China’s restriction of rare earth materials hurts

Chinas rare earth material dominance

China’s recent export restrictions on rare earth elements are sending shockwaves through multiple industries worldwide.

As the curbs continue to take effect, sectors reliant on these critical minerals—including automotive, defence, and clean energy—are beginning to feel the strain.

China controls about 60–70% of global rare earth production and nearly 90% of the refining capacity.

Even when rare earths are mined elsewhere, they’re often sent to China for processing, since few countries have the infrastructure or environmental tolerance to handle the complex and polluting refining process.

In April 2025, China introduced export controls on seven key rare earth elements and permanent magnets, citing national interests and responding to rising trade tensions—particularly with the U.S.

Automotive industry in crisis

The auto sector is among the hardest hit. Rare earth elements are essential for both combustion engines and electric vehicles, particularly in the production of magnets used in motors and batteries.

European auto suppliers have already reported production shutdowns due to dwindling inventories.

Germany’s car industry, a global powerhouse, has reportedly warned that further disruptions could bring manufacturing to a standstill.

Japan’s Nissan and Suzuki have also expressed concerns, with Suzuki reportedly halting production of its Swift model due to shortages.

Defence and technology sectors at risk

China’s dominance in rare earth refining, controlling nearly 90% of global capacity, poses a strategic challenge for defense industries.

The U.S. military relies heavily on these materials for missile guidance systems, radar technology, and advanced electronics.

With nearly 78% of defence platforms dependent on Chinese-processed rare earths, the restrictions expose vulnerabilities in national security.

Clean energy ambitions under threat

The clean energy transition depends on rare earths for wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicle batteries.

China’s curbs threaten global efforts to reduce carbon emissions, forcing countries to scramble for alternative sources. India’s electric vehicle sector, for instance, faces potential setbacks as manufacturers struggle to secure supplies.

As industries grapple with these disruptions, governments and corporations are urgently seeking solutions. Whether through diplomatic negotiations or investment in domestic rare earth production, the race is on to mitigate the fallout from China’s tightening grip on these critical resources.

Several countries have significant rare earth reserves and can supply these materials in high quantities.

Top rare earth materials suppliers

China – The dominant player, with 44 million metric tons of reserves.

Brazil – Holds 21 million metric tons of rare earth reserves.

Vietnam – Has 22 million metric tons, making it a rising supplier.

India – Contains 6.9 million metric tons.

Australia – A key producer with 5.7 million metric tons.

Russia – Holds 10 million metric tons.

United States – While not a leading producer, it has 1.8 million metric tons.

Greenland – An emerging supplier with 1.5 million metric tons.

China remains the largest supplier, but countries like Brazil, Vietnam, and Australia are working to expand their production to reduce reliance on Chinese exports.

Ukraine?

Ukraine reportedly has significant reserves of rare earth elements, including titanium, lithium, graphite, and uranium. These minerals are crucial for industries such as defence, aerospace, and green energy.

However, the ongoing conflict with Russia has disrupted access to many of these deposits, with some now under Russian control.

Despite these challenges, Ukraine is being considered for strategic raw material projects by the European Union, aiming to strengthen supply chains and reduce reliance on China. The country’s mineral wealth could play a key role in post-war recovery and global supply diversification

Greenland?

Greenland is emerging as a key player in the global rare earth supply chain. The European Union has recently selected Greenland for new raw material projects aimed at securing critical minerals.

The island holds significant deposits of rare earth elements, including graphite, which is essential for battery production.

However, Greenland faces challenges in developing its rare earth industry, including harsh terrain, environmental concerns, and geopolitical tensions.

The U.S. and EU are keen to reduce reliance on China, which dominates rare earth processing, and Greenland’s resources could play a crucial role in this effort.

Greenland has indicated it has little desire to be transformed into a mining territory. It could have little choice.

Canada?

Canada is emerging as a significant player in the rare earth supply chain. The country has over 15.2 million tonnes of rare earth oxide reserves, making it one of the largest known sources globally.

Recently, Canada opened its first commercial rare earth elements refinery, marking a major step toward reducing reliance on Chinese processing.

The facility, located in Saskatchewan, aims to produce 400 tonnes of neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) metals per year, enough for 500,000 electric vehicles annually.

Additionally, Canada is investing in critical minerals infrastructure to unlock rare earth development in Northern Quebec and Labrador.

The government has allocated $10 million to support mining projects, including the Strange Lake Rare Earth Project, which contains globally significant quantities of dysprosium, neodymium, praseodymium, and terbium.

Rare earth materials are a necessity for our modern technological lives – big tech tells us this. The hunger for these products needs to be fed, and China, right now, does the feeding.

And the beast needs to be fed.

Shock but no ‘awe’ in Trump’s first 100 days in office

Sledgehammer policies

U.S. President Donald Trump has definitely brought a lot of shock in the first 100 days of his presidency, smashing trade links, alliances, and even his own government, but it can hardly be said to have left anybody truly in ‘awe’.

Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office during his second term have been a whirlwind of activity, marked by bold moves and significant controversy.

His poll rating is the lowest of any President of recent times for the first 100 days. It currently sits at around 41% (a CNN poll result suggests).

How does it compare?

Harry S. Truman, hit a rock-bottom approval rating of 22% in 1952. Other presidents like Richard Nixon and George W. Bush also dipped below 25%. But these were during their terms and not in the first 100 days.

His administration has focused heavily on reshaping trade policies, imposing tariffs that have disrupted global markets and strained relationships with long-standing allies.

Despite his claims of progress, no major trade deals have been finalised, leaving many questioning the effectiveness of his approach.

Legal challenges

Domestically, Trump’s policies have faced significant legal challenges, with numerous lawsuits filed against his administration. His stance on immigration and energy has sparked heated debates, reflecting the polarising nature of his decisions.

Trump’s ‘drill-baby-drill’ mantra has not had the desire reaction – oil prices has fallen with U.S. oil below $65 a barrel.

The automotive industry, for instance, has grappled with regulatory uncertainty and additional costs due to his tariffs, prompting him to soften some measures in response to industry concerns.

Internationally, Trump’s actions have raised concerns about U.S. credibility and stability. His hostile stance toward traditional allies, such as Canada, the EU and NATO, has left multi-decade relationships in tatters.

Meanwhile, his administration’s handling of the ongoing war in Ukraine and trade negotiations with China has drawn criticism for its lack of tangible results.

Despite these challenges, Trump remains confident in his vision for America. He has claimed progress in tariff negotiations with India, suggesting that a trade deal may be on the horizon.

No deals… yet

There has not been a single trade deal concluded with Trump’s administration – despite him reportedly claiming to have done ‘200 deals’ with only 195 countries in the world.

China is still striking a defiant tone on trade, and the war in Ukraine rages on. The president has also been forced to walk back on his “reciprocal tariffs.” 

However, his administration’s approach has left many wondering whether his first 100 days will be remembered for their impact or their controversy.

As the dust settles, the world watches closely to see how Trump’s policies will shape the future of the United States and its role on the global stage.

Trump may have wanted his first 100 days to be historic, and they were – but for all the wrong reasons.  

Trump announces 25% tariffs on car imports to U.S. and pledges pharma tariffs to come

Trump's Tariffs

Trump’s tariffs have been a cornerstone of his trade policy, aimed at protecting American industries and reducing trade deficits

These measures include tariffs on steel, aluminum, and a wide range of goods from countries like China, Canada, and the European Union.

While supporters argue that these tariffs have bolstered domestic manufacturing and created jobs, critics highlight the retaliatory tariffs imposed by other nations, which have affected American exporters.

President Donald Trump said he will soon announce tariffs targeting automobiles and pharmaceuticals.

Trump later added the timber and semiconductor industries to his list.

It was unclear whether the newly announced sector-specific tariffs would take effect after the tit-for-tat ‘reciprocal tariffs’ – which are set to take effect on for 2nd April 2025

The president’s latest comments at a Cabinet meeting came hours after he unveiled a plan to place 25% tariffs on all countries that buy oil and gas from Venezuela.

Trump’s tariffs have had widespread economic effects, both domestically and globally

Higher Prices for Consumers

Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, which often leads to higher prices for consumers. This can reduce purchasing power and affect living standards.

Impact on Businesses

Companies relying on imported materials face higher production costs due to tariffs. Some businesses may pass these costs onto consumers, while others might struggle to remain competitive.

Retaliatory Measures

Countries affected by U.S. tariffs often impose their own tariffs on American goods. This can hurt U.S. exporters and lead to trade wars.

Economic Growth

Studies suggest that tariffs can reduce GDP growth. For example, the U.S. GDP has been estimated to decrease by 0.4% due to these measures.

Employment

While tariffs aim to protect domestic jobs, they can also lead to job losses in industries affected by higher input costs or reduced export opportunities.

Global Trade Dynamics

Tariffs disrupt international trade relationships, leading to uncertainty and reduced investment in affected sectors.

These measures have sparked retaliatory tariffs from other countries, creating a complex web of trade disputes further sowing chaos and unrest.

Markets have reacted negatively to Trumps tariffs.

One thing is certain regarding the imposition of Trump’s tariffs – consumers suffer!

Trump and his tariff agenda

Trade tariffs

The United States has intensified its tariff policies, marking a significant shift in global trade dynamics

On 4th March 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping increase in tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, raising them to 25% across the board. This move, aimed at bolstering domestic industries, has sparked widespread reactions both domestically and internationally.

The tariffs, which now include a broader range of products such as nuts, bolts, and soda cans, have drawn sharp criticism from key U.S. allies, including Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia.

U.S and the EU

The European Union has responded with countermeasures, imposing tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods, set to take effect on 1st April 2025. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed regret over the U.S. decision but emphasised the need to protect European consumers and businesses.

Domestically, the tariffs have been met with mixed reactions. While U.S. steel and aluminum producers have welcomed the measures, citing potential job creation and increased investment, downstream manufacturers that rely on these metals are bracing for higher costs.

Economists warn that the tariffs could lead to increased prices for consumers and potential disruptions in supply chains. Trump has indicated many times that the tariffs levelled at the U.S. are unfair and unequal.

The Trump administration has justified the tariffs as a means to encourage foreign companies to establish manufacturing facilities in the United States. However, critics argue that the policy could backfire, leading to retaliatory measures from trading partners and a potential slowdown in global economic growth.

As the global trade landscape continues to evolve, the long-term impact of these tariffs remains uncertain. Businesses and policymakers alike are closely monitoring the situation, weighing the potential benefits of protecting domestic industries against the risks of escalating trade tensions.

The coming weeks and months will be crucial in determining the effectiveness of this bold and possibly misguided economic strategy.

U.S. and Canada

The trade relationship between the U.S. and Canada has recently faced significant strain due to escalating tariff policies.

President Donald Trump announced a sharp increase in tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, raising them from 25% to 50%. This decision was reportedly in response to Ontario’s provincial government imposing higher electricity prices on U.S. customers.

However, after discussions between Ontario Premier Doug Ford and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Ontario agreed to pause the electricity surcharge.

As a result, the U.S. decided to maintain the original 25% tariff rate instead of doubling it. Despite this temporary resolution, tensions remain high, with Canada preparing to implement retaliatory tariffs on $30 billion worth of American goods.

These developments highlight the ongoing challenges in U.S. – Canada trade relations, with both nations navigating the complexities of economic and political interests.

U.S. and China

The U.S. – China trade tensions have escalated significantly in recent months. President Donald Trump recently imposed a 20% tariff on all imports from China, reportedly citing concerns over China’s role in the flow of fentanyl into the U.S.

This move has reignited the trade war that began during Trump’s first term.

In response, China has implemented retaliatory measures, including a 15% tariff on U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) and coal, as well as a 10% tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery, and large-engine cars.

Additionally, China has restricted the export of rare earth minerals and metals, which are critical for U.S. tech and green energy industries.

Both nations have expressed a willingness to engage in dialogue, but the situation remains tense. The economic impact of these tariffs is being closely monitored, as they have the potential to disrupt global supply chains and affect industries worldwide.

U.S. and Mexico

The U.S. – Mexico trade conflict has intensified with the U.S. imposing a 25% tariff on Mexican imports, excluding oil and energy products, which face a 10% tariff.

This decision, aimed at addressing trade deficits and border concerns, prompted Mexico to announce retaliatory tariffs targeting $20 billion worth of U.S. goods. Critics argue these measures undermine the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and could disrupt supply chains.

Both nations are bracing for the economic impact, with businesses and consumers facing potential cost increases. This trade dispute highlights the challenges of balancing domestic priorities while maintaining strong international partnerships in a connected global economy.

And there’s more…

Russia and Ukraine peace deal according to Trump. Taking rare earth and other minerals from Ukraine in a ‘deal’. The potential reshaping of Gaza to become the riviera of the middle east. Talk of taking over Greenland. Making Canada the 51st state. etc. etc.

And this is just what we already know after 8 weeks of Trump in power!

Global markets slide into chaos as Trump pushes his ‘America First Agenda’

U.S. tariffs

Global markets have been thrown into turmoil following the announcement of sweeping tariffs by U.S. President Donald Trump

U.S. tariffs, which include a 25% levy on imports from Canada and Mexico and a 10% increase on Chinese goods, have sparked fears of a global trade war. Retaliatory measures from Canada and China have only added to the uncertainty, sending shockwaves through financial markets worldwide.

The FTSE 100, London’s blue-chip index, fell by 1.3%, marking its steepest decline since October last year. Across the Atlantic, Wall Street saw significant losses, with the S&P 500 dropping 1.6% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 1.7%. European markets were not spared, as Germany’s DAX and France’s CAC 40 plunged by 3.5% and 2.1%.

Investors are increasingly concerned about the long-term implications of these tariffs. The measures threaten to disrupt global supply chains, inflate costs, and dampen economic growth. Analysts warn that prolonged trade tensions could push the global economy closer to a recession.

The tariffs have also had a notable impact on currency markets. The U.S. dollar weakened against major currencies, with the pound rising to a six-week high of $1.27. Meanwhile, safe-haven assets like gold saw a surge in demand, with prices climbing above $2,900 per ounce.

Oil markets were not immune to the fallout, as Brent crude futures dropped to a three-month low of $70.65 per barrel. The decline reflects growing concerns over reduced demand amid escalating trade tensions.

As the world braces for further economic uncertainty, the focus now shifts to how global leaders will navigate these turbulent waters.

The stakes are high, and the path forward remains uncertain.

Trump’s tariffs tumble markets!

Stocks go red!

Trump’s tariffs have created fresh concern and new volatility in the markets forcing a stock market reversal.

The tariffs, which include a 25% duty on imports from Mexico and Canada, as well as a 10% levy on Chinese goods, have led to significant market volatility.

Investors remain cautious as they assess the long-term implications of these trade restrictions. The tariffs are expected to raise inflation in the U.S. and could potentially lead to a severe market correction.

It’s a complex situation with far-reaching consequences for global trade and the economy.

The S&P 500 retreated on Monday, extending February’s rout and turning red for the year after President Donald Trump’s confirmation of forthcoming tariffs.

The S&P 500 index fell to end at 5849, marking its worst day since December 2024 and bringing its year-to-date performance to a loss of about 0.5%.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 649 points to finish at 43191. The Nasdaq Composite slid to close at 18350, weighed down by Nvidia’s decline of more than 8%.

Stocks took a notable leg down in the afternoon following President Trump’s reiteration that 25% levies on imports from Mexico and Canada would go into effect on Tuesday 5th March 2025, dashing investors’ hopes of a last-minute deal to avert the full tariffs on the two U.S. allies.

All three indexes traded in positive territory earlier in the day, with the Dow rising nearly 200 points at session highs.

China retaliated with reciprocal tariffs of 15% on some U.S. goods due to take effect 10th. March 2025.

Is the world order being dramatically upended?

Tariff Man – Trumps tariffs take affect – markets fall!

U.S. Tariffs

U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs have moved from threat to reality.

U.S. President Donald Trump launched a series of tariffs on Saturday. U.S. imports from Mexico and Canada will face a 25% duty, while those from China will be subject to a 10% tariff. Energy resources from Canada will face a lower 10% tariff.

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced on the same day retaliatory tariffs of 25% against $155 billion in U.S. goods. Industry leaders in the U.S. have expressed concern over those tariffs.

They cap off a wild start to the new year during which a new U.S. president entered the White House and a new Chinese artificial intelligence player, DeepSeek upended the industry.

Indices at new highs

Something else that was new in January: the highest-ever closing level for the S&P 500, Dow Jones and new FTSE 100 highs were enjoyed too.

With tariffs now in effect and the possibility of a trade war looming markets may struggle to new heights in the short term.

Even Big Tech earnings and the jobs numbers coming out this week, typically market-moving reports, are likely to play second fiddle to policy developments.

Markets react

Markets are already responding to the news. Prices of oil and gold, which typically rise during periods of volatility, have increased, but Bitcoin is trading lower. It remains uncertain whether these will be a temporary shock or a sustained trend.

China’s factory activity experienced slower growth in January 2025 compared to December 2024 and is expected to be adversely affected as U.S. companies seek to reduce their dependence on Chinese imports.

Trump’s current tariffs may be targeted, but it’s hard to see any country or sector escaping the tariff turmoil.

The EU is also in line for a tariff attack and maybe the UK after.

Big tech companies pledge AI safety commitments

AI Kill Switch!

Leading technology companies, such as Microsoft, Amazon, and OpenAI, have united under a significant international accord for artificial intelligence (AI) safety measures, established at the Seoul AI Safety Summit on Tuesday 21st May 2024.

Following the agreement, firms from various nations, including the UK, China, Canada, the U.S., France, South Korea, and the United Arab Emirates, have pledged to voluntarily commit to the secure development of their cutting-edge AI models.

Framework

AI model developers who have not already done so agreed to issue safety frameworks that detail how they will address the challenges posed by their advanced models, including the prevention of technology misuse by malicious entities.

These frameworks will feature ‘red lines’ that tech companies will establish to delineate the types of risks associated with advanced AI systems that are deemed ‘unacceptable.’ These risks encompass, but are not limited to, automated cyberattacks and the potential for bioweapons.

Kill switch

In the event of such dire scenarios, companies have declared their intention to introduce a ‘kill switch’ that would halt the development of their AI models should they be unable to ensure the mitigation of these risks.

“It is unprecedented for so many prominent AI firms from diverse regions of the world to concur on identical commitments regarding AI safety,” Rishi Sunak, the UK Prime Minister reportedly said on Tuesday 21st May 2024.

He further noted that these commitments would guarantee that the world’s foremost AI companies will maintain transparency and accountability concerning their safe AI development strategies.

This agreement builds upon a prior set of pledges made in November 2023 by entities engaged in the creation of generative AI software.

The involved companies have consented to seek feedback on these standards from ‘trusted actors,’ which include their respective national governments when suitable, prior to their publication in anticipation of the forthcoming AI summit – the AI Action Summit scheduled to take place in France in early 2025.