Month: October 2025

Posted on

Which of the AI bubble indicators are we already seeing? Should we be concerned?

Bubble in AI

We’re already seeing multiple classic bubble indicators: extreme valuations (Buffett Indicator, Shiller CAPE), record retail participation, AI-driven hype, and surging margin debt—all pointing to elevated risk.

Key Bubble Indicators Already Present

📈 Buffett Indicator (Market Cap to GDP) This ratio is at historically high levels, suggesting stocks are significantly overvalued relative to the economy. Warren Buffett himself has warned investors may be “playing with fire”.

📊 Shiller CAPE Ratio Another respected valuation metric, the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, is also elevated—indicating unsustainable earnings multiples and potential for correction.

🧠 AI-driven speculation The rally is heavily concentrated in AI and tech stocks, with some analysts calling it a “toxic calm” before a crash. Search volume for ‘AI bubble‘ is at record highs, and billionaire Paul Tudor Jones has issued warnings.

📉 Retail investor frenzy A record 62% of Americans now own stocks, with $51 trillion at stake. This surge in retail participation is reminiscent of past bubbles, where optimism outpaces caution.

📌 New market highs The Nasdaq, S&P 500, and Dow have hit dozens of new highs in recent months. While bullish on the surface, this pace of gains often precedes sharp reversals.

💸 Margin debt and risk appetite Risk-taking is accelerating, with margin debt climbing and speculative behavior increasing. Analysts note this as a historically bad sign when paired with euphoric sentiment.

What’s Not Yet Peaking (But Worth Watching)

IPO and SPAC volume: While not at 2021 levels, any surge here could signal speculative excess.

Corporate earnings vs. valuations: Some firms still show strong earnings, but the disconnect is widening.

Narrative dominance: AI optimism is strong, but hasn’t fully eclipsed fundamentals—yet.

How far away are we from the AI bubble popping?

Will it deflate slowly or burst?

Posted on

Cathie Wood Warns of AI Market Top-Heavy Risks Amid Strategic Portfolio Shifts

AI stock warning

Cathie Wood, CEO of ARK Invest, has once again stirred debate in financial circles by cautioning that the artificial intelligence (AI) sector may be growing top-heavy.

While she remains bullish on the long-term potential of AI technologies, Wood has signalled concern over the concentration of capital in a handful of dominant players—particularly those driving the S&P 500’s recent surge.

Speaking during a recent investor forum in Saudi Arabia, Wood dismissed fears of an outright AI bubble but acknowledged the risk of valuation corrections as interest rates climb and market exuberance outpaces fundamentals.

Her remarks come as ARK Invest continues to rebalance its portfolio, trimming exposure to overvalued tech giants while increasing stakes in emerging AI innovators such as Baidu and Robinhood.

Wood’s flagship ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has rebounded sharply in 2025, up over 87% year-on-year, largely fuelled by AI-related holdings.

Yet she reportedly remains wary of the ‘Mag 7’ effect—where a small cluster of mega-cap stocks like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Alphabet dominate investor attention and index weightings.

Strategy

This concentration, she argues, distorts broader market signals and risks sidelining promising mid-cap disruptors.

In response, ARK has shed positions in AMD and Shopify while doubling down on Baidu, a move that reflects Wood’s belief in underappreciated AI plays beyond Silicon Valley.

Her strategy underscores a broader thesis: that the next wave of AI growth will come from decentralised platforms, edge computing, and global innovators—not just the usual suspects.

While critics remain divided on her timing and tactics, Wood’s portfolio adjustments suggest a nuanced approach—one that embraces AI’s transformative power while resisting the gravitational pull of overhyped valuations.

For investors watching the sector’s evolution, her message is clear: beware the weight of giants.

Posted on

Microsoft Azure suffered a major global outage on 29th October 2025, disrupting services across industries and platforms

Microsoft outage

Microsoft Azure experienced a widespread outage on 29th October, beginning around 16:00 UTC, which affected thousands of users and businesses globally.

The disruption stemmed from issues with Azure Front Door, Microsoft’s content delivery network, and cascaded into failures across Microsoft 365, Xbox, Minecraft, and numerous third-party services reliant on Azure infrastructure.

Major retailers such as Costco and Starbucks, as well as airlines including Alaska and Hawaiian, reported system failures that hindered customer access and internal operations.

Users struggled with authentication, hosting, and server connectivity, with DownDetector logging a surge in complaints from 15:45 GMT onwards.

Microsoft acknowledged the problem on its Azure status page, attributing the outage to a suspected configuration change.

Full service restoration was achieved by about 23:20 UTC, though the timing coincided awkwardly with Microsoft’s Q1 FY26 earnings report, where Azure was reportedly highlighted as its fastest-growing segment.

The incident underscores the critical dependence on cloud infrastructure and raises questions about resilience and contingency planning.

As businesses increasingly migrate to cloud platforms, the ripple effects of such outages become more pronounced, impacting not just productivity, but public trust in digital reliability.

AWS has also experienced outage issues recently.

Posted on

Nvidia has become the first company in history to surpass a $5 trillion market valuation, marking a seismic shift in global tech leadership

Nvidia at $5 trillion Valuation

In October 2025, Nvidia’s stock surged past $207 per share, lifting its market capitalisation to $5.06 trillion. Once a niche graphics chip maker, Nvidia now powers the backbone of artificial intelligence worldwide.

CEO Jensen Huang confirmed over $500 billion in chip orders and plans for seven U.S. supercomputers.

This milestone, reached just three months after crossing $4 trillion, places Nvidia ahead of Microsoft and Apple, cementing its dominance in the AI era and redefining the future of computing.

Nvidia one-year chart as of October 2025

Nvidia one-year chart as of October 2025 passes $5 trillion Market Cap

Posted on

The U.S. Federal Reserve has cut interest rates by 0.25%, lowering the federal funds rate to a range of 3.75%–4.00%

U.S. interest rate cut October 2025

This marks the second consecutive cut in 2025 amid economic uncertainty and a government data blackout.

In a move aimed at supporting growth, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate by 0.25% following its October policy meeting.

The decision, reportedly backed by a 10–2 vote from the Federal Open Market Committee, reflects growing concern over a weakening labour market and subdued consumer confidence.

Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged the challenges posed by the ongoing U.S. government shutdown, which has delayed key economic reports.

With official data frozen, the Fed relied on private indicators showing a slowdown in hiring and modest inflation. The Consumer Price Index rose just 3% year-on-year, below the Fed’s long-term target.

While the rate cut aims to ease borrowing costs and stimulate investment, Powell cautioned against assuming further reductions in December.

He emphasised that future decisions would depend on incoming data and evolving risks. It is not a done deal.

The Fed also announced plans to end quantitative tightening (QT) by 1st December 2025, signalling a broader shift towards monetary easing.

Markets responded cautiously, with investors weighing the implications for growth, inflation, and the Fed’s credibility.

Markets, after a short rally during the week, were subdued after the announcement.

AI is still the bull run driver

Posted on

Gold goes cold – but it’s not a melt-down

Gold pulls back

Gold has entered a correction phase as of late October 2025, following a record-breaking rally earlier this year.

The Correction in Context

  • Gold surged over 55% in 2025, reaching an all-time high of nearly $4,400 per ounce before sharply reversing course.
  • On 21st October 2025, gold experienced its steepest intraday drop in 12 years, falling over 6% in a single day.
  • This pullback followed nine consecutive weeks of gains, marking a classic technical correction after an overheated rally.

What’s Driving the Pullback?

  • Profit-taking: Many institutional investors began locking in gains after the massive run-up.
  • Stronger U.S. dollar: A rising dollar has historically pressured gold prices lower.
  • Easing geopolitical tensions: Particularly between the U.S. and China, which reduced safe-haven demand.
  • Technical overbought signals: Analysts flagged a ‘blow-off top’ pattern, similar to 2006, suggesting a short-term peak.

What’s Next?

Some analysts believe this is a healthy reset, not the end of the gold bull run.

Others warn of a further $300–$400 downside risk, especially if profit-taking accelerates.

Despite the correction, long-term fundamentals—like inflation concerns and geopolitical uncertainty—remain supportive of gold.

Gold is still up, and its safe haven status is still very much intact.

Posted on

Amazon’s AI Pivot Triggers Historic Layoffs Amid AI Productivity Drive

Amazon cutting workers to introduce more AI

Amazon has reportedly announced its largest corporate restructuring to date, with plans to lay off up to 30,000 white-collar employees.

This represents nearly 10% of its global office workforce—as it accelerates its transition toward artificial intelligence and automation-led operations.

The move, confirmed on 28th October 2025, marks a dramatic shift in the tech giant’s internal priorities.

CEO Andy Jassy has framed the layoffs as part of a broader effort to streamline management. The company appears to want to eliminate bureaucratic inefficiencies and reallocate resources toward AI infrastructure.

‘We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs’, Jassy is reported as saying.

Affected departments span human resources, logistics, customer service, and Amazon Web Services (AWS). Many roles are deemed redundant due to AI integration.

Heavy investment

The company has been investing heavily in machine learning systems. These are capable of handling tasks ranging from inventory forecasting to customer support. This approach has prompted the reevaluation of traditional staffing models.

While Amazon employs over 1.5 million people globally, the layoffs target its 350,000 corporate staff, signalling a significant recalibration of its white-collar operations.

It was reported that the job cuts were delivered via email, underscoring the impersonal nature of the transition.

The timing of the announcement—just ahead of the holiday season—has raised eyebrows across the industry.

Analysts suggest Amazon is betting on AI to offset seasonal labour demands and long-term cost pressures. However, this risks reputational fallout and internal morale issues.

Structural challenges

Critics argue that the scale of the layoffs reflects deeper structural challenges, including overhiring during the pandemic and a growing reliance on technology to solve human-centred problems.

Others see it as a bellwether for the wider tech sector, where AI is increasingly viewed as both a productivity boon and a disruptive force.

As Amazon reshapes its workforce for an AI-driven future, questions remain about the social and ethical implications of such rapid automation.

For now, the company appears resolute: leaner, faster, and more algorithmically efficient—even if it means leaving tens of thousands behind in the process.

But, AI is also creating job opportunities in other areas.

Posted on

China’s Industrial Profits Surge 21.6% in September 2025, Marking Strongest Growth in Nearly Two Years

Industrial profit surge in China September 2025

China’s industrial sector roared back to life in September, posting a 21.6% year-on-year increase in profits— reportedly the sharpest monthly gain in approximately two years.

The rebound offers a glimmer of optimism for the world’s second-largest economy, which has been grappling with sluggish domestic demand and a challenging global trade environment.

According to data released by China’s National Bureau of Statistics, the profit growth was broad-based, reportedly with 30 out of 41 major industrial sectors returning gains.

Key areas

Key contributors included the equipment manufacturing and automotive industries, both of which benefited from policy support and a modest uptick in consumer sentiment.

Analysts reportedly suggest the surge reflects a combination of easing input costs, improved factory output, and a low base effect from the previous year.

However, they caution that the momentum may not be sustainable without deeper structural reforms and stronger domestic consumption.

The September figures follow a 17.2% rise in August, indicating a tentative recovery trend after months of contraction earlier in the year.

Up but down

Still, cumulative profits for the first nine months of 2025 reportedly remain down 9% compared to the same period last year, underscoring the uneven nature of the recovery.

Beijing has recently stepped up efforts to stabilise the economy, including targeted fiscal stimulus and measures to support private enterprise.

Whether these gains can be sustained into the final quarter remains to be seen, but for now, September’s data offers a rare bright spot in an otherwise subdued industrial landscape.

Posted on

Stock market roundup of latest all-time highs! October 2025

Stocks hit all-time high

Scaling the Summit: Markets Hit Record Highs Amid Global Uncertainty led by the Nasdaq and S&P 500 reflecting the AI race

Global stock hit new highs October 2025

🌍 Country📈 Index Name🗓️ Date🔝 Closing Value
🇺🇸 United StatesS&P 500Oct 276,875.16
🇺🇸 United StatesDow JonesOct 2747,544.59
🇺🇸 United StatesNasdaq CompositeOct 2723,637.46
🇬🇧 United KingdomFTSE 100Oct 249,662.00
🇳🇱 NetherlandsAEX IndexOct 28966.82
🇮🇳 IndiaNifty 50Oct 2825,966
🇮🇳 IndiaSensexOct 2884,778.84
🇯🇵 JapanNikkei 225Oct 2850,342.25
🇯🇵 JapanTOPIXOct 283,285.87

These rallies were largely fueled by optimism over a potential U.S.–China trade deal, cooler inflation data, and expectations of interest rate cuts from the Fed.

Is there a market crash, correction or a pullback coming to a stock market near you soon?

Posted on

U.S. Inflation Slows Slightly in September, Easing Pressure on Fed

U.S. Inflation data

The latest U.S. inflation figures show a modest increase in consumer prices. The annual rate rose to 3.0% in September 2025, up from 2.9% in August. 2025.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased by 0.3% month-on-month, slightly below economists’ expectations.

Core inflation—which excludes volatile food and energy prices—also rose by 0.2% in September. This brought the year-on-year rate to 3.0%, again undercutting forecasts of 3.1%.

A notable contributor to the headline figure was a 4.1% surge in petrol prices. This offset declines in other areas such as used vehicles and household furnishings.

Federal Reserve

The data arrives just ahead of the Federal Reserve’s next policy meeting, where a 0.5% rate cut is widely anticipated. Softer inflation readings have buoyed market sentiment, with futures posting gains on hopes of looser monetary policy.

Despite a partial government shutdown, the inflation report was released on schedule, underscoring its significance for financial markets and policymakers.

With inflation now hovering near the Fed’s target, attention turns to wage growth and consumer spending as key indicators of future price stability.

The next CPI update is due mid-November.

This CPI news added to the possibility of a Fed rate cut in conjunction to the possibility of a U.S. China ‘tariff trade’ deal and relaxation of Rare Earth material sales pushed markets to new all-time highs!

Posted on

Changpeng Zhao Walks Free: Crypto’s Controversial King Returns

Crypto King pardoned

Changpeng Zhao, better known as CZ, has been released from prison following a high-profile pardon by President Donald Trump.

The Binance founder had served a four-month sentence after pleading guilty to violating U.S. anti-money laundering laws—a conviction that formed part of a $4.3 billion settlement with the Department of Justice.

CZ’s release marks a dramatic turning point in the U.S. government’s approach to cryptocurrency regulation. Once emblematic of the Biden administration’s crackdown on crypto platforms, CZ now reportedly finds himself at the centre of a political pivot.

Trump’s pardon, announced in October 2025, has been met with both celebration and condemnation. Critics, including Senator Thom Tillis, argue the move undermines efforts to regulate illicit finance, while supporters hail it as a step toward restoring innovation in the digital asset space.

Now based in Abu Dhabi, CZ has vowed to ‘help make America the Capital of Crypto‘. His post-release activities suggest a shift from direct exchange management to broader influence.

Such as, investing in educational initiatives like Giggle Academy, backing blockchain startups, and lobbying for friendlier crypto legislation.

Despite the pardon, expectations remain high. CZ is under intense scrutiny—not just from regulators, but from the crypto community itself.

Many expect him to champion transparency, rebuild Binance’s reputation, and avoid the shadowy practices that led to its U.S. ban in 2019. His future influence may hinge on whether he can balance ambition with accountability.

For now, CZ’s return is symbolic: a signal that the crypto world is once again in flux, with its most controversial figure back in play.

Posted on

Nikkei 225 Breaks 50,000: A Milestone Fueled by Tech Trade and Policy Optimism

Nikkei at new all-time high!

Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 index surged past the 50,000 mark for the first time in history, marking a symbolic milestone for Asia’s second-largest economy.

The rally reflects a potent mix of domestic resilience, global investor appetite, and strategic policy shifts that have redefined Japan’s market narrative.

The breakthrough comes amid renewed optimism surrounding U.S.-China trade negotiations, with President Trump signalling progress ahead of a key meeting with Japan’s Sanae Takaichi.

Investors are betting on a thaw in geopolitical tensions, which could unlock export growth for Japan’s tech-heavy industrial base.

Driving the rally are heavyweight stocks in semiconductors, robotics, and AI infrastructure—sectors buoyed by global demand and Japan’s push to become a regional data hub.

Nikkei 225 Index at new history high above 50,000

Companies like Tokyo Electron and SoftBank have seen double-digit gains, fuelled by bullish earnings and strategic pivots toward AI and automation.

Domestically, the Bank of Japan’s continued accommodative stance has kept borrowing costs low, while corporate governance reforms have attracted foreign capital.

The weaker yen has also boosted exporters, making Japanese goods more competitive abroad.

Symbolically, the 50,000 threshold represents more than just market exuberance—it’s a vote of confidence in Japan’s ability to adapt, innovate, and lead in a shifting global landscape.

While risks remain—from demographic headwinds to geopolitical flashpoints—the Nikkei’s ascent signals a new era of investor engagement with Japan’s evolving economic story.

Posted on

AWS Outage Reveals Fragility of Global Cloud Dependency

Amazon services go dark

It was just one week ago on Monday 20th October 2025, Amazon Web Services (AWS) experienced a major outage that rippled across the digital world, disrupting operations for millions of users and businesses.

The incident, which originated in AWS’s US-East-1 region, was reportedly traced to DNS resolution failures affecting DynamoDB—one of AWS’s core database services.

This technical fault triggered cascading issues across EC2, network load balancers, and other critical infrastructure, leaving many services offline for hours.

The impact was immediate and widespread. Major consumer platforms such as Snapchat, Reddit, Disney+, Canva, and Ring doorbells went dark.

Financial services including Venmo and Robinhood faltered, while airline customers at United and Delta struggled to access bookings. Even British government portals like Gov.uk and HMRC were affected, underscoring the global reach of AWS’s infrastructure.

World leader

AWS is the world’s leading cloud provider, commanding roughly one-third of the global market—well ahead of Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud.

Millions of companies, from startups to multinational corporations, rely on AWS for everything from data storage and virtual servers to machine learning and content delivery.

Its services underpin critical operations in healthcare, education, retail, logistics, and media. When AWS stumbles, the internet itself feels the tremor.

20 Prominent Companies Affected by the AWS Outage (20th Oct 2025)

SectorCompany NameImpact Summary
E-commerceAmazonInternal systems and Seller Central offline
Social MediaSnapchatApp outages and delays
StreamingDisney+Service interruptions
NewsRedditPartial outages, scaling issues
Design ToolsCanvaHigh error rates, reduced functionality
Smart HomeRingDevice connectivity issues
FinanceVenmoTransaction delays
FinanceRobinhoodTrading disruptions
AirlinesUnited AirlinesBooking and check-in issues
AirlinesDelta AirlinesReservation access problems
TelecomT-MobileIndirect service disruptions
GovernmentGov.ukPortal access issues
GovernmentHMRCService delays
BankingLloyds BankOnline banking affected
ProductivityZoomMeeting access issues
ProductivitySlackMessaging delays
EducationCanvasAssignment submissions disrupted
CryptoCoinbaseUser access failures
GamingRobloxServer outages
GamingFortniteGameplay interruptions

This outage wasn’t the result of a cyberattack, but rather a technical fault in one of Amazon’s main data centres. Yet the consequences were no less severe.

Amazon’s own operations were disrupted, with warehouse workers unable to access internal systems and third-party sellers locked out of Seller Central.

Canva reported ‘significantly increased error rates’. while Coinbase and Roblox cited cloud-related failures.

The incident serves as a stark reminder of the risks inherent in centralised cloud infrastructure. As digital life becomes increasingly dependent on a handful of providers, the potential for systemic disruption grows.

A single point of failure can cascade across industries, affecting everything from classroom assignments to emergency services.

AWS has since restored normal operations and promised a detailed post-event summary. But for many, the outage has reignited questions about resilience, redundancy, and the wisdom of placing so much trust in a single cloud giant.

In the age of digital interdependence, even a brief lapse can feel like a global blackout.

Posted on

Has the S&P 500 Become an AI Index?

S&P 500 becoming an AI index

In recent months, the S&P 500 has shown signs of evolving from a broad economic barometer into something far more concentrated: a proxy for artificial intelligence optimism.

While traditionally viewed as a diversified snapshot of American corporate health, the index’s current composition and market behaviour suggest it’s increasingly tethered to the fortunes of a handful of AI-driven giants.

At the heart of this transformation is the dominance of mega-cap tech firms. Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Apple now account for a disproportionate share of the index’s total market capitalisation.

As of late 2025 that heady combination of AI led tech represents just over 30% of the S&P 500.

AI in S&P 500
Six AI related companies represent 30% of the S&P 500

These companies aren’t merely adjacent to AI—they’re building its infrastructure, shaping its software ecosystems, and embedding it into consumer and enterprise products.

Nvidia, for instance, has become synonymous with AI hardware, its valuation soaring on the back of demand for high-performance chips powering generative models and data centres.

Recent analysis reveals that roughly 8% of the S&P 500’s weight is directly tied to AI-related revenue.

An additional 25 companies within the index are actively developing AI technologies, even if those efforts haven’t yet translated into standalone revenue streams. This includes sectors as varied as autonomous vehicles, quantum computing, and predictive analytics.

Investor behaviour has only amplified this shift. The index’s recent rally has been fuelled largely by enthusiasm for AI breakthroughs, with capital flowing into stocks perceived as future beneficiaries of machine learning and automation.

This momentum has led some analysts to warn of valuation bubbles, urging diversification away from AI-heavy names in case of a sector-wide correction.

Narrower narrative

Symbolically, the S&P 500’s identity is shifting. Once a mirror of industrial and consumer strength, it now reflects a narrower narrative—one of technological acceleration and speculative belief in artificial intelligence.

This raises philosophical questions about what the index truly represents: is it still a measure of economic breadth, or has it become a momentum gauge for a single transformative theme?

For editorial observers, this evolution offers fertile ground. The index’s transformation can be read not just as a financial trend, but as a cultural signal—suggesting that AI is no longer a niche innovation, but the dominant lens through which investors, executives, and policymakers interpret the future.

Whether this concentration proves visionary or vulnerable remains to be seen.

But one thing is clear: the S&P 500 is no longer just a mirror of the American economy—it’s increasingly a reflection of our collective bet on intelligent machines.

30% of S&P 500

As of 2025, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Apple—often grouped as part of the ‘Magnificent Seven’—collectively represent approximately 30% of the S&P 500’s total market capitalisation.

That’s a staggering concentration for just six companies in an index meant to reflect the broader U.S. economy.

For context, their combined performance was responsible for roughly two-thirds of the S&P 500’s total gains in 2024—a clear signal that the index’s movement is increasingly tethered to the fortunes of a few dominant tech giants.

Posted on

Paxos – A PayPal Crypto Partner Mints $300 Trillion in Stablecoins—A Glitch of Galactic Proportions

Stablecoin Glitch

In a surreal twist that briefly defied economic logic, Paxos—the blockchain infrastructure firm behind PayPal’s PYUSD stablecoin—accidentally minted $300 trillion worth of digital dollars in a technical mishap.

The error, reportedly spotted on Ethereum’s public ledger Etherscan, triggered a wave of astonishment across crypto circles before Paxos swiftly burned the excess tokens and issued a statement clarifying the blunder.

Technical error?

‘This was an internal technical error. There is no security breach. Customer funds are safe’, Paxos assured, adding that the root cause had been addressed.

To put the scale of the error in perspective: $300 trillion is more than double the estimated total GDP of the entire planet. And we trust these people and systems?

It’s a sum that could theoretically buy every publicly traded company several times over—and still leave room for a few moon bases. Fortunately, the minting was part of an internal transfer and never entered circulation.

Who is in charge?

PYUSD is designed to be a dollar-pegged stablecoin, backed by U.S. dollar deposits and short-term treasuries. Its promise of 1:1 redemption relies not on algorithmic magic but on real-world reserves and third-party attestations.

The incident, while resolved in under 20 minutes, underscores the fragility of trust in digital finance—especially when automation meets scale.

The crypto community, already wary of stablecoin transparency, seized on the event as a cautionary tale.

While no funds were lost and no users affected, the episode raises questions about auditability, protocol safeguards, and the symbolic weight of ‘minting’ in a decentralised economy.

In an era where digital assets are increasingly mainstream, even a fleeting glitch can ripple through markets and headlines.

Thin air

Paxos may have burned the tokens, but the spectacle of $300 trillion conjured from code won’t be forgotten anytime soon.

Hey, let’s go make some money!

We can ‘print’ dollars too… can’t we?

Posted on

Concerns about credit contagion are back as troubles in U.S. regional banks shake global markets

U.S. Bank Credit Woes!

On Friday 17th October 2025, a fresh wave of credit concerns erupted across financial markets, triggered by troubling disclosures from U.S. regional lenders Zions Bancorporation and Western Alliance.

Both banks revealed significant exposure to deteriorating commercial real estate loans, reigniting fears of systemic fragility just months after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.

The revelations sent shockwaves through Wall Street. Shares in Zions plunged over 11% in early trading, while Western Alliance dropped nearly 9%.

Larger institutions weren’t spared either—JP Morgan, Bank of America, and Citigroup all saw declines, as investors reassessed the health of the broader banking sector.

Volatile

The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), often dubbed Wall Street’s ‘fear gauge’, spiked to its highest level since April, signalling a sharp uptick in investor anxiety.

The panic quickly spread across the Atlantic. UK lenders bore the brunt of the fallout, with Barclays tumbling 6.2%, Standard Chartered down 5.4%, and NatWest shedding 4.8%.

£13 billion loss to UK banks

In total, nearly £13 billion was reportedly wiped off the value of British banks in a single trading session. The FTSE 100 closed down 1.5%, its worst performance in over a month.

At the heart of the crisis lies commercial real estate—a sector battered by high interest rates, remote working trends, and declining occupancy. U.S. regional banks, which often hold concentrated portfolios of property loans, are particularly vulnerable.

Analysts warn that rising defaults could trigger a domino effect, undermining confidence in institutions previously deemed stable.

The Bank of England’s Financial Stability Report had already flagged elevated risks from global fragmentation and sovereign debt pressures. As did the IMF Financial Stability Report.

Credit outlook review

The events of Friday 17th October 2025 appear to validate those concerns, with Moody’s and other agencies now reviewing credit outlooks for multiple institutions.

While some commentators view the sell-off as a temporary overreaction, others see it as a harbinger of deeper trouble.

The symbolic resonance is hard to ignore: vaults cracking, balance sheets buckling, and trust—once again—on the brink. Why?

For editorial observers, the moment invites reflection. Is this merely a cyclical tremor, or the start of a structural reckoning?

Either way, the illusion of resilience has been punctured. And as markets brace for further disclosures, the spectre of contagion looms large.

Remember the sub-prime loans fiasco?

I thought banks were ‘funded and ring-fenced’ more now to prevent this from happening again.

Posted on

Nick Clegg’s AI Correction Prophecy: The Return of the Technocratic Tourist

AI commentator?

After years in Silicon Valley’s policy sanctum, Nick Clegg has re-emerged on British soil with a warning: the AI sector is overheating.

The man who once fronted a coalition government, then pivoted to Meta’s global affairs desk, now cautions that the ‘absolute spasm’ of AI deal-making may be headed for a correction.

Is this his opinion or just borrowed from other commentators. I, for one, am not interested in what he has to say. I did once, but not anymore.

It’s a curious homecoming. Clegg left UK politics after his party was electorally eviscerated, only to rebrand himself as a transatlantic tech ‘diplomat’ or tech tourist.

Now, with the AI hype cycle in full swing, he returns not as a policymaker, but as a prophet of moderation—urging restraint in a sector he arguably helped legitimise from within.

His critique isn’t wrong. Valuations are frothy. Infrastructure costs are staggering. And the promise of artificial superintelligence remains more theological than technical. But Clegg’s timing invites scrutiny.

Is this a genuine call for realism, or a reputational hedge from someone who’s seen the inside of the machine?

There’s a deeper irony here: the same political class that once championed deregulation and digital optimism now warns of runaway tech. The same voices that embraced disruption now plead for caution.

It’s less a reversal than a ritual—an elite rite of return, where credibility is reasserted through critique.

Clegg’s message may be sound. But in a landscape saturated with recycled authority, the messenger matters.

And for many, his reappearance feels less like a reckoning and more like déjà vu in a different suit.

Please don’t open your case.

Posted on

TSMC’s Profit Soars 39% Amid AI Chip Boom!

Chip factory

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) has posted a record-breaking 39% surge in third-quarter profit, underscoring its pivotal role in the global AI revolution.

The world’s largest contract chipmaker reported net income of NT$452.3 billion (£11.4 billion), far exceeding analyst expectations and marking a new high for the company.

Revenue climbed 30.3% year-on-year to NT$989.92 billion, driven by insatiable demand for high-performance chips powering artificial intelligence applications.

Tech giants including Nvidia, OpenAI, and Oracle have ramped up orders for TSMC’s cutting-edge processors, fuelling the company’s meteoric rise.

TSMC’s CEO, C.C. Wei, reportedly attributed the growth to ‘unprecedented investment in AI infrastructure’, noting that the company’s advanced nodes are now central to training large language models and deploying generative AI tools.

Despite global economic headwinds and ongoing trade tensions, TSMC’s strategic expansion—including a $165 billion global buildout across Arizona, Europe, and Japan—is positioning it as the backbone of next-gen computing.

The results also reflect a broader shift in the semiconductor landscape. As traditional consumer electronics plateau, AI-driven demand is reshaping supply chains and investment priorities.

Analysts suggest that AI chip spending could surpass $1 trillion in the coming years, with TSMC poised to capture a significant share.

For investors and industry observers, the message is clear: AI isn’t just a trend—it’s a fundamental shift. And TSMC, with its unparalleled fabrication expertise and global influence, is quietly shaping the future.

As the AI arms race accelerates, TSMC’s performance offers a glimpse into the future of tech: one where silicon, not software, defines the frontier.

The company’s latest earnings are not just a financial milestone—they’re a signal of where innovation is headed next.

Posted on

Oracle Cloud reportedly to deploy 50,000 AMD AI chips, signalling direct competition with Nvidia

Oracle Cloud AI

Oracle Bets Big on AMD AI Chips, Challenging Nvidia’s Dominance

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure has announced plans to deploy 50,000 AMD Instinct MI450 graphics processors starting in the second half of 2026, marking a bold strategic shift in the AI hardware landscape.

The move signals a direct challenge to Nvidia’s long-standing dominance in the data centre GPU market, where it currently commands over 90% market share.

AMD’s MI450 chips, unveiled earlier this year, are designed for high-performance AI workloads and can be assembled into rack-sized systems that allow 72 chips to function as a unified engine.

This architecture is tailored for inferencing tasks—an area Oracle believes AMD will excel in. ‘We feel like customers are going to take up AMD very, very well’, reportedly said Karan Batta, Oracle Cloud’s senior vice president.

The announcement comes amid a broader realignment in the AI ecosystem. OpenAI, historically reliant on Nvidia hardware, has recently inked a multi-year deal with AMD involving processors requiring up to 6 gigawatts of power.

If successful, OpenAI could acquire up to 10% of AMD’s shares, further cementing the chipmaker’s role in next-generation AI infrastructure.

Oracle’s pivot also reflects its ambition to compete with cloud giants like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google. With a reported five-year cloud deal with OpenAI potentially worth $300 billion, Oracle is positioning itself not just as a capacity provider but as a strategic AI enabler.

While Nvidia remains a formidable force, Oracle’s investment in AMD chips underscores a growing appetite for alternatives.

As AI demands scale, diversity in chip supply could become a competitive advantage—especially for enterprises seeking flexibility, cost efficiency, and innovation beyond the Nvidia ecosystem.

The AI arms race is far from over, but Oracle’s latest move suggests it’s no longer content to play catch-up. It’s aiming to redefine the rules.

Posted on

Why the U.S. Has Bailed Out Argentina: A $20 Billion Gamble with Global Implications

Argentina bailed out by the U.S.

In a move that has stunned economists and ignited political debate, the United States has extended a $20 billion bailout to Argentina—a country long plagued by inflation, debt crises, and political volatility.

The lifeline, structured as a currency swap between the U.S. Treasury and Argentina’s central bank, aims to stabilise the peso and prevent a broader emerging market meltdown.

At the heart of the bailout is President Javier Milei, Argentina’s libertarian leader and a vocal ally of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Milei’s radical economic reforms—slashing public spending, deregulating markets, and firing thousands of civil servants—have earned praise from American conservatives but rattled domestic confidence.

Following a bruising electoral defeat last month, Argentina’s currency nosedived, prompting fears of default and capital flight.

Pre-emptive?

The U.S. Treasury, led by Secretary Scott Bessent, argues the bailout is a pre-emptive strike against contagion.

While Argentina poses little systemic risk on its own, its collapse could trigger panic across Latin American debt markets and commodity exchanges.

The swap provides Argentina with desperately needed dollar liquidity, while the U.S. hopes to anchor regional stability and protect its own financial interests.

Critics, however, accuse the Trump administration of prioritising political loyalty over economic prudence.

With the U.S. government itself mired in a shutdown and domestic industries reeling from trade tensions, the optics of rescuing a foreign ally are fraught. Democratic lawmakers have introduced bills to block the bailout, calling it “inexplicable” and “reckless”.

Whether this intervention proves a masterstroke of diplomacy or a costly miscalculation remains to be seen. For now, Argentina has bought time—and Washington has bet big on Milei’s vision of libertarian revival.

Posted on

UK economy grew slightly in August – very slightly – tax increases are coming

UK Economy

The UK economy recorded modest growth in August 2025, expanding by 0.1% according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

This slight gain follows a revised contraction of 0.1% in July 2025, underscoring the fragile nature of the recovery as the government prepares for next month’s Budget.

Manufacturing led the charge, growing by 0.7%, while services held steady. However, consumer-facing sectors and wholesale trade continued to drag, reflecting persistent cost pressures and subdued household confidence.

Over the three-month period to August 2025, the economy grew by 0.3%, offering a glimmer of resilience despite broader concerns.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces mounting pressure to address a projected £22bn shortfall. It always appears to be a £20-22 billion hole – it must be a ‘magical’ figure.

She has signalled potential tax and spending adjustments to ensure fiscal sustainability, though uncertainty around these measures may dampen business and consumer sentiment in the near term.

Some economists have warned that slowing wage growth and elevated living costs are likely to constrain household spending, with sluggish growth expected to persist.

Meanwhile, the IMF forecasts the UK to be the second-fastest-growing G7 economy this year, albeit with the highest inflation rate.

As Budget Day looms, the government’s challenge remains clear: stimulate growth without deepening the cost-of-living strain.

Tax increases are coming, despite government manifesto promises to the contrary.

Posted on

Wall Street’s Fear Gauge Surges: What the Spike in Volatility Signals

VIX Fear gauge

Wall Street’s so-called ‘fear gauge’—officially known as the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX)—has surged to its highest level since April 2025, jolting investors out of a months-long lull and reigniting concerns about market stability.

On 14th October 2025, the VIX briefly spiked above 22.9 before settling near 19.70, a sharp rise from recent lows that had hovered below 14.

The VIX is a real-time market index that reflects investors’ expectations for volatility over the next 30 days. Often dubbed the ‘fear gauge’, it’s derived from S&P 500 options pricing and tends to rise when traders seek protection against sharp market declines.

CBOE (VIX Index) slowly creeping up again October 2025 – So called Fear Index

A reading above 20 typically signals heightened anxiety and increased demand for hedging strategies.

This latest spike was triggered by renewed tensions between the U.S. and China, including Beijing’s announcement of sanctions against American subsidiaries of South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean.

The move, widely seen as retaliation for Washington’s export controls, sent shockwaves through tech-heavy indices. The Dow dropped over 500 points, while the Nasdaq slid nearly 2%.

For months, markets had basked in a rare stretch of calm, buoyed by AI-driven optimism and resilient earnings. But the VIX’s resurgence suggests that investors are now recalibrating their risk assessments.

It’s not just about trade wars—concerns over interest rates, geopolitical instability, and tech sector overvaluation are converging.

While a rising VIX doesn’t guarantee a crash, it often precedes periods of turbulence. For editorial observers, it’s a symbolic pulse check on investor psychology—a reminder that beneath euphoric rallies, fear never fully disappears.

As Wall Street braces for further shocks, the fear gauge is once again flashing caution. Whether it’s a tremor or a tremor before the quake remains to be seen.

Posted on

Markets on a Hair Trigger: Trump’s Tariff Whiplash and the AI Bubble That Won’t Pop

Markets move as Trump tweets

U.S. stock markets are behaving like a mood ring in a thunderstorm—volatile, reactive, and oddly sentimental.

One moment, President Trump threatens a ‘massive increase’ in tariffs on Chinese imports, and nearly $2 trillion in market value evaporates.

The next, he posts that: ‘all will be fine‘, and futures rebound overnight. It’s not just policy—it’s theatre, and Wall Street is watching every act with bated breath.

This hypersensitivity isn’t new, but it’s been amplified by the precarious state of global trade and the towering expectations placed on artificial intelligence.

Trump’s recent comments about China’s rare earth export controls triggered a sell-off that saw the Nasdaq drop 3.6% and the S&P 500 fall 2.7%—the worst single-day performance since April.

Tech stocks, especially those reliant on semiconductors and AI infrastructure, were hit hardest. Nvidia alone lost nearly 5%.

Why so fickle? Because the market’s current rally is built on a foundation of hope and hype. AI has been the engine driving valuations to record highs, with companies like OpenAI and Anthropic reaching eye-watering valuations despite uncertain profitability.

The IMF and Bank of England have both warned that we may be in stage three of a classic bubble cycle6. Circular investment deals—where AI startups use funding to buy chips from their investors—have raised eyebrows and comparisons to the dot-com era.

Yet, the bubble hasn’t burst. Not yet. The ‘Buffett Indicator‘ sits at a historic 220%, and the S&P 500 trades at 188% of U.S. GDP. These are not numbers grounded in sober fundamentals—they’re fuelled by speculative fervour and a fear of missing out (FOMO).

But unlike the dot-com crash, today’s AI surge is backed by real infrastructure: data centres, chip fabrication, and enterprise adoption. Whether that’s enough to justify the valuations remains to be seen.

In the meantime, markets remain twitchy. Trump’s tariff threats are more than political posturing—they’re economic tremors that ripple through supply chains and investor sentiment.

And with AI valuations stretched to breaking point, even a modest correction could trigger a cascade.

So yes, the market is fickle. But it’s not irrational—it’s just balancing on a knife’s edge between technological optimism and geopolitical anxiety.

One tweet can tip the scales.

Fickle!

Posted on

China’s rare Earth clampdown continues to send shockwaves through global markets

Rare Earth Materials

China’s latest tightening of rare earth exports has reignited global concerns over supply chain fragility and strategic resource dependence.

With Beijing now requiring special permits for the export of key rare earth elements—used in everything from electric vehicles to missile guidance systems—the move is widely seen as a geopolitical lever in an increasingly fractured global trade landscape.

Rare earths, despite their name, are not scarce—but China controls over 60% of global production and an even larger share of refining capacity. The new restrictions, framed as national security measures, have already begun to ripple through equity markets.

Shares of Western mining firms such as Albemarle and MP Materials surged on the news, as investors bet on alternative sources gaining traction. Meanwhile, defence and tech stocks in Europe dipped, reflecting fears of supply bottlenecks and rising input costs1.

This isn’t China’s first foray into rare earth brinkmanship. Similar curbs in 2010 triggered a scramble for diversification, but progress has been slow.

The current squeeze coincides with rising tensions over semiconductor access and military technology, suggesting a broader strategy of resource weaponisation.

For investors, the message is clear: rare earths are no longer just a niche commodity—they’re a geopolitical flashpoint. Expect increased volatility in sectors reliant on high-performance magnets, batteries, and advanced optics.

Countries like the US, Australia, and Canada are accelerating domestic mining initiatives, but scaling up remains a long-term play.

In the short term, China’s grip on rare earths is tightening—and markets are reacting accordingly.

As the global economy pivots toward electrification and AI-driven infrastructure, the battle over these elemental building blocks is only just beginning. The stocks may rise and fall, but the strategic stakes are climbing ever higher.

China’s sweeping export restrictions on rare earths have triggered a sharp rally in related stocks, especially among U.S.-based producers and processors.

The market is interpreting Beijing’s move as both a supply threat and a strategic opportunity for non-Chinese firms to gain ground.

📈 Some companies in the spotlight

  • USA Rare Earth surged nearly 15% in a single day and is up 94% over the past five weeks, buoyed by speculation of a potential U.S. government investment and its vertically integrated magnet production pipeline.
  • NioCorp Developments, Ramaco Resources, and Energy Fuels all posted gains of approximately between 9–12%.
  • MP Materials, the largest U.S. rare earth miner, rose over 6% following news of tighter Chinese controls. The company recently secured a strategic equity deal with the U.S. Department of Defence.
  • Albemarle, Lithium Americas, and Trilogy Metals also saw modest gains, reflecting broader investor interest in critical mineral plays.
Company / SectorStock MovementStrategic Note
MP Materials (US)↑ +6%DoD-backed, key US supplier
USA Rare Earth↑ +15%Magnet pipeline, gov’t investment buzz
NioCorp / Ramaco / Energy Fuels↑ +9–12%Domestic mining surge
European Defence Stocks↓ 2–4%Supply chain fears
Chinese Magnet Producers↔ / ↓Export permit uncertainty

China’s new rules, effective December 1st, require export licences for any product containing more than 0.1% rare earths or using Chinese refining or magnet recycling tech. This has intensified scrutiny on global supply chains and elevated the strategic value of domestic alternatives.

🧭 Investor sentiment is shifting toward companies that can offer secure, non-Chinese sources of rare earths—especially those with downstream capabilities like magnet manufacturing. The rally suggests markets are pricing in long-term geopolitical risk and potential government backing.

Weekend update

Is President Trump in control of the stock market? A comment on TruthSocial suggesting that more China tariffs might be introduced in response to China’s restrictions on rare earth materials reportedly wipes out around $2 trillion from U.S. stocks.

Then it reverses as Trump says, ‘All will be fine’. Stocks climb back up. What’s going on?

It’s just a game.

But who is the game master?

Posted on

Is Bitcoin truly an asset class investment?

Is Bitcoin truly an asset class investment?

Bitcoin’s status as an asset class remains fiercely debated—its classification hinges on whether one prioritises institutional frameworks or symbolic disruption.

✅ Arguments for Bitcoin as an asset class

Many investors treat Bitcoin as a distinct asset class due to its unique characteristics:

  • Scarcity: With a capped supply of 21 million coins, Bitcoin mirrors commodities like gold.
  • Divisibility & Fungibility: It can be split into smaller units, and each unit is interchangeable.
  • Liquidity: It’s widely traded and easily converted into fiat currencies.
  • Store of Value: Often dubbed ‘digital gold’, especially in inflationary climates.
  • Low correlation: Bitcoin’s behaviour diverges from traditional assets, offering potential diversification.

❌ Arguments against Bitcoin as an asset class

Institutions such as Hargreaves Lansdown argue Bitcoin lacks the stability and intrinsic value required for formal classification:

  • Volatility: Its dramatic price swings make it riskier than equities or bonds.
  • No intrinsic value: Unlike shares or debt instruments, Bitcoin doesn’t generate income or cash flow.
  • Regulatory ambiguity: Its decentralised nature and evolving legal status complicate analysis.
  • Speculative behaviour: Critics liken it more to a speculative punt than a foundational portfolio component.

So…

Bitcoin’s contested identity as an asset class reflects a deeper philosophical divide: is it a legitimate store of value shaped by digital innovation, or a speculative mirage challenging financial orthodoxy?

While its traits—scarcity, liquidity, and decentralised architecture—suggest asset-like behaviour, its volatility and lack of intrinsic value leave its classification unresolved.

For investors and thinkers alike, Bitcoin invites not just financial analysis but existential reflection on what we trust, value, and rebel against in the evolving economy.

Posted on

AI Crash! Correction or pullback? Something is coming…

AI Bubble concerns

Influential figures and institutions are sounding the AI alarm—or at least raising eyebrows—about the frothy valuations and speculative fervour surrounding artificial intelligence.

Who’s Warning About the AI Bubble?

🏛️ Bank of England – Financial Policy Committee

  • View: Stark warning.
  • Quote: “The risk of a sharp market correction has increased.”
  • Why it matters: The BoE compares current AI stock valuations to the dotcom bubble, noting that the top five S&P 500 firms now command nearly 30% of market cap—the highest concentration in 50 years.

🏦 Jerome Powell – Chair, U.S. Federal Reserve

  • View: Cautiously sceptical.
  • Quote: Assets are “fairly highly valued.”
  • Why it matters: While not naming AI directly, Powell’s remarks echo broader concerns about tech valuations and investor exuberance.

🧮 Lisa Shalett – Chief Investment Officer, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management

  • View: Deeply concerned.
  • Quote: “This is not going to be pretty” if AI capital expenditure disappoints.
  • Why it matters: Shalett warns that 75% of S&P 500 returns are tied to AI hype, likening the moment to the “Cisco cliff” of the early 2000s.

🌍 Kristalina Georgieva – Managing Director, IMF

  • View: Watchful.
  • Quote: Financial conditions could “turn abruptly.”
  • Why it matters: Georgieva highlights the fragility of markets despite AI’s productivity promise, warning of sudden sentiment shifts.

🧨 Sam Altman – CEO, OpenAI

  • View: Self-aware caution.
  • Quote: “People will overinvest and lose money.”
  • Why it matters: Altman’s admission from inside the AI gold rush adds credibility to bubble concerns—even as his company fuels the hype.

📦 Jeff Bezos – Founder, Amazon

  • View: Bubble-aware.
  • Quote: Described the current environment as “kind of an industrial bubble.”
  • Why it matters: Bezos sees parallels with past tech manias, suggesting that infrastructure spending may be overextended.

🧠 Adam Slater – Lead Economist, Oxford Economics

  • View: Analytical.
  • Quote: “There are a few potential symptoms of a bubble.”
  • Why it matters: Slater points to stretched valuations and extreme optimism, noting that productivity projections vary wildly.

🏛️ Goldman Sachs – Investment Strategy Division

  • View: Cautiously optimistic.
  • Quote: “A bubble has not yet formed,” but investors should “diversify.”
  • Why it matters: Goldman acknowledges the risks while maintaining that fundamentals may still justify valuations—though they advise caution.
AI Bubble voices infographic October 2025

🧠 Julius Černiauskas and the Oxylabs AI/ML Advisory Board

🔍 View: The AI hype is nearing its peak—and may soon deflate.

  • Černiauskas warns that AI development is straining environmental resources and public trust. He’s pushing for responsible and sustainable AI practices, noting that transparency is lacking in how many models operate.
  • Ali Chaudhry, research fellow at UCL and founder of ResearchPal, adds that scaling laws are showing their limits. He predicts diminishing returns from simply making models bigger, and expects tightened regulations around generative AI in 2025.
  • Adi Andrei, cofounder of Technosophics, goes further: he believes the Gen AI bubble is on the verge of bursting, citing overinvestment and unmet expectations

🧠 Jamie Dimon on the AI Bubble

🔥 View: Sharply concerned—more than most as widely reported

  • Quote: “I’m far more worried than others about the prospects of a downturn.”
  • Context: Dimon believes AI stock valuations are “stretched” and compares the current surge to the dotcom bubble of the late 1990s.

📉 Key Warnings from Dimon

  • “Sharp correction” risk: He sees a real danger of a sudden market pullback, especially given how AI-related stocks have surged disproportionately—like AMD jumping 24% in a single day after an OpenAI deal.
  • “Most people involved won’t do well”: Dimon told the BBC that while AI will ultimately pay off—like cars and TVs did—many investors will lose money along the way.
  • “Governments are distracted”: He criticised policymakers for focusing on crypto and ignoring real security threats, saying: “We should be stockpiling bullets, guns and bombs”.
  • “AI will disrupt jobs and companies”: At a trade event in Dublin, he warned that AI’s ubiquity will shake up industries and employment across the board.

And so…

The AI boom of 2025 has ignited a speculative frenzy across global markets, with tech stocks soaring and investors piling into anything labelled “AI-adjacent.”

But beneath the euphoria, a chorus of high-profile warnings is growing louder. From the Bank of England and IMF to JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon and OpenAI’s Sam Altman, concerns are mounting that valuations are dangerously stretched, capital is overconcentrated, and the narrative is outpacing reality.

Dimon likens the moment to the dotcom bubble, while Altman admits many will “lose money” chasing the hype. Analysts point to classic bubble signals: retail mania, corporate FOMO, and earnings divorced from fundamentals.

Even as AI’s long-term utility remains promising, the short-term exuberance may be setting the stage for a sharp correction.

Whether it’s a pullback or a full-blown crash, the mood is shifting—from uncritical optimism to wary anticipation.

The question now is not whether AI will change the world, but whether markets have priced in too much, too soon.

We have been warned!

The AI bubble will pop – it’s just a matter of when and not if.

Go lock up your investments!