Are investors saying it’s time to move on from tariffs and if so to what effect on the markets?

Tariffs and the Markets

It looks like investor sentiment is shifting away from obsessing over tariffs—though not because they’ve disappeared.

Instead, there’s a growing sense that tariffs may be settling into a predictable range, especially in the U.S., where President Trump signalled a blanket rate of 15–20% for countries lacking specific trade agreements.

Here’s how that’s playing out

🌐 Why Investors Are Moving On

  • Predictability over Panic: With clearer expectations around tariff levels, markets may no longer treat them as wildcards.
  • Muted Market Reaction: The recent U.S.-EU trade deal barely nudged the S&P 500 or European indexes after moving the futures initially, signalling tariffs aren’t the hot trigger they once were.
  • Economists Cooling Expectations: Revisions to tariff impact estimates suggest future trade deals might not generate outsized optimism on Wall Street.

📈 Effects on the Markets

  • Focus Shift: Investors are turning to earnings—particularly from the ‘Magnificent Seven’ tech giants—and macroeconomic data for momentum.
  • Cautious Optimism: While stocks haven’t rallied hard, they’re not dropping either. Traders seem to be waiting for a new catalyst, like U.S. consumer strength or signs of a bull phase in certain indexes.
  • Geopolitical Undercurrents: A new deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal and threats of ‘secondary tariffs’ could still stir volatility, depending on how global partners react.

So, in short tariffs aren’t gone, but they’ve become background noise. Investors are tuning in to the next big signals.

If you’re keeping an eye on retail, tech earnings, or commodity flows, this shift could have ripple effects worth dissecting.

Market moving events, other than tariffs

DateEvent/CatalystMarket Impact Potential
July 30Meta earnings + possible stock split📈 High (tech sentiment)
July 31Fed meeting📈📉 High (rate guidance)
Aug 1U.S.–EU tariff milestone, not flashpoint📉 Moderate (sector recalibration)
July 22U.S. AI Action Plan (released)📈 Unclear (dependent on execution

Markets rally as EU–U.S. trade deal eases some tariff tension

U.S. EU tariff trade deal

European and American financial markets rallied following the announcement of a new trade pact between the EU and the U.S on Sunday 27th July 2025., easing months of escalating tensions.

The deal introduces a 15% tariff on most EU exports to the United States—well below the previously threatened 30% rate—providing greater predictability across key sectors.

Global markets surged on Monday following the announcement of a landmark trade agreement between the European Union and the United States, announced by President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at Trump’s Turnberry golf resort in Scotland.

The deal imposes a 15% tariff on most EU exports to the U.S., significantly lower than the previously threatened 30% rate.

It would appear that Trump’s global tariff rate will end up between 15% – 20%

While still a sharp increase from pre-2025 levels—when many goods faced tariffs under 3%—the agreement has been hailed as a pragmatic compromise that averts a full-blown transatlantic trade war.

In exchange, the EU has reportedly committed to $750 billion in U.S. energy purchases and $600 billion in investment into the American economy, with further spending on military equipment also expected.

European negotiators secured zero tariffs on strategic goods such as aircraft components, select chemicals, and semiconductor equipment

Strategic exemptions for aircraft components, semiconductors and select chemicals help preserve supply chain efficiency, while agricultural and consumer goods will adapt to the new rate over time.

In return, the EU has reportedly committed to over $1.3 trillion in investments focused on U.S. infrastructure, renewable energy and defence technologies.

Investors responded positively to the agreement as futures surged

  • The FTSE 100 futures hit 9,172 overnight
  • Euro Stoxx 50 futures rose 1.3%.
  • DAX hit overnight futures high of: 24,550
  • S&P 500 and Nasdaq Tech 100 hit overnight futures highs of: 6,422 and 23,440
  • Wall Street’s major indices extended futures gains, boosted by trade optimism and tech strength.

However, European stocks trimmed back ‘futures’ gains after the opening bell.

While some concerns remain over unresolved steel and pharmaceutical tariffs, analysts view the pact as a turning point that restores confidence.

The deal sets the stage for further cooperation on digital standards, regulation and intellectual property later in 2025.

This step toward economic stability is expected to foster stronger ties and benefit export-driven industries across both regions.

Trump is getting his deals, but how good are they really?

Eurozone inflation hits ECB target in June 2025

ECB hits EU Inflation target

Eurozone inflation edged up to 2.0% in June, aligning precisely with the European Central Bank’s (ECB) target and marking a slight increase from 1.9% in May 2025.

The small rise was largely driven by persistent services inflation, which climbed to 3.3%, and steady increases in food, alcohol, and tobacco prices at 3.1%.

Core inflation, which excludes volatile items like energy and food, held firm at 2.3%, suggesting underlying price pressures remain stable. Energy prices, however, continued to decline, easing some of the broader inflationary strain.

The ECB, having already cut interest rates earlier this year, now faces a delicate balancing act. While inflation appears under control, economic growth remains sluggish, and ongoing trade tensions – particularly with the U.S. – could complicate the outlook.

With inflation now at target, attention shifts to whether the ECB will pause further rate cuts or act again to support the eurozone’s fragile recovery.

China’s restriction of rare earth materials hurts

Chinas rare earth material dominance

China’s recent export restrictions on rare earth elements are sending shockwaves through multiple industries worldwide.

As the curbs continue to take effect, sectors reliant on these critical minerals—including automotive, defence, and clean energy—are beginning to feel the strain.

China controls about 60–70% of global rare earth production and nearly 90% of the refining capacity.

Even when rare earths are mined elsewhere, they’re often sent to China for processing, since few countries have the infrastructure or environmental tolerance to handle the complex and polluting refining process.

In April 2025, China introduced export controls on seven key rare earth elements and permanent magnets, citing national interests and responding to rising trade tensions—particularly with the U.S.

Automotive industry in crisis

The auto sector is among the hardest hit. Rare earth elements are essential for both combustion engines and electric vehicles, particularly in the production of magnets used in motors and batteries.

European auto suppliers have already reported production shutdowns due to dwindling inventories.

Germany’s car industry, a global powerhouse, has reportedly warned that further disruptions could bring manufacturing to a standstill.

Japan’s Nissan and Suzuki have also expressed concerns, with Suzuki reportedly halting production of its Swift model due to shortages.

Defence and technology sectors at risk

China’s dominance in rare earth refining, controlling nearly 90% of global capacity, poses a strategic challenge for defense industries.

The U.S. military relies heavily on these materials for missile guidance systems, radar technology, and advanced electronics.

With nearly 78% of defence platforms dependent on Chinese-processed rare earths, the restrictions expose vulnerabilities in national security.

Clean energy ambitions under threat

The clean energy transition depends on rare earths for wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicle batteries.

China’s curbs threaten global efforts to reduce carbon emissions, forcing countries to scramble for alternative sources. India’s electric vehicle sector, for instance, faces potential setbacks as manufacturers struggle to secure supplies.

As industries grapple with these disruptions, governments and corporations are urgently seeking solutions. Whether through diplomatic negotiations or investment in domestic rare earth production, the race is on to mitigate the fallout from China’s tightening grip on these critical resources.

Several countries have significant rare earth reserves and can supply these materials in high quantities.

Top rare earth materials suppliers

China – The dominant player, with 44 million metric tons of reserves.

Brazil – Holds 21 million metric tons of rare earth reserves.

Vietnam – Has 22 million metric tons, making it a rising supplier.

India – Contains 6.9 million metric tons.

Australia – A key producer with 5.7 million metric tons.

Russia – Holds 10 million metric tons.

United States – While not a leading producer, it has 1.8 million metric tons.

Greenland – An emerging supplier with 1.5 million metric tons.

China remains the largest supplier, but countries like Brazil, Vietnam, and Australia are working to expand their production to reduce reliance on Chinese exports.

Ukraine?

Ukraine reportedly has significant reserves of rare earth elements, including titanium, lithium, graphite, and uranium. These minerals are crucial for industries such as defence, aerospace, and green energy.

However, the ongoing conflict with Russia has disrupted access to many of these deposits, with some now under Russian control.

Despite these challenges, Ukraine is being considered for strategic raw material projects by the European Union, aiming to strengthen supply chains and reduce reliance on China. The country’s mineral wealth could play a key role in post-war recovery and global supply diversification

Greenland?

Greenland is emerging as a key player in the global rare earth supply chain. The European Union has recently selected Greenland for new raw material projects aimed at securing critical minerals.

The island holds significant deposits of rare earth elements, including graphite, which is essential for battery production.

However, Greenland faces challenges in developing its rare earth industry, including harsh terrain, environmental concerns, and geopolitical tensions.

The U.S. and EU are keen to reduce reliance on China, which dominates rare earth processing, and Greenland’s resources could play a crucial role in this effort.

Greenland has indicated it has little desire to be transformed into a mining territory. It could have little choice.

Canada?

Canada is emerging as a significant player in the rare earth supply chain. The country has over 15.2 million tonnes of rare earth oxide reserves, making it one of the largest known sources globally.

Recently, Canada opened its first commercial rare earth elements refinery, marking a major step toward reducing reliance on Chinese processing.

The facility, located in Saskatchewan, aims to produce 400 tonnes of neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) metals per year, enough for 500,000 electric vehicles annually.

Additionally, Canada is investing in critical minerals infrastructure to unlock rare earth development in Northern Quebec and Labrador.

The government has allocated $10 million to support mining projects, including the Strange Lake Rare Earth Project, which contains globally significant quantities of dysprosium, neodymium, praseodymium, and terbium.

Rare earth materials are a necessity for our modern technological lives – big tech tells us this. The hunger for these products needs to be fed, and China, right now, does the feeding.

And the beast needs to be fed.

ECB cuts interest rate to 2%

EU interest rate at 2%

The European Central Bank (ECB) announced a 0.25% rate cut on 5th June 2025, lowering the deposit facility rate to 2%.

This marks the seventh consecutive rate cut as the ECB continues its monetary easing cycle.

ECB President Christine Lagarde emphasised that inflation has fallen below the 2% target, but economic growth remains sluggish.

Investors are now watching for further rate cuts later in the year, with markets pricing in another 0.25% reduction in October.

Eurozone inflation falls below ECB target of 2% – now what?

Inflation in the eurozone fell to 1.9% in May 2025, dropping below the European Central Bank’s (ECB) 2% target for the first time in months.

This unexpected decline has sparked discussions about the potential consequences for the region’s economy.

The latest data from Eurostat shows that core inflation, which excludes volatile items like energy and food, also eased to 2.3%, down from 2.7% in April.

Services inflation, a key indicator of consumer demand, dropped sharply to 3.2% from 4%. These figures suggest that price pressures are cooling faster than anticipated.

While lower inflation can ease the cost of living for consumers, it also raises concerns about economic stagnation.

The ECB has been gradually cutting interest rates to support growth, and markets are now pricing in a 95% chance of another rate cut this week. However, if inflation continues to fall below target, it could signal weak demand and slow wage growth, potentially leading to deflationary risks.

Adding to the uncertainty, global trade tensions, particularly U.S. tariff policies, are clouding the economic outlook. The ECB will need to carefully balance its approach to ensure inflation remains stable while supporting economic expansion.

As policymakers prepare for their next decision, the eurozone faces a delicate challenge: maintaining price stability without stifling growth.

What’s going on in the U.S. bond market?

Treasury yields

The U.S. bond market is experiencing some turbulence due to rising Treasury yields and concerns over government debt.

Investors are demanding higher yields because they’re worried about the GOP’s tax-cut plans, which could lead to increased borrowing and a larger deficit.

Additionally, the recent Trump tax bill has caused Treasury bond yields to surge, as investors anticipate more government debt issuance. Moody’s has also downgraded the U.S. credit rating, adding to market jitters.

The bond market’s reaction is significant because higher yields can lead to increased borrowing costs across the economy, affecting everything from mortgages to corporate financing.

Japan

Japan’s bond market is facing significant turbulence, with yields on 40-year government bonds hitting an all-time high. This surge in yields is causing concerns about capital repatriation, as Japanese investors may start pulling funds from the U.S. and other foreign markets.

The Bank of Japan’s reduced bond purchases have contributed to this trend, leading to weaker demand for long-term government debt. Analysts warn that if Japanese investors begin moving their capital back home, it could trigger a global financial market shake-up.

Additionally, Japan’s Finance Ministry is considering reducing the issuance of super-long bonds to stabilise the market. However, recent auctions have shown weak demand, raising concerns about the effectiveness of this strategy.

Europe

The European bond market is experiencing some shifts due to falling government bond yields and easing U.S. – EU trade tensions.

German 10-year bund yields dropped by 4 basis points, reflecting increased investor confidence.

UK and French 10-year bond yields also declined by 4 basis points, while Italian bonds saw a 2 basis point dip.

Long-term UK gilts experienced the biggest movement, with 20 and 30-year yields falling by 7 basis points.

This decline in yields suggests higher demand for European government debt, possibly due to investors shifting away from U.S. assets amid concerns over U.S. fiscal health.

UK

The UK bond market is facing some challenges, with the IMF warning that it is vulnerable to sudden shocks due to a growing reliance on hedge funds and foreign investors.

30-year gilt yields have hit 5.5%, the highest in over three decades.

The Bank of England’s quantitative tightening and increased bond issuance are putting pressure on the market.

The Debt Management Office (DMO) is shifting towards short-dated debt to reduce long-term interest costs.

Additionally, the UK government has launched a new 30-year gilt offering 5.375% interest, which is attracting investor attention.

Shock but no ‘awe’ in Trump’s first 100 days in office

Sledgehammer policies

U.S. President Donald Trump has definitely brought a lot of shock in the first 100 days of his presidency, smashing trade links, alliances, and even his own government, but it can hardly be said to have left anybody truly in ‘awe’.

Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office during his second term have been a whirlwind of activity, marked by bold moves and significant controversy.

His poll rating is the lowest of any President of recent times for the first 100 days. It currently sits at around 41% (a CNN poll result suggests).

How does it compare?

Harry S. Truman, hit a rock-bottom approval rating of 22% in 1952. Other presidents like Richard Nixon and George W. Bush also dipped below 25%. But these were during their terms and not in the first 100 days.

His administration has focused heavily on reshaping trade policies, imposing tariffs that have disrupted global markets and strained relationships with long-standing allies.

Despite his claims of progress, no major trade deals have been finalised, leaving many questioning the effectiveness of his approach.

Legal challenges

Domestically, Trump’s policies have faced significant legal challenges, with numerous lawsuits filed against his administration. His stance on immigration and energy has sparked heated debates, reflecting the polarising nature of his decisions.

Trump’s ‘drill-baby-drill’ mantra has not had the desire reaction – oil prices has fallen with U.S. oil below $65 a barrel.

The automotive industry, for instance, has grappled with regulatory uncertainty and additional costs due to his tariffs, prompting him to soften some measures in response to industry concerns.

Internationally, Trump’s actions have raised concerns about U.S. credibility and stability. His hostile stance toward traditional allies, such as Canada, the EU and NATO, has left multi-decade relationships in tatters.

Meanwhile, his administration’s handling of the ongoing war in Ukraine and trade negotiations with China has drawn criticism for its lack of tangible results.

Despite these challenges, Trump remains confident in his vision for America. He has claimed progress in tariff negotiations with India, suggesting that a trade deal may be on the horizon.

No deals… yet

There has not been a single trade deal concluded with Trump’s administration – despite him reportedly claiming to have done ‘200 deals’ with only 195 countries in the world.

China is still striking a defiant tone on trade, and the war in Ukraine rages on. The president has also been forced to walk back on his “reciprocal tariffs.” 

However, his administration’s approach has left many wondering whether his first 100 days will be remembered for their impact or their controversy.

As the dust settles, the world watches closely to see how Trump’s policies will shape the future of the United States and its role on the global stage.

Trump may have wanted his first 100 days to be historic, and they were – but for all the wrong reasons.  

EU reduces interest rate to 2.25%

EU reduces interest rate

The European Central Bank (ECB) announced its seventh consecutive interest rate cut on Thursday 17th April 2025, lowering the rate by 0.25% to 2.25%.

This decision aims to counter economic growth concerns fueled by global trade tensions, particularly the impact of tariffs imposed by the United States.

The ECB’s move is expected to make borrowing more affordable, supporting consumer spending and business investment.

Inflation in the eurozone has fallen to 2.2%, close to the ECB’s target, shifting the focus to growth worries.

The eurozone economy grew by a modest 0.2% in the last quarter of 2024, highlighting the need for measures to stimulate activity.

The ECB’s decision reflects the challenges posed by trade uncertainties and the potential impact of tariffs on European industries.

Russell 2000 goes into bear territory as Dow Jones – S&P 500 and Nasdaq hit correction!

Stocks fall

The Russell 2000, a key benchmark for small-cap U.S. stocks, has officially entered bear market territory.

This means the index has fallen more than 20% from its all-time high in late November 2024. The decline was accelerated by the recent rollout of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, which have raised concerns about rising costs, economic softening, and global supply chain disruptions3.

Small-cap stocks, which were initially seen as beneficiaries of Trump’s policies due to their domestic focus, are now facing significant challenges. Many of these companies are particularly vulnerable to input cost shocks and lack the financial flexibility of larger firms.

Analysts warn that the combination of higher costs and a slowing economy is squeezing profits, leaving small caps in a precarious position.

The Russell 2000’s downturn highlights the broader market volatility triggered by the tariff measures. While other major indices like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are in correction territory, the Russell 2000 was the first to enter a bear market.

Russell 2000 index

Russell 2000 index

This development underscores the heightened risks for small-cap stocks in the current economic climate.

Despite the challenges, some strategists believe there could be opportunities for recovery, particularly if the Federal Reserve takes steps to cut interest rates.

However, Trump’s tariffs have introduced uncertainty into this policy, as inflation is likely to increase, casting doubt on the possibility of further interest rate cuts.

For now, the Russell 2000’s performance serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between protectionist policies and market stability.

The Russell 2000, a key benchmark for small-cap U.S. stocks, has officially entered bear market territory.

Dow Jones decline – the ripple effects of tariff policies

The Dow Jones Industrial Average has seen a sharp decline, falling from its all-time high of 45,073.63 points in December 2024 to its current level of 38,314.86 points—a drop of approximately 15%.

Dow Jones one-year chart

Dow Jones one-year chart

This downturn reflects a mix of economic challenges, including the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariff policies.

Trump’s sweeping tariffs, introduced as part of his ‘Liberation Day‘ initiative, aimed to bolster American manufacturing by imposing taxes on imported goods. While the policy sought to ‘level the playing field’, it triggered significant disruptions in global trade.

Retaliatory tariffs from key trading partners, including China and the European Union, compounded the issue, ultimately leading to higher costs for U.S. businesses and consumers.

The tariffs have also strained supply chains, particularly in industries reliant on international components. This has contributed to inflationary pressures, further dampening investor sentiment.

The tech sector, already grappling with regulatory scrutiny, has been hit hard, with companies facing increased production costs.

Nasdaq tech 100 one-year chart

Nasdaq tech 100 one-year chart

While some view the market’s decline as a natural correction, others warn of prolonged economic challenges, especially with the uncertainty surround Trump’s tariff agenda.

For investors, the key lies in navigating these turbulent times with caution and a focus on long-term fundamentals.

As the Dow adjusts to these pressures, its performance underscores the far-reaching consequences of trade policies on global markets.

S&P 500 one-year chart

S&P 500 one-year chart

Trump announces 25% tariffs on car imports to U.S. and pledges pharma tariffs to come

Trump's Tariffs

Trump’s tariffs have been a cornerstone of his trade policy, aimed at protecting American industries and reducing trade deficits

These measures include tariffs on steel, aluminum, and a wide range of goods from countries like China, Canada, and the European Union.

While supporters argue that these tariffs have bolstered domestic manufacturing and created jobs, critics highlight the retaliatory tariffs imposed by other nations, which have affected American exporters.

President Donald Trump said he will soon announce tariffs targeting automobiles and pharmaceuticals.

Trump later added the timber and semiconductor industries to his list.

It was unclear whether the newly announced sector-specific tariffs would take effect after the tit-for-tat ‘reciprocal tariffs’ – which are set to take effect on for 2nd April 2025

The president’s latest comments at a Cabinet meeting came hours after he unveiled a plan to place 25% tariffs on all countries that buy oil and gas from Venezuela.

Trump’s tariffs have had widespread economic effects, both domestically and globally

Higher Prices for Consumers

Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, which often leads to higher prices for consumers. This can reduce purchasing power and affect living standards.

Impact on Businesses

Companies relying on imported materials face higher production costs due to tariffs. Some businesses may pass these costs onto consumers, while others might struggle to remain competitive.

Retaliatory Measures

Countries affected by U.S. tariffs often impose their own tariffs on American goods. This can hurt U.S. exporters and lead to trade wars.

Economic Growth

Studies suggest that tariffs can reduce GDP growth. For example, the U.S. GDP has been estimated to decrease by 0.4% due to these measures.

Employment

While tariffs aim to protect domestic jobs, they can also lead to job losses in industries affected by higher input costs or reduced export opportunities.

Global Trade Dynamics

Tariffs disrupt international trade relationships, leading to uncertainty and reduced investment in affected sectors.

These measures have sparked retaliatory tariffs from other countries, creating a complex web of trade disputes further sowing chaos and unrest.

Markets have reacted negatively to Trumps tariffs.

One thing is certain regarding the imposition of Trump’s tariffs – consumers suffer!

Trump and his tariff agenda

Trade tariffs

The United States has intensified its tariff policies, marking a significant shift in global trade dynamics

On 4th March 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping increase in tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, raising them to 25% across the board. This move, aimed at bolstering domestic industries, has sparked widespread reactions both domestically and internationally.

The tariffs, which now include a broader range of products such as nuts, bolts, and soda cans, have drawn sharp criticism from key U.S. allies, including Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia.

U.S and the EU

The European Union has responded with countermeasures, imposing tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods, set to take effect on 1st April 2025. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed regret over the U.S. decision but emphasised the need to protect European consumers and businesses.

Domestically, the tariffs have been met with mixed reactions. While U.S. steel and aluminum producers have welcomed the measures, citing potential job creation and increased investment, downstream manufacturers that rely on these metals are bracing for higher costs.

Economists warn that the tariffs could lead to increased prices for consumers and potential disruptions in supply chains. Trump has indicated many times that the tariffs levelled at the U.S. are unfair and unequal.

The Trump administration has justified the tariffs as a means to encourage foreign companies to establish manufacturing facilities in the United States. However, critics argue that the policy could backfire, leading to retaliatory measures from trading partners and a potential slowdown in global economic growth.

As the global trade landscape continues to evolve, the long-term impact of these tariffs remains uncertain. Businesses and policymakers alike are closely monitoring the situation, weighing the potential benefits of protecting domestic industries against the risks of escalating trade tensions.

The coming weeks and months will be crucial in determining the effectiveness of this bold and possibly misguided economic strategy.

U.S. and Canada

The trade relationship between the U.S. and Canada has recently faced significant strain due to escalating tariff policies.

President Donald Trump announced a sharp increase in tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, raising them from 25% to 50%. This decision was reportedly in response to Ontario’s provincial government imposing higher electricity prices on U.S. customers.

However, after discussions between Ontario Premier Doug Ford and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Ontario agreed to pause the electricity surcharge.

As a result, the U.S. decided to maintain the original 25% tariff rate instead of doubling it. Despite this temporary resolution, tensions remain high, with Canada preparing to implement retaliatory tariffs on $30 billion worth of American goods.

These developments highlight the ongoing challenges in U.S. – Canada trade relations, with both nations navigating the complexities of economic and political interests.

U.S. and China

The U.S. – China trade tensions have escalated significantly in recent months. President Donald Trump recently imposed a 20% tariff on all imports from China, reportedly citing concerns over China’s role in the flow of fentanyl into the U.S.

This move has reignited the trade war that began during Trump’s first term.

In response, China has implemented retaliatory measures, including a 15% tariff on U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) and coal, as well as a 10% tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery, and large-engine cars.

Additionally, China has restricted the export of rare earth minerals and metals, which are critical for U.S. tech and green energy industries.

Both nations have expressed a willingness to engage in dialogue, but the situation remains tense. The economic impact of these tariffs is being closely monitored, as they have the potential to disrupt global supply chains and affect industries worldwide.

U.S. and Mexico

The U.S. – Mexico trade conflict has intensified with the U.S. imposing a 25% tariff on Mexican imports, excluding oil and energy products, which face a 10% tariff.

This decision, aimed at addressing trade deficits and border concerns, prompted Mexico to announce retaliatory tariffs targeting $20 billion worth of U.S. goods. Critics argue these measures undermine the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and could disrupt supply chains.

Both nations are bracing for the economic impact, with businesses and consumers facing potential cost increases. This trade dispute highlights the challenges of balancing domestic priorities while maintaining strong international partnerships in a connected global economy.

And there’s more…

Russia and Ukraine peace deal according to Trump. Taking rare earth and other minerals from Ukraine in a ‘deal’. The potential reshaping of Gaza to become the riviera of the middle east. Talk of taking over Greenland. Making Canada the 51st state. etc. etc.

And this is just what we already know after 8 weeks of Trump in power!

EU cuts interest rates again down to 2.5%

ECB interest rate cut

The European Central Bank (ECB) on 6th March 2025 reduced its interest rates to 2.5%, marking the sixth reduction since June 2024

The bank stuck to its plan in the face of economic challenges, including threats of U.S. tariffs and plans to boost European military spending.

This move reflects a shift in focus from combating inflation to supporting economic growth in the Eurozone.

Inflation has eased to 2.4% in February, and the ECB expects it to stabilise around its 2% target.

Economic growth forecasts for 2025 and 2026 have been lowered to 0.9% and 1.2%, respectively.

Global markets slide into chaos as Trump pushes his ‘America First Agenda’

U.S. tariffs

Global markets have been thrown into turmoil following the announcement of sweeping tariffs by U.S. President Donald Trump

U.S. tariffs, which include a 25% levy on imports from Canada and Mexico and a 10% increase on Chinese goods, have sparked fears of a global trade war. Retaliatory measures from Canada and China have only added to the uncertainty, sending shockwaves through financial markets worldwide.

The FTSE 100, London’s blue-chip index, fell by 1.3%, marking its steepest decline since October last year. Across the Atlantic, Wall Street saw significant losses, with the S&P 500 dropping 1.6% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 1.7%. European markets were not spared, as Germany’s DAX and France’s CAC 40 plunged by 3.5% and 2.1%.

Investors are increasingly concerned about the long-term implications of these tariffs. The measures threaten to disrupt global supply chains, inflate costs, and dampen economic growth. Analysts warn that prolonged trade tensions could push the global economy closer to a recession.

The tariffs have also had a notable impact on currency markets. The U.S. dollar weakened against major currencies, with the pound rising to a six-week high of $1.27. Meanwhile, safe-haven assets like gold saw a surge in demand, with prices climbing above $2,900 per ounce.

Oil markets were not immune to the fallout, as Brent crude futures dropped to a three-month low of $70.65 per barrel. The decline reflects growing concerns over reduced demand amid escalating trade tensions.

As the world braces for further economic uncertainty, the focus now shifts to how global leaders will navigate these turbulent waters.

The stakes are high, and the path forward remains uncertain.

Trump’s tariffs tumble markets!

Stocks go red!

Trump’s tariffs have created fresh concern and new volatility in the markets forcing a stock market reversal.

The tariffs, which include a 25% duty on imports from Mexico and Canada, as well as a 10% levy on Chinese goods, have led to significant market volatility.

Investors remain cautious as they assess the long-term implications of these trade restrictions. The tariffs are expected to raise inflation in the U.S. and could potentially lead to a severe market correction.

It’s a complex situation with far-reaching consequences for global trade and the economy.

The S&P 500 retreated on Monday, extending February’s rout and turning red for the year after President Donald Trump’s confirmation of forthcoming tariffs.

The S&P 500 index fell to end at 5849, marking its worst day since December 2024 and bringing its year-to-date performance to a loss of about 0.5%.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 649 points to finish at 43191. The Nasdaq Composite slid to close at 18350, weighed down by Nvidia’s decline of more than 8%.

Stocks took a notable leg down in the afternoon following President Trump’s reiteration that 25% levies on imports from Mexico and Canada would go into effect on Tuesday 5th March 2025, dashing investors’ hopes of a last-minute deal to avert the full tariffs on the two U.S. allies.

All three indexes traded in positive territory earlier in the day, with the Dow rising nearly 200 points at session highs.

China retaliated with reciprocal tariffs of 15% on some U.S. goods due to take effect 10th. March 2025.

Is the world order being dramatically upended?

UK wants to control its own AI direction – suggesting a divergence from the EU and U.S.

UK tech

The UK is charting its own course when it comes to regulating artificial intelligence, signaling a potential divergence from the approaches taken by the United States and the European Union. This move is part of a broader strategy to establish the UK as a global leader in AI technology.

UK AI framework

Britain’s minister for AI and digital government, Feryal Clark, emphasised the importance of the UK developing its own regulatory framework for AI.

She highlighted the government’s strong relationships with AI companies like OpenAI and Google DeepMind, which have voluntarily opened their models for safety testing. Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed these sentiments, stating that the UK now has the freedom to regulate AI in a way that best suits its national interests following Brexit.

Unlike the EU, which has introduced comprehensive, pan-European legislation aimed at harmonising

AI rules across the bloc, the UK has so far refrained from enacting formal laws to regulate AI.

Instead, it has deferred to individual regulatory bodies to enforce existing rules on businesses developing and using AI. This approach contrasts with the EU’s risk-based regulation and the U.S.’s patchwork of state and local frameworks.

Labour Party Plan

During the Labour Party’s election campaign, there was a commitment to introducing regulations focusing on ‘frontier’ AI models, such as large language models like OpenAI’s GPT. However, the UK government has yet to confirm the details of proposed AI safety legislation, opting instead to consult with the industry before formalising any rules.

The UK’s AI Opportunities Action Plan, endorsed by tech entrepreneur Matt Clifford, outlines a comprehensive strategy to harness AI for economic growth.

The plan includes recommendations for scaling up AI capabilities, establishing AI growth zones, and creating a National Data Library to support AI research and innovation. The government has committed to implementing these recommendations, aiming to build a robust AI infrastructure and foster a pro-innovation regulatory environment.

Despite the ambitious plans, some industry leaders have expressed concerns about the lack of clear rules. Sachin Dev Duggal, CEO of AI startup Builder.ai, reportedly warned that proceeding without clear regulations could be ‘borderline reckless’.

He reportedly highlighted the need for the UK to leverage its data to build sovereign AI capabilities and create British success stories.

The UK’s decision to ‘do its own thing’ on AI regulation reflects its desire to tailor its approach to national interests and foster innovation.

While this strategy offers flexibility, it also presents challenges in terms of providing clear guidance and ensuring regulatory certainty for businesses. As the UK continues to develop its AI regulatory framework, it will be crucial to balance innovation with safety and public trust

Euro zone inflation rose to 2.4% in December 2024 – as expected

Inflation

The annual inflation rate in euro zone increased for the consecutive month reaching 2.4% in December 2024, according to the statistics released on Tuesday 7th January 2024 by Eurostat

The reading, according to economists’ forecasts, indicated an increase from a revised 2.2% figure in November 2024. Core inflation remained steady at 2.7% for the fourth consecutive month, meeting economists’ expectations, while services inflation edged up to 4% from 3.9%.

Headline inflation was widely expected to accelerate after hitting a low of 1.7% in September 2024, as the effect from lower energy prices fade.

The European Central Bank will monitor the full extent of increases in the reading, as well as persistence in services and core inflation. Markets currently anticipate that the ECB will reduce rates from 3% to 2% through several cuts this year.

How is AI regulation likely to affect stock markets in 2025?

AI regulation

As we head into 2025, the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation is poised to undergo significant changes, and these shifts are likely to have a profound impact on the stock markets.

The introduction of new regulations, particularly in regions like the European Union and the United States, will create both challenges and opportunities for investors.

One of the most anticipated regulatory developments is the European Union’s AI Act, which aims to set a global standard for AI regulation. This act is expected to impose stringent requirements on AI systems, particularly those used in high-risk sectors such as healthcare, finance, and law enforcement.

Companies operating in these sectors will need to invest heavily in compliance, which could lead to increased operational costs and potentially affect their profitability. As a result, stocks of companies heavily reliant on AI technologies may experience volatility as investors react to these new regulations.

In the United States, the political landscape is also shifting, with the incoming administration expected to take a more hands-on approach to AI regulation. President-elect Donald Trump has appointed Elon Musk to co-lead a new Department of Government EfficiencyDOGE‘, which will focus on nascent technologies like AI. Musk’s influence and experience in the AI field could lead to more favourable policies for AI development, but it could also result in increased scrutiny and regulation of AI applications. Musk’s AI vision differs to that of Mark Zuckerberg’s for instance.

This dual approach of promoting innovation while ensuring safety and ethical use of AI could create a dynamic and unpredictable market environment.

The impact of AI regulation on the stock markets will not be uniform across all sectors. While companies in high-risk sectors may face challenges, those in industries like healthcare and finance could benefit from AI’s transformative potential.

For example, AI-driven innovations in healthcare, such as predictive diagnostics and personalised treatment plans, have the potential to revolutionize patient care and reduce costs. Companies that successfully integrate AI into their operations and comply with regulatory requirements could see their stock prices rise as investors recognize the long-term value of these advancements.

However, the regulatory landscape is not without its risks. Companies that fail to adapt to new regulations or face compliance issues may see their stock prices suffer. Additionally, the rapid pace of technological change means that regulations may struggle to keep up, leading to potential legal and financial uncertainties for companies operating in the AI arena.

AI regulation in 2025 is likely to create a complex and dynamic environment for the stock markets. While new regulations will pose challenges for some companies, they will also open up opportunities for those that can navigate the regulatory landscape successfully.

Investors will need to stay informed and agile, as the impact of AI regulation on the stock markets will be both significant and multifaceted.

Euro zone inflation rises to higher-than-expected 2%

Euro Zone Data

Inflation in the euro zone increased from 1.7% to 2% in October 2024, according to latest figures released on Thursday 31st October 2024, exceeding the forecast of 1.9%. weakening case for jumbo rate cut

Both core inflation and services inflation reportedly remained the same as the previous month.

The markets are anticipating a 0.25% reduction in interest rates by the European Central Bank in December 2024, while analysts have suggested that the latest figures could sway the argument against a more substantial cut.

A reduction of 0.5% has been muted but is now less likely.

Euro zone economy grows 0.4% in third quarter – better than expected

Euro Zone GDP

The euro zone’s economy expanded by 0.4% in the third quarter, according to flash figures released by the European Union’s statistics office (Eurostat) on Wednesday 30th October 2024.

Economists had anticipated a growth of 0.2%, following a 0.3% increase in the second quarter.

Analysts predict that euro zone growth may pick up cautiously in the upcoming months, in light of lower interest rates and subsiding inflation.

At its October 2024 meeting, the European Central Bank (ECB) reduced rates for the third time this year, following a final reading of September’s EU headline inflation at 1.8%.

The ECB pointed to sustained indications of sluggish activity in the euro area as a significant reason for the rate cut in October.

Markets have completely factored in another 0.25% reduction by the ECB for its final meeting of the year in December 2024.

Germany, the largest economy in the euro zone, reported an unexpected 0.2% growth in the third quarter, as per figures released on Wednesday 30th October 2024. This growth helped the country steer clear of the recession predicted by some economists.

ECB cuts rates for the third time this year by 0.25% to 3.25%

ECB interest rate cut

On Thursday 17th October 2024, the ECB announced its third interest rate reduction of 2024, as inflation risks within the European Union diminished more rapidly than anticipated.

At its October meeting, the central bank decreased the deposit rate by 0.25%. This decision followed a slowdown in the euro area’s price increases to 1.8% in September 2024, falling below the central bank’s target of 2%.

The EU interest rate is now: 3.25%

European Union vote to slap tariff charge on Chinese EV imports

EU EV Charge

On Friday 4th October 2024, the European Union voted to implement definitive tariffs on battery electric vehicles (BEVs) made in China

‘The European Commission’s proposal to levy definitive countervailing duties on imports of Chinese battery electric vehicles has garnered the requisite support from EU Member States to proceed with the imposition of tariffs,‘ stated the EU.

Initially, the EU announced in June its intention to impose higher tariffs on imports of Chinese electric vehicles, citing substantial unfair subsidies that threaten economic harm to European electric vehicle manufacturers.

The EU disclosed specific duties for companies based on their level of cooperation and the information provided during the bloc’s investigation into China’s EV production, which commenced last year. Provisional duties have been in effect since early July.

Following the receipt of ‘substantiated comments on the provisional measures‘ from stakeholders, the European Commission updated its tariff strategy in September 2024.

A spokesperson from China’s Ministry of Commerce indicated that Beijing maintains its stance that the EU’s investigation into China’s electric vehicle industry subsidies has led to predetermined outcomes – suggesting that the EU is fostering unfair competition.

China responded by vowing a suitable response.

Ireland’s 13-billion-euro Apple windfall

Apple

Ireland stands to gain a substantial financial boost following a pivotal ruling by the European Union’s highest court, which requires Apple to pay €13 billion (around $14 billion) in back taxes. Initially resisted by Dublin, this windfall is now seen as a transformative chance for the nation.

The settlement’s roots trace back to 2016 when the European Commission deemed that Apple had received illegal state aid via favorable tax deals with Ireland. After prolonged legal disputes, the EU court’s verdict has concluded the issue, mandating Apple to settle the substantial amount.

The Irish government has devised a strategic plan to capitalise on this unforeseen fiscal advantage. The funds are designated for various key sectors to promote sustained economic growth and societal welfare. A considerable portion is allocated for infrastructure enhancements, including transport network upgrades and sustainable energy initiatives, in line with Ireland’s green economy transition goals.

The windfall will also bolster progress in healthcare and education. Plans are in place to improve healthcare facilities and services, enhancing access and care quality for residents. In education, investments will focus on updating educational institutions, fostering research and innovation, and preparing the workforce with future-oriented skills.

The financial influx also presents a chance to tackle housing deficits, with investments directed towards boosting affordable housing availability and ameliorating living standards nationwide. This comprehensive strategy aims to forge a more equitable and thriving society.

In essence, Ireland’s $14 billion windfall from Apple offers an exceptional opportunity to effectuate considerable improvements across diverse sectors, potentially reshaping the country’s economic and social fabric for generations.

It’s quite remarkable how a fortune from just ONE company can be utterly transformational for an entire country.

As of September 2024, Apple’s market cap sat at around $3.4 trillion. This makes Apple the most valuable company in the world by market cap.

As of September 2024, Apple’s market cap sat at around $3.4 trillion. This makes Apple the most valuable company in the world by market cap.

Just so you know, 14 billion of 3.4 trillion equals about 0.41%. A small drop in a massive financial ocean.

Euro zone inflation falls to 1.8% in September 2024 below the ECB target of 2%

In September 2024, inflation in the Euro zone fell to 1.8%, falling below the European Central Bank’s target of 2%, according to early data from Eurostat released on Tuesday 1st October 2024

Excluding the more volatile prices of energy, food, alcohol, and tobacco, the core inflation rate stood at 2.7%, marginally below the anticipated forecasts.

This inflation figure matched the predictions of economists.

Apple loses EU court battle over €13 billion tax bill in Ireland

EU court ruling

Europe’s highest court ruled against Apple on Tuesday 10th September 2024, concluding a decade-long legal dispute over the company’s tax dealings in Ireland.

The case dates back to 2016, when the European Commission directed Ireland to reclaim up to 13 billion euros ($14.4 billion) in unpaid taxes from Apple.

The Commission had determined that Apple benefited from ‘illegal’ tax advantages in Ireland for twenty years.