What is the deal with the new Huawei AI power chip cluster touted by China?

AI race hots up!

Huawei has unveiled a bold new AI chip cluster strategy aimed squarely at challenging Nvidia’s dominance in high-performance computing.

At its Connect 2025 conference in Shanghai, Huawei introduced the Atlas 950 and Atlas 960 SuperPoDs—massive AI infrastructure systems built around its in-house Ascend chips.

These clusters represent China’s most ambitious attempt yet to bypass Western semiconductor restrictions and assert technological independence.

The technical stuff

The Atlas 950 SuperPoD, launching in late 2026, will integrate 8,192 Ascend 950DT chips, delivering up to 8 EFLOPS of FP8 compute and 16 EFLOPS at FP4 precision. (Don’t ask me either – but that’s what the data sheet says).

It boasts a staggering 16.3 petabytes per second of interconnect bandwidth, enabled by Huawei’s proprietary UnifiedBus 2.0 optical protocol. It is reportedly claimed to be ten times faster than current internet backbone infrastructure.

This system is reportedly designed to outperform Nvidia’s NVL144 cluster, with Huawei asserting a 6.7× advantage in compute power and 15× in memory capacity.

In 2027, Huawei reportedly plans to release the Atlas 960 SuperPoD, doubling the specs with 15,488 Ascend 960 chips. This reportedly will give 30 EFLOPS FP8 compute, and 34 PB/s bandwidth.

These SuperPoDs will be linked into SuperClusters. The Atlas 960 SuperCluster is reportedly projected to reach 2 ZFLOPS of FP8 performance. This potentially rivals even Elon Musk’s xAI Colossus and Nvidia’s future NVL576 deployments.

Huawei’s roadmap includes annual chip upgrades: Ascend 950 in 2026, Ascend 960 in 2027, and Ascend 970 in 2028.

Each generation promises to double computing power. The chips will feature Huawei’s own high-bandwidth memory variants—HiBL 1.0 and HiZQ 2. These are designed to optimise inference and training workloads.

Strategy

This strategy reflects a shift in China’s AI hardware approach. Rather than competing on single-chip performance, Huawei is betting on scale and system integration.

By controlling the entire stack—from chip design to memory, networking, and interconnects—it aims to overcome fabrication constraints imposed by U.S. sanctions.

While Huawei’s software ecosystem still trails Nvidia’s CUDA, its CANN toolkit is gaining traction. Chinese regulators discourage purchases of Nvidia’s AI chips.

The timing of Huawei’s announcement coincides with increased scrutiny of Nvidia in China, suggesting a coordinated push for domestic alternatives.

In short, Huawei’s AI cluster strategy is not just a technical feat—it’s a geopolitical statement.

Whether it can match Nvidia’s real-world performance remains to be seen, but the ambition is unmistakable.

The AI power race just got even hotter!

China experiences a slowdown as retail and industrial output miss targets

China data

China’s economic recovery continues to show signs of strain, with the latest figures for August 2025 revealing a slowdown across retail sales, industrial output, and fixed-asset investment.

This raises fresh concerns about the sustainability of growth amid persistent domestic and global headwinds China is facing.

Retail sales rose by 3.4% year-on-year, falling short of analysts’ expectations of 3.9% and marking a deceleration from July’s 3.7% growth.

The slowdown was particularly pronounced in urban centres, where consumption lagged behind rural areas.

Consumer

Categories such as furniture, jewellery, and entertainment goods reportedly saw robust gains, but these were offset by weaker demand for electronics and home appliances, as the impact of Beijing’s consumer trade-in subsidies began to fade.

Industrial output also disappointed, growing just 5.2% compared to 5.7% in July—its weakest performance in over a year.

Economists had anticipated a repeat of July’s figures, but Beijing’s crackdown on industrial overcapacity and subdued domestic demand appear to have taken a toll.

China August 2025 data Infographic

Fixed-asset investment, a key driver of long-term growth, expanded by a mere 0.5% in the year to date, down sharply from 1.6% in the January–July period.

Real estate

The real estate sector remains a major drag, with investment plunging 12.9% over the first eight months. While state-owned enterprises have continued to prop up infrastructure and high-tech investment, private sector activity has contracted, highlighting a growing imbalance in capital allocation.

The urban unemployment rate edged up to 5.3%, attributed in part to seasonal factors such as university graduations.

However, the broader picture suggests underlying fragility in the labour market, with policymakers warning of “multiple risks and challenges” ahead.

Despite the underwhelming data, markets remained relatively calm. The CSI 300 index rose nearly 1%, reflecting investor expectations that Beijing may introduce incremental policy easing.

Stimulus?

However, economists caution that a large-scale stimulus is unlikely unless the government’s 5% annual growth target is at risk.

As China grapples with deflationary pressures, weakening consumer sentiment, and a faltering property market, the latest figures underscore the need for more targeted support and structural reforms.

Without a decisive shift in policy, the world’s second-largest economy may struggle to regain its footing in the months ahead.

China-U.S. trade slump deepens as exports plunge 33%

U.S. imports from China fall in August 2025

China’s exports to the United States fell sharply in August 2025, marking a six-month low and underscoring the growing strain in global trade dynamics.

According to recent data, shipments from China to the U.S. dropped by 33% year-on-year, reflecting both weakening demand and the ongoing effects of geopolitical tensions.

This decline is part of a broader slowdown in China’s export sector, which saw overall outbound shipments contract for the sixth consecutive month.

Analysts point to several contributing factors: tighter monetary policy in the U.S., shifting supply chains, and a cooling appetite for Chinese goods amid rising tariffs and trade barriers.

Down 33%

The 33% plunge is particularly striking given the scale of bilateral trade. The U.S. remains one of China’s largest export markets, and such a steep drop signals deeper economic recalibrations.

Sectors hit hardest include electronics, machinery, and consumer goods—industries that once formed the backbone of China’s export dominance.

Economists warn that this trend could have ripple effects across global markets. For China, it raises questions about domestic resilience and the need to pivot toward internal consumption.

For the U.S., it may accelerate efforts to diversify supply chains and invest in domestic manufacturing.

The timing is also politically charged. With President Trump’s tariff policies still in effect and China navigating its own economic headwinds, trade relations remain tense.

This downturn may prompt renewed negotiations—or further decoupling.

Despite the ongoing slump in trade, the U.S. continues to be China’s largest export destination among individual countries.

The staying power of gold!

Gold

Gold’s recent surge—hitting over $3,550 per ounce (4th September 2025)—isn’t just a speculative blip.

It’s a convergence of deep structural shifts and short-term catalysts that are reshaping how investors, central banks, and governments think about value and stability.

Here’s why

🧭 Strategic Drivers (Long-Term Forces)

Central Bank Buying: Nearly half of surveyed central banks reportedly plan to increase gold reserves through 2025, citing inflation hedging, crisis resilience, and reduced reliance on the U.S. dollar.

Dollar Diversification: After Western sanctions froze Russia’s reserves in 2022, many countries began reassessing their exposure to dollar-denominated assets.

Fiscal Expansion & Debt Concerns: With U.S. debt surpassing $37 trillion and new legislation adding trillions more, gold is seen as a hedge against long-term dollar instability.

⚡ Tactical Catalysts (Short-Term Triggers)

Geopolitical Tensions: Ongoing wars, trade disputes, and questions around Federal Reserve independence have heightened uncertainty, boosting gold’s ‘fear hedge’ appeal.

Interest Rate Expectations: The Fed has held rates steady, but markets anticipate cuts. Lower yields make non-interest-bearing assets like gold more attractive.

Weakening U.S. Dollar: The dollar’s decline against the euro and yen has made gold cheaper for foreign buyers, increasing global demand.

ETF Inflows & Retail Demand: Physically backed gold ETFs saw their largest first-half inflows since 2020, while bar demand rose 10% in 2024.

Gold futures price one-year chart (December 2025 Gold)

🧮 Symbolic Undercurrent

Gold isn’t just a commodity—it’s a referendum on trust. When institutions wobble and currencies lose their shine, gold becomes the narrative anchor: a timeless, tangible vote of no confidence in the system.

Summary

🛡️ Safe Haven: Retains value during crisis.

📈 Inflation Hedge: Preserves purchasing power.

🧩 Portfolio Diversifier: Low correlation with other assets.

Tangible Asset: Physical, unlike stocks or bonds.

China’s EV Price War: BYD falters as the Chinese EV machine reshapes the global car market

EV global price war

China’s electric vehicle (EV) powerhouse is rewriting the global automotive playbook—but not without homegrown company damage.

BYD, now the world’s largest EV manufacturer by volume, has been caught in the crossfire of a domestic price war.

Damaging price war

The price war is damaging margins. It is unnerving investors and revealing the perils of hyper-competition in the world’s most aggressive car market.

In Q2 2025, BYD posted a 30% drop in net profit to 6.4 billion yuan (£700 million), its first earnings decline in over three years.

Despite a 145% surge in overseas sales, the company’s sweeping discounts across 22 models have eroded profitability at home.

Gross margins slipped to around 16%, and its Hong Kong-listed shares tumbled 8% to a five-month low.

Analysts reportedly now question whether BYD can hit its ambitious 5.5-million-unit sales target, having reached only 45% by July 2025.

The price war, ignited by BYD’s aggressive cuts in May 2025, has forced rivals like Geely, Chery, and SAIC-GM to follow suit. Entry-level EVs now start below (£6,500), with features like driver assistance and smart infotainment once reserved for premium models.

But the race to the bottom has drawn concern from regulators and industry leaders. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) warned of “disorderly competition”, while executives fear quality compromises and supplier strain.

Yet even as BYD stumbles, the broader Chinese EV machine is gaining global momentum. In Europe, BYD overtook Tesla in July sales, capturing 1.1% market share versus Tesla’s 0.7%.

Chinese EV car brands account for around 10% of new UK car sales

Chinese brands now account for around 10% of new car sales in the UK. There are over 30 affordable EV models priced under £30,000.

Their edge lies in battery supply chains, manufacturing efficiency, and software integration. Transforming cars into ‘smartphones on wheels’ tailored to digitally connected consumers.

China’s EV revolution is no longer just a domestic shake-up—it’s a global reordering. Legacy automakers are retreating from the budget segment. But Chinese firms flooding international markets with sleek, connected, and competitively priced vehicles.

BYD’s profit dip may be a temporary wobble. The long-term trajectory is clear: China isn’t just building cars—it’s building the future of mobility.

For global rivals, the message is unmistakable: adapt, or be outpaced by the dragon’s electric roar.

Infographic: China’s BYD and other EVs

Summary

BYD’s Q2 2025 net profit drop of 30% to 6.4 billion yuan: This figure aligns with recent earnings reports and analyst commentary. The drop is consistent with margin pressure from domestic price cuts.

Gross margin falling to 16.3%: Matches industry estimates for BYD’s automotive segment, which has seen compression due to aggressive discounting.

Overseas sales up 145% YoY: BYD’s international expansion—especially in Europe, Southeast Asia, and Latin America—has been rapid. This growth rate is plausible and supported by export data.

BYD reaching only 45% of its 5.5 million unit sales target by July: This tracks with cumulative delivery figures through mid-year, suggesting a potential shortfall unless H2 volumes accelerate.

Price war triggered by BYD’s cuts across 22 models in May: Confirmed by industry reports and BYD’s own promotional campaigns. Other automakers like Geely and Chery have responded with similar discounts.

CAAM warning of “disorderly competition”: This quote has appeared in official statements and media coverage, reflecting regulatory concern over unsustainable pricing.

Chinese EVs gaining market share in Europe and UK: BYD overtaking Tesla in July 2025 sales in Europe is supported by registration data. Chinese brands now account for ~10% of UK new car sales, with many models priced under £30,000.

Japan faces steepest export decline in four years

Japan exports drop

Japan’s economy has hit a troubling patch, with July 2025 marking its sharpest export contraction in over four years.

The Ministry of Finance reported a 2.6% year-on-year drop, driven largely by tariff led trade tensions and weakening global demand.

The most dramatic impact came from the United States, where exports fell 10.1%, led by a 28.4% plunge in automobile shipments.

This follows the U.S. administration’s decision to impose 25% tariffs on Japanese vehicles and auto parts in April—a move that has rattled Japan’s automotive sector, long a pillar of its export economy.

Despite a partial tariff rollback to 15% in July, the damage was already done. Japanese carmakers absorbed much of the cost to maintain shipment volumes, which only fell 3.2%, but the value loss was substantial.

Japan – July export data infographic

Exports to China also declined by 3.5%, underscoring broader regional weakness. Meanwhile, imports dropped 7.5%, signalling sluggish domestic consumption and further strain on Japan’s trade balance, which recorded a 117.5 billion yen deficit.

Economists warn that if the export downturn continues, Japan could face a recession. Although Q2 GDP showed modest growth of 0.3%, the July figures suggest that momentum may be fading.

The Bank of Japan is now expected to hold off on interest rate hikes, with its next policy meeting scheduled for 19th September 2025.

As global markets digest the implications, Japan’s export slump serves as a stark reminder of how vulnerable even advanced economies can be to shifting trade policies and geopolitical headwinds.

Is BIG tech being allowed to pay its way out of the tariff turmoil

BIG tech money aids tariff avoidance

Where is the standard for the tariff line? Is this fair on the smaller businesses and the consumer? Money buys a solution without fixing the problem!

  • Nvidia and AMD have struck a deal with the U.S. government: they’ll pay 15% of their China chip sales revenues directly to Washington. This arrangement allows them to continue selling advanced chips to China despite looming export restrictions.
  • Apple, meanwhile, is going all-in on domestic investment. Tim Cook announced a $600 billion U.S. investment plan over four years, widely seen as a strategic move to dodge Trump’s proposed 100% tariffs on imported chips.

🧩 Strategic Motives

  • These deals are seen as tariff relief mechanisms, allowing companies to maintain access to key markets while appeasing the administration.
  • Analysts suggest Apple’s move could trigger a ‘domino effect’ across the tech sector, with other firms following suit to avoid punitive tariffs.
Tariff avoidance examples

⚖️ Legal & Investor Concerns

  • Some critics call the Nvidia/AMD deal a “shakedown” or even unconstitutional, likening it to a tax on exports.
  • Investors are wary of the arbitrary nature of these deals—questioning whether future administrations might play kingmaker with similar tactics.

Big Tech firms are striking strategic deals to sidestep escalating tariffs, with Apple pledging $600 billion in U.S. investments to avoid import duties, while Nvidia and AMD agree to pay 15% of their China chip revenues directly to Washington.

These moves are seen as calculated trade-offs—offering financial concessions or domestic reinvestment in exchange for continued market access. Critics argue such arrangements resemble export taxes or political bargaining, raising concerns about legality and precedent.

As tensions mount, these deals reflect a broader shift in how tech giants navigate geopolitical risk and regulatory pressure.

They buy a solution…

TSMC’s alleged trade secret breach

Tech breach at TSMC

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, on 5th August 2025 has reportedly uncovered a serious internal breach involving its 2-nanometer chip technology, one of the most advanced processes in the semiconductor industry.

🔍 What Happened

  • TSMC detected unauthorised activities during routine monitoring, which led to the discovery of potential trade secret leaks.
  • Several former employees are suspected of attempting to access and extract proprietary data related to the 2nm chip development and production.
  • The company has reportedly taken strict disciplinary action, including terminations, and has initiated legal proceedings under Taiwan’s National Security Act, which protects core technologies from unauthorized use.

🧠 Why It Matters

The alleged leak doesn’t just constitute corporate espionage—it has strategic implications. Taiwan’s National Security Act categorises such breaches under core tech theft, permitting aggressive legal action and severe penalties.

With chip supremacy increasingly viewed as a geopolitical asset, this saga is more than just workplace misconduct—it’s a digital arms race.

  • The 2nm process is a breakthrough in chip design, offering:
    • 35% lower power consumption
    • 15% higher transistor density compared to 3nm chips
  • These chips are crucial for AI accelerators, high-performance computing, and next-gen smartphones—markets expected to dominate sub-2nm demand by 2030.
  • A leak of this magnitude could allow competitors to replicate or leapfrog TSMC’s proprietary methods, threatening its technological edge and market dominance.
  • Moreover, company design secrets are potentially at stake, and this would seriously damage these businesses as their hard work in R&D is stolen.

⚖️ Legal & Strategic Response

  • TSMC has reaffirmed its zero-tolerance IP policy, stating it will pursue violations to the fullest extent of the law.
  • The case is now under legal investigation.

While TSMC’s official line is firm—’zero tolerance for IP breaches’—investors are jittery.

The company’s shares dipped slightly amid concerns about reputational damage and longer-term supply chain vulnerabilities.

Analysts expect limited short-term impact on production timelines, but scrutiny over internal controls may rise.

China’s new AI model GLM-4.5 threatens DeepSeek – will it also threaten OpenAI?

China's AI

In a bold move reshaping the global AI landscape, Chinese startup Z.ai has launched GLM-4.5, an open-source model touted as cheaper, smaller, and more efficient than rivals like DeepSeek.

The announcement, made at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, has sent ripples across the tech sector.

What sets GLM-4.5 apart is its lean architecture. Requiring just eight Nvidia H20 chips—custom-built to comply with U.S. export restrictions—it slashes operating costs dramatically.

By comparison, DeepSeek’s model demands nearly double the compute power, making GLM-4.5 a tantalising alternative for cost-conscious developers and enterprises.

But the savings don’t stop there. Z.ai revealed that it will charge just $0.11 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens. In contrast, DeepSeek R1 costs $0.14 for input and a hefty $2.19 for output, putting Z.ai firmly in the affordability lead.

Functionally, GLM-4.5 leverages ‘agentic’ AI—meaning it can deconstruct tasks into subtasks autonomously, delivering more accurate results with minimal human intervention.

This approach marks a shift from traditional logic-based models and promises smarter integration into coding, design, and editorial workflows.

Z.ai, formerly known as Zhipu, boasts an impressive funding roster including Alibaba, Tencent, and state-backed municipal tech funds.

With IPO ambitions on the horizon, its momentum mirrors China’s broader push to dominate the next wave of AI innovation.

While the U.S. has placed Z.ai on its entity list, stifling some Western partnerships, the firm insists it has adequate computing resources to scale.

As AI becomes a battleground for technological and geopolitical influence, GLM-4.5 may prove to be a powerful competitor.

But it has some way yet to go.

China reportedly concerned about security of Nvidia AI chips

U.S. and China AI chips concern

China has reportedly voiced concerns about the security implications of Nvidia’s cutting-edge artificial intelligence chips, deepening the tech cold war between Beijing and Washington.

The caution follows increasing scrutiny of semiconductors used in defence, infrastructure, and digital surveillance systems—sectors where AI accelerators play an outsized role.

While no official ban has been announced, sources suggest that Chinese regulators are examining how Nvidia’s chips—known for powering generative AI and large language models—might pose risks to national data security.

At the core of the issue is a growing unease about foreign-designed hardware transmitting or processing sensitive domestic information, potentially exposing it to surveillance or manipulation.

Nvidia, whose H100 and A800 series dominate the high-performance AI landscape, has already faced restrictions from the U.S. government on exports to China.

In response, Chinese tech firms have been developing domestic alternatives, including chips from Huawei and Alibaba, though few match Nvidia’s sophistication or efficiency.

The situation highlights China’s larger strategy to reduce reliance on American technology, especially as AI becomes more integral to industrial automation, cyber defence, and public services.

It also underscores the dual-use dilemma of AI—where innovation in consumer tech can quickly scale into military applications.

While diplomatic channels remain frosty, the market implications are heating up. Nvidia’s shares dipped slightly on the news, and analysts predict renewed interest in sovereign chip initiatives across Asia.

For all the lofty aspirations of AI making the world smarter, it seems that suspicion—not cooperation—is the current driving force behind chip geopolitics.

As one observer quipped, ‘We built machines to think for us—now we’re worried they’re thinking too much, in all the wrong places’.

Nvidia reportedly denies there are any security concerns.

China’s restriction of rare earth materials hurts

Chinas rare earth material dominance

China’s recent export restrictions on rare earth elements are sending shockwaves through multiple industries worldwide.

As the curbs continue to take effect, sectors reliant on these critical minerals—including automotive, defence, and clean energy—are beginning to feel the strain.

China controls about 60–70% of global rare earth production and nearly 90% of the refining capacity.

Even when rare earths are mined elsewhere, they’re often sent to China for processing, since few countries have the infrastructure or environmental tolerance to handle the complex and polluting refining process.

In April 2025, China introduced export controls on seven key rare earth elements and permanent magnets, citing national interests and responding to rising trade tensions—particularly with the U.S.

Automotive industry in crisis

The auto sector is among the hardest hit. Rare earth elements are essential for both combustion engines and electric vehicles, particularly in the production of magnets used in motors and batteries.

European auto suppliers have already reported production shutdowns due to dwindling inventories.

Germany’s car industry, a global powerhouse, has reportedly warned that further disruptions could bring manufacturing to a standstill.

Japan’s Nissan and Suzuki have also expressed concerns, with Suzuki reportedly halting production of its Swift model due to shortages.

Defence and technology sectors at risk

China’s dominance in rare earth refining, controlling nearly 90% of global capacity, poses a strategic challenge for defense industries.

The U.S. military relies heavily on these materials for missile guidance systems, radar technology, and advanced electronics.

With nearly 78% of defence platforms dependent on Chinese-processed rare earths, the restrictions expose vulnerabilities in national security.

Clean energy ambitions under threat

The clean energy transition depends on rare earths for wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicle batteries.

China’s curbs threaten global efforts to reduce carbon emissions, forcing countries to scramble for alternative sources. India’s electric vehicle sector, for instance, faces potential setbacks as manufacturers struggle to secure supplies.

As industries grapple with these disruptions, governments and corporations are urgently seeking solutions. Whether through diplomatic negotiations or investment in domestic rare earth production, the race is on to mitigate the fallout from China’s tightening grip on these critical resources.

Several countries have significant rare earth reserves and can supply these materials in high quantities.

Top rare earth materials suppliers

China – The dominant player, with 44 million metric tons of reserves.

Brazil – Holds 21 million metric tons of rare earth reserves.

Vietnam – Has 22 million metric tons, making it a rising supplier.

India – Contains 6.9 million metric tons.

Australia – A key producer with 5.7 million metric tons.

Russia – Holds 10 million metric tons.

United States – While not a leading producer, it has 1.8 million metric tons.

Greenland – An emerging supplier with 1.5 million metric tons.

China remains the largest supplier, but countries like Brazil, Vietnam, and Australia are working to expand their production to reduce reliance on Chinese exports.

Ukraine?

Ukraine reportedly has significant reserves of rare earth elements, including titanium, lithium, graphite, and uranium. These minerals are crucial for industries such as defence, aerospace, and green energy.

However, the ongoing conflict with Russia has disrupted access to many of these deposits, with some now under Russian control.

Despite these challenges, Ukraine is being considered for strategic raw material projects by the European Union, aiming to strengthen supply chains and reduce reliance on China. The country’s mineral wealth could play a key role in post-war recovery and global supply diversification

Greenland?

Greenland is emerging as a key player in the global rare earth supply chain. The European Union has recently selected Greenland for new raw material projects aimed at securing critical minerals.

The island holds significant deposits of rare earth elements, including graphite, which is essential for battery production.

However, Greenland faces challenges in developing its rare earth industry, including harsh terrain, environmental concerns, and geopolitical tensions.

The U.S. and EU are keen to reduce reliance on China, which dominates rare earth processing, and Greenland’s resources could play a crucial role in this effort.

Greenland has indicated it has little desire to be transformed into a mining territory. It could have little choice.

Canada?

Canada is emerging as a significant player in the rare earth supply chain. The country has over 15.2 million tonnes of rare earth oxide reserves, making it one of the largest known sources globally.

Recently, Canada opened its first commercial rare earth elements refinery, marking a major step toward reducing reliance on Chinese processing.

The facility, located in Saskatchewan, aims to produce 400 tonnes of neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) metals per year, enough for 500,000 electric vehicles annually.

Additionally, Canada is investing in critical minerals infrastructure to unlock rare earth development in Northern Quebec and Labrador.

The government has allocated $10 million to support mining projects, including the Strange Lake Rare Earth Project, which contains globally significant quantities of dysprosium, neodymium, praseodymium, and terbium.

Rare earth materials are a necessity for our modern technological lives – big tech tells us this. The hunger for these products needs to be fed, and China, right now, does the feeding.

And the beast needs to be fed.

India’s Rare Earths Future: A growing contender in a strategic market

Rare Earth Elements

As the world transitions toward cleaner technologies and digital connectivity, rare earth elements (REEs) have emerged as vital components in everything from electric vehicles and wind turbines to smartphones and defence systems and of course AI.

Currently, China dominates the global supply chain, accounting for over 60% of global rare earth production and an even greater share of refining capacity.

But India, rich in untapped reserves and increasingly assertive in its industrial strategy, is positioning itself to become a major player in this crucial sector.

India possesses the world’s fifth-largest reserves of rare earths, largely located in coastal monazite sands.

For decades, however, its output has remained modest, constrained by limited infrastructure, outdated regulations, and a lack of downstream processing capabilities. That is changing.

In recent years, the Indian government has taken clear steps to ramp up domestic production and attract investment.

One significant move was allowing private and foreign players into the exploration and processing of REEs -previously controlled by a single government-run firm.

Coupled with India’s broader push to diversify supply chains away from China, this signals a shift in ambition.

India is also pursuing strategic partnerships. Collaborations with countries such as Australia and Japan – both of which have rare earth expertise and a shared desire to counterbalance Chinese dominance – are paving the way for technology transfers and joint ventures.

Moreover, India’s participation in the Quad (with the U.S., Australia, and Japan) adds a geopolitical dimension to these efforts.

Challenges remain. India still lacks the sophisticated separation and refining technologies that make rare earths commercially viable. Environmental concerns around mining also demand a careful, sustainable approach.

Rare Earth Elements table – top 10 producers

Total global reserves are estimated at approximately 131 million metric tons. See worlpopulationreview.

Yet, with incentives under the Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, and growing demand for localised electronics and green tech manufacturing, momentum is building.

So, is India likely to become a major competitor? Not overnight. But ‘possible’ is rapidly morphing into ‘plausible.’ As the global rare earths map continues to shift—fueled by geopolitics, technological change, and strategic realignment – India is no longer on the sidelines.

Whether it becomes a global leader or a key alternative supplier, its role is poised to expand.

The world should watch closely—not just for the metals it may mine, but for the strategic leverage they may bring.

And we have Greenland and Ukraine reserves yet to be discovered?

China suffers U.S. tariff driven falls in exports and increased deflation concerns

China exports to U.S. suffer due to tariffs

China’s economic landscape is facing mounting challenges as exports to the United States plummet and consumer prices decline, sparking fears of deflation.

The latest trade data reveals that Chinese exports to the U.S. fell by 34.5% in May 2025, marking the sharpest drop in over five years. This decline comes despite a temporary trade truce that paused most tariffs for 90 days.

China’s consumer prices have continued their downward trend, raising concerns about deflation and its long-term impact on the economy.

The sharp fall in exports is largely attributed to high U.S. tariffs and weakening demand. While China’s overall exports grew by 4.8%, shipments to the U.S. suffered significantly, reflecting the ongoing trade tensions between the two economic giants.

Imports from the U.S. also dropped by 18%, further shrinking China’s trade surplus with America. In response, Chinese exporters are shifting their focus to other markets, particularly Southeast Asia and Europe, where demand remains relatively strong.

China’s CPI reading

At the same time, China’s consumer price index (CPI) fell by 0.1% in May 2025, deepening concerns about deflation. Deflation, the opposite of inflation, can lead to lower corporate profits, wage cuts, and job losses, creating a vicious cycle of economic stagnation.

The decline in consumer prices is largely driven by weak domestic demand, exacerbated by the ongoing real estate crisis. Many Chinese consumers are hesitant to spend, fearing further declines in property values and economic uncertainty.

China’s rare earth materials olive branch

China appears to have offered U.S. and European auto manufacturers a reprieve after industry groups warned of increasing production threats over a rare earth shortage.

China’s Ministry of Commerce on Saturday 7th June 2025 reportedly said it was willing to establish a so-called ‘green channel’ for eligible export licence applications to expedite the approval process to European Union firms. 

China’s manufacturing sector experiences decline amid Tariff chaos

China factory data

China’s manufacturing activity took an unexpected hit in May 2025, marking its steepest decline since September 2022.

The Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI fell to 48.3, signalling contraction for the first time in eight months. This downturn comes as U.S. tariffs begin to weigh heavily on Chinese exports, dampening global demand and disrupting supply chains.

The latest data reveals that new export orders shrank for the second consecutive month, hitting their lowest level since July 2023.

Factory output also contracted for the first time since October 2023, reflecting the broader economic slowdown. Analysts attribute this slump to the reinstatement of sweeping U.S. tariffs, which were briefly halted before being reimposed by a federal appeals court.

Despite a temporary trade truce between the U.S. and China, tensions remain high, with both sides accusing each other of violating agreements.

The uncertainty surrounding trade policies has led Chinese manufacturers to cut jobs at the fastest pace since the start of the year, further exacerbating economic concerns.

China’s Premier Li Qiang has hinted at new policy tools, including unconventional measures to stabilise the economy. However, with tariffs set to remain high and structural challenges persisting, experts predict continued pressure on China’s industrial sector.

As the world’s second-largest economy grapples with these headwinds, the coming months will be crucial in determining whether Beijing can implement effective strategies to counteract the impact of tariffs and restore manufacturing momentum.

Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI survey

The report was based on the Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI survey, which is a private-sector survey that tracks China’s manufacturing activity.

This survey is conducted mid-month and covers over 500 mostly export-oriented businesses, making it distinct from China’s official PMI, which samples 3,000 companies and is compiled at month-end.

The Caixin PMI tends to focus more on small and medium-sized enterprises, whereas the official PMI aligns more closely with industrial output.

In May, the Caixin PMI fell to 48.3, marking its first contraction in eight months. The decline was largely driven by shrinking new export orders, which hit their lowest level since July 2023.

The survey also showed that employment in the manufacturing sector declined at the fastest pace since January, reflecting the broader economic slowdown.

One key difference between the Caixin PMI and the official PMI is their timing. The Caixin survey is conducted earlier in the month, meaning it may not fully capture policy changes or trade developments that occur later.

For example, economists noted that the effect of the tariff de-escalation in mid-May may not have been reflected in the Caixin PMI results

Tesla’s European market meltdown – sales plunge 49% amid brand damage and fierce competition

Tesla's European sales fall!

Tesla’s vehicle sales in Europe plummeted by 49% in April 2025, marking the fourth consecutive month of decline.

Despite an overall 27.8% rise in battery-electric vehicle sales, Tesla struggled to maintain its foothold in the region.

The drop in sales has been attributed to increasing competition from Chinese automakers, a shift in consumer preferences towards hybrid vehicles, and growing backlash against CEO Elon Musk’s political affiliations.

Tesla’s market share in Europe nearly halved, falling from 1.3% to 0.7%. The company’s aging lineup, particularly the Model Y, has failed to attract new buyers, while rivals such as BYD have overtaken Tesla in European EV sales for the first time.

Additionally, European carmakers are cutting costs and adapting to U.S. tariffs on auto imports, further intensifying competition. Chinese EV manufacturers are also cutting EV prices.

While Tesla faces challenges in Europe, the broader EV market continues to expand, driven by government incentives and stricter emission targets.

However, unless Tesla refreshes its lineup and rebuilds consumer trust, its dominance in the European market may continue to erode.

The company’s future remains uncertain as it navigates political controversies and shifting market dynamics

China’s industrial profit accelerates in April 2025 – despite Trump’s tariffs

China factory output

Despite the heavy tariffs imposed by former U.S. President Donald Trump, China’s industrial sector has demonstrated remarkable resilience.

In April 2025, industrial profits rose by 3%, marking the second consecutive month of growth.

This increase was largely driven by Beijing’s strategic policy measures, which cushioned the impact of the tariffs and supported private enterprises.

In the first four months of 2025 China’s industrial profits rose 1.4%, according to data released on 27th May 2025.

Trump’s administration had levied tariffs as high as 145% on Chinese imports, prompting Beijing to retaliate with its own trade restrictions.

However, rather than crippling China’s manufacturing sector, these tariffs led to a shift in trade dynamics. Chinese exporters successfully found alternative markets, particularly in Southeast Asia and Europe, mitigating the losses from reduced U.S. trade.

It isn’t unusual for businesses to weather and absorb such tariffs but more usually, the consumer bears the brunt and pays some, if not all, of the increased costs.

High-tech manufacturing and equipment production saw notable gains, with profits in these sectors rising by 9% in the first four months of the year.

Additionally, government subsidies for consumer electronics and appliances helped boost domestic demand, further stabilising industrial growth.

While state-owned enterprises reportedly faced challenges, private firms and foreign-invested businesses saw profits improve.

Analysts suggest that China’s ability to adapt to external shocks underscores the resilience of its industrial economy, even in the face of aggressive trade policies

China’s retail and industrial growth slows amid ongoing tariff driven economic uncertainty

China retail data

China’s economy showed signs of slowing in April 2025, with both retail sales and industrial output missing expectations.

Retail sales grew 5.1% year-on-year, falling short of analysts’ forecasts of 5.5% growth. The slowdown reflects weak consumer sentiment, driven by deflationary pressures and uncertainty in the housing market.

While categories like gold and jewellery (+25.3%) and furniture (+26.9%) saw strong growth, car sales stagnated at just 0.7%.

Industrial production expanded 6.1% year-on-year, down from 7.7% in March 2025. The decline was largely attributed to tariff trade war tensions, which have disrupted exports.

However, fixed-asset investment rose 4% in the first four months of 2025, signalling continued infrastructure spending.

Despite the slowdown, China remains confident in achieving its 5% GDP growth target for the year. The government has introduced stimulus measures, including interest rate cuts and liquidity injections, to stabilise the economy.

With global trade uncertainties and domestic economic challenges, China’s policymakers face a delicate balancing act to sustain growth while addressing structural weaknesses.

Trump tariff roll-back – a win for China? U.S. markets rejoice the ‘deal’

U.S. markets gain on U.S China tariff roll-back announcement

The U.S. stock market surged as investors cheered a breakthrough in trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing.

The rollback of tariffs, announced as part of a new trade agreement, sent the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite soaring.

The deal, which slashes ‘reciprocal’ tariffs on both sides, is seen as a major de-escalation in the ongoing trade war that has rattled global markets for years.

Wall Street’s Reaction

Markets responded with enthusiasm as the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped over 1,000 points, while the S&P 500 climbed more than 2.5%, and the Nasdaq surged by nearly 3%.

Investors had been wary of prolonged trade tensions, which had weighed heavily on corporate earnings and economic growth.

The tariff rollback signals a potential thaw in relations, boosting confidence across sectors, particularly in technology, retail, and manufacturing.

Tariff rollback

Under the agreement, U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports will be reduced from 145% to 30%, while China’s tariffs on American goods will drop from 125% to 10%. The reductions will be in effect for 90 days, allowing both nations to continue negotiations on a broader trade framework.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasised that neither side wants a complete decoupling, and the rollback is intended to restore trade flows disrupted by years of economic brinkmanship.

China’s perspective: A strategic victory?

While the U.S. markets celebrated, China views the deal as a significant win. Beijing has sought relief from the steep tariffs imposed by Washington, which had strained its export-driven economy.

The agreement not only reduces financial pressure on Chinese manufacturers but also positions China as a key player in shaping future trade policies.

Some analysts argue that Beijing successfully leveraged its economic resilience to push Washington toward concessions, reinforcing its global influence.

Looking ahead

Despite the optimism, uncertainties remain. The 90-day window for negotiations suggests that further trade disputes could arise if talks stall. But will the U.S. allow that after the stock market turmoil Trump’s tariffs originally created?

Additionally, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cautioned that while sentiment has improved, the economic impact of previous tariffs has yet to fully materialise. Investors will be watching closely for signs of sustained progress, as any setbacks could trigger renewed volatility.

For now, Wall Street is basking in the relief of a tariff truce, with hopes that this momentum will lead to a more stable and predictable trade environment.

Whether this marks the beginning of a lasting resolution or just a temporary reprieve remains to be seen.

It is most likely now a platform for the U.S. to benefit from generally lower tariffs in the future.

There will again be cheap goods on U.S. shelves in time for Christmas.

U.S. and China agree 90-day ‘reciprocal’ tariff pause and reduction deal

Tariff trade war 90-day pause

In a surprising breakthrough, the United States and China have agreed to suspend most tariffs on each other’s goods for 90 days, marking a significant step toward easing trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies.

Following high-stakes negotiations in Geneva, representatives from both nations announced that reciprocal tariffs would be slashed from 125% to 10%, significantly lowering trade barriers.

However, the U.S. will continue imposing 20% tariffs on Chinese imports related to fentanyl, meaning total tariffs on Chinese goods will settle at 30%.

The agreement signals a temporary thaw in what has been a long-standing economic standoff between Washington and Beijing. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who played a leading role in the discussions, described the talks as ‘very productive’, crediting the location for fostering an atmosphere of cooperation.

While this move could provide immediate relief for businesses and consumers impacted by trade restrictions, analysts caution that the 90-day suspension may not translate into a long-term solution.

Some experts speculate that ongoing trade negotiations could lead to further reductions, while others warn that unresolved tensions could lead to reinstated tariffs if agreements stall.

For now, the deal presents an opportunity for renewed dialogue, leaving global markets optimistic about future relations between the two economic powerhouses.

How the next three months unfold will determine whether this development is a stepping stone to broader reforms or simply a temporary reprieve in a complex trade dispute.

I expect Trump, having instigated the ‘tariff’ upheaval, will happily hang on to this ‘deal’ with China to avoid any further stock market turmoil.

What really just happened? The markets seem to be rewarding a situation that was artificially created and then ‘fixed’.

Aren’t we simply back where we were before the Trump tariff onslaught or is this really a ‘promise’ for better ‘deals’ to come?

Has it opened a door for better relations?

Create a problem… fix a problem!

It’s all about the U.S.

We’ll see…

China’s Exports Defy Tariff Pressures, Surge 8.1% in April

China World Trade

Despite the weight of U.S. tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, China’s export sector has shown remarkable resilience, posting an 8.1% increase in April 2025 compared to the previous year.

This surge comes as a surprise, surpassing economists’ expectations of a modest 1.9% rise.

While China’s outbound shipments to the U.S. plunged by over 21%, exports to Southeast Asian nations soared by 20.8%, with Indonesia and Thailand seeing particularly strong growth.

This shift suggests that Chinese exporters are successfully redirecting their goods to alternative markets, mitigating the impact of U.S. trade restrictions.

The tariffs, which now stand at 145% on Chinese imports, were designed to pressure Beijing into trade concessions. In response, China retaliated with 125% duties on American goods, further escalating tensions.

However, analysts suggest that some of China’s export growth may be attributed to transshipment through third countries and contracts signed before the tariffs took effect.

Despite the export boom, China’s factory activity has taken a hit, falling to a 16-month low in April 2025, with new export orders dropping to their lowest level since December 2022.

Concerns are mounting that the tariffs could spill over into the job market, with estimates suggesting China could lose 16 million jobs tied to U.S. – bound production.

As both nations prepare for high-level trade talks in Switzerland, there is cautious optimism that a phased rollback of tariffs could be on the horizon.

While a comprehensive deal remains elusive, even minor tariff reductions could provide relief to businesses on both sides.

The coming months will be crucial in determining whether China can sustain its export momentum or if the tariff war will take a deeper toll on its economy.

Stock markets see three-day recovery as U.S. tech boost offsets trade worries – but for how long?

Tech gains

Global markets have shown resilience in the past three days, rebounding from recent downturns as technology stocks rally amid cautious optimism.

The boost in investor confidence follows strong earnings reports from major tech firms, highlighting their ability to weather economic uncertainty.

However, lingering concerns about international trade tensions raise questions about how sustainable this recovery truly is.

Technology stocks have led the charge, with companies in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductor production posting better-than-expected growth figures.

Investors have flocked to these sectors, hoping that innovation will drive forward profitability even amid broader market volatility.

This renewed enthusiasm has helped offset concerns over ongoing global trade disputes, which have led to tariffs and economic slowdowns in key sectors such as manufacturing and consumer goods.

Yet, beneath this recovery, risks persist. Geopolitical uncertainties, including unresolved trade negotiations between major economies, continue to cast a shadow over financial markets.

Inflationary pressures, alongside tightening monetary policies by central banks, also threaten to cool investor enthusiasm. Analysts warn that without concrete progress on trade agreements; the rebound may be short-lived.

As investors weigh the competing forces of technological optimism and trade anxieties, the market remains in a delicate balance.

The question remains: Is this recovery a sign of renewed growth, or merely a temporary respite before further economic turbulence?

With the next wave of financial reports and policy decisions on the horizon, market makers will be closely monitoring whether the tech sector’s momentum can sustain broader economic confidence – or whether trade headwinds will ultimately pull markets back into uncertainty again.

Tech gains ground again


Stocks jumped Thursday 24th April 2024 thanks to strong gains in Mega Cap tech names.

The S&P 500 ended up 2.03%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite added 2.74%.

The S&P 500 index was able to exit correction territory, ending at least 10% above its recent low set in the wake of President Donald Trump’s 2nd April 2025 ‘liberation day’ tariffs.

For the S&P 500 to maintain its rapid exit from correction territory – it now has to witness Trump’s tariff walk-back and the ‘cooling’ of a potential Fed fight.

Trump seems to be the first to have ‘blinked’ on his self-imposed tariffs suggesting the tariffs are too high and will not go any higher – thy are high enough!

China has reportedly said there are no ‘ongoing’ trade talks?

The Dow Jones Industrial Average lagged the other two indexes but still added 1.23% and retook the 40,000 for the first time since 15th April 2025.

 Japan’s Nikkei 225 up almost 2% and leading gains.

Alphabet shares climb after better than expected results


Alphabet reported stronger-than-expected first-quarter growth on Thursday 24th April 2025.

Alphabet’s search and advertising units are still showing strong growth despite AI competition heating up, according to its first-quarter earnings report.

The company’s overall revenue grew 12% year-on-year, higher than the 10% Wall Street expected.

Shares rose more than 5% in after-hours trading. 

However, Alphabet reportedly indicated to expect ‘slight headwind’ to ads business this year.

Intel also posts results beat, but warns of tariff impact


Intel reported first-quarter results on 24th April 2025 that beat analysts’ estimates but also reportedly issued disappointing guidance. 

Second-quarter revenue will come in below estimates due to elevated uncertainty driven by the macro environment, the company warned.

Intel was reported saying that President Donald Trump’s tariffs and retaliation from other countries had increased the likelihood of a U.S. recession.

Big tech gains drive markets but the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s tariffs remain.

Russell 2000 goes into bear territory as Dow Jones – S&P 500 and Nasdaq hit correction!

Stocks fall

The Russell 2000, a key benchmark for small-cap U.S. stocks, has officially entered bear market territory.

This means the index has fallen more than 20% from its all-time high in late November 2024. The decline was accelerated by the recent rollout of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, which have raised concerns about rising costs, economic softening, and global supply chain disruptions3.

Small-cap stocks, which were initially seen as beneficiaries of Trump’s policies due to their domestic focus, are now facing significant challenges. Many of these companies are particularly vulnerable to input cost shocks and lack the financial flexibility of larger firms.

Analysts warn that the combination of higher costs and a slowing economy is squeezing profits, leaving small caps in a precarious position.

The Russell 2000’s downturn highlights the broader market volatility triggered by the tariff measures. While other major indices like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are in correction territory, the Russell 2000 was the first to enter a bear market.

Russell 2000 index

Russell 2000 index

This development underscores the heightened risks for small-cap stocks in the current economic climate.

Despite the challenges, some strategists believe there could be opportunities for recovery, particularly if the Federal Reserve takes steps to cut interest rates.

However, Trump’s tariffs have introduced uncertainty into this policy, as inflation is likely to increase, casting doubt on the possibility of further interest rate cuts.

For now, the Russell 2000’s performance serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between protectionist policies and market stability.

The Russell 2000, a key benchmark for small-cap U.S. stocks, has officially entered bear market territory.

Dow Jones decline – the ripple effects of tariff policies

The Dow Jones Industrial Average has seen a sharp decline, falling from its all-time high of 45,073.63 points in December 2024 to its current level of 38,314.86 points—a drop of approximately 15%.

Dow Jones one-year chart

Dow Jones one-year chart

This downturn reflects a mix of economic challenges, including the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariff policies.

Trump’s sweeping tariffs, introduced as part of his ‘Liberation Day‘ initiative, aimed to bolster American manufacturing by imposing taxes on imported goods. While the policy sought to ‘level the playing field’, it triggered significant disruptions in global trade.

Retaliatory tariffs from key trading partners, including China and the European Union, compounded the issue, ultimately leading to higher costs for U.S. businesses and consumers.

The tariffs have also strained supply chains, particularly in industries reliant on international components. This has contributed to inflationary pressures, further dampening investor sentiment.

The tech sector, already grappling with regulatory scrutiny, has been hit hard, with companies facing increased production costs.

Nasdaq tech 100 one-year chart

Nasdaq tech 100 one-year chart

While some view the market’s decline as a natural correction, others warn of prolonged economic challenges, especially with the uncertainty surround Trump’s tariff agenda.

For investors, the key lies in navigating these turbulent times with caution and a focus on long-term fundamentals.

As the Dow adjusts to these pressures, its performance underscores the far-reaching consequences of trade policies on global markets.

S&P 500 one-year chart

S&P 500 one-year chart

China to impose 34% retaliatory tariff on all goods imported from the U.S.

Trade war

China has reportedly announced a significant escalation in its trade dispute with the United States, declaring a 34% retaliatory tariff on all U.S. goods.

This move, set to take effect on 10th April 2025 and comes in response to the sweeping tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump’s administration earlier this week.

The Chinese Ministry of Finance reportedly stated that these measures are aimed at safeguarding China’s economic interests and countering what it describes as ‘unilateral bullying’ by the U.S. government.

The tariffs will apply across a wide range of American exports, potentially impacting industries such as agriculture, technology, and manufacturing.

This development has heightened global market uncertainty, with investors bracing for further economic disruptions.

The ongoing tit-for-tat measures between the two economic giants underscore the fragility of international trade relations in the current climate.

Markets dropped on the news!

Trump announces 25% tariffs on car imports to U.S. and pledges pharma tariffs to come

Trump's Tariffs

Trump’s tariffs have been a cornerstone of his trade policy, aimed at protecting American industries and reducing trade deficits

These measures include tariffs on steel, aluminum, and a wide range of goods from countries like China, Canada, and the European Union.

While supporters argue that these tariffs have bolstered domestic manufacturing and created jobs, critics highlight the retaliatory tariffs imposed by other nations, which have affected American exporters.

President Donald Trump said he will soon announce tariffs targeting automobiles and pharmaceuticals.

Trump later added the timber and semiconductor industries to his list.

It was unclear whether the newly announced sector-specific tariffs would take effect after the tit-for-tat ‘reciprocal tariffs’ – which are set to take effect on for 2nd April 2025

The president’s latest comments at a Cabinet meeting came hours after he unveiled a plan to place 25% tariffs on all countries that buy oil and gas from Venezuela.

Trump’s tariffs have had widespread economic effects, both domestically and globally

Higher Prices for Consumers

Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, which often leads to higher prices for consumers. This can reduce purchasing power and affect living standards.

Impact on Businesses

Companies relying on imported materials face higher production costs due to tariffs. Some businesses may pass these costs onto consumers, while others might struggle to remain competitive.

Retaliatory Measures

Countries affected by U.S. tariffs often impose their own tariffs on American goods. This can hurt U.S. exporters and lead to trade wars.

Economic Growth

Studies suggest that tariffs can reduce GDP growth. For example, the U.S. GDP has been estimated to decrease by 0.4% due to these measures.

Employment

While tariffs aim to protect domestic jobs, they can also lead to job losses in industries affected by higher input costs or reduced export opportunities.

Global Trade Dynamics

Tariffs disrupt international trade relationships, leading to uncertainty and reduced investment in affected sectors.

These measures have sparked retaliatory tariffs from other countries, creating a complex web of trade disputes further sowing chaos and unrest.

Markets have reacted negatively to Trumps tariffs.

One thing is certain regarding the imposition of Trump’s tariffs – consumers suffer!

China’s position on open-source artificial intelligence (AI) is upending the global AI race

AI

China’s embrace of open-source artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionising the global AI landscape, challenging traditional notions of innovation and competitiveness in this rapidly evolving field.

Traditionally, the AI sector has been dominated by proprietary models and closed-source systems, particularly in the U.S.

However, China has made a strategic pivot towards open-source initiatives, driven by trailblazers like the AI startup DeepSeek.

DeepSeek’s R1 model, released earlier this year, has become a symbol of China’s open-source movement. Distributed under the permissive MIT licence, the R1 model allows unrestricted use, modification and distribution.

This approach has disrupted traditional business models by democratising access to cutting-edge AI tools. Companies from tech giants like Baidu and Tencent to emerging players like ManusAI have followed suit, releasing their own open-source models and fostering a collaborative environment for AI innovation.

This shift is seen by some as China’s ‘Android moment’ in AI – a reference to the impact of Google’s open-source Android operating system on the mobile app ecosystem.

The move towards open-source has enabled rapid cost reductions, increased accessibility, and accelerated product development. Chinese firms have leveraged these advantages to narrow the perceived technological gap with the U.S., with some analysts suggesting that the disparity has shrunk from years to mere months.

Despite these advancements, the open-source approach also raises questions about intellectual property, security, and sustainable business models.

While it has catalysed innovation, it remains to be seen whether open-source strategies can sustain long-term competitiveness against well-funded proprietary systems.

China’s open-source embrace exemplifies a bold shift in AI strategy, emphasizing collaboration and accessibility over exclusivity.

This paradigm shift could redefine global dynamics in artificial intelligence, fostering a more inclusive and innovative future for the industry.

Trump and his tariff agenda

Trade tariffs

The United States has intensified its tariff policies, marking a significant shift in global trade dynamics

On 4th March 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping increase in tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, raising them to 25% across the board. This move, aimed at bolstering domestic industries, has sparked widespread reactions both domestically and internationally.

The tariffs, which now include a broader range of products such as nuts, bolts, and soda cans, have drawn sharp criticism from key U.S. allies, including Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia.

U.S and the EU

The European Union has responded with countermeasures, imposing tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods, set to take effect on 1st April 2025. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed regret over the U.S. decision but emphasised the need to protect European consumers and businesses.

Domestically, the tariffs have been met with mixed reactions. While U.S. steel and aluminum producers have welcomed the measures, citing potential job creation and increased investment, downstream manufacturers that rely on these metals are bracing for higher costs.

Economists warn that the tariffs could lead to increased prices for consumers and potential disruptions in supply chains. Trump has indicated many times that the tariffs levelled at the U.S. are unfair and unequal.

The Trump administration has justified the tariffs as a means to encourage foreign companies to establish manufacturing facilities in the United States. However, critics argue that the policy could backfire, leading to retaliatory measures from trading partners and a potential slowdown in global economic growth.

As the global trade landscape continues to evolve, the long-term impact of these tariffs remains uncertain. Businesses and policymakers alike are closely monitoring the situation, weighing the potential benefits of protecting domestic industries against the risks of escalating trade tensions.

The coming weeks and months will be crucial in determining the effectiveness of this bold and possibly misguided economic strategy.

U.S. and Canada

The trade relationship between the U.S. and Canada has recently faced significant strain due to escalating tariff policies.

President Donald Trump announced a sharp increase in tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, raising them from 25% to 50%. This decision was reportedly in response to Ontario’s provincial government imposing higher electricity prices on U.S. customers.

However, after discussions between Ontario Premier Doug Ford and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Ontario agreed to pause the electricity surcharge.

As a result, the U.S. decided to maintain the original 25% tariff rate instead of doubling it. Despite this temporary resolution, tensions remain high, with Canada preparing to implement retaliatory tariffs on $30 billion worth of American goods.

These developments highlight the ongoing challenges in U.S. – Canada trade relations, with both nations navigating the complexities of economic and political interests.

U.S. and China

The U.S. – China trade tensions have escalated significantly in recent months. President Donald Trump recently imposed a 20% tariff on all imports from China, reportedly citing concerns over China’s role in the flow of fentanyl into the U.S.

This move has reignited the trade war that began during Trump’s first term.

In response, China has implemented retaliatory measures, including a 15% tariff on U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) and coal, as well as a 10% tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery, and large-engine cars.

Additionally, China has restricted the export of rare earth minerals and metals, which are critical for U.S. tech and green energy industries.

Both nations have expressed a willingness to engage in dialogue, but the situation remains tense. The economic impact of these tariffs is being closely monitored, as they have the potential to disrupt global supply chains and affect industries worldwide.

U.S. and Mexico

The U.S. – Mexico trade conflict has intensified with the U.S. imposing a 25% tariff on Mexican imports, excluding oil and energy products, which face a 10% tariff.

This decision, aimed at addressing trade deficits and border concerns, prompted Mexico to announce retaliatory tariffs targeting $20 billion worth of U.S. goods. Critics argue these measures undermine the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and could disrupt supply chains.

Both nations are bracing for the economic impact, with businesses and consumers facing potential cost increases. This trade dispute highlights the challenges of balancing domestic priorities while maintaining strong international partnerships in a connected global economy.

And there’s more…

Russia and Ukraine peace deal according to Trump. Taking rare earth and other minerals from Ukraine in a ‘deal’. The potential reshaping of Gaza to become the riviera of the middle east. Talk of taking over Greenland. Making Canada the 51st state. etc. etc.

And this is just what we already know after 8 weeks of Trump in power!