Category: Politica

Posted on

Well – that didn’t last long – is the ‘love in’ over already?

Elon Musk and Trump

Elon Musk has dramatically distanced himself from Donald Trump’s latest tax-and-spending bill, branding it a ‘disgusting abomination’ in a fiery post on X.

The Tesla and SpaceX CEO, once a key financial backer of Trump’s 2024 campaign, has now turned against the administration’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’, warning that it will explode the federal deficit and burden American taxpayers with unsustainable U.S. debt.

Musk’s frustration boiled over as he accused lawmakers of reckless spending, calling out those who voted for the bill: ‘Shame on you. You know you did wrong’.

His criticism comes just days after leaving his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he had pushed for aggressive cost-cutting measures.

The White House, however, remains unmoved. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Musk’s remarks, insisting that Trump is ‘sticking to it’ and that the bill will drive economic growth.

With Republican deficit hawks rallying behind Musk’s concerns, the billionaire’s influence in Washington is far from over.

His next move? Firing back at politicians who, in his words, ‘betrayed the American people.’

Elon Musk’s fiery critique of Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ has raised concerns for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an initiative he once led.

His departure from DOGE signals instability (much of which he created) within the agency, which had been pushing for aggressive cost-cutting measures and anti-waste policies.

Without Musk’s influence, DOGE could lose traction, allowing excessive spending to go unchecked. Additionally, Musk’s fallout with Trump might weaken DOGE’s ability to implement reforms, as its credibility is tied to his vision.

The question now is whether DOGE can remain a force for fiscal responsibility, or whether it will become just another bureaucratic arm.

Mid-terms are coming!

Posted on

Trump’s tariffs challenged in court and deemed to be illegal

U.S. tariff court ruling

A U.S. federal court has ruled that former President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs were imposed illegally, dealing a significant blow to his economic policies.

The Court of International Trade determined that Trump exceeded his authority by invoking emergency powers to justify tariffs on nearly every country.

The ruling states that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress exclusive power to regulate commerce, meaning the president cannot unilaterally impose such broad trade restrictions.

The decision immediately halted the 10% tariffs Trump had imposed on most U.S. trading partners, as well as additional levies on China, Mexico, and Canada.

The court found that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which Trump cited as justification, does not grant him the authority to implement such sweeping trade measures.

The White House swiftly filed an appeal, arguing that the tariffs were necessary to address trade imbalances and safeguard American industries.

However, businesses and state governments that challenged the tariffs welcomed the ruling, citing concerns over inflation and economic harm.

Dow Jones Industrial Average Futures 28th & 29th May 2025 after the court ruling

Dow Jones Industrial Average Futures 28th & 29th May 2025 after the court ruling

Markets responded positively to the decision, with stock futures rising and the U.S. dollar strengthening. If the ruling stands, businesses that paid the tariffs may be eligible for refunds, marking a potential shift in U.S. trade policy.

The U.S. President is expected to find a workaround after suffering a major blow to a core part of his economic agenda.

Posted on

Tesla’s European market meltdown – sales plunge 49% amid brand damage and fierce competition

Tesla's European sales fall!

Tesla’s vehicle sales in Europe plummeted by 49% in April 2025, marking the fourth consecutive month of decline.

Despite an overall 27.8% rise in battery-electric vehicle sales, Tesla struggled to maintain its foothold in the region.

The drop in sales has been attributed to increasing competition from Chinese automakers, a shift in consumer preferences towards hybrid vehicles, and growing backlash against CEO Elon Musk’s political affiliations.

Tesla’s market share in Europe nearly halved, falling from 1.3% to 0.7%. The company’s aging lineup, particularly the Model Y, has failed to attract new buyers, while rivals such as BYD have overtaken Tesla in European EV sales for the first time.

Additionally, European carmakers are cutting costs and adapting to U.S. tariffs on auto imports, further intensifying competition. Chinese EV manufacturers are also cutting EV prices.

While Tesla faces challenges in Europe, the broader EV market continues to expand, driven by government incentives and stricter emission targets.

However, unless Tesla refreshes its lineup and rebuilds consumer trust, its dominance in the European market may continue to erode.

The company’s future remains uncertain as it navigates political controversies and shifting market dynamics

Posted on

Saudi Arabia to acquire 18000 Nvidia AI chips with more to follow

Nvidia AI

Saudi Arabia is making bold moves in artificial intelligence with a major acquisition from Nvidia.

The tech giant will be sending more than 18,000 of its latest GB300 Blackwell AI chips to Saudi-based company Humain, in a deal that marks a significant step toward the nation’s ambitions to become a global AI powerhouse.

The announcement was made by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang during the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in Riyadh, as part of a White House-led trip that included President Donald Trump and other top CEOs.

Humain, backed by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, aims to develop AI models and build data center infrastructure, with plans to eventually deploy several hundred thousand Nvidia GPUs

Humain, backed by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, plans to use the chips to develop large-scale AI models and establish cutting-edge data centers.

The chips will be deployed in a 500-megawatt facility, making it one of the largest AI computing projects in the region. Nvidia’s Blackwell AI chips are among the most advanced in the industry, used in training sophisticated AI models and powering data-intensive applications.

Saudi Arabia’s investment in AI technology aligns with its long-term vision of transforming its economy beyond traditional industries. With plans to expand its data infrastructure and deploy several hundred thousand Nvidia GPUs in the future, the country is positioning itself as a major AI hub in the Middle East.

As AI continues to shape global industries, Saudi Arabia’s investment signals a broader shift in how nations are competing for dominance in the AI revolution.

Nvidia’s involvement underscores the strategic importance of AI chips, not just in business, but in international relations as well.

Posted on

Trump’s Boeing 747 Gift from Qatar – a diplomatic gesture or controversial play?

It's just a gift!

It’s just a gift?

Former U.S. President Donald Trump is set to receive a luxury Boeing 747-8 from the Qatari royal family, a move that has sparked debate over its implications.

The aircraft, valued at $400 million, is expected to serve as a temporary Air Force One until the U.S. government receives its long-delayed replacements.

Trump has been vocal about his frustration with Boeing’s delays in delivering the new presidential aircraft, originally scheduled for 2022 but now pushed to 2027.

The Qatari government’s offer provides an interim solution, allowing Trump to use the jet for official travel.

However, critics argue that accepting such a gift raises ethical and legal concerns, particularly regarding the U.S. Constitution’s emoluments clause, which restricts officials from receiving gifts from foreign states without congressional approval3.

The White House insists the arrangement is legal, stating that the aircraft will be transferred to the U.S. Air Force rather than Trump personally.

Upon completion of his term, the plane will reportedly be donated to his presidential library.

As Trump prepares for a Middle East visit, the controversy surrounding the aircraft continues to unfold.

Will this be seen as a practical solution or a diplomatic misstep?

And anyway, why can’t the U.S. provide its own presidential plane?

Posted on

Trump tariff roll-back – a win for China? U.S. markets rejoice the ‘deal’

U.S. markets gain on U.S China tariff roll-back announcement

The U.S. stock market surged as investors cheered a breakthrough in trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing.

The rollback of tariffs, announced as part of a new trade agreement, sent the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite soaring.

The deal, which slashes ‘reciprocal’ tariffs on both sides, is seen as a major de-escalation in the ongoing trade war that has rattled global markets for years.

Wall Street’s Reaction

Markets responded with enthusiasm as the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped over 1,000 points, while the S&P 500 climbed more than 2.5%, and the Nasdaq surged by nearly 3%.

Investors had been wary of prolonged trade tensions, which had weighed heavily on corporate earnings and economic growth.

The tariff rollback signals a potential thaw in relations, boosting confidence across sectors, particularly in technology, retail, and manufacturing.

Tariff rollback

Under the agreement, U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports will be reduced from 145% to 30%, while China’s tariffs on American goods will drop from 125% to 10%. The reductions will be in effect for 90 days, allowing both nations to continue negotiations on a broader trade framework.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasised that neither side wants a complete decoupling, and the rollback is intended to restore trade flows disrupted by years of economic brinkmanship.

China’s perspective: A strategic victory?

While the U.S. markets celebrated, China views the deal as a significant win. Beijing has sought relief from the steep tariffs imposed by Washington, which had strained its export-driven economy.

The agreement not only reduces financial pressure on Chinese manufacturers but also positions China as a key player in shaping future trade policies.

Some analysts argue that Beijing successfully leveraged its economic resilience to push Washington toward concessions, reinforcing its global influence.

Looking ahead

Despite the optimism, uncertainties remain. The 90-day window for negotiations suggests that further trade disputes could arise if talks stall. But will the U.S. allow that after the stock market turmoil Trump’s tariffs originally created?

Additionally, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cautioned that while sentiment has improved, the economic impact of previous tariffs has yet to fully materialise. Investors will be watching closely for signs of sustained progress, as any setbacks could trigger renewed volatility.

For now, Wall Street is basking in the relief of a tariff truce, with hopes that this momentum will lead to a more stable and predictable trade environment.

Whether this marks the beginning of a lasting resolution or just a temporary reprieve remains to be seen.

It is most likely now a platform for the U.S. to benefit from generally lower tariffs in the future.

There will again be cheap goods on U.S. shelves in time for Christmas.

Posted on

Shock but no ‘awe’ in Trump’s first 100 days in office

Sledgehammer policies

U.S. President Donald Trump has definitely brought a lot of shock in the first 100 days of his presidency, smashing trade links, alliances, and even his own government, but it can hardly be said to have left anybody truly in ‘awe’.

Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office during his second term have been a whirlwind of activity, marked by bold moves and significant controversy.

His poll rating is the lowest of any President of recent times for the first 100 days. It currently sits at around 41% (a CNN poll result suggests).

How does it compare?

Harry S. Truman, hit a rock-bottom approval rating of 22% in 1952. Other presidents like Richard Nixon and George W. Bush also dipped below 25%. But these were during their terms and not in the first 100 days.

His administration has focused heavily on reshaping trade policies, imposing tariffs that have disrupted global markets and strained relationships with long-standing allies.

Despite his claims of progress, no major trade deals have been finalised, leaving many questioning the effectiveness of his approach.

Legal challenges

Domestically, Trump’s policies have faced significant legal challenges, with numerous lawsuits filed against his administration. His stance on immigration and energy has sparked heated debates, reflecting the polarising nature of his decisions.

Trump’s ‘drill-baby-drill’ mantra has not had the desire reaction – oil prices has fallen with U.S. oil below $65 a barrel.

The automotive industry, for instance, has grappled with regulatory uncertainty and additional costs due to his tariffs, prompting him to soften some measures in response to industry concerns.

Internationally, Trump’s actions have raised concerns about U.S. credibility and stability. His hostile stance toward traditional allies, such as Canada, the EU and NATO, has left multi-decade relationships in tatters.

Meanwhile, his administration’s handling of the ongoing war in Ukraine and trade negotiations with China has drawn criticism for its lack of tangible results.

Despite these challenges, Trump remains confident in his vision for America. He has claimed progress in tariff negotiations with India, suggesting that a trade deal may be on the horizon.

No deals… yet

There has not been a single trade deal concluded with Trump’s administration – despite him reportedly claiming to have done ‘200 deals’ with only 195 countries in the world.

China is still striking a defiant tone on trade, and the war in Ukraine rages on. The president has also been forced to walk back on his “reciprocal tariffs.” 

However, his administration’s approach has left many wondering whether his first 100 days will be remembered for their impact or their controversy.

As the dust settles, the world watches closely to see how Trump’s policies will shape the future of the United States and its role on the global stage.

Trump may have wanted his first 100 days to be historic, and they were – but for all the wrong reasons.  

Posted on

U.S. stocks slide again as Trump publicly criticises Fed Chair Powell

Jerome Powell criticised

President Donald Trump’s recent criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has sent shockwaves through the financial markets, reigniting concerns about the central bank’s independence.

On Monday 21st April 2025, Trump took to social media to publicly call Powell a ‘major loser’ and demanded immediate interest rate cuts, warning of an economic slowdown if his demands were not met.

This public rebuke, coupled with Trump’s earlier threats to terminate Powell, has unsettled investors and triggered another sharp sell-off in U.S. stocks.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged nearly 1,000 points, or 2.48%, closing at 38170. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite also suffered significant losses, falling 2.36% and 2.55%.

Dow Jones one-year chart

Dow Jones one-year chart

Trump continues to create uncertainty

Analysts attribute this market turmoil to fears that Trump’s rhetoric could undermine the Federal Reserve’s ability to operate independently, a cornerstone of its credibility.

‘Magnificent Seven’ tech companies dragged the major indexes lower, with Tesla and Nvidia respectively losing 5.8% and more than 4%. Amazon shed 3%, and Meta Platforms suffered losses too.

Tesla one-year chart

Tesla one-year chart

Adding to the uncertainty, Trump’s tariff policies have already strained investor confidence. The combination of trade tensions and doubts about the Fed’s autonomy has led to a flight from U.S. assets.

The dollar hit a three-year low, while gold prices soared to record highs above $3,400 per ounce as investors sought safe-haven assets.

Market experts warn that prolonged uncertainty could have far-reaching implications. ‘The market is okay with rates coming down,’ reportedly said Thierry Wizman, a global currency strategist. ‘What the market is not okay with is having the president or politicians tell the Fed that the rates need to come down’.

As Trump’s public rebuttal of Powell continues, investors observe the potential implications. The stakes are high, not just for the U.S. economy but for global markets that rely on the stability of American financial institutions.

Investors are left grappling with a volatile landscape, where political pressures and economic policies collide.

The Trump ‘turmoil’ continues.

Posted on

Tech stocks propel market rally amid Trump’s tariff pause

Stocks move back up

On Monday 14th April 2025, the stock market experienced a notable mini rally, driven by the tech sector’s resurgence following a weekend announcement of a temporary tariff pause.

President Trump’s decision to exempt smartphones, computers, and other electronics from steep tariffs provided a much-needed reprieve for the industry, sparking optimism among investors.

Major tech companies like Apple, Nvidia, and Amazon saw significant gains, with Apple shares surging by 7.5%. The Nasdaq Composite, heavily weighted with tech stocks, climbed 1.9%, while the S&P 500 rose 1.5%.

This rally marked a stark contrast to the volatility of the previous week, where tariff uncertainties had sent shockwaves through the market.

The tariff pause, although temporary and restricted to 20%, helped to alleviate immediate concerns about rising costs for consumers and businesses.

Importers were spared from choosing between absorbing higher expenses or passing them on to customers. This relief was particularly impactful for companies reliant on Chinese manufacturing, as the exemptions covered a wide range of tech products.

Market analysts noted that the rally was not just a reaction to the tariff news but also a reflection of the tech sector’s resilience.

Despite facing challenges earlier in the year, tech companies have continued to innovate and adapt, maintaining their position as a driving force in the U.S. and world economies.

However, the rally’s sustainability remains uncertain. The administration’s mixed messages about future tariffs have left investors cautious.

While Monday’s gains were encouraging, the broader market continues to grapple with the unpredictability of trade policies.

Posted on

Trump takes wrecking ball to global trade – sets stock markets on fire and plays golf – all in one week

Reckless tariffs

Is this a fair ‘take’ on the last weeks tariff turmoil?

President Trump’s tariffs have left a significant mark on global trade and financial markets, creating waves that continue to shape global economic dynamics.

The tariffs, initially aimed at reducing the U.S. trade deficit and protecting domestic industries, triggered a rollercoaster ride for stock markets and strained international relations.

Highs to lows

The Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq Composite, and S&P 500 experienced sharp declines following the announcement of sweeping tariffs. At their lowest points, the Dow fell to 37226, the Nasdaq dropped to 15266, and the S&P 500 sank to 4956.

These figures marked significant losses, with trillions of dollars wiped off the market in just a few days.

The volatility was exacerbated by fears of a global trade war and the uncertainty surrounding the tariffs’ implementation.

Tariff turmoil and 90 day pause

In response to the market turmoil, President Trump announced a 90-day pause on most tariffs, providing temporary relief to investors and businesses. This decision led to a rebound in stock markets, with indices recovering some of their losses.

However, the relief was short-lived, as tensions with China escalated. While tariffs on many trading partners were paused, China’s tariff rate was increased to a staggering 125%.

This move further strained U.S.-China relations and added pressure on industries reliant on Chinese imports.

Tech garners favour

The tech sector, heavily dependent on global supply chains, was among the hardest hit. Tariffs on components like microchips and finished products such as smartphones and computers disrupted production and increased costs.

Companies faced challenges in maintaining profitability and passing on the increased costs to consumers. The eventual reduction and cancellation of some tariffs provided a lifeline to the tech industry, allowing businesses to stabilize operations and reduce prices.

However, the uncertainty surrounding trade policies continued to pose challenges for the sector.

Market turmoil?

Was this the ultimate in market ‘management’ as President Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, that it was a ‘great time to buy’ just hours before announcing the 90-day tariff pause.?

This statement, made at 9:37 am., came shortly before the announcement, which caused stock markets to surge significantly. The timing of his post raised eyebrows and sparked discussions about potential insider trading concerns

China retaliates

China’s response to the tariffs was swift and retaliatory. Beijing imposed its own tariffs on U.S. imports, raising rates to 125%. This retaliation targeted key U.S. industries, including agriculture and technology, further escalating the trade conflict.

The Chinese yuan also hit its lowest level against the dollar since the global financial crisis. These measures highlighted the deepening economic rift between the world’s two largest economies.

The effects of President Trump’s tariffs underscore the complexities of modern trade policies. While intended to protect domestic industries, the tariffs created significant economic disruptions, both domestically and globally.

The stock market volatility, strained international relations, and challenges faced by industries like technology illustrate the far-reaching consequences of such policies.

As the world continues to navigate the aftermath of these tariffs, the importance of balanced and strategic trade policies becomes increasingly evident.

Markets moved up, unsurprisingly, after Trump announced the tech tariff adjustment

Over the weekend, President Trump reportedly made several statements about tariffs on tech products, creating some confusion.

Initially, it was announced that smartphones, computers, and other electronics would be temporarily excluded from the steep tariffs.

However, Trump later clarified that these products were not entirely exempt but had been moved to a different ‘tariff bucket.’ He reportedly stated that they would still face a 20% tariff as part of broader measures targeting Chinese goods.

Trump also hinted at upcoming tariffs on semiconductors and the entire electronics supply chain, emphasising the need for the U.S. to produce more of these components domestically.

President Trump reportedly described this as part of a ‘National Security Tariff Investigation’. These announcements have left tech companies and investors uncertain about the long-term implications for the industry.

Tariffs are like a spider’s web cast over the world with the spider, crawling around collecting from its prey.

Trump’s tariffs continue to ‘infect’ world trade, and they will be here for a while yet.

Posted on

The end of globalisation or a fresh start with a new world order?

Global trade

Globalisation is a process that has woven the world together, creating interconnected networks of trade, culture, technology, and governance.

At its core, globalisation refers to the increased interaction and integration between people, companies, and governments across the globe.

This phenomenon has profound economic, political, and cultural implications, shaping the way we live and think.

Historically speaking

Historically, globalisation is not a recent occurrence; it has been evolving for centuries. The roots of globalisation can be traced back to ancient civilizations when trade routes like the Silk Road emerged around 130 BCE during the Han Dynasty of China.

The Silk Road connected Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and North Africa, facilitating the exchange of goods, ideas, religions, and innovations. While it was primarily a trade route, it also marked the first notable instances of cross-cultural interaction on a global scale.

However, the modern wave of globalisation began much later. Many historians point to the Age of Exploration in the late 15th and early 16th centuries as a pivotal moment.

European explorers like Christopher Columbus and Vasco da Gama sought new trade routes to Asia and the Americas, leading to the establishment of colonial empires.

These explorations were driven by ambitions of trade, wealth, and power, further intertwining economies and cultures.

Adam Smith, the 18th-century economist and philosopher, can also be credited with significantly influencing globalisation through his ideas. His seminal work, The Wealth of Nations (1776), laid the foundation for modern economics and advocated for free-market trade.

His philosophies supported the idea of open international markets, which became a cornerstone of globalisation in later years.

Industrial revolution

Fast forward to the 19th and 20th centuries, the Industrial Revolution and advancements in technology supercharged globalisation.

Railroads, steamships, telegraphs, and later airplanes and the internet, reduced distances and enhanced global connectivity.

This period also saw the establishment of international organisations such as the United Nations and the World Trade Organisation, further embedding globalisation into global policies.

Evolution

Today, globalisation continues to evolve. While it has brought unparalleled access to goods, services, and information, it has also sparked debates about its impact on inequality, environmental sustainability, and cultural homogenisation.

As nations and individuals grapple with its implications, globalisation remains a defining characteristic of our interconnected world. Its history is a testament to humanity’s constant quest to connect, collaborate, and innovate.

Tariffs

The introduction of ‘protectionist’ policies and ideals will likely lead back to globalisation in the end. Are Trump’s protectionist tariff ideals about protectionism or more about a drive to level the imbalance of global trade differences? Gobal trade will not end!

The tariffs are more about aiming to settle trade imbalances, at least according to U.S. President Trump.

Trump’s tariffs have had a significant impact on globalisation, challenging its trajectory. By imposing sweeping tariffs on imports, including a baseline 10% on goods from various countries, Trump aimed to reduce the U.S. trade deficit and reshore U.S. manufacturing.

While this approach sought to protect domestic industries, it disrupted global trade networks and raised concerns about inflation and economic instability.

These tariffs marked a shift away from decades of free trade policies that had fostered globalisation. Critics argue that such measures could lead to higher consumer prices and strained international relations.

On the other hand, proponents believe they might encourage self-reliance and industrial growth within the U.S.

The long-term effects on globalisation remain uncertain. While some see this as a step toward de-globalisation, others view it as a recalibration of trade dynamics.

The future will likely depend on how nations adapt to these changes and whether they seek collaboration or confrontation in global trade.

Globalisation is too big for it to simply… stop!

Posted on

What’s a tariff?

Trump's tariffs

Some of the strangest locations affected by Trump’s tariffs include an uninhabited island near Antarctica?

U.S. President Donald Trump’s ‘reciprocal tariffs‘ hit major trading partners around the world, but some tiny islands and remote locations were also unlikely targets.

These ‘odd’ choices have cast doubt on the validity of the calculation used to fire off these tariff salvos.

President Donald Trump set a baseline tariff rate of 10% across the board, with a raft of levies affecting over 180 countries.

Meanwhile global markets, but especially U.S. stocks continue to tumble in a freefall rout!

Posted on

Dow drops 2200 points Friday 4th April 2025 – S&P 500 loses 10% in 2 days as Trump’s tariff rout deepens – just two days after ‘Liberation Day!’

Stocks down

The stock market was smashed for a second day Friday 4th April 2025 after China retaliated with new tariffs on U.S. goods, sparking fears President Donald Trump has ignited a global trade war that will lead to a global recession.

Stock market damage

The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 2,231.07 points, or 5.5%, to 38,314.86 on Friday 4th April 2025, the biggest decline since June 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic.

This follows a 1,679-point decline on Thursday 3rd April 2025 and marks the first time ever that it has shed more than 1,500 points on consecutive days.

The S&P 500 collapsed 5.97% to 5,074.08, the biggest decline since March 2020. The benchmark shed 4.84% on Thursday 3rd April 2025 and is now down more than 17% off its recent high.

The Nasdaq Composite, home to many well-known tech companies that sell to China and manufacture there as well, dropped 5.8%, to 15,587.79.

This follows a nearly 6% drop on Thursday 3rd April 2025 and takes the index down by 22% from its December 2024 record – pushing it into a bear market.

The selling was wide ranging with only 14 members of the S&P 500 higher on the day. Major market indexes closed at their lows of the session.

China’s commerce ministry said the country will impose a 34% levy on all U.S. products, disappointing investors who had hoped countries would negotiate with Trump before retaliating.

Technology stocks led the massive rout Friday

Apple shares slumped 7%, bringing its loss for the week to 13%.

Nvidia dropped 7% during the session.

Tesla fell 10%.

All three companies have large exposure to China and are among the hardest hit from Beijing’s retaliatory tariffs.

The bull market is dead, and it was destroyed by self-inflicted wounds!

Posted on

Dow dives 1600 points after Trump’s tariff attack – S&P 500 and Nasdaq drop the most since 2020

Stocks markets fall

The U.S. stock market experienced a dramatic plunge following President Donald Trump’s announcement of sweeping tariffs, marking one of the most significant market downturns since 2020.

On 3rd April 2025, the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted by 1,600 points, a staggering 4% drop, closing at 40,546.

Dow Jones one day chart

The S&P 500 fell by 4.8%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite suffered a 6% decline, reflecting widespread investor anxiety.

S&P 500 one day chart

Trump’s tariffs, which include a baseline 10% levy on imports from all trading partners and higher rates for specific countries, have sparked fears of a global trade war.

The effective tariff rate for China, for instance, has risen to 54%, raising concerns about supply chain disruptions and inflation. Major industries, including technology, retail, and manufacturing, were hit hard.

Apple shares dropped nearly 10%, while companies like Nike and Nvidia saw significant losses.

Apple one day chart

The market reaction underscores the uncertainty surrounding the economic impact of these tariffs. Analysts warn that the measures could dampen consumer spending, increase inflation, and slow economic growth.

The ripple effects were felt globally, with European and Asian markets also experiencing declines. The Nikkei index declined a further 3%.

Nikkei Index five-day chart

Despite the turmoil, Trump defended the tariffs, likening them to a necessary ‘operation’ for the economy. He expressed confidence that the markets would eventually rebound, emphasising the long-term benefits of reshoring manufacturing and generating federal revenue.

As investors grapple with the implications of these policies, the focus remains on potential retaliatory measures from affected countries and the broader impact on global trade dynamics.

The sharp market sell-off serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between protectionist policies and economic stability in an interconnected world.

The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether these tariffs lead to lasting economic shifts or temporary market volatility.

U.S. companies are experiencing more harm from Trump’s tariffs. He wants manufacturing to come back to America – but after decades of globalization fine tuning – that is no easy task.

Are markets underestimating the impact of the tariffs on inflation?

Are markets pricing in the fact that Trump’s tariff policy will not be fully followed through?

The U.S. would be lucky to see a single rate cut from the Federal Reserve this year – and that will unsettle investors.

The U.S. economy could now only expand by between 1% and 1.5% this year – this would be a significant change in the growth outlook when compared with the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) projection of 2.7% U.S. growth made earlier this year.

If we get close to 1%, we get close to ‘stall’ speed and then it could just stop – and that will mean recession or worse for the U.S.

Posted on

U.S. so-called Liberation Day arrives – It’s tariff time baby! Do you like my chart?

Trumps tariffs

Tariffs are terrific, according to Trump – it’s his most favourite word.

Donald Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs have sent shockwaves through global trade, marking a dramatic escalation in his tariff trade war strategy. The day of economic independence.

The President of the United States proudly showed off his tariff agenda neatly displayed on a chart akin to a ‘pub quiz scoreboard’.

In the White House Rose Garden on 2nd April 2025 Trump happily unleashed tariff turmoil on a global scale.

Announced with his usual characteristic bravado, these tariffs were ‘calculated’ to impose ‘reciprocal’ charges on imports from over 180 countries, including allies like the UK, the European Union and Canada.

It’s not fair

Trump claims this move will restore fairness in global trade and bolster American manufacturing, but critics warn of dire economic consequences.

The tariffs vary by country, with the UK facing a 10% levy on all exports to the U.S., while the EU faces a 20% tariff. China, already subject to existing tariffs, now faces a combined rate of 54%.

The automotive industry has been hit particularly hard, with a 25% tariff on foreign-made vehicles, threatening thousands of jobs around the world.

Trump’s announcement, delivered in the White House Rose Garden, was accompanied by a chart comparing tariffs imposed by other countries on U.S. goods.

He argued that these measures are necessary to counter years of unfair trade practices and to ‘make America wealthy again’.

However, economists and analysts have expressed concerns that these tariffs could plunge the global economy into a downturn, disrupt decades-old trade alliances, and spark retaliatory measures from affected nations.

Keep calm and carry on

The UK government, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, has reportedly vowed to take a calm and pragmatic approach, emphasizing the importance of securing a wider economic prosperity deal with the U.S.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged that the UK would not be ‘out of the woods’ even if exemptions are secured, citing the broader impact of global tariffs.

As nations brace for the fallout, Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs may well redefine the landscape of international trade, for better or worse. The world watches as the ripple effects unfold.

Understandably stock markets reacted badly as futures tumbled. The Dow Jones was down 1000 points. Nikkei down 4%. S&P 500 down 3%.

UK and EU markets opened down too

Posted on

Global markets slide into chaos as Trump pushes his ‘America First Agenda’

U.S. tariffs

Global markets have been thrown into turmoil following the announcement of sweeping tariffs by U.S. President Donald Trump

U.S. tariffs, which include a 25% levy on imports from Canada and Mexico and a 10% increase on Chinese goods, have sparked fears of a global trade war. Retaliatory measures from Canada and China have only added to the uncertainty, sending shockwaves through financial markets worldwide.

The FTSE 100, London’s blue-chip index, fell by 1.3%, marking its steepest decline since October last year. Across the Atlantic, Wall Street saw significant losses, with the S&P 500 dropping 1.6% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 1.7%. European markets were not spared, as Germany’s DAX and France’s CAC 40 plunged by 3.5% and 2.1%.

Investors are increasingly concerned about the long-term implications of these tariffs. The measures threaten to disrupt global supply chains, inflate costs, and dampen economic growth. Analysts warn that prolonged trade tensions could push the global economy closer to a recession.

The tariffs have also had a notable impact on currency markets. The U.S. dollar weakened against major currencies, with the pound rising to a six-week high of $1.27. Meanwhile, safe-haven assets like gold saw a surge in demand, with prices climbing above $2,900 per ounce.

Oil markets were not immune to the fallout, as Brent crude futures dropped to a three-month low of $70.65 per barrel. The decline reflects growing concerns over reduced demand amid escalating trade tensions.

As the world braces for further economic uncertainty, the focus now shifts to how global leaders will navigate these turbulent waters.

The stakes are high, and the path forward remains uncertain.

Posted on

Trump’s tariffs tumble markets!

Stocks go red!

Trump’s tariffs have created fresh concern and new volatility in the markets forcing a stock market reversal.

The tariffs, which include a 25% duty on imports from Mexico and Canada, as well as a 10% levy on Chinese goods, have led to significant market volatility.

Investors remain cautious as they assess the long-term implications of these trade restrictions. The tariffs are expected to raise inflation in the U.S. and could potentially lead to a severe market correction.

It’s a complex situation with far-reaching consequences for global trade and the economy.

The S&P 500 retreated on Monday, extending February’s rout and turning red for the year after President Donald Trump’s confirmation of forthcoming tariffs.

The S&P 500 index fell to end at 5849, marking its worst day since December 2024 and bringing its year-to-date performance to a loss of about 0.5%.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 649 points to finish at 43191. The Nasdaq Composite slid to close at 18350, weighed down by Nvidia’s decline of more than 8%.

Stocks took a notable leg down in the afternoon following President Trump’s reiteration that 25% levies on imports from Mexico and Canada would go into effect on Tuesday 5th March 2025, dashing investors’ hopes of a last-minute deal to avert the full tariffs on the two U.S. allies.

All three indexes traded in positive territory earlier in the day, with the Dow rising nearly 200 points at session highs.

China retaliated with reciprocal tariffs of 15% on some U.S. goods due to take effect 10th. March 2025.

Is the world order being dramatically upended?

Posted on

China’s AI vs U.S. AI – competition heats up – and that’s good for business – isn’t it?

DeepSeek AI

The escalating AI competition between the U.S. and China has taken a new turn with the emergence of DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup that has introduced a low-cost AI model capable of rivaling the performance of OpenAI’s models.

This development has significant implications for data centres and the broader technology sector.

The rise of DeepSeek

DeepSeek’s recent breakthrough involves the development of two AI models, V3 and R1, which have been created at a fraction of the cost compared to their Western counterparts.

The total training cost for these models is estimated at around $6 million, significantly lower than the billions spent by major U.S. tech firms. This has challenged the prevailing assumption that developing large AI models requires massive financial investments and access to cutting-edge hardware.

Impact on data centres

The introduction of cost-effective AI models like those developed by DeepSeek could lead to a shift in how data centers operate.

Traditional AI models require substantial computational power and energy, leading to high operational costs for data centers. DeepSeek’s models, which are less energy-intensive, could reduce these costs and make AI technology more accessible to a wider range of businesses and organizations.

Technological advancements

DeepSeek’s success also highlights the potential for innovation in AI without relying on the most advanced hardware.

This could encourage other companies to explore alternative approaches to AI development, fostering a more diverse and competitive landscape. Additionally, the open-source nature of DeepSeek’s models promotes collaborative innovation, allowing developers worldwide to customise and improve upon these models2.

Competitive dynamics

The competition between DeepSeek and OpenAI underscores the broader U.S.-China rivalry in the AI space. While DeepSeek’s models pose a limited immediate threat to well-funded U.S. AI labs, they demonstrate China’s growing capabilities in AI innovation.

This competition could drive both countries to invest more in AI research and development, leading to faster technological advancements and more robust AI applications.

Broader implications

The rise of DeepSeek and similar Chinese and other AI startups could have far-reaching implications for the global technology sector.

As AI becomes increasingly integrated into various industries, the ability to develop and deploy AI models efficiently will be crucial.

Data centres will need to adapt to these changes, potentially investing in more energy-efficient infrastructure and exploring new ways to support AI workloads.

Where from here?

DeepSeek’s emergence as a significant player in the AI race highlights the dynamic nature of technological competition between the U.S. and China.

While the immediate impact on data centres and technology may be limited, the long-term implications could be profound.

As AI continues to evolve, the ability to innovate cost-effectively and collaborate across borders will be key to driving progress and maintaining competitiveness in the global technology landscape.

Posted on

‘Unimaginable’ billionaire wealth surged in 2024 as Oxfam predicts the emergence of five trillionaires within the next 10 years

Wealthiest and poorest

In 2024, billionaire wealth surged to unprecedented levels, with a staggering $2 trillion increase in just one year, according to an Oxfam report.

This rapid growth has led to predictions that the world could see at least five trillionaires within the next decade.

To place this in some context it is has been calculated that there are approximately 150 countries with a GDP of less than $1 trillion. This includes many smaller economies and developing nations.

So, 5 single human beings will likely hold more wealth ‘individually’ than approximately 150 separate countries. One person will be worth more than an entire country!

Oxfam report

The Oxfam report highlights the stark contrast between the wealth of the world’s richest individuals and the persistent poverty faced by millions.

The report reveals that the wealth of billionaires grew three times faster in 2024 compared to the previous year.

This surge in wealth has been attributed to various factors, including booming stock markets, lucrative investments, and favorable economic policies.

However, this concentration of wealth in the hands of a few has raised concerns about growing inequality and its impact on society.

Oxfam‘s findings emphasize the urgent need for bold economic reforms to address this disparity. The report calls for higher taxes on the super-rich and the abolition of tax havens to ensure a fairer distribution of wealth.

It also highlights the importance of investing in public services, such as healthcare and education, to improve the quality of life for all citizens.

Out of whack wealth

The growing concentration of wealth among billionaires has significant implications for global inequality. While the number of people living in poverty has remained largely unchanged since 1990, the wealth of the richest individuals has skyrocketed.

This disparity underscores the need for policies that promote economic fairness and reduce inequality.

The surge in billionaire wealth in 2024 serves as a stark reminder of the growing concentration of wealth and the urgent need for economic reforms.

By implementing policies that promote a fairer distribution of wealth and investing in public services, we can work towards a more equitable society. The emergence of trillionaires within the next decade should be a wake-up call for policymakers to address the root causes of inequality and ensure a better future for all.

World’s most wealthy climbed from $13 trillion to $15 trillion in just 12 months

The combined wealth of the world’s most wealthy rose from $13 trillion to $15 trillion in just 12 months, the global charity said Sunday. It marks the second largest annual increase in billionaire wealth since Oxfam records started.

Meanwhile, the number of people living in poverty has barely changed since 1990, the charity said, citing World Bank Data.

1% of people own nearly 45% of all wealth

The richest 1% of people own nearly 45% of all wealth, while 44% of humanity are living below the World Bank poverty line of $6.85 per day, the data showed.

First trillionaire by 2027 is predicted

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and now close ally of Trump, is on track to become the world’s first trillionaire by 2027, according to a report from Informa Connect Academy.

Musk is currently worth about around $440 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

Biden warning

Outgoing U.S. President Joe Biden warned of the rise of an “oligarchy taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence.”

“People should be able to make as much as they can, but pay – play by the same rules, pay their fair share in taxes,” Biden said in his farewell address.

Oxfam

Oxfam is trying to urge governments to commit to ensuring that the incomes of the top 10% are no higher than the bottom 40% worldwide.

Global economic rules should be adjusted to allow for the break-up of monopolies, and more corporate regulation and global tax policies should be adapted to ensure that the rich pay their fair share, according to the charity.

Money that is flowing to the bank accounts of the super-rich instead of much-needed investment in teachers and medicines is “not just bad for the economy — it’s bad for humanity,” said Oxfam’s Behar.

Posted on

Musk is everywhere!

Elon Musk

Elon Musk is the world’s richest person and the leader of Tesla, SpaceX, X, The Boring Company, x.AI, and Neuralink.

He is also the co-founder of PayPal and Zip2 and now the co-leader of DOGE – of U.S. Department of Government Efficiency and also recently led a group of investors in a bid to acquire OpenAI.

From a business perspective, Musk’s achievements are undeniable and even astonishing. The companies he leads are not only market leaders but also pioneers in their respective fields – consider how Tesla initiated the electric vehicle industry or how SpaceX successfully commercialised spaceflight.

Paradoxically, achieving success on a broad scale can have adverse effects. Investors appear to be increasingly concerned that Musk, despite his business acumen, is becoming distracted.

Tesla shares have declined over the past five trading days, dropping more than 6% on Tuesday 11th February 2025 as Chinese competitor BYD seems to be surpassing the company in AI-enabled autonomous driving.

If hands-free driving becomes a reality at Tesla, it could allow Musk to engage in other ventures without negatively impacting the company’s shares.

What you need to know today

BYD is a Tesla threat – but this is Elon Musk we’re talking about

Tesla shares fell 6.3% Tuesday 11th February 2025 after Chinese EV maker BYD said it will integrate DeepSeek into its autonomous driving technology and offer it in nearly all its vehicles.

There are also concerns over Musk’s distractions, such as his bid for OpenAI and his role at the ‘DOGE’ – Department of Government Efficiency in the White House.

Tesla’s stock price has fallen over 16% in the past five trading days

Tesla’s stock price has fallen over 16% in the past five trading days (5-day chart as of 11th February 2025)
Posted on

Apple and Google shares fall after China reportedly launches probes into Apple App Store practices and Google’s anti-trust issues

Google and Apple probed

China Launches Probes into Google and Apple Over Antitrust Concerns

China has recently initiated investigations into both Google and Apple, raising concerns over potential antitrust violations.

The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) is considering whether to formally investigate Apple’s App Store practices, particularly focusing on the fees Apple charges and its policies that block third-party payment providers. This move has already caused Apple’s shares to fall.

In addition to the probe into Apple, China has also opened a separate investigation into Google, although details about the focus of this investigation have not been disclosed. These probes come at a time when trade tensions between the U.S. and China are escalating under President Donald Trump’s administration.

Apple’s app store under scrutiny

Apple’s App Store has been under scrutiny globally, with regulators in Europe recently forcing the company to open up its App Store under the Digital Markets Act, allowing non-Apple companies to offer app stores and app developers to use third-party payment systems.

If the China probe goes ahead, it would pose further challenges for Apple in one of its largest markets, where it is already facing stiff competition from local companies such as Huawei.

Google

Google, on the other hand, has not yet commented on the specifics of the investigation, but the move highlights the increasing regulatory pressures faced by U.S. tech giants in China.

Both companies will need to navigate these investigations carefully as they continue to operate in a highly competitive and regulated environment.

The outcome of these probes could have significant implications for the tech industry, potentially leading to changes in how these companies operate in China and other markets.

As the investigations unfold, the world will be watching closely to see how Google and Apple respond to these regulatory challenges.

Posted on

Trumps tariffs impact – what a difference a day makes!

U.S. tariff war

Trump pauses tariffs on Mexico and Canada amid China’s retaliatory measures

In a surprising turn of events, President Donald Trump announced a 30-day pause on tariffs targeting Mexico and Canada, just as China introduced retaliatory tariffs on a range of U.S. goods. This move comes amidst escalating trade tensions and a looming threat of a global trade war.

The decision to pause tariffs on Mexico and Canada was announced following discussions with the leaders of both countries.

Border security

Trump cited the need to address border security and drug trafficking concerns, particularly the flow of fentanyl into the United States. In response, Mexico committed to deploying 10,000 National Guard officers to the U.S. border, while Canada agreed to appoint a ‘Fentanyl Czar’ and launch a joint strike force to combat organised crime

However, while Trump’s administration has temporarily halted tariffs on Mexico and Canada, the situation with China remains tense. China swiftly introduced retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports, including a 15% levy on coal and liquefied natural gas (LNG), and a 10% tariff on crude oil and farm equipment.

These measures are seen as a direct response to the U.S.’s 10% tariff on Chinese goods, which took effect earlier this week.

Global impact

The global economic impact of these trade disputes is significant. Analysts warn that prolonged trade tensions could lead to higher prices, disrupted supply chains, and slower economic growth.

Businesses and consumers alike are bracing for the potential fallout, with many expressing concerns about the uncertainty and instability these tariffs bring.

Despite the temporary 30-day reprieve for Mexico and Canada, Trump has indicated that tariffs could be reinstated if the countries do not meet his demands for increased border security and drug control measures.

The administration is also considering imposing tariffs on imports from the European Union, further complicating the global trade landscape.

As negotiations continue, the world watches closely to see if a resolution can be reached or if Trumps self-imposed trade war will escalate further.

The coming weeks will be crucial in determining the future of international trade relations and the economic stability of nations involved.

Posted on

Tariff Man – Trumps tariffs take affect – markets fall!

U.S. Tariffs

U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs have moved from threat to reality.

U.S. President Donald Trump launched a series of tariffs on Saturday. U.S. imports from Mexico and Canada will face a 25% duty, while those from China will be subject to a 10% tariff. Energy resources from Canada will face a lower 10% tariff.

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced on the same day retaliatory tariffs of 25% against $155 billion in U.S. goods. Industry leaders in the U.S. have expressed concern over those tariffs.

They cap off a wild start to the new year during which a new U.S. president entered the White House and a new Chinese artificial intelligence player, DeepSeek upended the industry.

Indices at new highs

Something else that was new in January: the highest-ever closing level for the S&P 500, Dow Jones and new FTSE 100 highs were enjoyed too.

With tariffs now in effect and the possibility of a trade war looming markets may struggle to new heights in the short term.

Even Big Tech earnings and the jobs numbers coming out this week, typically market-moving reports, are likely to play second fiddle to policy developments.

Markets react

Markets are already responding to the news. Prices of oil and gold, which typically rise during periods of volatility, have increased, but Bitcoin is trading lower. It remains uncertain whether these will be a temporary shock or a sustained trend.

China’s factory activity experienced slower growth in January 2025 compared to December 2024 and is expected to be adversely affected as U.S. companies seek to reduce their dependence on Chinese imports.

Trump’s current tariffs may be targeted, but it’s hard to see any country or sector escaping the tariff turmoil.

The EU is also in line for a tariff attack and maybe the UK after.

Posted on

Recent surprise rise in UK borrowing – deals yet another disappointment for the chancellor

UK borrowing

The latest UK borrowing figures, reveal a significant increase in public sector net borrowing. In December 2024, the UK government borrowed £17.8 billion, which is the highest figure for the month for four years.

This amount was reportedly £10.1 billion higher than the same month last year and exceeded the £14.1 billion forecast by most economists.

The reported rise in borrowing was driven by several factors, including increased spending on public services, benefits, debt interest, and capital transfers. The interest payable on central government debt alone was £8.3 billion, nearly £4 billion higher than the previous year.

Additionally, a reduction in National Insurance contributions following rate cuts earlier in 2024 partially offset the increase in tax receipts.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a challenging fiscal environment, with borrowing costs rising due to lower economic growth, higher public sector wages, and increased benefits payments. The unexpected jump in December 2024’s borrowing highlights the difficulties in balancing the budget and maintaining economic stability. The Chancellor’s budget was one of growth, but employer NI hikes have unravelled her ‘growth’ plan.

Despite the rise in borrowing, government bond prices remained relatively stable, suggesting that traders were not overly concerned by the surge. However, the overall fiscal position remains precarious, with public sector net debt estimated at 97.2% of GDP, the highest level since the early 1960s.

The government has pledged to take a hard line on unnecessary spending and to ensure that every penny of taxpayer money is spent productively.

As the fiscal year progresses, the Chancellor will need to navigate these financial challenges carefully to maintain economic stability and growth.

However, it is anticipated next month, following the January tax income boost, figures will appear favourable for the government, albeit temporarily.

Posted on

The aftermath from the arrival of Deepseek

Deepseek AI

Nvidia, the renowned American technology company, recently experienced the largest one-day loss in U.S. history. On January 27, 2025, Nvidia’s stock plummeted by 17%, resulting in a staggering market cap loss of nearly $600 billion.

This unprecedented drop was primarily triggered by the emergence of DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence startup that has been making waves in the tech industry.

DeepSeek, founded in 2023 by Liang Wenfeng, has developed open-source large language models that rival some of the best AI models in the world. The company’s latest model, DeepSeek-V3, has demonstrated impressive performance at a fraction of the cost of its competitors.

This has raised concerns among investors about the sustainability of Nvidia’s dominance in the AI chip market.

The release of DeepSeek’s latest technology has caused significant anxiety among U.S. tech giants, leading to a massive sell-off in the stock market. Companies that rely heavily on Nvidia’s GPUs, such as Dell, Oracle, and Super Micro Computer, also saw their stock prices plummet.

The ripple effect of Nvidia’s loss was felt across the tech-heavy Nasdaq, which dropped by 3.1% on the same day.

Nvidia one-month chart 27th January 2025

In response to this market upheaval, former President Donald Trump commented on the situation, stating that DeepSeek’s emergence should serve as a ‘wake-up call’ for American companies.

Trump emphasised the need for U.S. industries to remain competitive and innovative in the face of rising competition from Chinese tech firms. He acknowledged the impressive advancements made by DeepSeek and suggested that American companies could benefit from adopting more cost-effective methods in their AI development.

Trump’s remarks highlight the growing concern among U.S. policymakers and industry leaders about the rapid advancements in AI technology coming from China.

The success of DeepSeek has demonstrated that significant breakthroughs can be achieved with relatively modest investments, challenging the notion that massive capital expenditure is necessary for top-tier AI performance.

As the AI race continues to heat up, it is clear that companies like Nvidia will need to adapt and innovate to maintain their competitive edge. The emergence of DeepSeek has not only disrupted the market but also underscored the importance of staying ahead in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.

For American tech giants, this wake-up call serves as a reminder that the global AI landscape is becoming increasingly competitive, and complacency is not an option.

Has the U.S. spent wisely on AI development?

The emergence of DeepSeek has indeed raised questions about the spending strategies of U.S. tech companies on AI development. DeepSeek’s ability to develop high-performing AI models at a fraction of the cost has led to concerns about the necessity of the massive capital expenditures by large U.S. tech firms.

For instance, companies like Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon have collectively spent over $1 trillion on AI investments in recent years. This significant spending has been driven by the belief that larger models and more computing power would lead to better performance.

However, DeepSeek’s success with more cost-effective methods challenges this notion and suggests that efficient innovation might be more important than sheer scale.

The impressive performance and lower costs of DeepSeek’s models have prompted some analysts to question whether the billions of dollars spent by U.S. tech companies on AI development are justified. This has led to a re-evaluation of AI spending strategies and a push for more efficient and innovative approaches to AI development.

In summary, while U.S. tech companies have invested heavily in AI, the success of DeepSeek highlights the potential for achieving cutting-edge results with fewer resources. This has sparked a broader discussion about the most effective and efficient ways to advance AI technology.

Asking ChatGPT – ‘Do you see Deepseek as a competitor or a threat?’

The reply:

As an AI, I don’t have personal opinions or feelings. However, I can share that DeepSeek’s rapid rise and impressive performance in the AI field are noteworthy. Their ability to develop high-performing models at a lower cost is a significant achievement and has certainly shaken up the industry. It’s a reminder of the dynamic and competitive nature of the AI landscape, where innovation can come from unexpected places.

Asking ChatGPT – ‘What do you think of Deepseek?’

The reply:

DeepSeek is a fascinating and disruptive player in the AI landscape. Founded in 2023 by Liang Wenfeng, this Chinese startup has quickly gained attention for its open-source large language models, which rival some of the best AI models in the world at a fraction of the cost. Their latest models, DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1, have demonstrated impressive performance and efficiency, challenging the dominance of established tech giants2.

DeepSeek’s emergence has caused significant market upheaval, leading to substantial drops in the stock prices of major AI-related firms, including Nvidia. The company’s success highlights the potential for innovation and cost-effectiveness in AI development, which has prompted industry leaders and policymakers to re-evaluate their strategies.

Overall, DeepSeek’s rapid rise and impact on the AI industry underscore the importance of staying competitive and innovative in this fast-evolving field. It’s a reminder that breakthroughs can come from unexpected places and that the AI landscape is becoming increasingly dynamic and competitive.

It would not be drawn on these questions but, one thing is for sure the U.S. has spent billions developing their systems and charge fortunes for using it.

This is about to change.

And further…

The Deepseek website reportedly crashed on 27th January 2025 due to heavy global demand. There were also reports of unrelenting cyberattacks on its systems…?

Curious. From minnow to centre stage in just one day!

Posted on

Why is Trump so fixated with Greenland?

The island of Greenalnd

Donald Trump’s fascination with Greenland has been a topic of intrigue and speculation since his first term in office.

His renewed interest in acquiring the world’s largest island has raised eyebrows and sparked debates about the underlying motivations and implications of such a move.

Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, holds significant strategic and economic value. Its location in the Arctic makes it a key player in global geopolitics, especially as ‘climate change’ could potentially open up new shipping routes and access to untapped natural resources.

The island is rich in rare earth minerals, oil, and natural gas, which are becoming increasingly accessible due to the melting ice caps. These resources are crucial for advanced technologies and the clean energy economy, making Greenland a highly coveted asset.

Critical minerals

Critical minerals refer to a subset of materials considered essential to the energy transition. These minerals, which tend to have a high risk of supply chain disruption, include metals such as copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt and rare earth elements.

Critical minerals and rare earth elements are vital components in emerging green technologies, such as wind turbines and electric vehicles, energy storage technologies and national security applications.

China is the undisputed leader of the critical minerals supply chain, accounting for roughly 60% of the world’s production of rare earth minerals and materials. U.S. officials have previously warned that this poses a strategic challenge amid the pivot to low-carbon energy sources

Jakob Kløve Keiding, senior consultant at the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), reportedly said a 2023 survey of Greenland’s resource potential evaluated a total of some 38 raw materials on the island, the vast majority of which have a relatively high or moderate potential.

These materials include the rare earth metals graphite, niobium, platinum group metals, molybdenum, tantalum and titanium.

A lot of independent state surveys are pointing to Greenland and its natural shelf boundaries as potentially hosting 20% to 25% of the last remaining extractable resources on the planet. Now, if that’s right, that’s an enormous opportunity for Greenland.”

Not just about money, it’s also about strategic benefits and ‘national’ security

Trump’s interest in Greenland is not solely driven by its natural resources. The island’s strategic military importance cannot be overlooked. Greenland hosts the U.S.’ northernmost military base, the Pituffik Space Base, which plays a critical role in ballistic missile early warning systems and space operations.

Control over Greenland would enhance the U.S.’ ability to monitor and respond to potential threats from adversaries, solidifying its position in the Arctic region.

And… it’s personal too

Beyond the strategic and economic factors, there are also personal and political motivations behind Trump’s fixation with Greenland.

Some experts suggest that Trump’s desire to acquire Greenland is fueled by his ambition to leave a lasting legacy and be remembered as a transformative leader. The idea of adding a vast, resource-rich territory to the United States’ portfolio aligns with his ‘America First’ agenda and his penchant for grandiose projects.

However, Trump’s pursuit of Greenland has not been without controversy. The Danish government and Greenland’s leadership have firmly rejected the idea of selling the island.

Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte Egede has emphasised the island’s desire for independence and self-determination, stating that Greenland is not for sale and that its future should be decided by its people. This stance reflects the broader sentiment among Greenlanders, who are wary of foreign exploitation and committed to preserving their unique cultural and environmental heritage.

Donald Trump’s fixation with Greenland is a complex interplay of strategic, economic, and personal factors.

While the island’s vast natural resources and strategic military importance make it an attractive target, the political and ethical implications of such a move cannot be ignored. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether Trump’s ambitions will materialize or if Greenland will maintain its autonomy and chart its own path in the Arctic region.

Rare earth minerals

Greenland is home to a variety of rare earth minerals, which are crucial for many modern technologies. Some of the key rare earth minerals found in Greenland include:

  • Yttrium
  • Scandium
  • Neodymium
  • Dysprosium
  • Terbium
  • Europium
  • Gadolinium
  • Holmium
  • Erbium
  • Thulium
  • Ytterbium
  • Lutetium
  • Copper
  • Gold
  • Zinc
  • Titanium
  • Lead
  • Silver
  • Platinum
  • Palladium
  • Rhodium
  • Nickel
  • Cobalt
  • Lithium

Some of these minerals are essential for the production of permanent magnets used in electric vehicles (EVs) and wind turbines. Others are more obvious.

Greenland’s rich mineral resources make it a significant player in the global supply of rare earth elements.

Greenland ‘mini’ history lesson

Greenland history of ownership is a captivating narrative of exploration colonization, and strategic significance. The island, the largest has been inhabited for millennia, with the known settlers arriving around 2500 BC. These early inhabitants were succeeded by several other groups migrating from continental North America.

The first formal claim Greenland can be traced to the late10th century when Erik the Red, a Norse, settled on the island after being banished from Iceland. He named it ‘Greenland’ to attract settlers, and small Norse communities established themselves along the coast. These settlements endured for centuries, despite the Arctic conditions and the encroaching cold of the Little Ice Age.

In the 18th century, Denmark-Norway began to reassert its influence over. In 1721, a missionary expedition led by Hans Egede marked the beginning of Denmark colonisation efforts. Greenland was formally incorporated into the Danish Kingdom in 1953, transitioning a colony to overseas county.

During World, Greenland became more closely connected to the U.S. due to Denmark’s occupation by Nazi Germany. After the war, Denmark reasserted its control, and in 1979 Greenland was granted home rule, allowing it to govern its affairs. Denmark retained control over defence and foreign policy.

Today, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, with increasing self-governance. It manages its domestic matters, including education health, natural resources, while Denmark oversees defense and foreign affairs.

Greenland’s strategic importance has it as a subject of interest for various global powers throughout history, and its unique position continues to shape its political and economic landscape.

Though a part of the continent of North America, Greenland has been politically and culturally associated with Europe (specifically Denmark and Norway)

See Wikipedia for more information.