England, which is projected to be the largest in Europe upon completion.

Posted on

U.S. introduces new microchip-related export controls

U.S. chip rules

The Biden administration is reportedly implementing new export controls on essential technologies, such as quantum computing and semiconductor materials, in response to China’s progress in the global chip market

These controls encompass quantum computers and their components, sophisticated chipmaking tools, semiconductor technologies, certain metal and metal alloy components and software, and high-bandwidth chips, which are vital for AI applications.

While the U.S. intensifies its measures to curb China’s expansion, there is noticeable hesitancy within the global industry.

The U.S. Department of Commerce issued new regulations on Friday, 6th September 2024, encompassing quantum computers and their components, sophisticated chipmaking tools, certain metal and metal alloy components and software, as well as high-bandwidth chips, which are vital for AI applications.

See report details here

Posted on

U.S. jobs data revision creates economic concern and political argument

U.S> jobs data revision

Job growth in the US last year was weaker than previously believed, according to a statement from the Labor Department on Wednesday 21st August 2024.

This revelation has intensified the ongoing debate regarding the health of the U.S. economy. The department’s updated figures indicate that there were approximately 818,000 fewer jobs added over the 12 months leading up to March than initially estimated.

This preliminary revision suggests a 30% decrease in the total number of jobs created during that period, marking the most significant adjustment since 2009.

The revised data points to an average monthly job increase of about 174,000, a reduction from the previously estimated 240,000.

Downward revisions affected most sectors, including information, media, technology, retail, manufacturing, and the broad category of professional and business services.

Analysis by Oxford Economics noted that this indicates the job growth for the period relied more heavily on government and education/healthcare sectors than previously understood.

Despite the revisions, hiring remained robust, albeit not at levels sufficient to match the growth of the working-age population.

The U.S. Labor Department issues monthly job creation estimates based on employer surveys and regularly updates these figures as more data becomes available, with an annual reset at the beginning of each year.

The report from Wednesday offered a glimpse into this process, incorporating data from county-level unemployment insurance tax records. This year’s revision is notably larger than those of previous years.

The Biden administration has highlighted strong job growth as evidence that its policies have positioned the U.S. as the world’s leading economy post-pandemic.

However, Republicans have used the latest figures to contend that the Democrats have misled the public about the economic situation. The Republican Party took to social media to announce: “BREAKING: 818,000 jobs that the Biden-Harris administration claimed to have ‘created’ do not actually exist.”

Over the past year, the U.S. has consistently reported robust job growth, defying both economists’ expectations and public sentiment. These gains have been particularly surprising given the highest borrowing costs in a generation, which typically hinder economic growth.

The recent revisions have lent weight to the argument that the labour market is less stable than previously thought, as highlighted by the Republican response.

Analysts believe these new figures will reinforce the case for the U.S. Federal Reserve to lower interest rates at its upcoming September 2024 meeting, a move that is widely anticipated to prevent further weakening of the job market.

These revisions have not caused widespread concern

Despite earlier economic anxieties this month, financial markets have largely absorbed the latest data without significant turmoil.

But that doesn’t mean there will be zero fallout – turmoil may follow. The data believed to be correct is incorrect – so, can we believe the data? Are there cracks appearing in the U.S labour market?

This data helped the U.S. economy – but it wasn’t right?

Posted on

Is the Fed fighting its own shadow?

Shadow boxing

Has the Fed over-cooked it this time by waiting too long to reduce interest rates?

U.S. stock markets threw a wobbly after the latest employment data and after the Fed delayed its first rate cut… again. September 2024 now looks likely for that first cut – but by how much: 0.25% or as high as 0.50%?

The latest batch of bad news for the U.S. economy has actually became bad news for stocks this time. For too long the ‘bad news’ has been taken as ‘good news’, especially regarding the likelihood of a Fed interest rate cut – and for the markets in general.

The Federal Reserve (Fed) is grappling with several challenges, including inflation, interest rates, and the broader U.S. and global economies.

Inflation

The Fed has been trying to control high inflation rates, which have been a significant concern. To combat inflation, the Fed has raised interest rates multiple times. Higher interest rates can help reduce inflation by slowing down borrowing and spending, but they can also slow economic growth.

Interest rates

By increasing interest rates, the Fed aims to make borrowing more expensive, which can help cool down an overheated economy. However, this can also lead to higher costs for consumers and businesses, potentially leading to reduced investment and spending.

Economic growth

The Fed’s policies are a balancing act. While they aim to control inflation, they also need to ensure that the economy doesn’t slow down too much. This balancing act can be challenging, especially when external factors like global economic conditions and geopolitical events come into play.

In essence, the Fed’s efforts to manage these issues can sometimes feel like ‘fighting its own shadow,’ as the consequences of their actions can create new challenges.

The timing of interest rate adjustments by the Federal Reserve is a topic of much debate among economists and policymakers.

Inflation control

The Fed’s primary goal in raising interest rates has been to control inflation. If inflation remains high, the Fed might be cautious about reducing rates too quickly to avoid a resurgence of inflation.

Economic indicators

The Fed closely monitors various economic indicators, such as employment rates, consumer spending, and GDP growth. If these indicators suggest that the economy is still strong, the Fed might delay reducing rates to ensure that inflation is fully under control.

Market reactions

Rapid changes in interest rates can cause volatility in financial markets. The Fed often aims for a gradual approach to avoid sudden shocks to the economy.

Global factors

The Fed also considers global economic conditions. For example, if other major economies are experiencing slow growth or financial instability, the Fed might be more cautious in adjusting rates.

Ultimately, the decision to reduce interest rates involves balancing the need to support economic growth with the risk of reigniting inflation. It’s a complex decision with significant implications for the U.S. and global economies.

Looks like the Fed overcooked it this time – but by how much?

Posted on

Which governments hold the most Bitcoin?

Bitcoin cartoon

U.S., UK and Germany hold more Bitcoin than you may think.

According to the Arkham website, the United States’ government holds some 212,847 BTC making it one of the biggest holders of Bitcoin, while the treasuries of the U.K. and Germany reportedly hold around 61,245 BTC and 49,858 BTC each. (These values alter daily).

In addition to Bitcoin, the U.S. government also holds around $200 million in other cryptocurrencies like Ether (ETH), as well as major stablecoins like USDC.

U.S. Bitcoin holding by current value according to Arkham

Data from Arkham (as of 12th July 2024)

Arkham, a crypto intelligence platform focused on deanonymizing entities on the blockchain network, has introduced a dashboard featuring the governments with the largest crypto holdings.

The U.K. government, reportedly ranked second, holds around $3.5 billion worth of Bitcoin at current valuations, according to Arkham’s data. The German government owns roughly $2.5 billion.

UK Bitcoin holding by current value according to Arkham

Data from Arkham (as of 12th July 2024)

Other world governments holding Bitcoin

China, Russia, Ukraine, El Salvador, Finland, Bhutan and many others.

In 2021, El Salvador became the first country to make Bitcoin legal tender and mandated all local businesses to accept payments in BTC. 

Posted on

Is the world shackled to debt?

World Debt

The world is in debt to the tune of $315 trillion, and counting.

$315,000,000,000,000

$315 trillion or $315,000,000,000,000 is a daunting number, it’s massive. In 2024, the global GDP reached just $109.5 trillion, just over a third of the global debt figure.

Perspective

To provide some perspective, with the world population at roughly 8.1 billion, if the debt were distributed evenly, each person would shoulder about $39,000 in debt.

As global debt reaches unprecedented levels, concerns naturally arise about its implications and origins.

Global debt

Global debt includes borrowings by households, businesses, and governments.

Household debt

Household debt, which many are familiar with, comprises mortgages, credit cards, and student loans. At the beginning of 2024, it stood at $59.1 trillion.

Corporate debt

Corporate debt, utilized by businesses for operations and growth, reached $164.5 trillion, with the financial sector contributing $70.4 trillion.

Government debt

Government debt, on the other hand, finances public services and projects without raising taxes. It can be obtained from other nations or institutions like the World Bank and the IMF, or through bond sales, which are essentially promises to pay with interest from the state to investors.

Public debt

Public debt was reported to be $91.4 trillion. While often perceived negatively, debt can be advantageous, supporting individuals in education and homeownership, aiding business expansion, and providing governments with means for economic development, social expenditures, or crisis management.

History

Historical evidence shows that public debt has been around for at least 2000 years, mainly for establishing settlements and financing wars, with governments accruing significant debts from conflicts such as the Napoleonic Wars.

Debt engulfs us all and is here to stay, but at what cost to society?

And who do we owe?