Opinionated Archives - Taking Stock

September 15, 2025September 15, 2025

Are we looking at an AI house of cards? Bubble worries emerge after Oracle blowout figures

There’s growing concern that parts of the AI boom—especially the infrastructure and monetisation frenzy—might be built on shaky foundations.

The term ‘AI house of cards’ is being used to describe deals like Oracle’s multiyear agreement with OpenAI, which has committed to buying $300 billion in computing power over five years starting in 2027.

That’s on top of OpenAI’s existing $100 billion in commitments, despite having only about $12 billion in annual recurring revenue. Analysts are questioning whether the math adds up, and whether Oracle’s backlog—up 359% year-over-year—is too dependent on a single customer.

Oracle’s stock surged 36%, then dropped 5% Friday as investors took profits and reassessed the risks.

Some analysts remain neutral, citing murky contract details and the possibility that OpenAI’s nonprofit status could limit its ability to absorb the $40 billion it raised earlier this year.

The broader picture? AI infrastructure spending is ballooning into the trillions, echoing the dot-com era’s early adoption frenzy. If demand doesn’t materialise fast enough, we could see a correction.

But others argue this is just the messy middle of a long-term transformation—where data centres become the new utilities

The AI infrastructure boom—especially the Oracle–OpenAI deal—is raising eyebrows because the financial and operational foundations look more speculative than solid.

Here’s why some analysts are calling it a potential house of cards

⚠️ 1. Mismatch Between Revenue and Commitments

OpenAI’s annual revenue is reportedly around $10–12 billion, but it’s committed to $300 billion in cloud spending with Oracle over five years.
That’s $60 billion per year, meaning OpenAI would need to grow revenue 5–6x just to break even on compute costs.
CEO Sam Altman projects $44 billion in losses before profitability in 2029.

🔌 2. Massive Energy Demands

The infrastructure needed to fulfill this contract requires electricity equivalent to two Hoover Dams.
That’s not just expensive—it’s logistically daunting. Data centres are planned across five U.S. states, but power sourcing and environmental impact remain unclear.

💸 3. Oracle’s Risk Exposure

Oracle’s debt-to-equity ratio is already 10x higher than Microsoft’s, and it may need to borrow more to meet OpenAI’s demands.
The deal accounts for most of Oracle’s $317 billion backlog, tying its future growth to a single customer.

🔄 4. Shifting Alliances and Uncertain Lock-In

OpenAI recently ended its exclusive cloud deal with Microsoft, freeing it to sign with Oracle—but also introducing risk if future models are restricted by AGI clauses.
Microsoft is now integrating Anthropic’s Claude into Office 365, signalling a diversification away from OpenAI.

🧮 5. Speculative Scaling Assumptions

The entire bet hinges on continued global adoption of OpenAI’s tech and exponential demand for inference at scale.
If adoption plateaus or competitors leapfrog, the infrastructure could become overbuilt—echoing the dot-com frenzy of the early 2000s.

Is this a moment for the AI frenzy to take a breather?

September 9, 2025September 12, 2025

Negative news is not affecting the market as the Nasdaq hits a new high!

The Nasdaq Composite closed at a record high of 21,798.70 on Monday, 8th September 2025. That 0.45% gain was driven largely by a rally in chip stocks—Broadcom surged 3.2%, and Nvidia added nearly 1%.

The broader market also joined the party:

S&P 500 rose 0.21% to 6,495.15
Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 0.25% to 45,514.95

Investor optimism is swirling around potential Federal Reserve rate cuts, especially with inflation data due later this week. The market’s momentum seems to be riding a wave of AI infrastructure spending and tech sector strength.

Negative news is not affecting the market – but why?

The Nasdaq Composite closes at a record high on Monday 8th September 2025.
Refunds could hit $1 trillion if tariffs are deemed illegal.
China’s Xpeng eyes global launch of its Mona brand.
French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou loses no-confidence vote.
UK deputy PM resigns after tax scandal.

Stocks are rising despite August’s dismal jobs report because investors are interpreting the weak labor data as a signal that interest rate cuts may be on the horizon—and that’s bullish for equities.

📉 The contradiction at the heart of the market The U.S. economy showed signs of slowing, with job numbers actually declining in June and August’s report falling short of expectations.

Normally, that would spook investors—fewer jobs mean less consumer spending, which hurts corporate earnings and stock prices.

📈 But here’s the twist Instead of panicking, markets rallied. The Nasdaq Composite hit a record high, and the S&P 500 and Dow Jones also posted gains.

Why? Because a weaker jobs market increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates to stimulate growth. Lower rates make borrowing cheaper and boost valuations—especially for tech stocks.

🤖 AI’s role in the rally Tech firms, particularly those tied to artificial intelligence like Broadcom and Nvidia, led the charge.

The suggestion is that investors may be viewing job cuts as a sign that AI is ‘working as intended’—streamlining operations and improving margins. Salesforce and Klarna, for instance, have both reportedly cited AI as a reason for major workforce reductions.

Summary

Indicator	Value / Change	Interpretation
Nasdaq Composite	📈 21,798.70 (Record High)	Tech led rally, investor optimism
S&P 500	➕ 6,495.15	Broad market strength
Dow Jones	➕ 45,514.95	Industrial resilience
August Jobs Report	📉 Missed expectations	Labour market weakness
Job Growth (June & Aug)	📉 Negative	Economic slowdown
Investor Reaction	🟢 Rate cuts expected	Bullish for equities
AI Layoff Narrative	🤖 ‘Efficiency gains’	Tech streamlining
Featured Stocks	Broadcom +3.2%, Nvidia +0.9%	AI infrastructure driving

Infographic summary

So, while the jobs report paints a gloomy picture for workers, the market sees a silver lining: rate relief and tech-driven efficiency.

It’s a classic case of Wall Street optimism—where bad news for Main Street can be good news for stock prices.

The career ladder is broken—but the Nasdaq is building a rocket.

The Fed up next to move the market.

September 8, 2025September 12, 2025

Japan’s yield curve bites back as it hits new highs!

After decades of economic sedation, Japan’s long-term bond yields are rising with a vengeance.

The 30-year government bond has breached 3.286%—its highest level on record—while the 20-year yield has climbed to 2.695%, a peak not seen since 1999.

These aren’t just numbers; they’re seismic signals of a nation confronting its delayed past, now its deferred future.

For years, Japan’s yield curve was a monument to inertia. Negative interest rates, yield curve control, and relentless bond-buying by the Bank of Japan created an artificial calm—a kind of economic Zen garden, raked smooth but eerily still.

That era is ending. Inflation has persisted above target for three years, and the BOJ’s retreat from monetary intervention has unleashed market forces long held at bay.

This steepening curve is more than financial recalibration—it’s a symbolic reckoning. Rising yields demand accountability: from policymakers who masked structural fragility, from investors who chased safety in stagnation, and from a society that postponed hard choices on demographics, debt, and productivity.

The bond market, once a passive witness, now acts as judge. Each basis point is a moral verdict on Japan’s economic past.

The shadows of the Lost Decades—deflation, aging populations, and overspending—are being dispelled not by command, but through the process of price discovery.

In this new era, Japan’s yield curve resembles a serpent uncoiling—no longer dormant but rising with intent.

The question isn’t whether the curve will flatten again, but whether Japan can meet the moment it has long delayed.

August 28, 2025September 12, 2025

AI In, Jobs Out: The Great Hiring Slowdown

Has BIG tech and AI stopped hiring? Not quite, though the hiring landscape has definitely shifted gears. Here’s the current take…

🧠 AI Hiring: Still Hot, Just More Focused

Private AI firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Perplexity are still hiring aggressively, especially for Machine Learning Engineers and Enterprise Sales roles. These two categories alone account for thousands of openings.
Even legacy tech giants like Salesforce are scaling up AI-focused sales teams—Marc Benioff announced 2,000 new hires just to sell AI solutions.
The demand for ML Engineers has splintered into niche specializations like LLM fine-tuning, inference optimisation, and RAG infrastructure, showing how deep the rabbit hole goes.

🖥️ Big Tech: Cooling, Not Collapsing

Across the U.S., software engineering roles dropped from 170,000 in March to under 150,000 by July.
AI job postings fell from 80,000 in February to just over 50,000 in June, though July showed a slight rebound.
Despite the slowdown, AI still makes up 11–15% of all software roles, suggesting it’s a strategic priority even as overall hiring cools.

🌍 Beyond Silicon Valley

States like South Dakota and Connecticut are seeing surprising growth in AI job postings—South Dakota reportedly jumped 164% last month.
The hiring boom is expanding into non-traditional industries, not just Big Tech. Think biotech, retail, and even energy sectors integrating AI.

So while the hiring frenzy of 2023 has mellowed, AI talent remains a hot commodity—just more targeted and strategic.

The general reporting across August 2025 paints a clear picture of slower, more cautious hiring, especially in tech and AI-adjacent roles.

🧊 Hiring Has Cooled—Especially for AI-Exposed Roles

In the UK, tech and finance job listings fell 38%, nearly double the broader market decline.
Entry-level roles and those involving repetitive tasks (like document review or meeting summarisation) are increasingly at risk of automation.
Even in sectors with strong business performance, such as IT and professional services, job opportunities have continued to shrink.

🧠 AI’s Paradox: High Usage, Low Maturity

McKinsey reportedly says that while 80% of large firms use AI, only 1% say their efforts are mature, and just 20% report enterprise-level earnings impact.
Most AI deployments are still horizontal (chatbots, copilots), while vertical use cases (full process automation) remain stuck in pilot mode.

Infographic of AI effect on jobs and hiring

📉 Broader Market Signals

Job adverts have dropped most for occupations most exposed to AI, especially among young graduates.
Despite a slight uptick in hiring intentions in June and July, the overall labour market shows a marked cooling.

So yes, the general tone is one of strategic hesitation—companies are integrating AI but not rushing to hire unless the role is future-proofed.

AI In, Jobs Out: The Great Hiring Slowdown

It’s official: the AI revolution has arrived—but the job listings didn’t get the memo.

Across the UK and U.S., tech hiring has slowed to a cautious crawl. Once-bustling boards now resemble digital ghost towns, especially for roles most exposed to automation.

Software engineering vacancies dropped by over 20% in just four months, while AI-related postings—once the darlings of 2023—have cooled from 80,000 to barely 50,000.

The irony? AI adoption is booming. Over 80% of large firms now deploy some form of artificial intelligence, from chatbots to copilots.

Yet only 1% claim their efforts are ‘mature’, and fewer still report meaningful earnings impact. It’s a paradox: widespread usage, minimal payoff, and a hiring freeze to match.

Even in sectors with strong performance—IT, finance, professional services—the job market is shrinking. Graduates face a particularly frosty reception, as entry-level roles vanish into the algorithmic ether.

Meanwhile, AI firms themselves are hiring with surgical precision: machine learning engineers and enterprise sales reps remain in demand, but the days of blanket recruitment are over.

Geographically, the hiring map is shifting too. South Dakota saw a 164% spike in AI job postings last month, while London and San Francisco quietly tightened their belts.

So, AI isn’t killing jobs—it’s reshaping them. The new roles demand fluency in automation, compliance, and creative problem-solving.

The rest? They’re being quietly retired.

For now, the job market belongs to the adaptable, the analytical, and the algorithmically literate.

Everyone else may need to reboot, eventually, but not quite just yet.

August 20, 2025September 12, 2025

UK statistical blind spots: The mounting failures of the UK’s ONS

The Office for National Statistics (ONS), once regarded as the bedrock of Britain’s economic data, is now facing a crisis of credibility.

A string of recent failings has exposed deep-rooted issues in the agency’s data collection, processing, and publication methods—raising alarm among economists, policymakers, and watchdogs alike.

The most visible setback came in August 2025, when the ONS abruptly delayed its monthly retail sales figures, citing the need for ‘further quality assurance’. This two-week postponement, while seemingly minor, is symptomatic of broader dysfunction.

Retail data is a key indicator of consumer confidence and spending, and its delay undermines timely decision-making across government and financial sectors.

But the problems run deeper. Labour market statistics—once a gold standard—have been plagued by collapsing response rates. The Labour Force Survey, a cornerstone of employment analysis, now garners responses from fewer than 20% of participants, down from 50% a decade ago.

This erosion has left institutions like the Bank of England flying blind on crucial metrics such as wage growth and economic inactivity.

Trade data and producer price indices have also suffered from delays and revisions, prompting the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR) to demand a full overhaul.

In June, a review led by Sir Robert Devereux identified “deep-seated” structural issues within the ONS, calling for urgent modernisation.

The resignation of ONS chief Ian Diamond in May, citing health reasons, added further instability to an already beleaguered institution.

Critics argue that the failings are not merely technical but systemic. Funding constraints, outdated methodologies, and a culture resistant to reform have all contributed to the malaise.

As Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Treasury Select Committee, reportedly warned: ‘Wrong decisions made by these institutions can mean constituents defaulting on mortgages or losing their livelihoods’.

Efforts are underway to replace the flawed Labour Force Survey with a new ‘Transformed Labour Market Survey’, but its rollout may not be completed until 2027.

Meanwhile, the ONS is attempting to integrate alternative data sources—such as VAT records and rental prices—to bolster its national accounts. Yet progress remains slow.

In an era where data drives policy, the failings of the ONS are more than bureaucratic hiccups—they are a threat to informed governance.

Without swift and transparent reform, Britain risks making economic decisions based on statistical guesswork.

June 6, 2025September 12, 2025

Trump and Musk feud – love to hate in 137 days – a billionaire brawl

It’s a worry – arguably the most powerful man in the world and the richest man in the world in a highly visible fallout.

Unrest and distrust at the top of U.S. government and the and in the corporate world – so what’s new?

Donald Trump and Elon Musk, once allies, have engaged in a heated public feud over a tax and spending bill. The conflict began when Musk criticised Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” calling it a “disgusting abomination” and warning it would increase the budget deficit. Trump retaliated on Truth Social, calling Musk “CRAZY” and threatening to terminate billions of dollars in government contracts for his companies.

Musk fired back on X, claiming Trump would have lost the election without his support and accusing him of being named in the unreleased Epstein files.

The spat has had financial repercussions, with Tesla’s stock plummeting over 14%, wiping out $152 billion in market value. Investors fear the fallout could impact Tesla’s regulatory environment under Trump’s administration.

Tesla 5-day chart

Political figures have weighed in, with billionaire Bill Ackman urging the two to reconcile, while Steve Bannon suggested Trump should seize SpaceX under the Defence Production Act. Musk also polled followers on whether to create a new political party, gaining support from Mark Cuban and Andrew Yang.

It got worse

Elon Musk escalated his feud with Donald Trump by making explosive claims that Trump appears in the Epstein files, suggesting that this is why they have not been made public. Musk posted on X, “Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.

“Have a nice day, DJT!”. He later doubled down, telling followers to “mark this post for the future” and insisting that “the truth will come out”.

Trump has denied any wrongdoing and dismissed Musk’s claims as retaliation for his tax bill. The White House press secretary called Musk’s comments “an unfortunate episode” and insisted that Trump is focused on passing his legislation.

Musk also endorsed a call for Trump’s impeachment, agreeing with a post that suggested Vice President JD Vance should replace Trump. This marks a dramatic shift, as Musk was previously a close ally of Trump and even held a government advisory role.

The feud continues to escalate, with Musk calling for the bill’s rejection and Trump defending it as a historic tax cut.

The position and authority of U.S. President Trump have been challenged. How will tariff trade negotiations and his standing with other world leaders progress from here?

I do have a couple of questions: why did Musk back Trump in the first place and, at what point in the 137 ‘love in’ days did he know about the Epstein link (if indeed there is one)?

Or did he know before?

Who to trust?

April 30, 2025September 12, 2025

Shock but no ‘awe’ in Trump’s first 100 days in office

U.S. President Donald Trump has definitely brought a lot of shock in the first 100 days of his presidency, smashing trade links, alliances, and even his own government, but it can hardly be said to have left anybody truly in ‘awe’.

Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office during his second term have been a whirlwind of activity, marked by bold moves and significant controversy.

His poll rating is the lowest of any President of recent times for the first 100 days. It currently sits at around 41% (a CNN poll result suggests).

How does it compare?

Harry S. Truman, hit a rock-bottom approval rating of 22% in 1952. Other presidents like Richard Nixon and George W. Bush also dipped below 25%. But these were during their terms and not in the first 100 days.

His administration has focused heavily on reshaping trade policies, imposing tariffs that have disrupted global markets and strained relationships with long-standing allies.

Despite his claims of progress, no major trade deals have been finalised, leaving many questioning the effectiveness of his approach.

Legal challenges

Domestically, Trump’s policies have faced significant legal challenges, with numerous lawsuits filed against his administration. His stance on immigration and energy has sparked heated debates, reflecting the polarising nature of his decisions.

Trump’s ‘drill-baby-drill’ mantra has not had the desire reaction – oil prices has fallen with U.S. oil below $65 a barrel.

The automotive industry, for instance, has grappled with regulatory uncertainty and additional costs due to his tariffs, prompting him to soften some measures in response to industry concerns.

Internationally, Trump’s actions have raised concerns about U.S. credibility and stability. His hostile stance toward traditional allies, such as Canada, the EU and NATO, has left multi-decade relationships in tatters.

Meanwhile, his administration’s handling of the ongoing war in Ukraine and trade negotiations with China has drawn criticism for its lack of tangible results.

Despite these challenges, Trump remains confident in his vision for America. He has claimed progress in tariff negotiations with India, suggesting that a trade deal may be on the horizon.

No deals… yet

There has not been a single trade deal concluded with Trump’s administration – despite him reportedly claiming to have done ‘200 deals’ with only 195 countries in the world.

China is still striking a defiant tone on trade, and the war in Ukraine rages on. The president has also been forced to walk back on his “reciprocal tariffs.”

However, his administration’s approach has left many wondering whether his first 100 days will be remembered for their impact or their controversy.

As the dust settles, the world watches closely to see how Trump’s policies will shape the future of the United States and its role on the global stage.

Trump may have wanted his first 100 days to be historic, and they were – but for all the wrong reasons.

January 28, 2025September 12, 2025

The aftermath from the arrival of Deepseek

Nvidia, the renowned American technology company, recently experienced the largest one-day loss in U.S. history. On January 27, 2025, Nvidia’s stock plummeted by 17%, resulting in a staggering market cap loss of nearly $600 billion.

This unprecedented drop was primarily triggered by the emergence of DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence startup that has been making waves in the tech industry.

DeepSeek, founded in 2023 by Liang Wenfeng, has developed open-source large language models that rival some of the best AI models in the world. The company’s latest model, DeepSeek-V3, has demonstrated impressive performance at a fraction of the cost of its competitors.

This has raised concerns among investors about the sustainability of Nvidia’s dominance in the AI chip market.

The release of DeepSeek’s latest technology has caused significant anxiety among U.S. tech giants, leading to a massive sell-off in the stock market. Companies that rely heavily on Nvidia’s GPUs, such as Dell, Oracle, and Super Micro Computer, also saw their stock prices plummet.

The ripple effect of Nvidia’s loss was felt across the tech-heavy Nasdaq, which dropped by 3.1% on the same day.

Nvidia one-month chart 27th January 2025

In response to this market upheaval, former President Donald Trump commented on the situation, stating that DeepSeek’s emergence should serve as a ‘wake-up call’ for American companies.

Trump emphasised the need for U.S. industries to remain competitive and innovative in the face of rising competition from Chinese tech firms. He acknowledged the impressive advancements made by DeepSeek and suggested that American companies could benefit from adopting more cost-effective methods in their AI development.

Trump’s remarks highlight the growing concern among U.S. policymakers and industry leaders about the rapid advancements in AI technology coming from China.

The success of DeepSeek has demonstrated that significant breakthroughs can be achieved with relatively modest investments, challenging the notion that massive capital expenditure is necessary for top-tier AI performance.

As the AI race continues to heat up, it is clear that companies like Nvidia will need to adapt and innovate to maintain their competitive edge. The emergence of DeepSeek has not only disrupted the market but also underscored the importance of staying ahead in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.

For American tech giants, this wake-up call serves as a reminder that the global AI landscape is becoming increasingly competitive, and complacency is not an option.

Has the U.S. spent wisely on AI development?

The emergence of DeepSeek has indeed raised questions about the spending strategies of U.S. tech companies on AI development. DeepSeek’s ability to develop high-performing AI models at a fraction of the cost has led to concerns about the necessity of the massive capital expenditures by large U.S. tech firms.

For instance, companies like Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon have collectively spent over $1 trillion on AI investments in recent years. This significant spending has been driven by the belief that larger models and more computing power would lead to better performance.

However, DeepSeek’s success with more cost-effective methods challenges this notion and suggests that efficient innovation might be more important than sheer scale.

The impressive performance and lower costs of DeepSeek’s models have prompted some analysts to question whether the billions of dollars spent by U.S. tech companies on AI development are justified. This has led to a re-evaluation of AI spending strategies and a push for more efficient and innovative approaches to AI development.

In summary, while U.S. tech companies have invested heavily in AI, the success of DeepSeek highlights the potential for achieving cutting-edge results with fewer resources. This has sparked a broader discussion about the most effective and efficient ways to advance AI technology.

Asking ChatGPT – ‘Do you see Deepseek as a competitor or a threat?’

The reply:

As an AI, I don’t have personal opinions or feelings. However, I can share that DeepSeek’s rapid rise and impressive performance in the AI field are noteworthy. Their ability to develop high-performing models at a lower cost is a significant achievement and has certainly shaken up the industry. It’s a reminder of the dynamic and competitive nature of the AI landscape, where innovation can come from unexpected places.

Asking ChatGPT – ‘What do you think of Deepseek?’

The reply:

DeepSeek is a fascinating and disruptive player in the AI landscape. Founded in 2023 by Liang Wenfeng, this Chinese startup has quickly gained attention for its open-source large language models, which rival some of the best AI models in the world at a fraction of the cost. Their latest models, DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1, have demonstrated impressive performance and efficiency, challenging the dominance of established tech giants2.

DeepSeek’s emergence has caused significant market upheaval, leading to substantial drops in the stock prices of major AI-related firms, including Nvidia. The company’s success highlights the potential for innovation and cost-effectiveness in AI development, which has prompted industry leaders and policymakers to re-evaluate their strategies.

Overall, DeepSeek’s rapid rise and impact on the AI industry underscore the importance of staying competitive and innovative in this fast-evolving field. It’s a reminder that breakthroughs can come from unexpected places and that the AI landscape is becoming increasingly dynamic and competitive.

It would not be drawn on these questions but, one thing is for sure the U.S. has spent billions developing their systems and charge fortunes for using it.

This is about to change.

And further…

The Deepseek website reportedly crashed on 27th January 2025 due to heavy global demand. There were also reports of unrelenting cyberattacks on its systems…?

Curious. From minnow to centre stage in just one day!

January 14, 2025September 12, 2025

Has ‘Rachel from accounts’ messed up the UK economy?

The pound has continued to fall after UK government borrowing costs rose and concerns grew about public finances

Sterling dropped as UK 10-year borrowing costs surged to their highest level since the 2008 financial crisis when bank borrowing virtually ground to a halt.

Economists have warned the rising costs could lead to further tax rises or cuts to spending plans as the government tries to meet its self-imposed borrowing target.

The UK government creates its own financial crisis as it messes up its ‘go for growth’ policy

The UK economy is currently grappling with a series of financial challenges that have led to a significant fall in the value of the pound, soaring treasury yields, and high borrowing costs.

These developments have been largely influenced by the recent budget announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, which has sparked concerns among investors and economists alike.

Downward trajectory

The pound has been on a downward trajectory, recently hitting its lowest level since November 2023. Traders are betting on further declines, with some predicting the pound could fall as low as $1.12

This decline is partly due to the rising cost of government borrowing, which has surged to levels not seen since the 2008 financial crisis. The yield on 10-year gilts has climbed to 4.8%, while the yield on 30-year gilts has reached 5.34%, the highest in 27 years.

Recent UK budget

The recent budget has played a crucial role in these developments. Announced in October 2024, the budget included significant tax hikes and increased spending, leading to a substantial rise in government borrowing.

The budget deficit is expected to reach 4.5% of GDP this fiscal year, pushing the overall government debt close to 100% of GDP. This increase in borrowing has led to a higher supply of government debt, which in turn has driven down the price of bonds and pushed up yields.

Higher yields

Higher yields mean that the government has to pay more to borrow money, which has significant implications for its fiscal policy. The rising cost of servicing government debt could force the government to either raise taxes further or cut spending to meet its fiscal rules.

This situation is reminiscent of the market turmoil following Liz Truss’s mini budget in 2022, which also led to a sharp rise in borrowing costs and a fall in the value of the pound.

The impact of these developments extends beyond the government. Higher borrowing costs are likely to affect households and businesses as well.

Economic growth at risk

Mortgage rates, which are influenced by government bond yields, are expected to remain high, putting additional pressure on homeowners. Businesses, on the other hand, may face higher costs of borrowing, which could lead to reduced investment and slower economic growth.

The UK is facing a challenging economic environment characterized by a falling pound, high treasury yields, and rising borrowing costs.

The recent budget has exacerbated these issues, leading to increased government borrowing and higher debt levels. As the government navigates these challenges, it will need to carefully balance its fiscal policies to avoid further economic instability and ensure sustainable growth and not more ‘unfunded’ debt.

January 13, 2025September 12, 2025

Meta boss bows to Trump re-aligning with their ‘free speech’ mandate

Mark Zuckerberg’s recent actions seem to be driven by a mix of strategic business decisions and political pragmatism.

As Trump prepares to retake the White House, Zuckerberg has made several changes at M eta, including scaling back content moderation and fact-checking, and moving safety teams to Texas. These moves appear to align with Trump’s stance on free expression and reducing censorship.

Additionally, Zuckerberg and other tech leaders are likely seeking to build a favorable relationship with the incoming administration to navigate potential regulatory challenges and maintain their business interests. It’s a complex dance of power and influence, with both sides looking to benefit from the alliance.

Recalibrating for Trump

Zuckerberg, who has been summoned to Washington eight times to testify before congressional committees during the last two administrations, wants to be perceived as someone who can work with Trump and the Republican Party, it would appear.

Though Meta’s content-policy updates caught many of its employees and fact-checking partners off-guard, a small group of executives were formulating the plans in the aftermath of the U.S. election results. By the New Year – managers had reportedly begun planning the public announcements of its policy change.

It has been noted that Meta typically undergoes major ‘recalibrations’ after power changes hand. Meta adjusts its policies to best suit its business model and reputational needs based on the political landscape.

Does the company remain true to its original founding principles, whatever they are – or does it ‘cozy up’ with power to re-position itself to benefit politically? Let’s put some more money in the Trump inauguration pot.

Nothing new here then – but go watch the video of Zuckerberg’s announcement.

Does it may you cringe – or is it just me?

January 6, 2025September 12, 2025

How is AI regulation likely to affect stock markets in 2025?

As we head into 2025, the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation is poised to undergo significant changes, and these shifts are likely to have a profound impact on the stock markets.

The introduction of new regulations, particularly in regions like the European Union and the United States, will create both challenges and opportunities for investors.

One of the most anticipated regulatory developments is the European Union’s AI Act, which aims to set a global standard for AI regulation. This act is expected to impose stringent requirements on AI systems, particularly those used in high-risk sectors such as healthcare, finance, and law enforcement.

Companies operating in these sectors will need to invest heavily in compliance, which could lead to increased operational costs and potentially affect their profitability. As a result, stocks of companies heavily reliant on AI technologies may experience volatility as investors react to these new regulations.

In the United States, the political landscape is also shifting, with the incoming administration expected to take a more hands-on approach to AI regulation. President-elect Donald Trump has appointed Elon Musk to co-lead a new ‘Department of Government Efficiency – DOGE‘, which will focus on nascent technologies like AI. Musk’s influence and experience in the AI field could lead to more favourable policies for AI development, but it could also result in increased scrutiny and regulation of AI applications. Musk’s AI vision differs to that of Mark Zuckerberg’s for instance.

This dual approach of promoting innovation while ensuring safety and ethical use of AI could create a dynamic and unpredictable market environment.

The impact of AI regulation on the stock markets will not be uniform across all sectors. While companies in high-risk sectors may face challenges, those in industries like healthcare and finance could benefit from AI’s transformative potential.

For example, AI-driven innovations in healthcare, such as predictive diagnostics and personalised treatment plans, have the potential to revolutionize patient care and reduce costs. Companies that successfully integrate AI into their operations and comply with regulatory requirements could see their stock prices rise as investors recognize the long-term value of these advancements.

However, the regulatory landscape is not without its risks. Companies that fail to adapt to new regulations or face compliance issues may see their stock prices suffer. Additionally, the rapid pace of technological change means that regulations may struggle to keep up, leading to potential legal and financial uncertainties for companies operating in the AI arena.

AI regulation in 2025 is likely to create a complex and dynamic environment for the stock markets. While new regulations will pose challenges for some companies, they will also open up opportunities for those that can navigate the regulatory landscape successfully.

Investors will need to stay informed and agile, as the impact of AI regulation on the stock markets will be both significant and multifaceted.

November 13, 2024September 12, 2025

Why has Sumsung fallen behind in the AI boom?

Samsung’s struggle in the AI race

Samsung, previously a powerhouse in the semiconductor industry, has encountered significant hurdles in the AI competition, leading to a notable decline in market value. The company’s faltering stance can be attributed to a variety of factors, such as strategic errors, fierce competition, and swift technological progress in the AI field.

Missteps

A key factor in Samsung’s downturn in the AI sector is its insufficient investment in high-bandwidth memory (HBM) technology, which is vital for AI applications due to its ability to expedite data processing and enhance performance.

Although Samsung was once at the forefront of memory technology, it did not leverage the increasing demand for HBM, thus ceding ground to competitors such as SK Hynix. SK Hynix made significant investments in HBM and forged a robust partnership with Nvidia, an influential entity in the AI domain.

Competition

The AI sector is fiercely competitive, featuring key companies such as Nvidia, Google, and Microsoft, which are making substantial advancements in AI technology. Nvidia has notably become a frontrunner with its GPUs, crucial for AI training. Samsung’s struggle to match these developments has resulted in a decline in both market share and revenue.

Rapid technological advancements

The swift advancement of technology in the AI sector has presented challenges for Samsung. The company’s emphasis on conventional memory technology did not fully prepare it for the transition to AI-centric applications. With the rise of AI applications such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, the need for sophisticated memory solutions surged, highlighting Samsung’s insufficient investment in High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) as a notable shortcoming.

Financial implications

Samsung’s difficulties in the AI sector have significantly affected its finances. The company has seen a reported loss of around $122 billion in market value since July 2024, marking the most substantial drop among global chipmakers. This decline is largely due to Samsung’s challenges in adapting to the evolving AI industry and competing with its rivals.

Prospects

Despite facing challenges, Samsung is actively striving to advance in the AI domain. The company has recently introduced its next-generation Bixby AI, which utilizes large language model technology, positioning it to better contend with competitors such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini.

Additionally, Samsung is cultivating its proprietary AI model, named Samsung Gauss, with the goal of augmenting device functionality and elevating the consumer experience.

Samsung’s lag in the AI sector is due to strategic errors, fierce competition, and swift technological progress. Despite considerable financial setbacks, the company is vigorously pursuing new AI initiatives and investments to recover its standing in the industry.

The path forward is fraught with challenges, yet Samsung’s commitment to innovation and adaptation could enable it to regain its status as a frontrunner in the AI domain.

November 7, 2024September 12, 2025

The mystery surrounding the origin of Bitcoin

Bitcoin’s origin is one of the most captivating mysteries of the digital age. The cryptocurrency was created in 2008 by an unknown individual or group under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.

Despite numerous investigations, the true identity of Nakamoto remains shrouded in secrecy.

Story

The story of Bitcoin begins with the release of a whitepaper titled “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” This document outlined a new kind of decentralised digital currency, one that relied on cryptographic principles to ensure security and prevent double-spending.

Nakamoto’s revolutionary vision was to create a financial system free from the control of traditional banks and government interference.

Genesis block

In January 2009, Nakamoto mined the first block of the Bitcoin blockchain, known as the ‘genesis block,’ marking the birth of the cryptocurrency. Over the next couple of years, Nakamoto continued to work on the project, communicating with other developers via email and online forums.

The mystery surrounding the origin of Bitcoin

However, by 2011, Nakamoto had largely stepped away from active involvement in the project, leaving behind a legacy that would forever change the financial landscape.

Speculation

Speculation about Nakamoto’s true identity has been rampant. Some believe Nakamoto is a single, exceptionally talented individual, while others theorise that it could be a group of developers working under a collective pseudonym.

Over the years, various names have been proposed as possible candidates, including renowned cryptographers, developers, and even eccentric entrepreneurs. Yet, none of these theories have been definitively proven, and Nakamoto’s identity remains a closely guarded secret.

Intrigue

The intrigue surrounding Nakamoto is not just a matter of curiosity but also of financial significance. As the creator of Bitcoin, Nakamoto is estimated to own around one million Bitcoins. At current market values, this makes Nakamoto one of the wealthiest individuals in the world.

Bitcoin chart from inception as of 7th November 2024 touching $75,000

However, these Bitcoins have never been moved or spent, adding to the enigma of Nakamoto’s motives and intentions.

Myth?

The myth of Satoshi Nakamoto has taken on a life of its own, becoming a symbol of the power and potential of decentralized technology. The anonymity of Nakamoto also serves as a reminder of the core principles behind Bitcoin: privacy, decentralisation, and freedom from traditional financial systems.

In a world increasingly dominated by surveillance and control, the mystery of Nakamoto provides a compelling counter-narrative, one that continues to inspire and intrigue both technologists and libertarians alike.

In the end, the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto may never be revealed, and perhaps that is as it should be. The enduring mystery adds to the allure of Bitcoin, ensuring that its origins will forever be a topic of fascination and debate.

November 4, 2024September 12, 2025

Is Switzerland about to experience deflation?

Switzerland may be at risk of entering deflationary territory in 2025 due to the strengthening of the Swiss franc, which is challenging policymakers’ control over price growth.

The Swiss National Bank has lowered interest rates three times this year as of September, attributing the country’s declining inflation rate to the robustness of the safe-haven currency, as well as to falling oil and electricity prices.

Analysts increasingly believe that the Swiss National Bank may need to engage in foreign currency intervention to avert a deflationary scenario.

Furthermore, the central bank has adjusted its forecasts downward, setting the average annual inflation rate for 2024 at 1.2%, down from 1.3%, and anticipating a price growth of 0.6% in 2025, a decrease from the previously forecasted 1.1%.

October 30, 2024September 12, 2025

Elon Musk predicts ‘hardship,’ economic turmoil and a stock market crash if Trump wins

Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur and CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has recently made headlines in the U.S. with his stark predictions about the potential economic fallout if Donald Trump wins the upcoming presidential election.

This is unusual, as you are more likely to hear these proposals in a crisis, when desperate times demand desperate measures, but not leading up to a presential election and especially not from an opposition vying to take control of the U.S. presidency.

Musk’s comments have sparked widespread debate and concern, as he foresees significant economic turmoil and a stock market crash in the event of a Trump victory.

Musk’s predictions are deep-rooted in his belief that Trump’s proposed economic policies, including drastic cuts to federal spending and mass deportations, will lead to severe short-term economic disruptions.

Musk emphasised the need to reduce government spending to live within the country’s means, even if it involves temporary hardship.

He reportedly argued that such measures are necessary for long-term prosperity but acknowledged that they would likely cause an initial severe overreaction in the economy

Comments Elon Musk made

Billionaire Musk, Trump’s would-be government budget-cutting and ‘efficiency’ adviser, also says there will be “no special cases” and “no exceptions” when he starts slashing federal spending after Trump takes office.

With just a week until the presidential election, Donald Trump’s ally and influential economic adviser Elon Musk is warning people to expect economic chaos, a crashing stock market and financial “hardship” – albeit only “temporary” – if Trump wins.

“We have to reduce spending to live within our means,” Musk said. “That necessarily involves some temporary hardship, but it will ensure long-term prosperity.”

Describing government spending as “a room full of targets,” Musk said: “Like, you can’t miss. Fire in any direction and you’re going to hit a target.”

He reportedly said, “I think once the election takes place we’ll immediately begin looking at where to take the most immediate action.”

And he reportedly added, “obviously a lot of people who are taking advantage of the government are going to be upset about that. I’ll probably need a lot of security.”

“Everyone,” he reportedly said, will be taking a “haircut.”

The Tesla CEO went further and agreed with a supporter who predicted “an initial severe overreaction in the economy” and that “Markets will tumble.”

“Sounds about right,” Musk replied.

Trump has already reportedly said he wants Musk to head up a commission of government efficiency. Trump says the billionaire tech entrepreneur would be his “Secretary of Budget-Cutting,” implying a possible Cabinet position.

Musk himself has described his new role as running a “Department of Government Efficiency,” though he admits the title is an inside joke – the acronym spells DOGE, the name of a cryptocurrency.

Musk speech highlights

One of the key points Musk highlighted is the potential impact of Trump’s policies on the stock market. He agreed with a social media post suggesting that the combination of mass deportations and significant government spending cuts would lead to a sharp decline in market values.

Musk’s agreement with this assessment has raised alarms among investors and economists, who fear that such a scenario could trigger a financial crisis.

Musk’s concerns are not without precedent. The stock market is highly sensitive to political and economic uncertainties, and drastic policy changes can lead to volatility and investor panic.

The prospect of mass deportations, in particular, could disrupt labour markets and consumer spending, further exacerbating economic instability. Additionally, significant cuts to federal spending could lead to job losses and reduced public services, compounding the economic challenges.

Unusual comments leading up to an election

Musk reportedly told supporters that the measures were needed because of the crisis of the skyrocketing federal debt.

This is not the usual picture when a politician and his campaign promise austerity, hardship, deep budget cuts, a likely economic “overreaction” and a slump in the stock market.

You usually hear these things proposed in a crisis, when desperate times supposedly demand desperate measures.

Are desperate times coming, maybe they are already here?

Optimism

Despite the grim outlook, Musk remains optimistic about the long-term benefits of these policies. He believes that once the initial shock subsides, the economy will recover and emerge stronger and more sustainable.

However, this perspective is not universally shared. Many economists argue that the risks associated with such drastic measures outweigh the potential benefits, and that a more balanced approach is needed to address the country’s economic challenges.

Musk’s predictions have also drawn criticism from those who view them as politically motivated. As a prominent supporter of Trump, Musk’s comments have been interpreted by some as an attempt to rally support for the former president’s economic agenda. Critics argue that Musk’s focus on austerity measures and government efficiency overlooks the broader social and economic implications of such policies.

Conclusion

Elon Musk’s predictions of economic hardship and a stock market crash if Trump wins the election have sparked significant debate and concern.

While Musk believes that these measures are necessary for long-term prosperity, the potential short-term disruptions and risks cannot be ignored. As the election approaches, investors and policymakers will be closely watching the developments and preparing for the potential economic fallout.

Whether Musk’s predictions come to pass remains to be seen, but his comments have undoubtedly added to the uncertainty and complexity of the current economic landscape and the never-ending ‘commentary surrounding the U.S. election.

October 4, 2024September 12, 2025

There is a UK budget coming and the new chancellor reportedly needs to raise £20 billion – to fill a ‘black hole’ – how can this be done without upsetting the electorate?

Tax Reforms

Increase in VAT: Adjusting the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate could generate substantial revenue.

Pension Tax Relief: Limiting pension tax relief to the basic rate of income tax could raise around £15 billion per year. Pension tax relief raid.

Windfall Tax: Increasing the windfall tax on the profits of oil and gas companies could also contribute significantly.

General Tax Increases: N.I., Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Inheritance Tax,

Public Sector Efficiency

Improving Productivity: Enhancing public sector productivity by just 5% could deliver up to £20 billion in benefits annually.

New Taxes or Levies

Green Taxes: Introducing or increasing taxes on carbon emissions and other environmental levies could help raise funds while promoting sustainability.

Digital Services Tax: Expanding the scope of the digital services tax to cover more online businesses could also be a potential revenue source.

Electric vehicle tax: new tax bands for electric cars

Spending Cuts

Reducing Public Expenditure: Identifying and cutting down on non-essential public spending could help balance the budget.

Economic Growth

Stimulating Growth: Policies aimed at boosting economic growth, such as investing in infrastructure and innovation, could increase tax revenues indirectly by expanding the tax base. But this will take time to fully materialise.

Each of these measures comes with its own set of challenges and implications, so the government would need to carefully consider the economic and social impacts before implementation.

Black hole?

The Chancellor has recently pointed to a ‘black hole’ in the public finances, referencing the recent uncovering of an ‘unbudgeted’ £22bn overspend in the current tax year following her tenure commencement at No. 11 Downing Street in July.

The reality of this newfound deficit is subject to debate. However, given that the Chancellor has ruled out the possibility of borrowing for day-to-day expenses, it seems she very likely she might be compelled to raise taxes to offset these expenditures.

N.I. and Pension raid?

In its last year, the Conservative government cut taxes by £20 billion by reducing the National Insurance rate. Reversing this cut would be a direct way to increase revenue, taking us back to the financial situation before last November.

Currently, many people receive a 40% tax relief on pension contributions but are taxed at 20% when they withdraw. This ‘inconsistency’ could easily become a target for the Chancellor.

Additionally, employers’ National Insurance contributions are not applied to pension contributions or withdrawals, and individuals can even take a tax-free lump sum from their pension after having received tax relief on their contributions.

Understanding the complexities is not necessary to see that a chancellor in search of extra tax revenue may consider pension contributions as a significant source of additional income.

The UK budget is due on: 30th October 2024 – let’s see just by how much UK taxes are increased – because they will be.

September 30, 2024September 12, 2025

Mervyn King’s perspective on interest rates and inflation – too low for too long

Lord Mervyn King, the former Governor of the Bank of England, has been a prominent voice in the ongoing debate about interest rates and inflation. His insights are particularly valuable given his extensive experience in central banking and economic policy

King has been critical of the Bank of England’s approach to interest rates in recent years. He argues that the central bank kept rates too low for too long, which he believes contributed significantly to the current high levels of inflation. According to King, the prolonged period of low interest rates created an environment where inflation could take root and grow unchecked. This, he suggests, was a misstep that central banks around the world are now grappling with.

In his recent comments, King has emphasised the need for a balanced approach to managing inflation. While he acknowledges that raising interest rates is a necessary tool to combat rising prices, he also warns against the potential negative impacts of aggressive rate hikes. King points out that rapid increases in interest rates can stifle economic growth, leading to higher unemployment and other economic challenges.

King’s perspective is that central banks should have acted more decisively when inflation first began to rise. By delaying action, they allowed inflation to become more entrenched, making it harder to control. He advocates for a more proactive stance in the future, where central banks are quicker to adjust interest rates in response to economic indicators.

As policymakers prepare for potential further rate hikes, King’s cautionary advice serves as a reminder of the delicate balance required in monetary policy. His insights underscore the importance of not only addressing inflation but also considering the broader economic implications of interest rate decisions.

In summary, Mervyn King calls for a nuanced approach to interest rates, one that carefully weighs the need to control inflation against the potential economic fallout of higher rates. His views highlight the complexities of monetary policy in today’s economic landscape

September 9, 2024September 12, 2025

Does the stock market reflect the state of the U.S. economy?

The stock market is often seen as a barometer of economic health, but its relationship with the broader U.S. economy is more nuanced than it might appear.

Although there are links between the two, they do not always correlate. The intricacies of this relationship and its implications for investors and the general public are multifaceted.

The stock market – A snapshot of investor sentiment

The stock market is largely a reflection of investor sentiment and their expectations for future economic performance. When investors feel optimistic, stock prices generally increase. On the other hand, when they are pessimistic, stock prices are likely to decrease. Because the market is driven by sentiment, it can react to factors that don’t immediately affect the real economy, like geopolitical events, interest rate changes, or corporate earnings announcements.

Economic indicators: The real economy

The well-being of the U.S. economy is often assessed using various indicators such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth, unemployment rates, consumer spending, and inflation. These metrics offer a broader perspective on the economic climate. For example, an expanding GDP coupled with low unemployment usually indicates a robust economy, despite any fluctuations in the stock market.

Divergence between the stock market and the economy

Occasionally, the stock market and the economy may move in different directions. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the stock market swiftly recovered from an initial downturn due to extraordinary fiscal and monetary stimulus measures. In contrast, the wider economy’s recovery was more protracted, marked by persistent high unemployment and substantial disruptions across numerous industries.

Likewise, the stock market might fall even amidst positive economic indicators. This occurs when investors foresee impending difficulties, such as possible increases in interest rates or geopolitical conflicts, that could affect corporate earnings.

Short-term vs. long-term perspectives

The stock market frequently responds to short-term factors and investor behaviours, such as speculation and market sentiment, leading to volatility that may not align with the underlying economic fundamentals. Conversely, economic indicators generally offer a more long-term perspective on the economy’s health.

The broader impact of the stock market

Although the stock market’s performance can influence the economy via wealth effects and corporate investments, it is not the only indicator of economic vitality. The performance of the stock market is significant to many U.S. citizens, especially those with investments through retirement plans.

However, the real economy, as measured by employment, production, and consumption, often has a more direct impact on people’s daily lives.

Conclusion

In conclusion, although the stock market is linked to the U.S. economy, they do not always move in tandem. The stock market reflects investor sentiment and anticipations for the future, yet it may not fully represent the present economic conditions.

Hence, for a thorough assessment of economic health, it is crucial to evaluate various economic indicators in addition to the performance of the stock market.

September 5, 2024September 12, 2025

Is the ‘eagerly anticipated’ Fed interest rate cut (due in September 2024) – too little too late?

Is the U.S. economy already weaker than the headline data suggests and should the U.S. Federal Reserve already be easing?

In the U.S. recent data (Friday 30th August 2024) showed the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, the Federal Reserve’s favored measure of inflation, ticked up 0.2% last month, as expected. The data seems to back a smaller rate cut.

The question of whether the economy is weaker than headline data suggests and if the U.S. Federal Reserve should already be easing is complex.

The gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 3% in Q2 of 2024, which is a positive indicator. However, the U.S. current-account deficit widened, and personal income and outlays show mixed signals with a slight increase in personal income but a higher increase in personal outlays.

Inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target but well below the pandemic-era peak. These factors suggest that while there are positive aspects to the U.S. economy, there are also challenges that may warrant caution from the Federal Reserve.

Is the market too focused on forecasting the size of any possible upcoming cut? “The question no one has asked yet is why is the policy rate is still at 5.5% when inflation is down to almost 2.5%? It would most likely be an error to do a ‘bigger’ rate cut in this kind of environment with all the uncertainty that the U.S. economy is facing.

Jobs data trends are also an important factor and play a major role in decision making. Company performance and future performance predictions are critical to help judge policy direction.

Decisions on monetary policy easing would be based on a comprehensive analysis of all economic indicators and trends.

If the FED go BIG on a rate cut some say it could be very dangerous and spook the markets.

August 29, 2024September 12, 2025

Company says it can cut data centre energy use by 50% as AI boom places increased strain on power grids

Major technology corporations such as Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta are channelling billions into data centre infrastructures to bolster generative AI, which is causing a spike in energy demand.

Sustainable Metal Cloud has announced that its immersion cooling technology is 28% less expensive to install compared to other liquid-based cooling methods and can cut energy use by up to 50%.

The surge in artificial intelligence has increased the need for more robust processors and the energy to cool data centres.

This presents an opportunity for Sustainable Metal Cloud, which runs ‘sustainable AI factories’ consisting of HyperCubes located in Singapore and Australia.

These HyperCubes house servers equipped with Nvidia processors immersed in a synthetic oil known as polyalphaolefin, which is more effective at dissipating heat than air. The company claims this technology can reduce energy consumption by as much as 50% when compared to the conventional air-cooling systems found in most data centres.

Additionally, the Singapore-based company states that its immersion cooling technology is more cost-effective to install by 28% than other liquid cooling options. The HyperCubes are modular and can be integrated into any data centre, utilising spaces that are currently unoccupied within existing facilities.

What is a Hypercube?

Structure: A hypercube topology connects nodes in a way that each node is connected to others in a manner similar to the geometric hypercube. For example, in a 3-dimensional hypercube (a cube), each node is connected to three other nodes.
Scalability: This structure allows for efficient scaling. As the number of dimensions increases, the number of nodes that can be connected grows exponentially.
Fault Tolerance: Hypercube networks are known for their robustness. If one connection fails, there are multiple alternative paths for data to travel, ensuring reliability.

Benefits in data centres

High Performance: The multiple pathways in a hypercube network reduce latency and increase data transfer speeds, which is crucial for big tech companies handling vast amounts of data.
Efficient Resource Utilisation: The topology allows for better load balancing and resource allocation, optimising the performance of data centres.
Flexibility: Hypercube networks can easily adapt to changes in the network, such as adding or removing nodes, without significant reconfiguration.
Big Tech Companies: Companies like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft likely use hypercube topologies in their data centres to ensure high performance and reliability.
High-Performance Computing (HPC): Hypercube networks are also used in supercomputers and other HPC environments where efficient data transfer is critical.

August 22, 2024September 12, 2025

Microsoft to release Windows Recall AI search feature for testing as soon as October 2024

Microsoft announced on Wednesday 21st August 2024 that it will release the contentious Recall AI search feature for Windows users to test starting in October

Recall captures screenshots of on-screen activity, enabling users to search for previously seen information. Security experts raised immediate concerns about the potential risks of Windows capturing images automatically without user consent. In response, researchers developed open-source software demonstrating how attackers could easily access personal information.

Microsoft addressed these concerns in June 2024, stating that Recall would be disabled by default and promising security improvements for the feature.

While Microsoft has not provided a specific timeline for a wider release, it has introduced a new category of Windows PCs, termed Copilot+ PCs, which meet the system requirements for Recall. These PCs, produced by various manufacturers, are designed to handle AI workloads, and Microsoft has demonstrated Recall operating on these devices.

*Manufacturers are eager to demonstrate that AI models can run on local PCs, offering an alternative to cloud-based servers from companies like OpenAI. Following this trend, Apple has launched MacBooks capable of running AI models, and Microsoft’s latest Surface Pro is also a Copilot+ PC with local AI capabilities.

The timing of Recall’s broader release could be pivotal, as consumer interest in new computers may spike during the holiday season if Microsoft extends Recall to all compatible devices by that time.

*Is this a move away from AI cloud-based operations to some extent? AI tasks can easily be run in the cloud – why do we need an AI enabled device?

August 12, 2024September 12, 2025

Slower and smaller-than-expected rate cuts. A slowing U.S. economy and a potential AI bubble – does this all add up to a coming bear market?

The stock markets mix of toil and trouble is in the cauldron ready for a bear market in 2025, if not before.

Why?

Fed to resist reducing rates to the market’s desired 3.50%.
Profits unlikely from now on to fulfill expectations, because the U.S. economy is slowing.
AI sector is in or close to ‘bubble territory’.
Debt.
Geopolitical concerns.

These concerns are now all combining, and it will likely add-up to a bear market of around 25% in 2025 (this is my best guess).

Remember – make your own decisions and always, always do your own careful research. Seek professional financial advice if in doubt.

RESEARCH! RESEARCH! RESEARCH!

August 8, 2024September 12, 2025

Is the Fed fighting its own shadow?

Has the Fed over-cooked it this time by waiting too long to reduce interest rates?

U.S. stock markets threw a wobbly after the latest employment data and after the Fed delayed its first rate cut… again. September 2024 now looks likely for that first cut – but by how much: 0.25% or as high as 0.50%?

The latest batch of bad news for the U.S. economy has actually became bad news for stocks this time. For too long the ‘bad news’ has been taken as ‘good news’, especially regarding the likelihood of a Fed interest rate cut – and for the markets in general.

The Federal Reserve (Fed) is grappling with several challenges, including inflation, interest rates, and the broader U.S. and global economies.

Inflation

The Fed has been trying to control high inflation rates, which have been a significant concern. To combat inflation, the Fed has raised interest rates multiple times. Higher interest rates can help reduce inflation by slowing down borrowing and spending, but they can also slow economic growth.

Interest rates

By increasing interest rates, the Fed aims to make borrowing more expensive, which can help cool down an overheated economy. However, this can also lead to higher costs for consumers and businesses, potentially leading to reduced investment and spending.

Economic growth

The Fed’s policies are a balancing act. While they aim to control inflation, they also need to ensure that the economy doesn’t slow down too much. This balancing act can be challenging, especially when external factors like global economic conditions and geopolitical events come into play.

In essence, the Fed’s efforts to manage these issues can sometimes feel like ‘fighting its own shadow,’ as the consequences of their actions can create new challenges.

The timing of interest rate adjustments by the Federal Reserve is a topic of much debate among economists and policymakers.

Inflation control

The Fed’s primary goal in raising interest rates has been to control inflation. If inflation remains high, the Fed might be cautious about reducing rates too quickly to avoid a resurgence of inflation.

Economic indicators

The Fed closely monitors various economic indicators, such as employment rates, consumer spending, and GDP growth. If these indicators suggest that the economy is still strong, the Fed might delay reducing rates to ensure that inflation is fully under control.

Market reactions

Rapid changes in interest rates can cause volatility in financial markets. The Fed often aims for a gradual approach to avoid sudden shocks to the economy.

Global factors

The Fed also considers global economic conditions. For example, if other major economies are experiencing slow growth or financial instability, the Fed might be more cautious in adjusting rates.

Ultimately, the decision to reduce interest rates involves balancing the need to support economic growth with the risk of reigniting inflation. It’s a complex decision with significant implications for the U.S. and global economies.

Looks like the Fed overcooked it this time – but by how much?

August 5, 2024September 12, 2025

Short-sighted policy U-turn as the UK Labour government cancels £1.3 billion of computing projects

A real set-back for UK AI global ambition

The new Labour government has withdrawn £1.3bn in funding previously pledged by the Conservatives for technology and Artificial Intelligence (AI) initiatives.

This includes £800m allocated for the development of an exascale supercomputer at Edinburgh University and an additional £500m for the AI Research Resource, which provides computing power for AI. These funds were announced less than a year ago.

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) stated that although the funds were promised by the former administration, they were not included in its budget. The decision has faced criticism from some within the industry.

Another blow for the UK’s homegrown tech sector.

July 8, 2024September 12, 2025

Is the world shackled to debt?

The world is in debt to the tune of $315 trillion, and counting.

$315,000,000,000,000

$315 trillion or $315,000,000,000,000 is a daunting number, it’s massive. In 2024, the global GDP reached just $109.5 trillion, just over a third of the global debt figure.

Perspective

To provide some perspective, with the world population at roughly 8.1 billion, if the debt were distributed evenly, each person would shoulder about $39,000 in debt.

As global debt reaches unprecedented levels, concerns naturally arise about its implications and origins.

Global debt

Global debt includes borrowings by households, businesses, and governments.

Household debt

Household debt, which many are familiar with, comprises mortgages, credit cards, and student loans. At the beginning of 2024, it stood at $59.1 trillion.

Corporate debt

Corporate debt, utilized by businesses for operations and growth, reached $164.5 trillion, with the financial sector contributing $70.4 trillion.

Government debt

Government debt, on the other hand, finances public services and projects without raising taxes. It can be obtained from other nations or institutions like the World Bank and the IMF, or through bond sales, which are essentially promises to pay with interest from the state to investors.

Public debt

Public debt was reported to be $91.4 trillion. While often perceived negatively, debt can be advantageous, supporting individuals in education and homeownership, aiding business expansion, and providing governments with means for economic development, social expenditures, or crisis management.

History

Historical evidence shows that public debt has been around for at least 2000 years, mainly for establishing settlements and financing wars, with governments accruing significant debts from conflicts such as the Napoleonic Wars.

Debt engulfs us all and is here to stay, but at what cost to society?

And who do we owe?

June 20, 2024September 12, 2025

The unloved stock market rally: exploring why many investors are hesitant to embrace this record-breaking run

The unloved rally: A paradox

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq have been reaching all-time highs with remarkable frequency, notching nearly thirty record days in 2024, including four in the past week. Despite this stellar performance, a considerable number of investors remain hesitant. Let’s explore the reasons behind this paradox.

Lingering recession fears

The recollection of the 2022 bear market continues to trouble investors. The swift escalation of monetary policy by the Federal Reserve at that time generated widespread uncertainty and apprehension. This has led many investors to maintain a cautious stance, concerned that the past may repeat, even amidst a surging market. Maybe less of us expected the AI driven stock buying frenzy to scale such highs so quickly?

Scepticism

Investors are inherently sceptical. Amidst a relentless market rally, uncertainty emerges. Can this be sustained? Is a correction looming? This scepticism may hinder investors from wholeheartedly participating in a bull market, despite what the statistics indicate.

Emotional baggage

Investment isn’t solely a game of numbers; it’s equally a matter of emotions (although it shouldn’t be). Investors bearing the scars of past losses may find their emotional baggage weighing heavily on their decisions. The fear of experiencing another market crash can cloud rational judgement, leading them to forgo opportunities for potential gains.

The ‘easy money’

The stock market’s significant rise from the lows of 2022 has convinced some that the phase of ‘easy money’ is over. Investors who did not capitalize on the early stages of the rally might think they have missed out, causing hesitation to engage fully. That’s where I am right now – but waiting for a ‘pullback’.

Navigating the dilemma

For individuals caught between caution and the fear of missing out (FOMO), the following strategies could be considered.

Diversification

Distribute your investments among various asset classes. Diversification serves to reduce risk and acts as a safeguard against the unpredictability of the market.

Long-term perspective

Keep in mind that investing is akin to a marathon, not a sprint. It’s important to concentrate on long-term objectives instead of short-term market movements.

Education

Inform yourself about market cycles, historical patterns, and the effects of monetary policy. This should empower more informed decision-making.

Professional advice

Consult a financial advisor who can guide you based on your individual circumstances and risk tolerance.

Conclusion

The current stock market rally, though not widely embraced, offers both opportunities and challenges. Investors are tasked with finding the right balance between exercising caution and capitalizing on potential growth. As the market climbs, it’s essential to be aware of our biases and emotions. Only then can we approach the rally with a more informed viewpoint.

Disclaimer: This article provides general insights and should not be considered personalised financial advice. Always consult a professional before making investment decisions.