Category: Economoney

Posted on

No tariffs for Russia?

Russia escapes Trumps tariffs

Russia’s exemption from recent U.S. tariffs has sparked curiosity and debate. While many nations face new trade duties, Russia remains notably absent from the list

This decision stems from a combination of geopolitical, economic, and strategic factors.

One key reason is the existing sanctions imposed on Russia by several countries, including the United States, following its invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

These sanctions have already significantly curtailed trade between Russia and its global partners, rendering additional tariffs less impactful.

For instance, U.S.-Russia trade has dwindled to a fraction of its pre-war levels, focusing primarily on strategic goods like fertilisers and chemicals.

Another factor is the ongoing diplomatic efforts to address the conflict in Ukraine. Some analysts suggest that exempting Russia from tariffs could be a strategic move to maintain a channel for negotiation and potential cooperation.

This approach might aim to encourage Russia’s participation in peace talks or other diplomatic initiatives.

Additionally, the structure of Russia’s exports plays a role. Certain goods, such as fertilisers, are critical to global supply chains, and imposing tariffs could disrupt markets and harm economies reliant on these imports.

While the decision has drawn criticism, it underscores the complexities of balancing economic policies with geopolitical realities.

The debate continues as the global community navigates these challenging dynamics caused through the imposition of U.S. tariffs.

Posted on

UK economy shows welcome signs of resilience with positive GDP growth and inflation relief

Union Jack flag and stocks charts

The UK economy displayed unexpected resilience in February 2025, with GDP growing by 0.5%.

This figure has exceeded market expectations and provided a welcome boost to UK economic confidence. The growth was fueled by robust activity in the services and manufacturing sectors, which helped counterbalance ongoing challenges in other areas.

February’s performance marks a recovery from the flat growth seen in January 2025, underscoring the adaptive capacity of businesses and consumers alike.

Adding to the positive momentum, the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation rate eased to 2.6% in March 2025, down from February’s 2.8%.

The decline in inflation reflects a combination of factors, including falling fuel costs and stable food prices, which have alleviated pressure on household budgets.

This marks the lowest inflation level since late 2024 and aligns with the Bank of England’s goal of achieving price stability.

The interplay of stronger-than-expected GDP growth and easing inflation suggests a cautiously optimistic outlook for the UK economy.

While challenges persist, such as global economic uncertainties and lingering effects of Brexit, these latest figures indicate a potential turning point, despite the Chancellors autumn and spring ‘budgets’.

The UK government and market participants will be watching closely to see if this positive trend continues into the coming months.

See: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

Posted on

Tech stocks propel market rally amid Trump’s tariff pause

Stocks move back up

On Monday 14th April 2025, the stock market experienced a notable mini rally, driven by the tech sector’s resurgence following a weekend announcement of a temporary tariff pause.

President Trump’s decision to exempt smartphones, computers, and other electronics from steep tariffs provided a much-needed reprieve for the industry, sparking optimism among investors.

Major tech companies like Apple, Nvidia, and Amazon saw significant gains, with Apple shares surging by 7.5%. The Nasdaq Composite, heavily weighted with tech stocks, climbed 1.9%, while the S&P 500 rose 1.5%.

This rally marked a stark contrast to the volatility of the previous week, where tariff uncertainties had sent shockwaves through the market.

The tariff pause, although temporary and restricted to 20%, helped to alleviate immediate concerns about rising costs for consumers and businesses.

Importers were spared from choosing between absorbing higher expenses or passing them on to customers. This relief was particularly impactful for companies reliant on Chinese manufacturing, as the exemptions covered a wide range of tech products.

Market analysts noted that the rally was not just a reaction to the tariff news but also a reflection of the tech sector’s resilience.

Despite facing challenges earlier in the year, tech companies have continued to innovate and adapt, maintaining their position as a driving force in the U.S. and world economies.

However, the rally’s sustainability remains uncertain. The administration’s mixed messages about future tariffs have left investors cautious.

While Monday’s gains were encouraging, the broader market continues to grapple with the unpredictability of trade policies.

Posted on

Trump takes wrecking ball to global trade – sets stock markets on fire and plays golf – all in one week

Reckless tariffs

Is this a fair ‘take’ on the last weeks tariff turmoil?

President Trump’s tariffs have left a significant mark on global trade and financial markets, creating waves that continue to shape global economic dynamics.

The tariffs, initially aimed at reducing the U.S. trade deficit and protecting domestic industries, triggered a rollercoaster ride for stock markets and strained international relations.

Highs to lows

The Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq Composite, and S&P 500 experienced sharp declines following the announcement of sweeping tariffs. At their lowest points, the Dow fell to 37226, the Nasdaq dropped to 15266, and the S&P 500 sank to 4956.

These figures marked significant losses, with trillions of dollars wiped off the market in just a few days.

The volatility was exacerbated by fears of a global trade war and the uncertainty surrounding the tariffs’ implementation.

Tariff turmoil and 90 day pause

In response to the market turmoil, President Trump announced a 90-day pause on most tariffs, providing temporary relief to investors and businesses. This decision led to a rebound in stock markets, with indices recovering some of their losses.

However, the relief was short-lived, as tensions with China escalated. While tariffs on many trading partners were paused, China’s tariff rate was increased to a staggering 125%.

This move further strained U.S.-China relations and added pressure on industries reliant on Chinese imports.

Tech garners favour

The tech sector, heavily dependent on global supply chains, was among the hardest hit. Tariffs on components like microchips and finished products such as smartphones and computers disrupted production and increased costs.

Companies faced challenges in maintaining profitability and passing on the increased costs to consumers. The eventual reduction and cancellation of some tariffs provided a lifeline to the tech industry, allowing businesses to stabilize operations and reduce prices.

However, the uncertainty surrounding trade policies continued to pose challenges for the sector.

Market turmoil?

Was this the ultimate in market ‘management’ as President Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, that it was a ‘great time to buy’ just hours before announcing the 90-day tariff pause.?

This statement, made at 9:37 am., came shortly before the announcement, which caused stock markets to surge significantly. The timing of his post raised eyebrows and sparked discussions about potential insider trading concerns

China retaliates

China’s response to the tariffs was swift and retaliatory. Beijing imposed its own tariffs on U.S. imports, raising rates to 125%. This retaliation targeted key U.S. industries, including agriculture and technology, further escalating the trade conflict.

The Chinese yuan also hit its lowest level against the dollar since the global financial crisis. These measures highlighted the deepening economic rift between the world’s two largest economies.

The effects of President Trump’s tariffs underscore the complexities of modern trade policies. While intended to protect domestic industries, the tariffs created significant economic disruptions, both domestically and globally.

The stock market volatility, strained international relations, and challenges faced by industries like technology illustrate the far-reaching consequences of such policies.

As the world continues to navigate the aftermath of these tariffs, the importance of balanced and strategic trade policies becomes increasingly evident.

Markets moved up, unsurprisingly, after Trump announced the tech tariff adjustment

Over the weekend, President Trump reportedly made several statements about tariffs on tech products, creating some confusion.

Initially, it was announced that smartphones, computers, and other electronics would be temporarily excluded from the steep tariffs.

However, Trump later clarified that these products were not entirely exempt but had been moved to a different ‘tariff bucket.’ He reportedly stated that they would still face a 20% tariff as part of broader measures targeting Chinese goods.

Trump also hinted at upcoming tariffs on semiconductors and the entire electronics supply chain, emphasising the need for the U.S. to produce more of these components domestically.

President Trump reportedly described this as part of a ‘National Security Tariff Investigation’. These announcements have left tech companies and investors uncertain about the long-term implications for the industry.

Tariffs are like a spider’s web cast over the world with the spider, crawling around collecting from its prey.

Trump’s tariffs continue to ‘infect’ world trade, and they will be here for a while yet.

Posted on

The end of globalisation or a fresh start with a new world order?

Global trade

Globalisation is a process that has woven the world together, creating interconnected networks of trade, culture, technology, and governance.

At its core, globalisation refers to the increased interaction and integration between people, companies, and governments across the globe.

This phenomenon has profound economic, political, and cultural implications, shaping the way we live and think.

Historically speaking

Historically, globalisation is not a recent occurrence; it has been evolving for centuries. The roots of globalisation can be traced back to ancient civilizations when trade routes like the Silk Road emerged around 130 BCE during the Han Dynasty of China.

The Silk Road connected Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and North Africa, facilitating the exchange of goods, ideas, religions, and innovations. While it was primarily a trade route, it also marked the first notable instances of cross-cultural interaction on a global scale.

However, the modern wave of globalisation began much later. Many historians point to the Age of Exploration in the late 15th and early 16th centuries as a pivotal moment.

European explorers like Christopher Columbus and Vasco da Gama sought new trade routes to Asia and the Americas, leading to the establishment of colonial empires.

These explorations were driven by ambitions of trade, wealth, and power, further intertwining economies and cultures.

Adam Smith, the 18th-century economist and philosopher, can also be credited with significantly influencing globalisation through his ideas. His seminal work, The Wealth of Nations (1776), laid the foundation for modern economics and advocated for free-market trade.

His philosophies supported the idea of open international markets, which became a cornerstone of globalisation in later years.

Industrial revolution

Fast forward to the 19th and 20th centuries, the Industrial Revolution and advancements in technology supercharged globalisation.

Railroads, steamships, telegraphs, and later airplanes and the internet, reduced distances and enhanced global connectivity.

This period also saw the establishment of international organisations such as the United Nations and the World Trade Organisation, further embedding globalisation into global policies.

Evolution

Today, globalisation continues to evolve. While it has brought unparalleled access to goods, services, and information, it has also sparked debates about its impact on inequality, environmental sustainability, and cultural homogenisation.

As nations and individuals grapple with its implications, globalisation remains a defining characteristic of our interconnected world. Its history is a testament to humanity’s constant quest to connect, collaborate, and innovate.

Tariffs

The introduction of ‘protectionist’ policies and ideals will likely lead back to globalisation in the end. Are Trump’s protectionist tariff ideals about protectionism or more about a drive to level the imbalance of global trade differences? Gobal trade will not end!

The tariffs are more about aiming to settle trade imbalances, at least according to U.S. President Trump.

Trump’s tariffs have had a significant impact on globalisation, challenging its trajectory. By imposing sweeping tariffs on imports, including a baseline 10% on goods from various countries, Trump aimed to reduce the U.S. trade deficit and reshore U.S. manufacturing.

While this approach sought to protect domestic industries, it disrupted global trade networks and raised concerns about inflation and economic instability.

These tariffs marked a shift away from decades of free trade policies that had fostered globalisation. Critics argue that such measures could lead to higher consumer prices and strained international relations.

On the other hand, proponents believe they might encourage self-reliance and industrial growth within the U.S.

The long-term effects on globalisation remain uncertain. While some see this as a step toward de-globalisation, others view it as a recalibration of trade dynamics.

The future will likely depend on how nations adapt to these changes and whether they seek collaboration or confrontation in global trade.

Globalisation is too big for it to simply… stop!

Posted on

China to impose 34% retaliatory tariff on all goods imported from the U.S.

Trade war

China has reportedly announced a significant escalation in its trade dispute with the United States, declaring a 34% retaliatory tariff on all U.S. goods.

This move, set to take effect on 10th April 2025 and comes in response to the sweeping tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump’s administration earlier this week.

The Chinese Ministry of Finance reportedly stated that these measures are aimed at safeguarding China’s economic interests and countering what it describes as ‘unilateral bullying’ by the U.S. government.

The tariffs will apply across a wide range of American exports, potentially impacting industries such as agriculture, technology, and manufacturing.

This development has heightened global market uncertainty, with investors bracing for further economic disruptions.

The ongoing tit-for-tat measures between the two economic giants underscore the fragility of international trade relations in the current climate.

Markets dropped on the news!

Posted on

Dow dives 1600 points after Trump’s tariff attack – S&P 500 and Nasdaq drop the most since 2020

Stocks markets fall

The U.S. stock market experienced a dramatic plunge following President Donald Trump’s announcement of sweeping tariffs, marking one of the most significant market downturns since 2020.

On 3rd April 2025, the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted by 1,600 points, a staggering 4% drop, closing at 40,546.

Dow Jones one day chart

The S&P 500 fell by 4.8%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite suffered a 6% decline, reflecting widespread investor anxiety.

S&P 500 one day chart

Trump’s tariffs, which include a baseline 10% levy on imports from all trading partners and higher rates for specific countries, have sparked fears of a global trade war.

The effective tariff rate for China, for instance, has risen to 54%, raising concerns about supply chain disruptions and inflation. Major industries, including technology, retail, and manufacturing, were hit hard.

Apple shares dropped nearly 10%, while companies like Nike and Nvidia saw significant losses.

Apple one day chart

The market reaction underscores the uncertainty surrounding the economic impact of these tariffs. Analysts warn that the measures could dampen consumer spending, increase inflation, and slow economic growth.

The ripple effects were felt globally, with European and Asian markets also experiencing declines. The Nikkei index declined a further 3%.

Nikkei Index five-day chart

Despite the turmoil, Trump defended the tariffs, likening them to a necessary ‘operation’ for the economy. He expressed confidence that the markets would eventually rebound, emphasising the long-term benefits of reshoring manufacturing and generating federal revenue.

As investors grapple with the implications of these policies, the focus remains on potential retaliatory measures from affected countries and the broader impact on global trade dynamics.

The sharp market sell-off serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between protectionist policies and economic stability in an interconnected world.

The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether these tariffs lead to lasting economic shifts or temporary market volatility.

U.S. companies are experiencing more harm from Trump’s tariffs. He wants manufacturing to come back to America – but after decades of globalization fine tuning – that is no easy task.

Are markets underestimating the impact of the tariffs on inflation?

Are markets pricing in the fact that Trump’s tariff policy will not be fully followed through?

The U.S. would be lucky to see a single rate cut from the Federal Reserve this year – and that will unsettle investors.

The U.S. economy could now only expand by between 1% and 1.5% this year – this would be a significant change in the growth outlook when compared with the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) projection of 2.7% U.S. growth made earlier this year.

If we get close to 1%, we get close to ‘stall’ speed and then it could just stop – and that will mean recession or worse for the U.S.

Posted on

Dow closed 700 points lower Friday 28th March 2025 as inflation and tariff fears worsen

Dow down

Stocks sold off sharply on Friday 28th March 2025, pressured by growing uncertainty on U.S. trade policy as well as a grim outlook on inflation

The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down 715 points at 41,583. The S&P 500 lost 1.97% to close 5,580 ending the week down for the fifth time in the last six weeks. The Nasdaq Composite plunged 2.7% to 17,322.

Shares of several technology giants also fell putting pressure on the broader market. Google-parent Alphabet lost 4.9%, while Meta and Amazon each shed 4.3%.

This week, the S&P 500 lost 1.53%, while the 30-stock Dow shed 0.96%. The Nasdaq declined by 2.59%. With this latest losing week, Nasdaq is now on pace for a more than 8% monthly decline, which would be its worst monthly performance since December 2022.

Dow Jones one-day chart (28th March 2025)

Dow Jones one-day chart (28th March 2025)

Stocks took a leg lower on Friday after the University of Michigan’s final read on consumer sentiment for March 2025 reflected the highest long-term inflation expectation since 1993.

Friday’s core personal consumption expenditures price index also came in hotter-than-expected, rising 2.8% in February and reflecting a 0.4% increase for the month, stoking concerns about persistent inflation.

Economists had reportedly been looking for respective numbers of 2.7% and 0.3%. Consumer spending accelerated 0.4% for the month, below the 0.5% forecast, according to fresh data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The market is getting squeezed by both sides. There is uncertainty about reciprocal tariffs hitting the major exporting sectors like tech alongside concerns about a weakening consumer facing higher prices

Trump’s tariffs push will hit the U.S. harder than Europe in the short term, it has been reported.

Japan’s Nikkei enters correction as Trump’s tariff assault drives sell-off in Asia markets

Posted on

Core U.S. inflation in February hits 2.8% – higher than expected

U.S. inflation

The core personal consumption expenditures price index, a key Fed inflation measure was up 0.4% in February 2025, putting the 12-month inflation rate at 2.8%

Consumer spending accelerated 0.4% for the month, below the 0.5% forecast, but personal income posted a 0.8% rise, against the estimate for 0.4%.

If we were to combine these higher inflation figures with Trump’s tariffs and the unrest Trump is creating around the world and of the tensions with Russia and China – it doesn’t bode well for the future!

Posted on

Trump announces 25% tariffs on car imports to U.S. and pledges pharma tariffs to come

Trump's Tariffs

Trump’s tariffs have been a cornerstone of his trade policy, aimed at protecting American industries and reducing trade deficits

These measures include tariffs on steel, aluminum, and a wide range of goods from countries like China, Canada, and the European Union.

While supporters argue that these tariffs have bolstered domestic manufacturing and created jobs, critics highlight the retaliatory tariffs imposed by other nations, which have affected American exporters.

President Donald Trump said he will soon announce tariffs targeting automobiles and pharmaceuticals.

Trump later added the timber and semiconductor industries to his list.

It was unclear whether the newly announced sector-specific tariffs would take effect after the tit-for-tat ‘reciprocal tariffs’ – which are set to take effect on for 2nd April 2025

The president’s latest comments at a Cabinet meeting came hours after he unveiled a plan to place 25% tariffs on all countries that buy oil and gas from Venezuela.

Trump’s tariffs have had widespread economic effects, both domestically and globally

Higher Prices for Consumers

Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, which often leads to higher prices for consumers. This can reduce purchasing power and affect living standards.

Impact on Businesses

Companies relying on imported materials face higher production costs due to tariffs. Some businesses may pass these costs onto consumers, while others might struggle to remain competitive.

Retaliatory Measures

Countries affected by U.S. tariffs often impose their own tariffs on American goods. This can hurt U.S. exporters and lead to trade wars.

Economic Growth

Studies suggest that tariffs can reduce GDP growth. For example, the U.S. GDP has been estimated to decrease by 0.4% due to these measures.

Employment

While tariffs aim to protect domestic jobs, they can also lead to job losses in industries affected by higher input costs or reduced export opportunities.

Global Trade Dynamics

Tariffs disrupt international trade relationships, leading to uncertainty and reduced investment in affected sectors.

These measures have sparked retaliatory tariffs from other countries, creating a complex web of trade disputes further sowing chaos and unrest.

Markets have reacted negatively to Trumps tariffs.

One thing is certain regarding the imposition of Trump’s tariffs – consumers suffer!

Posted on

Fallout from Trump’s self-imposed tariffs and DOGE cuts is visibly damaging the U.S.

DOGE and U.S. Tariffs

The economic impact of tariffs and budget cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is becoming increasingly evident

Major corporations like Nike and Accenture, for example have recently reported significant challenges stemming from these policies. Nike has warned of a sharp decline in sales for the current quarter, attributing this to tariffs and weakened consumer sentiment.

Similarly, Accenture has experienced a reduction in revenue due to cuts in U.S. government contracts, highlighting the ripple effects of reduced federal spending. It is a good guide to U.S. consumer sentiment.

The tariffs, part of a broader economic strategy, aim to protect domestic industries but have led to higher production costs and strained international trade relations.

The European Union has postponed its own tariffs on U.S. goods, seeking to negotiate a more favourable agreement and mitigate potential economic fallout.

These developments underscore the delicate balance between protecting domestic interests and maintaining a respectable global economic position.

Some argue that the U.S. tariffs and budget cuts may ultimately harm both businesses and consumers, as higher costs are passed down the supply chain.

As the 2nd April 2025 implementation date for new tariffs approaches, businesses and policymakers alike face mounting pressure to address these challenges and find solutions that support economic growth while minimizing adverse effects.

The coming months will be crucial in determining the long-term impact of these policies.

Posted on

UK government borrowing higher than expected in February 2025

UK borrowing up!

In February 2025, UK government borrowing reached £10.7 billion, significantly exceeding the £6.5 billion forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR)

This marks the fourth-highest borrowing figure for February since records began in 1993. The unexpected rise in borrowing has intensified pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves ahead of her upcoming Spring Statement.

The increase in borrowing is attributed to higher public sector spending, which totaled £93 billion for the month, driven by social benefits and investment expenditures.

Meanwhile, government receipts, primarily from taxes, rose to £87.7 billion but failed to offset the spending surge.

Over the financial year to date, borrowing has climbed to £132.2 billion, surpassing the OBR’s earlier projection of £127.5 billion for the entire fiscal year.

Economists warn that the higher-than-expected borrowing could challenge the Chancellor’s fiscal rules, which aim to reduce debt as a share of GDP by 2029/30.

With limited options, Reeves faces tough decisions, including potential spending cuts and tax adjustments, to maintain fiscal discipline.

The borrowing figures underscore the delicate balance between managing public finances and addressing economic pressures.

As the Spring Statement approaches, all eyes are on the Chancellor’s strategy to navigate these challenges while maintaining economic stability.

The Chancellor has allowed herself to be backed into a corner.

Posted on

Japan’s inflation up 3% in February 2025 – interest rates expected to rise

Japan inflation

Japan’s core inflation rate rose to 3% in February, exceeding market expectations of 2.9%

This marks the 35th consecutive month that inflation has remained above the Bank of Japan’s 2% target.

While the figure is slightly lower than January’s 3.2%, it reflects persistent price pressures, driven by rising food and wage costs. Government subsidies for fuel helped ease the overall inflation rate to 3.7%, down from January’s 4%.

The Bank of Japan has maintained its interest rate at 0.5%, but the data strengthens the case for potential rate hikes in the coming months as inflationary trends continue to challenge households.

Posted on

Bank of England holds interest rate at 4.5%

UK interest rate

The Bank of England (BoE) has decided to maintain its base interest rate at 4.5%, following its latest Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting

The Bank of England has warned economic and global trade uncertainty has ‘intensified’ as it held UK interest rates at 4.5%.

This decision, supported by eight out of nine committee members, reflects the Bank’s cautious approach amidst ongoing economic challenges.

The move comes as inflation remains above the Bank’s 2% target, with the UK Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation recorded at 3% in January 2025. Rising energy costs, water bills, and transportation fares have contributed to the persistent inflationary pressures.

Despite these challenges, the UK economy has shown mixed signals, with a slight GDP growth of 0.1% in the final quarter of 2024, followed by a contraction of 0.1% in January 2025.

The BoE’s decision to hold rates steady aims to balance the need to control inflation while supporting economic stability. Governor Andrew Bailey reportedly emphasised the importance of monitoring both global and domestic economic developments closely (that’s useful then – what a good idea).

The MPC’s cautious stance reflects concerns over global trade uncertainties and the potential impact of geopolitical tensions.

While the decision provides some relief to borrowers, it leaves savers and businesses navigating a landscape of economic uncertainty.

Analysts predict that the Bank of England may consider rate cuts later in the year, depending on inflation trends and economic performance.

For now, however, the focus remains on maintaining stability in a forever fast challenging environment.

Posted on

U.S. holds interest rate steady despite Trumps tariff threats – transitory inflation is back – remember that?

U.S. Interest rate

The Federal Reserve has opted to maintain its federal funds rate within the range of 4.25% to 4.5%, a decision that aligned with market expectations

This comes amidst increasing uncertainty surrounding the economic landscape. While the Fed’s current stance is to hold interest rates steady, it has reiterated its intention to implement two rate cuts later this year – a prospect that has garnered significant attention and appreciation from investors.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell reportedly expressed measured optimism about the state of the U.S. economy during his press conference.

He highlighted the strength of labour markets, and the progress made toward reducing inflation, which, although still above the 2% target, has shown improvement.

Powell also addressed potential short-term impacts of tariffs but downplayed their long-term influence on inflation.

Financial markets responded positively to the announcement, with major stock indices such as the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq rallying after the recent slump.

This reflects investor confidence in the Fed’s ability to navigate economic challenges while supporting growth. However, economists warn of potential risks, including stagflation, as uncertainties tied to Trump’s tariffs and consumer spending persist.

The decision underscores the Fed’s balancing act between fostering economic stability and addressing inflationary pressures, leaving room for cautious optimism as the year unfolds.

Posted on

UK economy unexpectedly shrank by 0.1% in January 2025

UK economy shrinks

The UK economy faced an unexpected contraction of 0.1% in January, marking a surprising downturn following a 0.4% growth in December 2024

This decline, reported by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), has raised concerns about the nation’s economic trajectory, particularly as the government prioritizes boosting growth.

The contraction was primarily attributed to a slowdown in manufacturing, alongside weak performances in oil and gas extraction and construction.

The ONS noted that while the economy shrank in January 2025, the broader three-month period still showed modest growth of 0.2%. But never-the-less, it remains one of weak growth.

Interestingly, the services sector provided a glimmer of hope, driven by robust retail activity, especially in food stores, as consumers opted to eat and drink at home more frequently. This sector’s resilience partially offset the declines in other areas.

The timing of this economic dip is particularly significant, as it precedes the Chancellor’s Spring Statement, where even more government spending cuts are expected to be outlined.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged the challenges and reportedly commented that the global economic landscape has shifted, and the UK is feeling the repercussions. She reiterated the government’s commitment to accelerating efforts to stimulate growth and reform public services.

However, the unexpected contraction has sparked criticism from opposition parties, who have labeled the government’s policies as ineffective in fostering sustainable economic growth.

The Shadow Chancellor reportedly described the government as a ‘growth killer,’ citing high taxes and restrictive employment legislation as barriers to business confidence and therefore growth.

As the UK navigates these economic headwinds, the focus will remain on the Chancellor’s upcoming measures and their potential to steer the economy back on track.

The January figures serve as a stark reminder of the fragile state of the UK economy and the challenges that lie ahead.

Posted on

‘A pig in lipstick’ – Trump’s strategic Bitcoin reserve criticised

Pig in lipstick

The announcement of Donald Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve has sparked a wave of criticism and debate, with detractors likening the initiative to ‘a pig in lipstick’ – a superficial attempt to dress up a flawed concept.

The reserve, which aims to stockpile or create a strategic reserve Bitcoin seized through criminal and civil forfeitures, has been touted as a bold move to position the United States as a leader in the cryptocurrency space. However, critics argue that the plan is fraught with risks and questionable motives.

One of the primary concerns is Bitcoin’s notorious volatility. Unlike traditional reserve assets such as gold or oil, Bitcoin’s value can fluctuate wildly, making it a precarious choice for a national reserve.

Economists warn that integrating such an unpredictable asset into government holdings could destabilise financial strategies rather than strengthen them.

Moreover, the initiative has raised eyebrows over its potential conflicts of interest. Critics point out that Trump’s administration has shown a growing affinity for cryptocurrency, with some officials previously holding stakes in digital assets.

This has led to accusations that the reserve could serve as a vehicle for personal or political gain rather than a genuine effort to bolster national economic security.

Supporters of the reserve argue that it represents a forward-thinking approach to embracing digital assets as ‘digital gold.’ They believe that retaining seized Bitcoin, rather than auctioning it off, could provide long-term financial benefits and signal the U.S.’s commitment to innovation in the crypto space.

However, even some crypto enthusiasts are skeptical, questioning whether the reserve’s creation is more about optics than substance.

In the end, the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve has ignited a broader conversation about the role of cryptocurrency in national policy. Whether it proves to be a visionary move, or a misguided gamble remains to be seen.

For now, the debate goes on.

Posted on

Trump and his tariff agenda

Trade tariffs

The United States has intensified its tariff policies, marking a significant shift in global trade dynamics

On 4th March 2025, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping increase in tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, raising them to 25% across the board. This move, aimed at bolstering domestic industries, has sparked widespread reactions both domestically and internationally.

The tariffs, which now include a broader range of products such as nuts, bolts, and soda cans, have drawn sharp criticism from key U.S. allies, including Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia.

U.S and the EU

The European Union has responded with countermeasures, imposing tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods, set to take effect on 1st April 2025. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed regret over the U.S. decision but emphasised the need to protect European consumers and businesses.

Domestically, the tariffs have been met with mixed reactions. While U.S. steel and aluminum producers have welcomed the measures, citing potential job creation and increased investment, downstream manufacturers that rely on these metals are bracing for higher costs.

Economists warn that the tariffs could lead to increased prices for consumers and potential disruptions in supply chains. Trump has indicated many times that the tariffs levelled at the U.S. are unfair and unequal.

The Trump administration has justified the tariffs as a means to encourage foreign companies to establish manufacturing facilities in the United States. However, critics argue that the policy could backfire, leading to retaliatory measures from trading partners and a potential slowdown in global economic growth.

As the global trade landscape continues to evolve, the long-term impact of these tariffs remains uncertain. Businesses and policymakers alike are closely monitoring the situation, weighing the potential benefits of protecting domestic industries against the risks of escalating trade tensions.

The coming weeks and months will be crucial in determining the effectiveness of this bold and possibly misguided economic strategy.

U.S. and Canada

The trade relationship between the U.S. and Canada has recently faced significant strain due to escalating tariff policies.

President Donald Trump announced a sharp increase in tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, raising them from 25% to 50%. This decision was reportedly in response to Ontario’s provincial government imposing higher electricity prices on U.S. customers.

However, after discussions between Ontario Premier Doug Ford and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Ontario agreed to pause the electricity surcharge.

As a result, the U.S. decided to maintain the original 25% tariff rate instead of doubling it. Despite this temporary resolution, tensions remain high, with Canada preparing to implement retaliatory tariffs on $30 billion worth of American goods.

These developments highlight the ongoing challenges in U.S. – Canada trade relations, with both nations navigating the complexities of economic and political interests.

U.S. and China

The U.S. – China trade tensions have escalated significantly in recent months. President Donald Trump recently imposed a 20% tariff on all imports from China, reportedly citing concerns over China’s role in the flow of fentanyl into the U.S.

This move has reignited the trade war that began during Trump’s first term.

In response, China has implemented retaliatory measures, including a 15% tariff on U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) and coal, as well as a 10% tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery, and large-engine cars.

Additionally, China has restricted the export of rare earth minerals and metals, which are critical for U.S. tech and green energy industries.

Both nations have expressed a willingness to engage in dialogue, but the situation remains tense. The economic impact of these tariffs is being closely monitored, as they have the potential to disrupt global supply chains and affect industries worldwide.

U.S. and Mexico

The U.S. – Mexico trade conflict has intensified with the U.S. imposing a 25% tariff on Mexican imports, excluding oil and energy products, which face a 10% tariff.

This decision, aimed at addressing trade deficits and border concerns, prompted Mexico to announce retaliatory tariffs targeting $20 billion worth of U.S. goods. Critics argue these measures undermine the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and could disrupt supply chains.

Both nations are bracing for the economic impact, with businesses and consumers facing potential cost increases. This trade dispute highlights the challenges of balancing domestic priorities while maintaining strong international partnerships in a connected global economy.

And there’s more…

Russia and Ukraine peace deal according to Trump. Taking rare earth and other minerals from Ukraine in a ‘deal’. The potential reshaping of Gaza to become the riviera of the middle east. Talk of taking over Greenland. Making Canada the 51st state. etc. etc.

And this is just what we already know after 8 weeks of Trump in power!

Posted on

U.S. markets tumble as Trump and his administration dismiss stock slump and economic concern

U.S. stocks fall

The Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency claims to be streamlining the federal government’s spending

But it has so far sown confusion, with the Trump administration attempting to rehire employees it had previously fired.

DOGE presents a distorted reflection of the current state of the U.S. economy. U.S. President Trump has implemented a series of policies to try to stimulate effect, frequently modifying them mid-course, resulting in collateral damage within the country’s own borders.

U.S. markets have been on a downward trend and were significantly impacted on. Tesla shares have lost some 50% since Trump’s election. Consumers are also boycotting Tesla vehicles.

Tariffs, according to Trump, are meant to protect U.S. businesses and punish trade partners. But so far, it seems that the world’s biggest economy is the one suffering.

Dismal day in the markets

U.S. stocks experienced a rout Monday 10th March 2025 as fears of a recession gripped investors. The S&P 500 dropped 2.7%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 2.08% and the Nasdaq Composite sank 4% in its worst session since September 2022.

The White House downplayed the market slump, saying it’s not as ‘meaningful’ as business activity (what does that mean exactly)? 

Asia markets also retreated Tuesday 11th March 2025. Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell around 1% amid a weaker-than-expected showing for its fourth-quarter gross domestic product (GDP).

Posted on

China’s exports miss forecasts as U.S. tariffs bite -imports record sharp decline

China exports drop

China’s exports in the January 2025 to February 2025 period rose 2.3% in U.S. dollar terms from a year earlier, significantly undershooting expectations of a 5% increase

That marked the slowest growth since April 2024 last year when exports increased by just 1.5% on the year, according to recently released data.

Imports surprised markets by declining 8.4% year-on-year in the first two months of 2025, the sharpest fall since July 2023.

Trump’s first round of 10% tariff hikes on Chinese goods took effect on 4th February 2025, followed by another 10% tariff increase just one month later, taking the cumulative levies to 20%.

China retaliated in kind.

* Data from the customs authority

Posted on

EU cuts interest rates again down to 2.5%

ECB interest rate cut

The European Central Bank (ECB) on 6th March 2025 reduced its interest rates to 2.5%, marking the sixth reduction since June 2024

The bank stuck to its plan in the face of economic challenges, including threats of U.S. tariffs and plans to boost European military spending.

This move reflects a shift in focus from combating inflation to supporting economic growth in the Eurozone.

Inflation has eased to 2.4% in February, and the ECB expects it to stabilise around its 2% target.

Economic growth forecasts for 2025 and 2026 have been lowered to 0.9% and 1.2%, respectively.

Posted on

Trump’s U.S. Bitcoin reserve plan falls short of expectations

National U.S. crypto reserve

The cryptocurrency market faced a significant downturn following the announcement of President Donald Trump’s U.S. Bitcoin reserve plan

The initiative aimed to position the United States as a global digital asset leader fell short of market expectations, triggering a wave of selloffs.

Bitcoin, the flagship cryptocurrency, experienced a 3% drop, trading at $87,586.86 before dipping further to $84,688.13. Other major cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum, XRP, and Solana, also saw declines, with Cardano’s ADA token suffering a sharp 13% drop.

The market’s reaction underscores the gap between investor hopes and the plan’s immediate implications.

The executive order established a strategic bitcoin reserve funded exclusively by assets seized in criminal and civil proceedings. While this approach ensures no taxpayer burden, it disappointed investors who anticipated direct government purchases to bolster Bitcoin’s value.

White House Crypto and AI Czar David Sacks emphasised the reserve’s role as a ‘digital Fort Knox’, but the lack of immediate buy pressure dampened market sentiment.

The broader economic context also played a role. Weakness in equities and ongoing tariff concerns added to the uncertainty, compounding the market’s reaction.

Analysts noted that while the reserve plan is a step toward legitimising cryptocurrencies, its short-term impact on prices was underwhelming.

Despite the initial disappointment, the strategic reserve could have long-term benefits. By centralising and securing digital assets, the U.S. government aims to strengthen its position in the global financial system.

However, for now, the market remains volatile, reflecting the challenges of balancing innovation with investor expectations.

As the crypto landscape evolves, the success of such initiatives will depend on their ability to deliver tangible value to both the market and the broader economy.

Will the U.S. government create a strategic crypto reserve by directly buying the digital asset and holding it as a national reserve?

At this moment in time, only Trump has that ‘key’.

Posted on

China announces 7.2% increase in defence spending and targets around 5% growth for 2025

China has unveiled plans for 2025, announcing a 7.2% increase in defence spending alongside a GDP growth target of around 5%

These decisions, revealed during the annual National People’s Congress in Beijing, reflect the nation’s strategic priorities amid a challenging and fast changing global landscape.

The 7.2% rise in defence spending mirrors last year’s increase, underscoring China’s commitment to modernizing its military capabilities. With a defence budget of approximately 1.78 trillion yuan ($245.7 billion), China maintains the world’s second-largest military budget, though it remains significantly smaller than that of the United States.

The funds are expected to support advancements in high-tech military technologies, including stealth fighters, aircraft carriers, and nuclear capabilities. This move comes as China navigates heightened tensions with the U.S., territorial disputes in the South China Sea, and concerns over Taiwan.

On the economic front, the target of around 5% GDP growth signals a cautious yet determined approach to sustaining economic momentum.

This figure aligns with last year’s target and reflects the government’s focus on addressing domestic challenges, such as a sluggish property market and subdued consumer spending, while countering external pressures like trade tensions with the U.S.

Premier Li Qiang emphasized the importance of boosting domestic consumption and fostering innovation to achieve this goal.

China’s dual focus on defence and economic growth highlights its efforts to balance national security with economic stability.

However, the path forward is fraught with uncertainties, including geopolitical tensions and the need for structural economic reforms.

As the world watches, China’s ability to navigate these challenges will shape its trajectory in the years to come.

China says

‘Tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war’ – China says it’s ready to fight U.S. until the end.

Ominous!

Posted on

Federal Reserve’s preferred recession indicator is flashing red again!

U.S. inverted yield curve

The Federal Reserve’s favourite recession indicator, the inverted yield curve, is flashing a danger sign once again.

This occurs when the U.S. yield on the 10-year Treasury note falls below that of the 3-month note. Historically, this has been a reliable predictor of economic downturns, with a strong track record over a 12-18-month timeframe.

The New York Fed closely monitors this indicator and provides monthly updates on the probability of a recession occurring within the next 12 months.

As of January 2025, the probability was just 23%, but this is expected to change significantly due to the recent inversion in the coming months.

The inversion suggests that investors are becoming more risk-averse and are anticipating a slowdown in economic activity.

While the yield curve inversion has a strong forecasting history, it is not perfect, and there is no certainty that growth will turn negative this time around

Posted on

UK Government finances in surplus but…

UK finances

The UK government has announced a significant budget surplus for January 2025, marking a notable achievement in its fiscal management

The surplus, which is the difference between what the government spends and the tax it takes in, amounted to £15.4 billion. This figure represents the highest level for the month of January since records began over three decades ago.

However, despite this impressive surplus, the figure fell short of the Office for Budget Responsibility’s (OBR) forecast of £20.5 billion. The shortfall has increased pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves to meet her self-imposed fiscal rules.

The OBR, which monitors the government’s spending plans and performance, will release its latest outlook for the UK economy and public finances on 26 March 2025.

The surplus was driven by a surge in tax receipts, particularly from self-assessed taxes, which are typically higher in January compared to other months. However, the lower-than-expected tax receipts suggest underlying weaknesses in the UK economy.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported that borrowing in the financial year to January 2025 was £118.2 billion, which is £11.6 billion more than at the same point last year.

The government now faces the challenge of balancing its fiscal rules with the need to support economic growth. Weak economic growth and higher borrowing costs have reduced the headroom available to the Chancellor, making it more difficult to meet her fiscal targets.

Economists have suggested that Reeves may need to consider raising taxes or cutting public spending to stay within her fiscal rules.

As the UK economy continues to navigate these challenges, the government’s ability to manage its finances effectively will be crucial in maintaining credibility with financial markets and ensuring long-term economic stability.

The upcoming Spring Forecast will be a critical moment for the UK Chancellor to outline her plans and address the fiscal challenges ahead

Posted on

UK inflation higher-than-expected at 3% in January 2025

UK Inflation up

UK inflation rose sharply in January 2025 after airfares failed to fall by as much as usual and private school fees jumped.

The higher-than-expected inflation increase to 3% in the year to January 2025, from 2.5% in December 2024, means that consumer prices rose at the fastest rate for 10 months.

Why?

The U.K.’s inflation rate rose sharply to 3% in January, coming in above analyst expectations of a 2.8% reading, according to data released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Wednesday 19th February 2025.

Core inflation, which excludes more volatile items such as energy, food, alcohol and tobacco prices, rose by 3.7% in the 12 months to January 2025, which was up from 3.2% in the previous month.

The ONS reported Wednesday 19th February 2025 that the largest upward contribution to the monthly change in the CPI came from transport and food and non-alcoholic beverages.

Interest rate reductions will likely pause on this news.

I wonder what spin the UK chancellor add.

Not good!